logo
Hypersonic missiles are stirring fears in the Iran-Israel conflict. Here's why

Hypersonic missiles are stirring fears in the Iran-Israel conflict. Here's why

Yahoo5 hours ago

BARCELONA (AP) — Iran is boasting that it has hypersonic missiles and says it already has begun firing the cutting-edge weapons at Israel.
There is no evidence that Iran has unleashed the missiles, and experts are skeptical of the claim.
But the use of these fast-moving projectiles could test Israel's vaunted missile-defense system and alter the course of the fighting between the two bitter enemies.
Here's a closer look at these advanced weapons:
What is a hypersonic missile and what makes them so feared?
Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard claimed Wednesday that it had fired what it said were hypersonic 'Fattah 1' missiles toward Israel. But whether these missiles are hypersonic is a matter of debate.
Simply put, hypersonic weapons are any missile that travels beyond Mach 5, five times the speed of sound. Ballistic missiles, fired high up or outside the earth's atmosphere, routinely reach this speed.
But in modern warfare, experts say hypersonic weapons must also have advanced navigation systems – making them nimble and capable of changing their trajectory. This can challenge traditional defense systems, said Jack Watling, a senior fellow at the Royal United Services Institute.
Traditional ballistic missiles fly on a trajectory that missile-defense systems like the U.S.-made Patriot can anticipate. Cruise missiles, which can hug terrain, or hypersonic missiles, which are fired to a lower altitude, have less predictable trajectories and are harder to stop.
'Radar can see a missile on a ballistic curve because it's above the radar horizon. If it's a hypersonic glide vehicle, it can fly lower and hills get in the way,' Watling said. 'That further reduces the time that you will have to engage because if it comes over the horizon, you suddenly see it, and then it's over.'
Who has hypersonic missiles or is developing them?
Experts say the U.S. and China are the only countries that have developed new-generation hypersonic missiles — but neither have used them in battle. Other nations such as Russia, North Korea and Pakistan have tested or used missiles with similar but less sophisticated technology.
'In the way that it is currently being used, the term 'hypersonic' often has little to no meaning and at the same time fuels competitive dynamics and a fear of missing out on the technology,' according to a 2022 report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
The U.S. says it is putting hypersonic missiles on a stealth destroyer and is developing and testing other programs.
China tested its first hypersonic missile in 2017 and has since developed an array of hypersonic weapons that the U.S. Defense Department says could threaten Hawaii, Alaska and even the continental U.S.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has warned of China's ' huge investments ' in military technology including hypersonic weapons.
What are Iran's capabilities?
Most countries can't make missiles that would weather the temperature and momentum stresses of these incredibly fast munitions, Watling said.
'This is a hugely complicated task. The Iranians don't have the capacity to manufacture them,' he said.
Most of the missiles Iran has deployed against Israel travel at hypersonic speed, but are barely maneuverable, so are not considered true hypersonic missiles, said Yehoshua Kalisky, a senior researcher at the Israeli think tank INSS and a former scientist in Israeli defense industries.
The missile it has launched, the Fattah 1 has had minimal success. Israel says Iran has fired over 400 missiles, with over 40 causing damage or casualties.
'Israel is able to intercept more than 95% of the missiles because speed is not crucial,' said Kalisky. 'What is important is the maneuverability of the incoming missiles, and so far the maneuverability of these missiles is limited.'
He said Iran has two fast and maneuverable missiles, the Khorramshahr and Fattah 2, that would be 'more difficult' to intercept. But neither have been deployed.
When and where have hypersonic missiles been used?
Russia has claimed to have used hypersonic missiles in its war against Ukraine, but experts say that while fast they do not maneuver enough to be considered true hypersonic weapons.
Russia President Vladimir Putin boasted of the development and use of the Orenshik in Ukraine — claiming that flies 'like a meteorite' at 10 times the speed of sound, and that it was immune to any missile defense system. Ukrainian military officials said it reached Mach 11.
The Pentagon said last December the Oreshnik fired was an experimental type of intermediate-range ballistic missile.
Russia has also claimed its Kinzhal missile is hypersonic, but Ukraine has been able to intercept them with the U.S.-made Patriot missile defense system.
During the recent fighting between India and Pakistan over the disputed territory of Kashmir, Pakistan said it destroyed a Russian-built S-400 air defense system in India's border Punjab state with hypersonic missiles launched from a warplane.
Brazil, Australia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Iran, Japan, South Korea and North Korea all have hypersonic weapons programs. The European Union is studying how to develop an interceptor for hypersonic missiles as it ramps up defense spending to counter the Russian threat.
__
Associated Press writers Emma Burrows in London and Melanie Lidman in Tel Aviv contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Play Short-Term Market Volatility With These ETFs
Play Short-Term Market Volatility With These ETFs

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Play Short-Term Market Volatility With These ETFs

The Trump administration's chaotic tariff policies and escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East are making investors anxious, pushing them toward safe-haven assets. The S&P 500 has faced increased volatility in 2025, with the broad market index falling 2.7% and then rebounding 4.1% over the past month. The index fell about 1.1% on June 13, driven by intensifying protests and mounting Iran-Israel tensions. According to SP Global, U.S. investors remained risk-averse for the fifth consecutive month, even as equity market concerns have been easing. Per an investor sentiment survey, according to the S&P Global Investment Manager Index, the risk appetite of investors has been gradually increasing since April. Yet, June's reading has remained negative, highlighting continued caution. Even with easing in risk aversion, according to SP Global, investors continue to forecast net market losses in the month ahead. The survey's Equity Returns Index fell to -32% in June from -29% in May, reflecting a modest decline in investor confidence and a slightly more pessimistic outlook compared to the previous month. According to Kathryn Rooney Vera, chief market strategist at StoneX Group, as quoted on Reuters, with the market being highly sensitive to headlines and short-term events, short-term market swings have intensified. Struggling with escalating tensions in the Middle East after renewed military strikes between Israel and Iran, concerns over potential supply disruptions are a headwind. According to Rooney Vera, a possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz could restrict global oil supply chains, driving up prices and accelerating inflationary pressures. Planned protests across major U.S. cities are drawing investor attention. According to Tim Ghriskey, senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls & Snyder, as quoted on Reuters, the ongoing protests could dampen investor confidence, from a psychological perspective. Any blow to investor sentiment or risk appetite could further weigh on the S&P 500, adding to the headwinds it already faces in the near term. In periods of rising uncertainty, increasing exposure to volatility ETFs in the short term can be a winning move for investors. These funds have delivered short-term gains during periods of market chaos and could climb further if volatility endures. In the current economic environment, volatility-focused funds and strategies are ideal to reassess volatility exposure and for investors with a short-term horizon. With volatility rising due to trade tensions, policy uncertainty, geopolitical conflict and technical market breakdowns, increasing exposure to the below-mentioned funds can be a good strategic move (See: all Volatility ETFs here). iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN seeks to track the performance of the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return and has amassed an asset base of $375.1 million. The index offers exposure to a daily rolling long position in the first and second month VIX futures contracts. VXX charges an annual fee of 0.89% and has a one-month average trading volume of about 4.39 million shares. iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN has gained 17.87% over the past three months and 16.56% over the past year. ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF seeks to track the performance of the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index and has amassed an asset base of $179.5 million. The index measures the movements of a combination of VIX futures and is designed to track changes in the expectation for one month in the future. The fund is ideal for investors looking to gain from an increase in expected volatility of the S&P 500. VIXY has a one-month average trading volume of about 1.1 million shares. ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF has gained 17.48% over the past three months and 14.66% over the past year. The fund charges an annual fee of 0.85%. ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF seeks to track the performance of the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index and has amassed an asset base of $21.4 million. The index measures the movements of a combination of VIX futures and is designed to track changes in the expectation for VIX five months in the future. The fund is ideal for investors looking to gain from an increase in expected volatility of the S&P 500. VIXM has a one-month average trading volume of about 98,000 shares. ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF has gained 12.64% over the past three months and 22.03% over the past year. The fund charges an annual fee of 0.85%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX): ETF Research Reports ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY): ETF Research Reports ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

Who is US Central Command chief Gen. Erik Kurilla, key player in Iran, Israel clashes?
Who is US Central Command chief Gen. Erik Kurilla, key player in Iran, Israel clashes?

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Who is US Central Command chief Gen. Erik Kurilla, key player in Iran, Israel clashes?

US Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Gen. Erik Kurilla has become a key player in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. As CENTCOM chief, Kurilla leads the U.S. military command in the Middle East — a region that has taken outsized importance in recent days as President Trump weighs whether to join Israel in striking Iran to deal a permanent blow to its nuclear program. Kurilla — who oversees military missions throughout the 21-country region — would lead any operation that Trump orders targeting Iran. Kurilla has been briefing the president on the situation unfolding in the Middle East. In a Congressional hearing on June 10 — days before Israel initiated strikes on Iran — Kurilla told lawmakers that he presented Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth with a 'wide range' of military options to pursue if nuclear talks with Iran go sideways. 'President Trump has made it clear that if Iran doesn't permanently give up its nuclear enrichment, military force by the U.S. may be necessary. If the president directed, is CENTCOM prepared to respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran?' House Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) asked Kurilla. 'I have provided the secretary of defense and the president a wide range of options,' Kurilla responded during the House Armed Services hearing. 'I take that as a yes,' Rogers said. 'Yes,' Kurilla responded. Kurilla, a four-star Army general, has been in the position since April 2022 and is set to step down in the coming months. He oversaw U.S. military support for Israel in the aftermath of Oct. 7, 2023, and traveled numerous times to the region. Reports have suggested that he supports increased U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict and that he has significant influence in the decision-making circles. Dan Caldwell, Hegseth's former senior adviser at the Pentagon, nodded to the reporting in an interview on 'Breaking Points' on Monday, suggesting Kurilla's looming retirement could be contributing to the sense of urgency to take military action. 'It's been reported, and, you know, based on my experience with him, is that he takes a fundamentally different view of the importance of the Middle East than a lot of other people in the administration,' Caldwell said. 'He also, I think, believes that a military campaign against Iran will not be as costly as others. So, that's his view. And I think there are a lot of folks that want to see some type of military action occur before he retires as a result of that,' he continued. 'So, he retires, I believe, in the middle of July. And I don't think it's a coincidence you see a lot of the pressure ramping up to do something prior to his retirement,' Caldwell added.

Novogratz on the Senate's Landmark Stablecoin Bill
Novogratz on the Senate's Landmark Stablecoin Bill

Bloomberg

time32 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Novogratz on the Senate's Landmark Stablecoin Bill

Get a jump start on the US trading day with Matt Miller, Katie Greifeld and Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." Banks will get looser limitations for Treasury trades, but some argue that move could backfire on regulators. President Trump declines to say whether the US plans to join Israel's military offensive on Iran. Wall Street is quiet ahead of the Fed's decision later today. And Mike Novogratz joins Bloomberg Open Interest to talk about the Fed and his thoughts on the new stablecoin bill. (Source: Bloomberg)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store