
When MVNOs fight back: T-Mobile faces fallout from its own offering
T-Mobile introduced an offering called "Your Name, Our Wireless" a year ago, aimed to help small companies introduce their own MVNO services to run on T-Mobile 's network. But now, as per Light Reading, one of the main customers of the offering may be planning to leave Magenta.
Back when T-Mobile introduced the offering, it named Roccstar Wireless as an example of the kind of company that could use the carrier's new Mobile Virtual Network Enabler (MVNE) service. Now, this same Roccstar seems to be unhappy with T-Mo. The MVNO reportedly wrote a letter to T-Mobile that Light Reading also saw. The letter claims T-Mobile is failing to deliver on core obligations, including technical, legal, and operational, and has cost millions for the company. It's also allegedly putting their brand and compliance standing at risk.
Roccstar is reportedly demanding T-Mobile to reimburse the $165,000 the company spent on the offering. Also, Roccstar is said to be requesting some reimbursement of the $3.8 million Roccstar spent on marketing.
-Roccstar co-founder Darius Allen told Light Reading
Roccstar launched in 2023 and at the time, it used another MVNE provider, PWG. Reportedly, T-Mobile offered the company to switch to T-Mobile with the "Your Name, Our Wireless" offering. Then, Allen switched the MVNO and its 30,000 customers to T-Mobile 's network, but not too late after that, they started experiencing problems. Roccstar's letter claims there were problems with activating physical SIMs, lack of management tools, and insufficient reporting capabilities.
That's not the first time this is happening, though. Back in 2022, MVNO Lycamobile and T-Mobile argued and T-Mo ended up filing a lawsuit against the MVNO. In the lawsuit, T-Mo claimed it accidentally undercharged the MVNO for more than a year and also accused the MVNO of not catching it.
The two companies settled the legal battle last year, with no terms disclosed. Lycamobile reportedly shifted its US operations from T-Mo's network to AT&T's. Apart from T-Mobile , there are other companies offering MVNE services for the US market. Those include Gigs, OXIO, Reach, Ztar Mobile, and Spenza. Roccstar's complaints come at a time when it seems more and more people are starting to get interested in MVNOs. MVNOs use MVNEs to handle essential backend operations which include billing, customer service, and network access. This potential dispute hints that MVNOs are looking for more flexible and cost-effective solutions, which could mean their needs are evolving. This is in tune with the broader trend in the industry, as MVNOs are looking to enhance their service offerings and competitiveness. For anyone curious about starting their own wireless brand or just interested in how the industry works behind the scenes, this little shakeup is a reminder that even big partnerships can hit a few bumps. As MVNOs grow and evolve, I'm increasingly interested to see which networks step up – and which ones get left behind.
Meanwhile, the big three may start to feel the heat from MVNOs soon. T-Mobile recently had quite a lot of customers angered by a price hike on older plans, which, when it happened, blew the internet a little bit. In the meantime, data showed AT&T may also be losing some customers.
Verizon openly shared it's lost quite a lot of customers recently, the biggest loss since 2021. Nevertheless, Verizon seems not to be too concerned with MVNOs, especially those running on its own network, and it's recently reportedly said it wins either way. But one is clear – more and more people are looking into MVNOs as a more flexible and cheap alternative to the big three. Let's see how the landscape shifts in the near future, I'd say! Switch to Total 5G+ Unlimited 3-Month plan or Total 5G Unlimited and get a free iPhone.
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Buy at Total Wireless
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Phone Arena
4 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Google tries to stay one step ahead of ad-blocking YouTube users
Last year Google decided to get tough against YouTube users who were deploying ad blockers while streaming videos on the app. Those blocking ads are blocked from watching the video they selected until the ad blocker is disabled. Google says that preventing ads from playing on YouTube violates its Terms of Service. Even though Google does a good job of catching those violating its ToS, there are several ways that YouTube viewers can escape having to play ads. Some of these options that were used to escape YouTube ads, such as uBlock Origin and AdBlock, are no longer working according to Reddit users. Some uBlock Origin users said that Embed. This is actually the process we use when embedding YouTube videos in our articles but apparently it can be used as a workaround to defeat Google's ad blocker video ban. There is a back and forth between those who block ads on YouTube and Google as one Redditor wrote, " i="" know="" it's="" pretty="" annoying,every="" few="" months="" we="" have="" to="" figure="" out="" work="" arounds="" this="" shit."="" another="" typed,="" "yep:="" cat,="" mouse,="" repeat."="" [img="" center="" inline="" [[431155]]:"some="" youtube="" users="" with="" an="" ad="" blocker="" enabled="" are="" seeing="" box="" or="" a="" black="" page.="" |="" image="" credit-android="" authority"="" ]="" some="" losing="" the="" ability="" view="" videos="" because="" of="" their="" blockers="" huge="" put="" up="" on="" screen="" by="" google="" in="" place="" video.="" white="" text="" used="" against="" background,="" heading="" says,="" "ad="" not="" allowed="" youtube."="" it="" follows="" through="" adding:="" looks="" like="" you="" may="" be="" using="" blocker.="" ads="" allow="" billions="" nationwide.="" can="" go="" ad-free="" premium,="" and="" creators="" still="" get="" paid="" from="" your="" subscription.="" others="" see="" blank="" instead="" box.="" either="" way,="" results="" same.="" these="" being="" penalized="" for="" stopping="" collecting="" revenue="" shown="" before="" during="" they="" viewing.="" so="" battle="" here="" between="" who="" prefer="" feel="" forced="" watch="" viewing="" video="" want="" stream.="" is="" able="" make="" things="" difficult="" them="" constantly="" upgrading="" its="" capabilities="" detect="" punishing="" doing="" so.="" might="" upper="" hand="" now="" but="" most="" reddit="" believe="" apps="" will="" eventually="" find="" way="" block="" google's="" ads."="" class="external" target="_blank">they can still view videos even if Google is blocking them by tapping on Share > Embed . This is actually the process we use when embedding YouTube videos in our articles but apparently, it can be used as a workaround to defeat Google's ad blocker video ban. There is a back and forth between those who block ads on YouTube and Google as one Redditor wrote, "I know it's pretty annoying, every few months we have to figure out workarounds [around] this shit." Another typed, "Yep: cat, mouse, repeat." Some YouTube users with an ad blocker enabled are seeing this box or a black page. | Image credit-Android Authority Some losing the ability to view YouTube videos because of their ad blockers are seeing a huge black box put up on the screen by Google in place of a video. With white text used against a black background, the heading says, "Ad Blockers are not allowed on YouTube." It follows through by adding: It looks like you may be using an ad blocker. Ads allow YouTube to be used by billions nationwide. You can go ad-free with YouTube Premium, and creators can still get paid from your subscription. Others see a blank screen instead of a black box. Either way, the results are the same. These YouTube users are being penalized for stopping Google from collecting revenue on the ads shown before and during the videos they are viewing. So we have a battle here between Google and YouTube users who prefer not to feel forced to watch ads before viewing the video they want to stream. Google is able to make things difficult for them by constantly upgrading its capabilities to detect who is using an ad blocker and punishing them for doing so. Google might have the upper hand now but most on Reddit believe the ad blocker apps will eventually find a way to block Google's YouTube ads.


GSM Arena
13 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Apple loses in court, has to stop charging developers for payments outside of the App Store
Apple's request for a stay on a US court's ruling has been denied, so it has to immediately stop charging developers for payments made outside of the App Store. The company filed an emergency motion last month seeking a stay on a ruling in April, which found Apple in "willful violation" of a 2021 injunction that barred it from forcing anticompetitive pricing. It's also filed an appeal against that ruling, which is yet to be finalized, so things could still change in the future. Apple's stay is denied by the 9th Circuit Court. The long national nightmare of the Apple tax is ended. May next week's WWDC be the Apple-led celebration of freedom that developers and users have long deserved. — Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) June 4, 2025 But for now, Apple needs to stop taking a 27% fee on apps getting paid through non-Apple payment mechanisms, which amazingly it has been doing since it started allowing apps to link out and not handle payments exclusively through Apple. The company also has to eliminate the 'scare screens' it shows users before letting them use third-party payment providers for iOS apps. Spotify and Amazon are already making changes to their apps to reflect the new situation, so now you can pay for your purchases and subscriptions outside of the App Store without any 'Apple Tax'.


Phone Arena
13 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Apple reportedly delays the release of two AI-enhanced apps until iOS 27
We already have a good idea of what to expect from Apple this Monday when WWDC's Keynote kicks off at 10 am PDT (1 pm EDT). We also have a good idea of what not to expect Apple to unveil after pushing back the debut of "personal" Siri. You might remember the ad that showed actress Bella Ramsey panicking because she couldn't remember the name of this boy she met at a cafe a few months before. She asked Siri and the digital assistant went through her texts, emails, and other apps to get the name. Because of the delay that is pushing back the release of personal Siri, Apple pulled the ad . At this stage, it is hard to know exactly when "Personal" Siri and more "AI" based features will be coming to Apple's digital assistant. All indications point to a release of these features for Siri sometime in middle-to-late 2026. Apple also had to delay new features that would allow Siri to understand what was on your display and use that knowledge to respond to queries. The ability to use Siri to control apps and in-app features has also been put off by Apple. Receive the latest iOS news By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy A more advanced version of Siri, dubbed LLM Siri (for Large Language Model Siri) could be as much as two years away. This would allow Siri to work the same way as generative AI apps such as ChatGPT and Gemini. Currently, on iPhone models running Apple Intelligence , Siri will pass questions that it can't answer over to ChatGPT after asking you first if that is okay. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, AI-enhanced versions of the Calendar app and the Health app will not be mentioned at WWDC this year. Both apps will be pushed back to iOS 27 (still feels weird to say, right?). While there will be smaller changes made for both apps this year, the bulk of the updates will come in 2026 in iOS 27 which has been given the codename of Buttercup (which no doubt makes you think of the 1968 hit "Build Me Up Buttercup" by the Foundations). The nickname for macOS 27, also expected to be released next year, is Honeycrisp.