Oregon Gov. Kotek, lawmakers push for more regional collaboration for homeless shelters and services
After years of increased state funding to address homelessness and ever-growing numbers of homeless Oregonians, lawmakers and Gov. Tina Kotek are pushing for more state oversight and coordination for homeless shelters.
Kotek's office and Rep. Pam Marsh, D-Ashland, have spent months working on plans for a statewide homeless shelter program. The result, House Bill 3644, would require regional coordination and a focus on getting homeless Oregonians into their own homes, formalizing the regional approach shelter providers and local governments scrambled to put into place after Kotek declared a homelessness state of emergency in 2023.
'It's trying to put into place what has been working well on the ground throughout the state,' Kotek told reporters during a media availability on Monday.
The proposal — which accounts for almost $220 million of the $700 million Kotek wants lawmakers to spend to help shelter homeless Oregonians and prevent people living on the brink from falling into homelessness — comes as the state continues to grapple with a growing crisis.
Nearly 23,000 of Oregon's roughly 4.2 million residents were homeless in January 2024, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. About 62% of those individuals lacked shelter.
More Oregonians were homeless in 2024 than when Kotek took office in 2023, despite the state's record spending on shelter programs, eviction prevention and other homelessness prevention efforts. But Kotek and legislative allies say things are better than they would have been without her actions: By July, they estimate that 3,330 families will have moved off the streets and into permanent homes, 24,000 families will have received state aid to keep them from becoming homelessness and 4,800 new shelter beds will exist across the state as a direct result of her emergency order and state funding.
Kotek told lawmakers on the House Housing and Homelessness Committee that the framework created by the bill would help make sure that when someone experiences homelessness anywhere in the state they'll know where to go for help finding shelter and get the services they need to move back into housing.
'Without this bill, we're going to keep churning and causing a lot of inconsistency in the system,' Kotek said. 'Let's be clear with Oregonians what we need to be doing. Let's fund it. Let's support the work of partners around the state who are doing this hard work.'
Homeless shelters have historically been managed by local nonprofit organizations, sometimes with support from local government agencies. But over the past few years, as unsheltered homelessness skyrocketed in Oregon, the state has taken a larger role in providing funding for shelters.
That started in 2020, when the state used federal COVID relief money to set up Project Turnkey, a program that turned unused hotels and other buildings into homeless shelters. It started as emergency housing for people who lost their homes to the 2020 wildfires that destroyed thousands of houses, then expanded to include more forms of shelter.
In total, Project Turnkey turned $125 million in state funding into 32 shelters with nearly 1,400 beds across 18 counties. It marked a 30% increase to the number of shelter beds in Oregon.
Kotek's first action as governor in 2023 was declaring a state of emergency around homelessness. That gave her office and the state Department of Emergency Management the authority to coordinate state agencies, employees and equipment to quickly address the crisis. The Legislature responded by quickly allocating hundreds of millions of dollars for homelessness and housing, with the goal of getting more people into shelters and permanent homes and preventing others from losing their homes.
Kotek's emergency order resulted in setting up multi-agency coordinating groups, which bring together local governments, shelters and other service providers to collaborate on providing shelter and services. The bill would continue regional collaboration after the emergency order ends.
Tammy Baney, executive director of the Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council, said the central Oregon region, which includes Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson counties and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, works together to address homelessness. Additional funding from the state government over the past few years helped the region add 200 emergency shelter beds and get 300 people into housing, she said.
But on any given night, nearly 1,800 people in central Oregon are homeless, and nearly 1,250 of those people lack shelter, most staying in tents, makeshift shelters and vehicles on public lands. Baney urged lawmakers to approve House Bill 3644, which she said would help regions continue working on providing shelter to Oregonians who need it.
'It builds on the assets across the state, rather than a one-size-fits-all plan,' Baney said. 'This will also save precious time, tax dollars and reduce duplication as regions would not need to reinvent their structures. Instead, they can stay focused on outcomes.'
Rick Russell, lead pastor of Redmond's Mountain View Fellowship church, provides a vehicle-based shelter that helped about 140 people last year. Women, especially mothers with children, and assault survivors often feel safer staying in their own cars than they do in traditional congregate shelters, Russell said, and it's easier to convince residents skeptical of shelters in their neighborhoods to support a parking lot than a building.
'When people experience safety and stability, they move from 24-hour survival mode to long-term thinking and planning toward a better future, and that's what we're there to provide,' Russell said.
The bill would allow, but not require, regions to use safe car camping as a form of shelter. Umatilla County Commissioner Cindy Timmons said her eastern Oregon neighbors won't allow car-based shelters, and it's important that each region has the flexibility it needs to address homelessness.
Some eastern Oregon counties, including Morrow, Wheeler and Gilliam, have no shelter beds, Timmons said. That means her region needs to be able to use money for transportation to help get people who need services to the places they can access services.
Lawmakers will take more public comments on the bill on Wednesday. Oregonians who want to comment can submit written comments or sign up to speak to the committee on the Legislature's website.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Gabbard to slash offices, nearly half of staff at ODNI
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard plans to slash 40 percent of the agency's staff by October in a move she said would help transform the head of the intelligence community into 'ODNI 2.0.' Gabbard's cuts would reassign roles or eliminate various centers within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), including those that monitor foreign efforts to influence Americans, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including biological weapons, and a team monitoring for cyberattacks. A fact sheet from ODNI boasts the department has already slashed 500 jobs and that the future cuts would save an estimated $700 million from the agency that helps coordinate among the 18 different agencies that make up the sprawling U.S. intelligence community. Targeted in the restructuring is the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which has dedicated itself to tracking the efforts of U.S. adversaries to influence the U.S. public through social media and disinformation campaigns designed to sow division and shift votes. The Trump administration argues the center has been used 'to justify the suppression of free speech' and cited its work in responding to the Hunter Biden laptop. ODNI also accused the Foreign Malign Influence Center of 'falsely alleging Putin 'aspired' to help President Trump win the 2016 election,' though that conclusion is shared by most reports that have evaluated Russia's efforts in the 2016 contest, including in a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee. Gabbard argued that other elements of the intelligence community already monitor foreign influence campaigns, 'making FMIC redundant' — the same argument used for the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center. The fact sheet argues it biosecurity mission is no longer needed after the COVID-related national emergency. 'It has become apparent that taking action to address global health issues falls well outside of ODNI's core mission,' ODNI states. Gabbard said the need for the shift was part of 'ending the weaponization of intelligence and holding bad actors accountable.' 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' Gabbard said in a statement. 'ODNI and the IC must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people.' The shift comes a day after Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials, many with ties to prior Democratic administrations. Even as a top Democrat agreed ODNI could use a revamp, he argued Gabbard was not the person to deliver it. 'Twenty years after it was established, there is broad, bipartisan agreement that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is in need of thoughtful reform. The Intelligence Authorization Act directs Director Gabbard to submit a plan to Congress outlining her proposed changes, and we will carefully review her proposals and conduct rigorous oversight to ensure any reforms strengthen, not weaken, our national security,' Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement. 'But given Director Gabbard's track record of politicizing intelligence — including her decision just yesterday to revoke security clearances from career national security officials — I have no confidence that she is the right person to carry out this weighty responsibility.' Mark Zaid, a longtime national security lawyer, said the redesign was a clear effort to cut staff that might push back against the Trump administration 'This isn't about reform. It isn't about strengthening our intelligence agencies. It is about the Installation of loyalists & getting rid of anyone who opposes the patrimonialistic/authoritarian policies of Trump, regardless of whether DEM or GOP,' he wrote on X. Gabbard also proposes eliminating a number of other offices she accused, without evidence, of leaking intelligence of political biases. Among those slashed is the External Research Council, which Gabbard said amounted to 'politically appointed partisans who brought their external biases,' as well as the Strategic Futures Group, responsible for long-term forecasting on threats, which Gabbard accused of being used 'to push a partisan political agenda.' It's not entirely clear how many staff work at ODNI, but that figure has been a target of Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) who earlier this year said the office had nearly 2,000 staff. 'The ODNI staff is measured in the thousands, when it should be measured in the dozens, maybe a few hundred,' Cotton said at a hearing at the beginning of the year. 'I promise, that's going to change.' Cotton on Wednesday praised the move, even as he referenced the need for congressional review. 'Congress created the ODNI to be a lean organization that used small staffs to coordinate across the Intelligence Community and execute specific, important tasks. Today's announcement is an important step towards returning ODNI to that original size, scope, and mission. And it will help make it a stronger and more effective national security tool for President Trump,' he said in a statement. 'I look forwarded [sic] to working with Director Gabbard to implement these reforms and provide the ODNI with the legislative relief necessary to ensure our Intelligence Community can focus on its core mission: stealing secrets from our adversaries.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Turnover among election officials reaches new high, report finds
Election workers process ballots at the Davis County Administrative Building in Farmington, Utah, during November's election. Research from the Bipartisan Policy Center shows turnover among election workers reached a new high in 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps/Utah News Dispatch) Election officials turned over at the highest rate in at least a quarter century during the last presidential election, according to new research from the Bipartisan Policy Center. An analysis of shifts in election officials published Tuesday found nearly 41% of election officials administering the 2024 election were different than those in 2020. Turnover has accelerated over the past two decades, rising from about 28% in 2004 to 40.9% last year. The growing percentage of departing election officials comes after years of challenges. They navigated the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, as well as harassment and false conspiracy theories surrounding stolen elections that persist today. The analysis released by the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington, D.C.-based group that seeks to foster policy cooperation across party lines, represents an updated version of a report that previously examined turnover from 2004 to 2022. The new research, which extends the data through 2024, shows the turnover rate continued to climb. Wanted: Poll workers. Must love democracy. The change means that, over time, election officials have less experience. The research found that the share of chief local election officials with six or more years in their role has dropped from 60% in 2006 to 47% in 2024. But last year, 60% of election officials had previously overseen the administration of a presidential election in their jurisdiction. 'Despite increasing turnover and loss of experience, the majority of chief election officials still have experience running at least one presidential election cycle,' the analysis said. 'This is important because presidential elections typically see the highest turnout and are the most visible elections administered.' The analysis found that over the long term, election official turnover rates have been rising gradually in small jurisdictions, defined as areas with fewer than 100,000 voting-age residents. But large jurisdictions have experienced a more sudden jump in turnover. Small jurisdictions had a 27% turnover rate in 2004 that had risen to 40% in 2024. But large jurisdictions enjoyed a turnover rate as low as 31% in 2018 before climbing rapidly to nearly 46% last year. Stateline reporter Jonathan Shorman can be reached at jshorman@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword

Politico
7 hours ago
- Politico
Mistrust in CDC shooting's wake
AROUND THE AGENCIES More than 750 Health and Human Services staffers signed a letter sent to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress this morning, warning that he's 'endangering the nation's health by repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information.' A shooting at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Atlanta headquarters on Aug. 8 was not random, the letter says. The suspected shooter, who law enforcement said was motivated by his distrust of the Covid-19 vaccine, fired multiple rounds into four buildings on the CDC's Atlanta campus. No CDC employees were injured. The shooter died at the scene after shooting and killing a DeKalb County police officer. 'The attack came amid growing mistrust in public institutions, driven by politicized rhetoric that has turned public health professionals from trusted experts into targets of villainization — and now, violence,' the letter warns. Kennedy's actions endanger public health, they argue, pointing to Kennedy referring to the CDC as a 'cesspool of corruption,' saying mRNA vaccines failed to effectively protect against Covid-19 and the flu and then canceling $500 million in mRNA vaccine development projects, and disbanding the CDC's panel of vaccine experts and appointing replacements, some of whom have expressed skepticism about vaccines. 'These dangerous and deceitful statements and actions have contributed to the harassment and violence experienced by CDC staff,' the letter says. In addition to HHS staffers who signed anonymously or with their full names, former CDC officials joined the letter, including Dr. Anne Schuchat, a former top official' James Mercy, who directed the CDC's violence prevention division; Tom Simon, who led scientific programs for the violence prevention division; Jay Butler, former deputy director for infectious diseases; and Dr. Barbara Marston, who helped lead the agency's Ebola response. HHS did not respond to POLITICO's request for comment on the letter. Key context: The letter comes after hundreds of NIH staffers sent Director Jay Bhattacharya a letter in June, laying out their concerns about the delay and termination of grants, staff firings and a spending slowdown since President Donald Trump's inauguration. Nobel laureates, former NIH Institute and program directors and other leaders in the scientific community also signed the missive. Bhattacharya, who has said that free speech is among his policy priorities, met with a small group of staffers in July to hear their concerns. At the meeting, he pledged not to retaliate against those who signed the letter, which was modeled after the Great Barrington Declaration that Bhattacharya co-authored in 2020 to protest pandemic lockdowns. What's next: Staffers' request to Kennedy: Stop spreading misleading information about vaccines and affirm the CDC's scientific integrity. They also want Kennedy to guarantee the safety of the HHS workforce by ensuring HHS has fully functional emergency procedures and alerts. Kennedy should also take 'vigorous action to remove high-profile online material targeting the federal workforce, such as the widely seen 'DEI watchlists,'' they added, referring to a website run by the conservative nonprofit American Accountability Foundation, which posts names and photos of federal employees online. The foundation says the watchlist highlights the prevalence of diversity, equity and inclusion roles in government. Critics say it invites online harassment of private citizens. The HHS staffers asked their boss to take action by Sept. 2. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. AI scribe companies promise to help doctors bill more. The result will likely be higher health care costs that trickle down to patients, Stat News reports. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. FUTURE THREATS The artificial intelligence boom is ushering in chatbots that act — more and more — like people, our POLITICO colleague Aaron Mak reports. OpenAI's GPT-4.5 can ace the Turing Test, which evaluates whether a machine can fool a user into thinking it's human. The bots also serve as therapists, and, at least in one case, a bot got engaged to a human. Increasingly lifelike large language models are both a technological marvel and a conundrum for laws designed to regulate flesh-and-blood people. With growing worries about AI's harms, from emotional manipulation to addictiveness, how do you assign liability to something that seems to have so much autonomy? The anxieties were brought to a head last week when Reuters reported that Meta's internal policies permitted its AI to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.' Where Congress stands: The revelation triggered a bipartisan furor in Congress, POLITICO's Morning Tech reported this week. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said Meta 'has failed miserably' to protect children, and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) accused the company of being 'morally and ethically off the rails.' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) also launched an investigation into Meta on Friday. The company did not respond to POLITICO's request for comment. But all these calls for regulation raise the question: Who or what, exactly, do you regulate? It might not seem obvious that a company should be liable for its chatbots — each AI 'personality' adapts its responses based on interactions with a user, so they can act in unpredictable ways. But if you view chatbots as products instead of synthetic people, the regulatory problem becomes a bit more familiar. Even if a company doesn't have an explicit policy allowing chatbots to engage in unhealthy conversations with children, for example, you can still require safety features to proactively mitigate such behaviors. Ava Smithing, advocacy director at the Young People's Alliance, a youth advocacy group, told POLITICO, 'It's not about regulating a fake person, it's about regulating the real people who are deciding what that fake person can or cannot say.' Congress hasn't proposed any laws to regulate AI companions. In the meantime, advocates are trying to apply existing product liability laws to restrain these anthropomorphic chatbots. In the courts: In a landmark case that will set a major precedent in AI law, a Florida family is suing over a chatbot that allegedly formed a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old boy, leading to his suicide. Matthew Bergman, the family's attorney, is tackling AI by adapting product liability strategies he picked up representing asbestos victims. Bergman makes a novel argument in the suit that intentionally designed its chatbots to be so lifelike that they could emotionally exploit users to get hooked on its service. He's also contending that it was foreseeable that the bots would threaten young users' mental health. A federal judge in Florida rejected bid to dismiss the suit in May. The company declined to comment on the litigation but told POLITICO that it's implemented new safety measures for young users. The court held a discovery hearing in the case last week. In the states: Without a serious effort from Congress, states have been taking the lead on chatbot regulations. New York enacted a law in May requiring an AI companion to send regular reminders that it's not human and refer users to crisis centers if they're at risk of hurting themselves. California is considering a bill to prohibit companion chatbots from rewarding young users at unpredictable intervals, a trick that slot machines use to keep gamblers addicted. Lawmakers in Hawaii are also looking at legislation to restrict chatbots that mimic humans for advertising.