Social Security Disability rules after age 55
If you are 55 or older, you might not consider yourself a person of advanced age. But your age could help you qualify for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits if you can no longer work.
To receive SSDI benefits, you must show that you have an injury or illness that makes you unable to work for a living. In many cases, an applicant's age of 55 and older is one of the factors considered in a disability claim. As you get older, the Social Security Administration (SSA) is more likely to accept your inability to work, Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer notes.
The SSA's Medical-Vocational Guidelines, or "Grid Rules," can be helpful if you are disabled and of a certain age. The majority of applications for SSDI benefits are denied initially. But if you are over 55 and have been denied SSDI, there may be age-related considerations for SSDI eligibility that apply.
If you are injured or ill and can no longer work for a living, you may be eligible for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. SSDI benefits replace a portion of income lost as a result of being unable to work.
First, you must have a work history to qualify for SSDI benefits. SSDI is primarily funded by Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) paycheck deductions.
Individuals whose disability has prevented them from ever working and who do not have a work history may be eligible for a different disability benefit, Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
The Social Security Administration defines disability as:
You cannot perform your old job.
You cannot perform another type of gainful employment or your skillset does not transfer to another job.
Your disability prevents you from working for at least a year or is expected to cause your death.
The Social Security Administration uses two methods to determine whether an applicant is disabled.
If an applicant's condition matches the criteria outlined in the SSA's Listing of Impairments, the applicant automatically qualifies for disability benefits. The Listing of Impairments describes impairments for each major body system that are considered severe enough to prevent an individual from performing any gainful work. The Listing of Impairments is also known as "The Blue Book."
If an SSDI applicant's medical condition cannot be matched to a Blue Book impairment, SSA examiners must decide whether the condition is of equal severity to a listed condition. The examiners must also decide whether the applicant can perform their previous job or any other available job they are trained to do.
When an applicant is 55 years old or older, the SSA also considers its Medical-Vocational Guidelines. These guidelines consider various vocational factors, such as age, education, and work experience, in combination with the applicant's residual functional capacity (RFC) to evaluate the applicant's ability to engage in substantial gainful employment.
The Medical-Vocational Guidelines include grids that apply an applicant's functional capacity to their capability for sedentary, light, medium, heavy, or very heavy work.
When determining whether a disability applicant can perform substantial gainful activity, one factor considered alongside medical condition is age. The SSA considers advancing age to be an increasingly limiting factor that affects a person's ability to adjust to different work.
The SSA's age categories and how they are applied are:
Younger person (under age 50). At this age, the SSA generally does not consider that the applicant's age affects their ability to adjust to other work.
Closely approaching advanced age (age 50–54). SSA will consider that the applicant's age along with a severe impairment and limited work experience may seriously affect their ability to adjust to other work.
Person closely approaching retirement age (age 55 or older). The SSA believes advanced age significantly affects a person's ability to adjust to other basic work-related activities. For example, for an applicant of advanced age who has a severe impairment that limits them to no more than sedentary work, the SSA may find that the applicant has transferable skills to skilled work or semiskilled work only if the sedentary work is similar to previous work and requires little or no vocational adjustment in terms of tools, work processes, work settings, or the industry.
The SSA is more skeptical of an applicant's ability to transfer job skills to different work when the worker is 60 or older.
The upshot of the SSA's consideration of age is that if you are over 55 when you apply for SSDI, it is more likely that the SSA will decide you cannot perform work that you have not recently done. With the help of a Social Security Disability attorney, you may have a better chance of qualifying for Social Security Disability benefits.
When filing a Social Security Disability Insurance claim, you need to present detailed medical records that show you are totally disabled. If you do not have a diagnosis that matches a condition on the SSA's Listing of Impairments, your records need to detail your symptoms and treatment and the physical limitations your condition has caused you.
In addition to documenting your disability, you will need to document your work history before you became disabled and provide employer information.
An application requires several forms, including one to allow doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare professionals who have treated you to send medical evidence to the SSA.
Social Security Disability lawyer can prepare an SSDI benefits application on your behalf and help you navigate Social Security Disability rules.
This story was produced by Morgan, Collins, Yeast & Salyer and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Unite for Vets' rally calls for Trump to abandon planned cuts at VA
Thousands of veterans converged on the National Mall on Friday to rally against proposed cuts to Veterans Affairs services, moves that advocates insist will endanger their health and lives. The 'Unite for Veterans, Unite for America Rally' — which featured a performance from the rock band Dropkick Murphys — was one of 200 events scheduled across the country Friday in an effort to mobilize the veterans community. The event was billed as nonpartisan, but the Washington gathering featured numerous signs and protests against President Donald Trump, VA Secretary Doug Collins and billionaire Elon Musk, accusing them of betraying the country's promises to troops. Collins, Dems spar over whether VA needs key fixes or full overhaul 'Are you tired of being thanked for our service in the public and stabbed in our back in private?' Army veteran Everett Kelly, national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, asked the crowd assembled just a few blocks from the White House. 'For years, politicians on both sides of the aisle have campaigned on their support of veterans, but once they get into office, they cut our benefits, our services. They take every opportunity to privatize our health care.' The event — coinciding with the 81st anniversary of D-Day — was modeled on the Bonus Army protests of the 1930s, when veterans who served in World War I gathered in Washington to demand extra pay they had been denied after leaving the service. Organizers said this public protest needed to highlight worrisome plans from Trump and Collins to cut roughly 80,000 VA staffers in the coming months and shift more money from the federal health care system to private-sector clinics. VA officials in a statement dismissed the concerns and the event as misguided. 'Anyone who says VA is cutting health care and benefits is not being honest,' said VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz in a statement. 'The Biden Administration failed to address nearly all of VA's most serious problems, including rising health care wait times, benefits backlogs, and major issues with survivor benefits. Under President Trump and Secretary Collins, VA is fixing these problems and making major improvements.' Department leaders have sparred with Democratic lawmakers in recent months over details of those plans, and over the assertion that VA is a fundamentally broken organization in need of major reforms. Irma Westmoreland, a registered nurse working at a VA hospital and the secretary-treasurer of National Nurses United, said workers are already dealing with new restrictions and issues of short-staffing, with fears that more are on the way. 'It's important for every person to keep their job, from the engineering staff to the housekeeper to the dietary staff,' she told the crowd, eliciting applause. 'When cuts are made, the nursing and medical staff will have to pick up all their work that needs to be done.' Organizers encouraged veterans at Friday's rally to take their protests back home, through local activism and awareness campaigns, to ensure veterans services remain unharmed. For their part, VA officials dismissed the event as little more than union complaints and pledged to press ahead with their reform proposals in the coming months.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
VA secretary says 80,000 job cuts at agency are a ‘goal' but not yet ‘targeted'
With the threat of up to 80,000 job cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs, the new head of the agency faced angry senators Tuesday with few answers. Meanwhile, lawmakers offered legislation aimed at protecting a veteran's crisis hotline amid the agency's turmoil. VA Secretary Doug Collins appeared in front of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs for the first time Tuesday, where he faced contentious questioning over staffing upheavals at the VA. In two February rounds of firings, the VA dismissed 1,000 and then 1,400 more employees, which included veterans (a federal judge has temporarily halted the second round of firing). But when senators pressed Collins on the threat of much larger cuts, he called the reports of an additional 80,000 positions on the chopping block — or 15% of the agency workforce — a 'goal to look at our restructuring,' but not yet a reality. Collins declined to explain the 'deliberative process' over reductions in front of Congress. 'There's not been 83,000 people targeted for firing,' he said. 'You start with what you're looking for, and then you use the data that you find from your organizations to make the best choices you can.' Staff cuts, Collins said, would spare doctors, nurses and claims processors but phase out non-essential roles 'like interior designers and other things DEI.' But Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal, ranking member of the Senate Veterans Affairs committee, said the reduced staff has already led to postponed mammogram appointments, as well as reduced availability for prosthetic fitting services, operating rooms, and inpatient recovery room care. 'Support personnel are absolutely necessary, answering the phones, cleaning the surgical equipment, preparing the operating rooms, scheduling the appointments, or fixing the IT systems,' Blumenthal said. 'Those burdens will fall to others, or they will simply fall through the cracks if you slash and trash.' Notably, a Republican Senator offered cautiously critical remarks on the VA reductions, a departure from the typical Republican approach of overwhelming silence on staffing cuts by Trump-installed officials. Chairman of the committee, Sen. Jerry Moran from Kansas, told Collins that cuts at the VA should not be arbitrary. 'I have told you on the phone that it ought not be a set number that you're trying to reach. It ought to be about right-sizing,' Moran said. 'I want to hear from you that the changes underway at the VA are backed by data.' One program that lawmakers have put under the spotlight is the Veterans Crisis Line, a toll-free hotline connecting veterans and service members in crisis with mental healthcare providers. Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) plans to introduce a bill Wednesday to expand Congressional oversight of the hotline, requiring a 48-hour notice on crisis line terminations, justifications for the firings, and an indication of whether those let go would be veterans or military spouses. The bill also calls for a report on the hotline staffing, operations and performance. At an American Legion event in February, Collins said only 'backroom staff' had been cut from the crisis line, adding that any employees who answered the phones or worked directly with veterans had been spared. But Duckworth said she knew of at least one veteran let go from the crisis line who had not been rehired. She said that contradicted Collins' response to a letter sent by Senate democrats about crisis line firings. In an April 7 letter, Collins wrote that 24 crisis line employees 'erroneously received probationary termination notices, all notices were rescinded. All terminated employees were reinstated and have been rehired into the same position they previously held.' When Moran asked if the crisis line now had fewer staff, Collins said the same number of staff who were let go were brought back. Duckworth emphasized that any cuts, including support staff at the crisis line, would impact its mission. 'Crisis line serves veterans in their darkest hour, and it is our responsibility to make certain that it operates to the highest standards, just as every military commander understands that our war fighters' effectiveness, indeed their lethality, depends on a fully resourced, diverse network of enablers,' she said. 'You can't just say, okay, we're going to take care of the pilots, but not the refuelers and the mechanics who maintain that jet. A second bill Duckworth plans to re-introduce Wednesday would expand VA clinical staff's collective bargaining rights and give them the right to speak up about workplace safety issues that impact care, an issue democrats have highlighted as a potential impact of the mass firings. In April, Collins began the process of stripping unionizing rights from VA workers by issuing a federal register notice concurring with the Trump Administration's executive order that precludes federal workers in 'national security' from collective bargaining rights as union members. During questioning by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) about the executive order and whether VA workers are a 'threat to national security,' Collins said: 'I don't think that was the purpose of the EO.' The bill titled 'The VA Employee Fairness Act' would allow VA clinical staff like nurses, doctors, dentists, and physician assistants to speak out against poor working conditions and other workplace issues. A House version of the bill by the ranking member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.), will also be introduced on Wednesday. It previously passed the House in December 2022 with bipartisan support. 'The VA Employee Fairness Act would grant these indispensable workers the collective bargaining rights they deserve and have been fighting for while improving VA employee retention,' Takano said in a statement. 'This legislation is more critical than ever, given the Administration's efforts to fire VA employees and make cuts that continue to diminish VA employee morale.' According to the American Federation of Government Employees, a union representing hundreds of thousands of federal and D.C. workers, VA title 38 staff have limited rights compared to other federal agency workers and even those like VA psychologists and pharmacists who are classified as Title 5 employees. Title 38 workers, according to AFGE, are not allowed to negotiate their schedules, raise concerns 'over things like staffing shortages that undermine patient care,' challenge pay law violations, or VA policies. Commandant says Marines should have a say in whether they change duty stations Space Force Special Operations Command is on its way Army reverses course on banning fun and games for soldiers in Kuwait A meal card foul-up at Fort Johnson underscores a bigger Army problem Sailor wins $7,500 settlement after his car was towed and auctioned off while deployed
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Biden's post-presidency: From Social Security talk in Chicago to appearing on 'The View'
Joe Biden ended a half-century career in public office after a rough final year that saw him drop out of the 2024 presidential race amid questions about his age and fitness. Now, he has returned to the national spotlight after it was announced that he was diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier this month. A Biden spokesperson said on May 18 that the former president has been diagnosed with an "aggressive form" of prostate cancer that has spread to the bone. Biden was diagnosed after "experiencing urinary symptoms," and a "nodule" was discovered on his prostate, according to the statement. The former commander-in-chief, who left the White House and headed straight to California for vacation, has stayed low-key for months. The cancer diagnosis came as Biden, 82, was starting to grapple publicly with Donald Trump's presidency, which some Democrats blame on his decision to wait so long to exit the 2024 race. Biden began to reemerge publicly over the last month, giving a speech in Chicago, followed by an appearance on ABC's "The View," and then with an interview with the BBC. Biden said on "The View" that he was "trying to figure out what the most significant and consequential role I can play" post presidency. Now his plans are being upended by a significant health fight. Biden's first speech since leaving the White House came on April 15 in Chicago as Trump approached the 100-day mark of his presidency. The former president criticized his successor's opening policy blitz. "In fewer than 100 days, this new administration has done so much damage and so much destruction,' Biden said at a national conference of Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled in Chicago. "They've taken a hatchet to the Social Security Administration." The remarks came as Democrats were distraught about the opening days of Trump's presidency. Biden's role in the party has been unclear as Democrats look for new, younger voices to take on Trump. Biden finished his one term in the White House with low approval ratings and facing second-guessing from fellow Democrats. He sought to rehabilitate his image in the party, hiring a well-known Democratic operative to help. Biden began making the media rounds, attempting to rehabilitate his reputation, ahead of two highly anticipated books excavating his administration's efforts to downplay concerns about his age and acuity that many believe hobbled Democrats in 2024. Appearing on "The View", Biden rebuffed criticism that he waited too long to drop out of the 2024 race and maintained he would have defeated Trump in a rematch last fall. He also pushed back on those saying he experienced cognitive decline, adding: "They are wrong." And earlier this month, Biden told the BBC that ending his 2024 bid was "the right decision" but "just a difficult decision." "It was hard to say now I'm going to stop," he told the BBC. "Things moved so quickly that it made it difficult to walk away." His May 16 prostate cancer diagnosis came on the same day Axios released recordings of Biden's five-plus hours of interviews with Special Counsel Robert Hur. Hur ultimately decided not to prosecute Biden for improper possession of classified documents and asserted that jurors would have viewed Biden as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Biden dropped out of the 2024 race and turned the Democratic nomination over to former Vice President Kamala Harris after a disastrous debate performance against Trump. The debate heightened concerns about Biden's mental acuity. Since his cancer diagnosis, Biden has received an outpouring of support from across the political spectrum. Trump, Harris, former President Barack Obama, and former President Bill Clinton have all wished Biden well on social media. "Joe is a fighter - and I know he will face this challenge with the same strength, resilience, and optimism that have always defined his life and leadership," Harris wrote. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Phillip Bailey, and Sarah D. Wire, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Joe Biden retreated from the spotlight after leaving the White House