Oregon Gov. Kotek, lawmakers push for more regional collaboration for homeless shelters and services
Toys sit outside at the Columbia Inn, a Project Turnkey shelter in Astoria. (Julia Shumway/Oregon Capital Chronicle)
After years of increased state funding to address homelessness and ever-growing numbers of homeless Oregonians, lawmakers and Gov. Tina Kotek are pushing for more state oversight and coordination for homeless shelters.
Kotek's office and Rep. Pam Marsh, D-Ashland, have spent months working on plans for a statewide homeless shelter program. The result, House Bill 3644, would require regional coordination and a focus on getting homeless Oregonians into their own homes, formalizing the regional approach shelter providers and local governments scrambled to put into place after Kotek declared a homelessness state of emergency in 2023.
'It's trying to put into place what has been working well on the ground throughout the state,' Kotek told reporters during a media availability on Monday.
The proposal — which accounts for almost $220 million of the $700 million Kotek wants lawmakers to spend to help shelter homeless Oregonians and prevent people living on the brink from falling into homelessness — comes as the state continues to grapple with a growing crisis.
Nearly 23,000 of Oregon's roughly 4.2 million residents were homeless in January 2024, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. About 62% of those individuals lacked shelter.
More Oregonians were homeless in 2024 than when Kotek took office in 2023, despite the state's record spending on shelter programs, eviction prevention and other homelessness prevention efforts. But Kotek and legislative allies say things are better than they would have been without her actions: By July, they estimate that 3,330 families will have moved off the streets and into permanent homes, 24,000 families will have received state aid to keep them from becoming homelessness and 4,800 new shelter beds will exist across the state as a direct result of her emergency order and state funding.
Kotek told lawmakers on the House Housing and Homelessness Committee that the framework created by the bill would help make sure that when someone experiences homelessness anywhere in the state they'll know where to go for help finding shelter and get the services they need to move back into housing.
'Without this bill, we're going to keep churning and causing a lot of inconsistency in the system,' Kotek said. 'Let's be clear with Oregonians what we need to be doing. Let's fund it. Let's support the work of partners around the state who are doing this hard work.'
Homeless shelters have historically been managed by local nonprofit organizations, sometimes with support from local government agencies. But over the past few years, as unsheltered homelessness skyrocketed in Oregon, the state has taken a larger role in providing funding for shelters.
That started in 2020, when the state used federal COVID relief money to set up Project Turnkey, a program that turned unused hotels and other buildings into homeless shelters. It started as emergency housing for people who lost their homes to the 2020 wildfires that destroyed thousands of houses, then expanded to include more forms of shelter.
In total, Project Turnkey turned $125 million in state funding into 32 shelters with nearly 1,400 beds across 18 counties. It marked a 30% increase to the number of shelter beds in Oregon.
Kotek's first action as governor in 2023 was declaring a state of emergency around homelessness. That gave her office and the state Department of Emergency Management the authority to coordinate state agencies, employees and equipment to quickly address the crisis. The Legislature responded by quickly allocating hundreds of millions of dollars for homelessness and housing, with the goal of getting more people into shelters and permanent homes and preventing others from losing their homes.
Kotek's emergency order resulted in setting up multi-agency coordinating groups, which bring together local governments, shelters and other service providers to collaborate on providing shelter and services. The bill would continue regional collaboration after the emergency order ends.
Tammy Baney, executive director of the Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council, said the central Oregon region, which includes Crook, Deschutes and Jefferson counties and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, works together to address homelessness. Additional funding from the state government over the past few years helped the region add 200 emergency shelter beds and get 300 people into housing, she said.
But on any given night, nearly 1,800 people in central Oregon are homeless, and nearly 1,250 of those people lack shelter, most staying in tents, makeshift shelters and vehicles on public lands. Baney urged lawmakers to approve House Bill 3644, which she said would help regions continue working on providing shelter to Oregonians who need it.
'It builds on the assets across the state, rather than a one-size-fits-all plan,' Baney said. 'This will also save precious time, tax dollars and reduce duplication as regions would not need to reinvent their structures. Instead, they can stay focused on outcomes.'
Rick Russell, lead pastor of Redmond's Mountain View Fellowship church, provides a vehicle-based shelter that helped about 140 people last year. Women, especially mothers with children, and assault survivors often feel safer staying in their own cars than they do in traditional congregate shelters, Russell said, and it's easier to convince residents skeptical of shelters in their neighborhoods to support a parking lot than a building.
'When people experience safety and stability, they move from 24-hour survival mode to long-term thinking and planning toward a better future, and that's what we're there to provide,' Russell said.
The bill would allow, but not require, regions to use safe car camping as a form of shelter. Umatilla County Commissioner Cindy Timmons said her eastern Oregon neighbors won't allow car-based shelters, and it's important that each region has the flexibility it needs to address homelessness.
Some eastern Oregon counties, including Morrow, Wheeler and Gilliam, have no shelter beds, Timmons said. That means her region needs to be able to use money for transportation to help get people who need services to the places they can access services.
Lawmakers will take more public comments on the bill on Wednesday. Oregonians who want to comment can submit written comments or sign up to speak to the committee on the Legislature's website.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon lawmakers scale back proposal for unemployment strike payments amid blowback
Hundreds of educators, parents and students joined a rally Nov. 1. 2023 at Roosevelt High School in north Portland to support striking teachers. Teachers like them could soon receive up to 10 weeks of unemployment benefits under a compromise negotiated by Oregon lawmakers.(Alex Baumhardt/Oregon Capital Chronicle) A particularly controversial measure that would give unemployment benefits to public and private Oregon workers during labor strikes survived a key Wednesday hearing after lawmakers agreed to cut the length of time in which workers on strike could cash checks by more than half. Senate Bill 916 would have limited striking workers to receiving benefits for 26 weeks, in line with the current caps on unemployment checks for Oregonians. But after the Senate rejected an amended version of the bill on Tuesday, a bicameral conference committee voted Wednesday to set a new cutoff at 10 weeks after a two-week waiting period. Committee members voted along party lines, with the sole Republican present voting against the amendments. 'I do feel like this is a massive compromise,' said Rep. Dacia Grayber, D-Portland, the bill's lead author. 'It's not something I'm entirely thrilled with.' The measure would be a first-in-the-nation move by Oregon, establishing a right to strike for public and private employees while ensuring them the ability to apply for unemployment benefits. Aside from traditionally strike-exempt public employees such as firefighters and police, workers such as nurses and teachers could claim benefits after two weeks of striking. The bill has been among this session's most controversial measures, laying bare deep divisions over how best to use the state's $6.4 billion unemployment insurance fund. The changes come after support for a Democrat-led bill collapsed in a concurring Senate vote on Tuesday amid concerns from Republicans and a key dissenting Democrat. It had already drawn opposition from school board leaders who help negotiate teacher strikes, business groups, and local government leaders who contribute to the state's unemployment fund. 'We have a healthy fund today due in no small part because all the agreements in the years have been honored,' committee member Sen. Daniel Bonham, R- The Dalles, told his colleagues before voting against the amended bill. 'It is a healthy enough fund that I don't know that this will be a massive draw on it, but again the kids will lose if teachers are incentivized to strike.' House Democrats got the bill over the finish line in their chamber last week, arguing that the benefits would be used sparingly and not as a tool to prolong strikes, but to shorten them. A change made in a House committee would cap benefits to eight weeks if the state's unemployment fund is at risk, and lawmakers also included an amendment that mandates deductions in backpay for benefits claimed by teachers during strikes. Grayber on Tuesday repeated a promise she has made to continue monitoring the bill's implementation if it were to pass, but also signaled that she hoped to move past concerns that the bill would promote misuse of the unemployment system or dramatically hamper school life and public facilities. She said she's been 'guided by the math' behind the bill from the beginning, a subtle nod to the estimates from the state's employment department that the bill would not change existing tax structures for businesses and government agencies paying into the state's unemployment funding. 'I have heard the opposition,' she said. 'I very much look forward to moving past what feels like a worst-case scenario focus that we've maintained for several weeks now.' Oregonians who have lost a job can currently apply for unemployment weekly checks ranging from $196 to $836. The bill would allow benefits to kick in immediately if workers are locked out of facilities by their employer during negotiations. Sen. Mark Meek, D-Gladstone, is a sponsor of the legislation, but withdrew his support when it came up short in a 15-14 Senate vote on Tuesday. In a brief interview after the hearing, he declined to comment on whether he supported the proposed changes. He referred to another attempt at a transportation and infrastructure funding bill that the Legislature has taken up in the final weeks of the session: 'If there's time to pass a transportation package, there's time to get this right,' he said. The new amendment pushes the bill closer to a similar law passed in Washington that caps benefits at six weeks, but which doesn't go so far as to protect public employees like Oregon's proposed legislation. New Jersey and New York have also passed laws in recent years to provide unemployment benefits to striking private sector workers, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a similar effort in 2023 over fiscal concerns. Another bill extending benefits to striking workers in Connecticut is currently sitting on Gov. Ned Lamont's desk, but he is expected to veto it. The bill passed out of committee on a 4-1 vote. Rep. Lucetta Elmer, R-McMinnville, was excused. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary
Podcaster Joe Rogan claimed Tuesday that two unnamed former presidents were involved in the protest against his skeptical discussions about COVID-19. Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan, one of its biggest stars, to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. Musician Neil Young famously removed his content from Spotify in protest over Rogan's rhetoric, saying he no longer wanted to share a platform with him. "And then all of a sudden, I hear that Neil Young wants me removed from Spotify. I was like, 'What the f--- is going on? This is crazy,'" Rogan said Tuesday. "Spotify got calls from two former presidents," he added. Rogan Slams Cnn For 'Force-feeding Me Morons' Instead Of Delivering News Then-Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki commented on the controversy directly. After Spotify announced it would flag podcasts that cover COVID-19, Psaki responded, "So this disclaimer, it's a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out misinformation while also uplifting accurate information." Read On The Fox News App "Our hope is that all major tech platforms — and all major news sources for that matter — be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19," she added. But Rogan said that instead of being censored or deplatformed, "I grew by 2 million subscribers in a month." "People started listening," he said, despite how his critics attacked his reputation. "And they started listening, like, 'Oh, he's really reasonable and pretty humble about all this stuff and just asking questions.'" Rogan also condemned how media outlets attacked his use of Ivermectin to treat his COVID-19 by referring to it as a horse dewormer. "I'm, like, 'Why aren't you guys concentrating on the fact that a 55-year-old man is fine three days later during the worst strain?' It was during the Delta where everybody's freaking out. 'This one's going to kill us all.' And I was fine in three days," he said. Rogan described the whole experience as a "wake-up call" that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. "It's so dirty. It's such a dirty business," Rogan said. "God, I used to have massive respect for journalists. If I had never done this podcast, I would be your regular schmo out there with, you know, just spitting out all the company lines and all the blast all over the news." "I kind of liked it better then," he said with a laugh. "I didn't think the world is filled with demons, money-hungry demons that are willing to sacrifice human lives in the pursuit of revenue." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek addressed the pushback against hosting Rogan during the company's earnings call in February 2022. "I think the important part here is that we don't change our policies based on one creator, nor do we change it based on any media cycle," the chief executive said at the time. "Our policies have been carefully written with the input from numbers of internal and external experts in this space – and I do believe they're right for our platform." Fox News Digital reached out to Spotify for comment and did not receive an immediate article source: Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his controversial COVID commentary


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Joe Rogan claims 2 former presidents called Spotify over his COVID commentary
Podcaster Joe Rogan claimed Tuesday that two unnamed former presidents were involved in the protest against his skeptical discussions about COVID-19. Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan, one of its biggest stars, to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. Musician Neil Young famously removed his content from Spotify in protest over Rogan's rhetoric, saying he no longer wanted to share a platform with him. Advertisement 'And then all of a sudden, I hear that Neil Young wants me removed from Spotify. I was like, 'What the f— is going on? This is crazy,'' Rogan said Tuesday. Then-Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki commented on the controversy directly. After Spotify announced it would flag podcasts that cover COVID-19, Psaki responded, 'So this disclaimer, it's a positive step, but we want every platform to continue doing more to call out misinformation while also uplifting accurate information.' 'Our hope is that all major tech platforms — and all major news sources for that matter — be responsible and be vigilant to ensure the American people have access to accurate information on something as significant as COVID-19,' she added. 3 Spotify received backlash in 2022 for allowing Rogan to spread what progressive critics claimed was COVID misinformation. YouTube/PowerfulJRE Advertisement But Rogan said that instead of being censored or deplatformed, 'I grew by 2 million subscribers in a month.' 'People started listening,' he said, despite how his critics attacked his reputation. 'And they started listening, like, 'Oh, he's really reasonable and pretty humble about all this stuff and just asking questions.'' Rogan also condemned how media outlets attacked his use of Ivermectin to treat his COVID-19 by referring to it as a horse dewormer. 3 Rogan said that two former presidents reached out to Spotify about his claims on COVID-19. Diego – Advertisement 'I'm, like, 'Why aren't you guys concentrating on the fact that a 55-year-old man is fine three days later during the worst strain?' It was during the Delta where everybody's freaking out. 'This one's going to kill us all.' And I was fine in three days,' he said. Rogan described the whole experience as a 'wake-up call' that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. 'It's so dirty. It's such a dirty business,' Rogan said. 'God, I used to have massive respect for journalists. If I had never done this podcast, I would be your regular schmo out there with, you know, just spitting out all the company lines and all the blast all over the news.' 3 Rogan described the whole experience as a 'wake-up call' that opened his eyes about the liberal legacy media. HJBC – Advertisement 'I kind of liked it better then,' he said with a laugh. 'I didn't think the world is filled with demons, money-hungry demons that are willing to sacrifice human lives in the pursuit of revenue.' Spotify founder and CEO Daniel Ek addressed the pushback against hosting Rogan during the company's earnings call in February 2022. 'I think the important part here is that we don't change our policies based on one creator, nor do we change it based on any media cycle,' the chief executive said at the time. 'Our policies have been carefully written with the input from numbers of internal and external experts in this space – and I do believe they're right for our platform.' Fox News Digital reached out to Spotify for comment and did not receive an immediate reply.