Napoleonic prisoner of war camp buried under field bought from farmer
Located near Peterborough, it contains the remains of around 1,770 French, Dutch and German soldiers captured in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars fought between the French and other European nations.
The camp now lies barely visible under a field used for arable crops and grazing (Damian Grady/Historic England Archive{PA)
The trust says it wants to preserve the site and make it available to the public as a historic and green space.
The camp now lies barely visible under a field used for arable crops and grazing.
But it previously held a self-contained town, with barracks, offices, a hospital, school, marketplace and banking system, according to historian Paul Chamberlain.
It operated from 1797 to 1814 and housed around 7,000 French prisoners.
The location was chosen because it was far from the sea, making it difficult for any escapees to return to France.
A watercolour plan of the barracks of Norman Cross, with a list of buildings, made in 1799 (Peterborough Museum & Art Gallery/PA)
Prisoners made intricate models from bone, wood and straw to sell at the camp market and trade for food, tobacco and wine.
Around 800 of these artefacts, which include miniature ships and chateaus, are on display at the nearby Peterborough Museum and Art Gallery.
The trust received £200,000 of grant funding from Historic England and £50,000 from the National Lottery Heritage Fund to buy the camp following years of negotiations.
Its acquisition was fought for by resident Derek Lopez, who owned the Norman Cross Gallery near Yaxley and was an advocate of Peterborough's history.
He died last year before seeing the sale complete.
The location was chosen because it was far from the sea, making it difficult for any escapees to return to France (Damian Grady/Historic England Archive)
Duncan Wilson, chief executive of Historic England, said: 'The Norman Cross prisoner of war camp represents a pivotal moment in our shared European heritage that deserves to be better known.'
Matthew Bradbury, chief executive of Nene Park Trust, said he was 'delighted' to take on the ownership of Norman Cross and wanted 'to share its green space and unique stories for generations to come'.
Heritage minister Baroness Twycross said: 'Norman Cross represents a poignant chapter in our shared European story.
'The remarkable stories of those held in what was the first purpose-built prisoner of war camp should be remembered now and in the future.
'This partnership has secured this valuable heritage site for generations to come.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
12 hours ago
- STV News
Decision to deny permission for double doors on historic steading 'unfair'
The owner of a rural steading has accused East Lothian planners of behaving unfairly after they denied them permission to open a narrow doorway into double doors to allow 'wheelchair access'. Sandesh Pal has appealed to Scottish Ministers to step in after the council's planners rejected their application to install French doors in the Category A listed building , in Innerwick, despite mirroring the design on their neighbours door entrances. And they said the narrow door 'hinders wheelchair access for family members and visitors with disabilities, making these alterations necessary'. In their appeal to Scottish Ministers they say planning decisions at the Hunters Steading site, which was converted to housing more than 20 years ago, have been inconsistent with double doors and a roof window they applied for refused despite similar plans being approved for neighbours in the past. They say: 'The council's refusal cited potential harm to the building's historic fabric and visual imbalance, rejecting the roof window and door extension as modern interventions inconsistent with the character of the listed building. 'However, the proposed roof window matches already accepted on neighbouring properties and is hidden from public view. The door extension would use timber-framed doors consistent with existing features, alongside detailed stonework exact to match neighbouring properties and current buildings character, challenging the council's characterization of the changes as modern and intrusive.' In their appeal they point to planning permissions which have been granted to neighbours in recent years for similar changes to their homes in the steading, including double doors and windows. They said: 'Currently, there are a number of properties in the Hunter Steading development that have double door openings or windows on wall openings, enlarged. These inconsistent decisions appear to be unfair.' East Lothian Council refused permission for the roof window and double doors saying they would 'harmfully disrupt and unbalance' the look of the building, adding that the 'modern' double doors would be 'alien' to the character of the listed building. However the application said: 'The design includes an exact mirror image of stone lintels and stone sizes, precisely matching the existing openings.' The appeal is currently available for viewing on the Scottish Ministers appeal website. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Edinburgh Reporter
20 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
East Lothian Council double doors refusal ‘unfair'
The owner of a rural steading has accused East Lothian planners of behaving unfairly after they denied them permission to open a narrow doorway into double doors to allow 'wheelchair access'. Sandesh Pal has appealed to Scottish Ministers to step in after the council's planners rejected their application to install French doors in the Category A listed building , in Innerwick, despite mirroring the design on their neighbours door entrances. And they said the narrow door 'hinders wheelchair access for family members and visitors with disabilities, making these alterations necessary'. In their appeal to Scottish Ministers they say planning decisions at the Hunters Steading site, which was converted to housing more than 20 years ago, have been inconsistent with double doors and a roof window they applied for refused despite similar plans being approved for neighbours in the past. They say: 'The council's refusal cited potential harm to the building's historic fabric and visual imbalance, rejecting the roof window and door extension as modern interventions inconsistent with the character of the listed building. 'However, the proposed roof window matches already accepted on neighbouring properties and is hidden from public view. The door extension would use timber-framed doors consistent with existing features, alongside detailed stonework exact to match neighbouring properties and current buildings character, challenging the council's characterization of the changes as modern and intrusive.' In their appeal they point to planning permissions which have been granted to neighbours in recent years for similar changes to their homes in the steading, including double doors and windows. They said: 'Currently, there are a number of properties in the Hunter Steading development that have double door openings or windows on wall openings, enlarged. These inconsistent decisions appear to be unfair.' East Lothian Council refused permission for the roof window and double doors saying they would 'harmfully disrupt and unbalance' the look of the building, adding that the 'modern' double doors would be 'alien' to the character of the listed building. However the application said: 'The design includes an exact mirror image of stone lintels and stone sizes, precisely matching the existing openings.' The appeal is currently available for viewing on the Scottish Ministers appeal website. By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
Edinburgh Live
21 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
East Lothian home owner says council acted 'unfairly' over French door plans
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The owner of a rural steading has accused East Lothian planners of behaving unfairly after they denied them permission to open a narrow doorway into double doors to allow 'wheelchair access'. Sandesh Pal has appealed to Scottish Ministers to step in after the council's planners rejected their application to install French doors in the Category A listed building, in Innerwick, despite mirroring the design on their neighbours door entrances. And they said the narrow door "hinders wheelchair access for family members and visitors with disabilities, making these alterations necessary". In their appeal to Scottish Ministers they say planning decisions at the Hunters Steading site, which was converted to housing more than 20 years ago, have been inconsistent with double doors and a roof window they applied for refused despite similar plans being approved for neighbours in the past. They say: "The council's refusal cited potential harm to the building's historic fabric and visual imbalance, rejecting the roof window and door extension as modern interventions inconsistent with the character of the listed building. "However, the proposed roof window matches already accepted on neighbouring properties and is hidden from public view. The door extension would use timber-framed doors consistent with existing features, alongside detailed stonework exact to match neighbouring properties and current buildings character, challenging the council's characterization of the changes as modern and intrusive." In their appeal they point to planning permissions which have been granted to neighbours in recent years for similar changes to their homes in the steading, including double doors and windows. They said: "Currently, there are a number of properties in the Hunter Steading development that have double door openings or windows on wall openings, enlarged. These inconsistent decisions appear to be unfair." East Lothian Council refused permission for the roof window and double doors saying they would "harmfully disrupt and unbalance" the look of the building, adding that the 'modern' double doors would be 'alien' to the character of the listed building. However the application said: "The design includes an exact mirror image of stone lintels and stone sizes, precisely matching the existing openings." The appeal is currently available for viewing on the Scottish Ministers appeal website.
