
I sent India's first email, and that excitement has not faded: BV Naidu, Chairman, Karnataka Digital Economy Mission
One of KDEM's initiatives is the 'Beyond Bengaluru' programme, which aims to tap into the potential of emerging cities outside the state capital. By nurturing growth and attracting investments, it drives the tech economy in these emerging clusters.
He is also the founder of StartupXseed Ventures, funding deeptech, B2B, early-stage startups, and the founder of The GAIN, a non-profit accelerator focused on innovation.
A former director of the Software Technology Parks of India (STPI), an organisation under the Government of India, established to promote software exports from the country, BV Naidu has been a pivotal figure in the growth of the IT industry in Bengaluru.
BV Naidu spoke to indianexpress.com on his journey through the IT industry in India, the challenges incubators and startups face, and the role of governments in promoting tech clusters in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. Edited excerpts:
Venkatesh Kannaiah: What were some highlights of your journey in India's IT industry?
BV Naidu: My career began in 1987 when I joined the then Department of Electronics, now the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. One of my proudest moments was sending India's first email from my PC, an achievement marking the start of digital communications in the country. I was part of the founding team of ERNET (Education and Research Network of India), which connected universities and research institutions, laying the foundation for India's internet infrastructure. The project was supported by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
One unforgettable moment was demonstrating the working of an email to then Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar. It is possible he was the first Indian prime minister to engage with this technology, and I still recall the excitement as we showcased this new tool.
In 1992, I moved to Bengaluru as part of the Software Technology Parks of India (STPI) to tackle the software industry's biggest bottlenecks. At the time, companies faced delays of up to a year to secure a 64 kbps line, essential for global connectivity. Companies like IBM and Wipro needed reliable communication to compete internationally. I helped establish India's first commercial internet service in Bangalore's Electronic City and provided instant connectivity to small and medium-sized companies.
I also broke the monopoly of the then Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL) by setting up an international satellite gateway in Bengaluru's Electronics City to connect Bengaluru directly to the US, bypassing traditional barriers, and also established a multi-access radio network to link software firms' offices in the city to this infrastructure. This helped them communicate seamlessly with overseas markets. In 1993, I facilitated India's first video conferencing, connecting Bengaluru with WorldCom's CEO in New York.
These early initiatives were about building trust in India's capabilities.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: You have been with Software Technology Parks of India for 15 years. Can you tell us the changes you brought about and their impact?
BV Naidu: As the head of STPI Bangalore, I saw an opportunity to redefine the organisation's role. STPI was tasked with promoting software exports and monitoring compliance. But I had a vision of it as a proactive enabler, removing barriers to industry growth.
One of my key interventions was helping streamline customs processes. Software companies needed duty-free imports, but delays and inefficiencies were common. I took responsibility for bonding and debonding imported goods, ensuring my team handled these processes efficiently. This shielded companies from customs-related hassles, allowing them to focus on the core business of software exports.
From 1998-2001, I expanded STPI's reach beyond Bengaluru, establishing centres in Mysore, Mangalore, and Hubli. From 2004-2006, I expanded the footprint of STPI to Tirupati, Vijayawada, Visakhapatnam, and Kakinada. These centres provided communication infrastructure, regulatory support, and incubation facilities.
Beyond infrastructure, I helped draft Karnataka's first IT policy in 1998 and launched BangaloreIT.com in 1998, an event that showcased the city's tech capabilities.
As a founding trustee of the International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore (IIIT-B), I helped establish a model for industry-academia collaboration. These initiatives transformed Bengaluru into a global tech hub and set a precedent for other cities.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: What are your thoughts on the effectiveness of different incubation models?
BV Naidu: Over the years, I have closely observed the strengths and weaknesses of incubation models in India. They are of three types: academic-led, government-supported, and corporate, each with different challenges.
Academic incubators, hosted by institutions like IITs and IIMs, struggle to translate research into market-friendly products. Professors, while brilliant in their fields, often lack a commercial outlook needed to guide startups to scale. Despite significant government funding, the return on investment is low. There are exceptions like IIM Ahmedabad, IIT Chennai, and IISc Bangalore, but overall, academic incubators fall short of their potential. There is a certain disconnect between theoretical research and practical applications.
Government-supported incubators and some backed by industry organisations have substantial budgets and infrastructure. However, many turn into co-working spaces or event management hubs, losing sight of their core mission to nurture startups. They offer good facilities, but the focus often shifts to branding rather than fostering entrepreneurial success. This dilution of purpose limits their impact.
Corporate incubators run by multinational firms have deep pockets and brand recognition. But some of these incubators are partly corporate branding initiatives, and there may not be sufficient commitment to innovation. While some corporate incubators perform well, many prioritise their parent company's image over tangible outcomes.
We need more and more tech practitioner/entrepreneur-driven incubators for passion to take centre-stage and make a difference.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: Tell us about your accelerator, The GAIN, and how it is different?
BV Naidu: Our approach at The GAIN, which was started in 2019, has been different. We ran a cohort programme with the Government of India, supporting 29 companies without taking equity, a rarity in the incubation space. Our acceleration support outperformed larger, better-funded programmes, earning recognition from the Startup India Seed Fund. We also pioneered cross-border acceleration, bringing Korean and Israeli startups to Bengaluru. These startups, often tech-savvy but lacking market access, found joint venture partners in India.
I believe the key to effective incubation lies in passion and professionalism, unlike academic or corporate models, where external priorities often dominate.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: As the Chairman of the Karnataka Digital Economy Mission, what is your focus?
BV Naidu: You must understand the logic behind the founding of the Karnataka Digital Economy Mission (KDEM). Technology moves at a breakneck speed, and government officials often struggle to keep pace with the changes. Moreover, their job roles keep changing. KDEM is a unique industry initiative with the participation of various industry associations working with the support of the government. This has attracted corporate talent to work alongside the government, bridging the gap between industry needs and support policy implementation. It is like a knowledge bridge, and the goal is to sustain Karnataka's leadership in the digital economy.
KDEM drives innovation across three verticals: IT/Global Capability Centres (GCCs), Electronic System Design and Manufacturing (ESDM), and startups and innovation. We also focus on two horizontals: talent development and the mission of 'Beyond Bengaluru'.
Startups in regions like Mysore, Mangalore, and Hubli often feel that they are not up to the mark. To change this perception, we identified over 400 startups in these clusters and launched initiatives to energise them. Through the Karnataka Accelerator Network, we established a mother accelerator in Bengaluru that supports regional accelerators in smaller cities. This network has been a game-changer, with over 40% of participants in the Elevate programme — a government-backed startup initiative — coming from Beyond Bengaluru clusters.
We also organise tech shows to showcase these startups, much like the BangaloreIT.com events, which began in 1998 and have now transformed into the Bangalore Tech Summit, a large global event. These events at these clusters put regional startups in the spotlight, attracting investors and partners. We also promote global tech centres, similar to Bengaluru's ITPL, to draw anchor companies to these regions. For instance, we helped IBM establish a presence in Mysore, where they now employ 600 people, with plans to scale to 2,000 by next year. This creates a snowball effect, encouraging other companies to follow suit.
We are helping create a cluster seed fund under KITVEN (Karnataka IT fund). This fund combines government contributions with investments from local industry leaders, ensuring that regional startups have the capital and mentorship needed to compete. By focusing on these emerging tech clusters, we are democratising and decentralising innovation.
Our approach is industry-driven, with senior corporate leaders guiding each vertical. This ensures that our initiatives are grounded in real-world needs.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: Should the development of tech clusters at Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities be left to market forces, or should the government play a role?
BV Naidu: I firmly believe that markets alone cannot drive the development of emerging tech clusters, what others call Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. The government must act as an enabler, creating the conditions for growth. I have stopped using the terms Tier-2 and Tier-3 because they demean these regions.
Instead, I call them emerging tech clusters, emphasising their potential.
Take Mysore as an example. We attracted IBM by crafting a value proposition of lower operational costs, reduced attrition rates, and access to talent. My team at KDEM worked closely with IBM to demonstrate the return on investment. This sparked a ripple effect, drawing other companies to the region. The government is also creating a two-lakh square feet Global Tech Centre in Mysore, and it has generated a lot of interest in the industry. The Mysore cluster is also bringing in US companies to the Chamarajanagar district of Karnataka, which is generally considered a backward district. In Mangalore, we have encouraged local entrepreneurs to build high-quality co-working spaces.
These outcomes do not happen by chance. Governments must show the path by providing infrastructure, attracting anchor companies, and fostering talent. In Hubli and Belagavi, we are replicating this model, creating global tech centres and co-working spaces to drive growth. Small incentives like rental reimbursement, reimbursement of PF, power tariff concession, and stamp duty exemptions on land are helpful, but companies do not come for incentives alone. They look at long-term ROI — lower costs, stable talent, and market access. Without government intervention to seed these ecosystems, progress would be slow.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: How do you see Bengaluru's tech ecosystem evolving over the next 10 years?
BV Naidu: I am optimistic about Bengaluru's future as a tech hub. The city contributes over 35-40% of India's tech output, and despite infrastructure challenges, like any other growing city, its talent pool and growing domestic market will sustain its growth. Initiatives in emerging fields like quantum computing and robotics, such as the ARTPARK at IISc, are positioning Bengaluru at the forefront of innovation. Beyond Bengaluru, clusters like Mysore, Mangalore, and Hubli are adding to this momentum. Together, Karnataka will maintain its leadership in India's tech landscape.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: What are your thoughts on AI and its impact on jobs?
BV Naidu: When it comes to AI and jobs, I am not concerned. I have seen the industry navigate disruptions like Y2K in 2000, the Dotcom bust in 2001-2002, and the Lehman Brothers crash in 2008. Each time, people feared the end of tech jobs. Each time, new opportunities emerged. AI will follow a similar path, creating new roles and skills if we embrace change. Moreover, it provides a bigger platform for our startups to perform. I am of the school of thought that sees AI as a catalyst for innovation, not a threat.
Some worry about job losses, but I believe reskilling is the key. By equipping our workforce with AI-related skills, we can turn this disruption into an opportunity.
Venkatesh Kannaiah: How has the government-industry-academia relationship evolved, and what makes Karnataka unique?
BV Naidu: In Karnataka, the government-industry-academia relationship is a model for others. I've been part of this transformation, starting with my time at STPI, when we requested Narayana Murthy in 1997 to be the chairman of the STPI Executive Board. We had ensured that industry voices shaped our strategies. Now, all the vision groups of the Government of Karnataka are driven by industry leaders, and initiatives like KDEM have cemented this collaboration. Unlike other states, where government, industry, and academia often operate in silos, in Karnataka, it is a tight-knit partnership.
Other states like Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra are looking to replicate KDEM's model, showing that we are doing things right.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
16 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Need to support Modi govt against Trump's pressure tactics in national interest: Sharad Pawar
'The imposition of a 50% tariff on Indian goods is a pressure tactic. We, the people of India, should support the government to protect the interests of the country,' Pawar said while addressing a press conference in Nagpur.


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
E20 rollout achieved ahead of schedule; govt eyes higher ethanol blends, SAF adoption: Puri
India has achieved 20 per cent ethanol blending in petrol five years ahead of the revised 2025 target, Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said on Friday, adding that the government will now move towards higher ethanol blends and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) adoption in a phased manner. Speaking at the Pioneer Biofuels 360 Summit, Puri said ethanol blending was at just 1.53 per cent in 2014 and reached 10 per cent by 2022, five months ahead of the original schedule. 'The target of E20 by 2025 has already been met in the current ethanol supply year,' he said, crediting policy reforms such as guaranteed ethanol pricing, allowing multiple feedstocks and rapid capacity expansion. He said the transition to E20 had taken place without any reported cases of engine breakdowns in the past 10 months. 'Some lobbies with vested interests are attempting to create confusion, but the shift is backed by policy, industry readiness and consumer acceptance,' he said, citing Brazil's example of running on E27 fuel. Puri said E20 has saved over ₹1.4 lakh crore in foreign exchange, reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved air quality. Over the past 11 years, ethanol procurement has provided ₹1.21 lakh crore in income to farmers and reduced crude imports by 238.68 lakh metric tonnes. Maize-based ethanol now accounts for 42 per cent of the supply, up from zero in 2021–22. On flex-fuel vehicles, he said Indian automakers have developed prototypes for E85-compatible models and higher blends like E25, E27 and E30 will be introduced gradually, supported by BIS norms and fiscal incentives. Outlining plans for SAF, Puri said India has set a 1 per cent blending target for international flights by 2027 and 2 per cent by 2028. Indian Oil Corporation 's Panipat refinery is already producing SAF from used cooking oil, he said.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Tycoons who profit from India's increasing demand for Russian oil
The last time many Americans paid any attention to Jamnagar, a sunbaked industrial stretch on the mud flats on India's Gulf of Kutch, it was thanks to Rihanna. She performed there in March 2024 for an exclusive audience — Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Ivanka Trump and the like — at the pre-wedding party for Anant Ambani, the younger son of Asia's richest man, Mukesh Ambani. They were in Jamnagar, which had no international airport or hotel rooms for most of the guests, because its port and oil refineries have become central to the Ambanis' empire and $115 billion fortune. One week later, Mr. Trump signed an executive order that doubled the punishment. In effect, he pushed India's exporters into peril on the grounds that their government was aiding Russia's war aims in Ukraine by letting Indian companies profit from the international oil trade. Mr. Trump did not name the companies. But all roads lead back to Mukesh Ambani and his company, Reliance Industries. Its principal refinery in Jamnagar — part of Gujarat, the home state of India's prime minister, Narendra Modi — is the biggest in the world. Many of Reliance's investments there and across India have been planned in consultation with Mr. Modi and other politicians. This area, including another refining business nearby, brings in 1.5 million barrels of oil every day, about a third of it shipped from Russia. The Reliance name is everywhere in India. The company, started by Mukesh Ambani's father in Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1965 as a trading house for polyester, is the nation's biggest conglomerate, composed of dominant players in energy, data and mobile networks, retail, finance, and more. The companies stream HBO, they own one of the world's most valuable cricket teams, they run a legion of charitable foundations, and recently they bought up nearly every haute couture brand in the country. The Reliance refinery at Jamnagar is internationally rated in the top percentile in terms of complexity. There are many kinds of crude oil, and the Jamnagar facility can easily switch from refining crude from the Persian Gulf, Latin America or wherever the best prices can be found. Jamnagar had processed 500 types over the past 25 years, a Reliance spokesman said. While about 30 percent of the crude that Reliance buys comes from Russia, a company spokesman said, 'it is incorrect to attribute profitability only to Russian crude oil discounts.' He added that the company had been consistently profitable over decades, more so than any regional competitor, both before and after the wartime discounts. The money it makes selling refined products to Europe is a small fraction of its total output. The other big refining business in Jamnagar is Nayara Energy, just a few miles away from Reliance's. The Nayara refinery is massive and modern, too, though its output is only a third of Reliance's. Since 2017, Nayara has been 49 percent owned by Rosneft, Russia's state oil company. One of its other largest stakeholders is a Russian-owned investment firm. That means that a Rosneft-backed entity has been buying oil from Russia, processing it in India and in some cases selling the results back to Europe. Unlike Reliance, it has most of its eggs in one basket. In the first year of the war in Ukraine, these private refiners became the world's biggest buyers of seaborne Russian crude. Shut out of the European market, Russia offered discounts to whoever would take its stranded crude. India, along with China and Turkey, stepped in. For two or three years, Indians and Americans took it in stride. Eric Garcetti, President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s ambassador in New Delhi, said at a conference in Washington in May 2024 that 'we wanted somebody to be buying Russian oil,' to stabilize the price. Mr. Trump's salvo seemed to come out of the blue. Pankaj Saran, a former Indian ambassador to Russia who runs the NatStrat think tank in New Delhi, said archly, 'The trigger for the penalty would seem to be an action which has been going on in plain view since 2022.' To him, Mr. Trump's recent talk about Russian oil looks like a red herring. India, home to 1.4 billion people and the world's fastest-growing large economy, has only modest oil reserves and needs to import 85 percent of its supply. Traditionally that meant spending hard currency in the Persian Gulf. The pressure those purchases put on India's balance of trade forces the government to take a strong interest in how its thirst for oil can be met. 'We are completely defenseless against energy costs, because we don't have oil,' Mr. Saran said. For that reason, 'the government has actively encouraged the refining sector.' Reliance's balance sheet is such that it does not need the Russian oil trade, and Nayara Energy might not, either. (It did not respond to requests for comment.) There are indications that all of India's importers of crude were already scaling back their purchases, as European countries prepared to toughen up their constraints. Mr. Trump's threats though have put Mr. Modi's government in a bind, and businesses like Mr. Ambani's with it. Any shift away from Russia now will look like a capitulation. Even if that were a good deal, it is not something that any elected leader of India can afford.