Heads of Northwestern legal clinics sue House committee over records demand
The leaders of two Northwestern University law clinics are suing the House Education and the Workforce Committee and their own university to prevent the turning over of records the panel requested of the school.
Last month, the GOP-controlled committee sent a letter requesting details of the budgets and guidance at the university's legal clinics, accusing the centers of funding 'left-wing advocacy' and chastising pro-Palestinian clients the centers have.
'The Committee has demanded that Northwestern University's Pritzker School of Law and its Bluhm Legal Clinic produce information about how they teach their students, represent their clients, and fund their work. The effort is part of the federal government's ongoing attack on academic freedom, legal professionals, and the rule of law,' the Wednesday lawsuit reads.
The lawsuit was filed by Sheila Bedi, director of the university's Community Justice and Civil Rights Clinic, and Lynn Cohn, co-director of Northwestern's Center on Negotiation, Mediation and Restorative Justice.
The House Education Committee had given the university until Thursday to comply with the records request.
'The Letter reflects a bare desire to harm Plaintiffs for their association with 'left-wing' causes that the Committee does not like and for the protected speech reflected in their 'progressive,' 'left' advocacy,' the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit wants a judge to declare the committee letter unconstitutional and enjoin the university from producing any documents.
The Hill has reached out to the committee for comment.
The lawsuit comes the same day reports have come in that the federal government is pausing $790 million in funding for Northwestern.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Israeli strike on cafe near Gaza City port kills dozens, hospital official says
More than 30 people have been killed in an Israeli airstrike that hit a café near the port in Gaza City, according to the head of the territory's largest hospital. Dr. Mohammad Abu Silmiya, the director of Al-Shifa hospital, said in an update on Monday afternoon that at least 31 people had been killed and 70 injured in the strike. Videos geolocated by CNN show thick smoke rising from the scene as well as widespread damage to the café and the surrounding area. They also showed bodies being removed on stretchers. The Israel Defense Forces told CNN it was looking into the circumstances around the strike. The Al-Baqa café was a well-known spot for students, journalists and remote workers, as it offered internet and a place to work by the Mediterranean coast. Silmiya told CNN that 'most of the casualties are women and children,' including many students who were at the cafe for internet access. He also said the hospital was short of ICU beds and anesthetics to treat the casualties. 'We are treating the injured on the hospital floor as no rooms and hospital beds are available,' the hospital director added. Among those killed was a freelance journalist, Ismail Abu Hatab, according to other journalists at the scene. The Hamas-controlled Government Media Office said his death brought to 228 the number of journalists killed by Israeli military action in Gaza since October 2023. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Politico
36 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP remittance tax in megabill projected to raise a lot more money, despite lower rate
The Senate's 'big, beautiful' vote-a-rama starts in just two hours — and nobody knows how it's going to end. Senate Majority Leader John Thune can only lose one more vote with Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) already opposed. As Senate GOP leaders scramble to strike deals to keep the bill on track, House Republicans are drawing red lines, with fiscal hawks threatening to tank the bill over the Senate's budget framework and moderates balking at the provider-tax crackdown. Here are the big fights we're watching when amendment votes kick off at 9 a.m., leading to a final vote on passage late Monday or early Tuesday: Medicaid: GOP Sen. Rick Scott's proposal to curb a key Medicaid funding mechanism after 2030 has Thune's support as part of a deal struck to get the Florida senator and a handful of other holdouts to advance the megabill to debate. If it fails, it could cost leadership some fiscal hawks, though Sens. Scott and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) refused to go there Sunday night. If it passes, it could alienate so-called Medicaid moderates. One of them, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, filed an amendment that would double the stabilization fund for rural hospitals to $50 billion, and pay for it by adding a 39.6-percent bracket on earners making over $25 million. Medicaid moderates could also try to further water down the bill's cut to the provider tax. Keep an eye on Tillis, now unburdened by a reelection bid, who slammed the Medicaid cuts in a fiery floor speech Sunday and might jump in again. Another key player to watch is Sen. Lisa Murkowski and whether her support slips after the parliamentarian derailed Medicaid-payment provisions aimed at winning over the Alaskan. The parliamentarian also, as of early this morning, had yet to rule on food-aid waivers for Alaska that could affect Murkowski's vote. Green credits: Moderates including Tillis and Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) could offer amendments to soften the bill's deep cuts against wind and solar energy, including its crackdown on IRA credits and a new excise tax. That could provoke a fight with House conservatives and the White House, which have pushed for aggressive rollbacks. AI: Commerce Chair Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) are pitching a plan to cut the megabill's 10-year moratorium on state enforcement of AI laws in half and make accommodations for internet protections. The grand finale could be a manager's amendment that House GOP leaders are pushing for to further resolve differences between the chambers and speed the bill to Trump by Friday. The House is scheduled to vote as soon as Wednesday at 9 a.m. What else we're watching: — Farm bill fight: Dozens of agriculture groups are urging senators to oppose an amendment from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) that would limit income thresholds of farmers who can receive federal aid. A host of farm-state GOP senators also oppose Grassley's push, according to three people granted anonymity. Some are concerned that liberal senators could join with conservative fiscal hawks to pass the amendment. — Solar and wind tax backlash: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Solar Energy Industry Association are slamming a new addition to the megabill that would tax solar and wind projects that have components from foreign sources, including China. 'Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables,' Chamber executive vice president and chief policy officer Neil Bradley wrote on X. — Campaign announcements: Rep. Don Bacon is expected to announce his retirement Monday, according to two people familiar with his plans. The centrist Republican's Nebraska seat is a prime pickup opportunity for Democrats; it's one of only three GOP-held districts Kamala Harris won in 2024. Meanwhile GOP Rep. Dusty Johnson is expected to announce a bid for South Dakota governor on Monday, according to two people familiar with his planning. He'll be the eighth House Republican to run for higher office in 2026. Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill, Mohar Chatterjee and Josh Siegel contributed to this report.
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
UK court rejects Palestinian human rights group's claim UK is illegally arming Israel
The UK government's decision to give Israel parts for F-35 fighter jets and other military equipment wasn't illegal — despite knowing the components could be used to aid the Jewish state's war in Gaza, London's High Court ruled Monday. Al-Haq, a Palestinian human rights group in the West Bank, had accused the British government of breaking domestic and international law in its decision to make F-35 parts exempt when it suspended some arms export licenses last year. At the time, the government suspended roughly 30 of 350 export licenses for equipment — including parts for helicopters and drones — that was deemed to be for use in the Gaza war because of a 'clear risk' the items could be used to violate international humanitarian law. Advertisement An exemption, though, was made for some licenses related to components of F-35 fighter jets. Israeli jets en route to conduct airstrikes in Iran last week. IDF/GPO/SIPA/Shutterstock Al-Haq was quick to take legal action over what they claimed was a 'deliberate loophole' — arguing the UK shouldn't keep exporting parts given the government's own assessment of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law. Advertisement The government noted the components manufactured in the UK were sent to assembly lines in the US, Italy and Japan that supply partners — including Israel — with jets and spare parts. In dismissing the group's challenge, High Court Judges Stephen Males and Karen Steyn ruled that the issue was one of national security because the parts were considered vital to that defense collaboration with the other countries. They added it wasn't up to the court to tell the government to withdraw from the group just because of the possibility the parts would be handed over to Israel and possibly used to violate international humanitarian law. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive, which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts,' the judges wrote in the hefty 72-page judgment. Advertisement Israeli jets in formation during last week's war with Iran. IDF/GPO/SIPA/Shutterstock The government said the ruling showed it had some of the most rigorous export rules in the world. 'We will continue to keep our defense export licensing under careful and continual review,' a spokesperson said. Al-Haq, meanwhile, said it was disappointed with the ruling but stopped short of saying whether it would seek permission to appeal. Advertisement 'Despite the outcome of today, this case has centered the voice of the Palestinian people and has rallied significant public support, and it is just the start,' Shawan Jabarin, general director of Al-Haq, said in a statement. 'We continue on all fronts in our work to defend our collective human values and work towards achieving justice for the Palestinians.' With Post wires
