
Nation gains closure with Constitutional Court ruling to remove Yoon
The Constitutional Court of Korea voted unanimously to remove President Yoon Suk Yeol from office, delivering a definitive verdict on Friday that punctuated months of political turmoil triggered by his short-lived martial law declaration on Dec. 3, 2024.
As interim Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae began reading out the 8-0 decision at 11 a.m., tens of thousands of South Koreans fell silent across Seoul's divided protest sites. Smartphones shot upward to capture the moment as loudspeakers broadcast the verdict through streets where police buses formed barricades between opposing crowds.
"President Yoon Suk Yeol violated his duty as the nation's commander-in-chief when he sent troops to the National Assembly in December," Justice Moon said, his voice echoing across the capital. The martial law declaration had "broadly violated the citizens' rights and damaged the republic's order," he clarified.
Then came the pronouncement that sealed the president's fate: "In a unanimous vote, the court upholds the National Assembly's motion to impeach the president."
Near the Constitutional Court, just blocks apart but worlds away politically, South Koreans responded with emotions as divided as the nation itself. Anti-Yoon protesters erupted in jubilation, embracing one another with tears streaming down their faces. Many jumped up and down, pumping fists skyward as K-pop anthems — for some time a soundtrack to the progressive protests here — blasted from portable speakers.
"Into the New World" by Girls' Generation reverberated through the crowd as demonstrators linked arms and swayed. One protest leader seized a microphone to lead a triumphant chant: "We won!"
Meanwhile, supporters of the ousted president received the news with disbelief. At Jongno's Tapgol Park, a longtime gathering place of retirees who come to play the board game Go and get free meals from a soup kitchen, aged protesters clutching Korean flags sat motionless, some wiping tears. Others shouted profanities at the screens broadcasting the court's ruling.
"How can it be 8-0? They must have bribed the justices," cried a middle-aged woman near the presidential residence in Hannam-dong. Nearby, a cluster of protesters hung their heads in disappointment.
Early morning standoff
The nation's political divide was on stark display throughout the morning as throngs of protesters were gathering across Seoul. In some locations, the two sides occupied opposite ends of the same streets, emblematic of the stark polarization of South Korean politics in recent years.
Near Anguk Station in central Seoul, a group of anti-Yoon demonstrators had camped overnight, their ranks swelling by early morning. Rainbow flags waved alongside banners reading "Impeach the insurrectionist-in-chief" and "Democracy shall prevail," as speakers blared aespa's "Supernova" — another K-pop track widely adopted by the movement.
Barely a kilometer away at Tapgol Park, clusters of older Yoon supporters had gathered from the early morning. Many wore headbands supporting the president and carried South Korean flags, a symbol of conservative protests. Some confronted passersby, calling them "commies" and demanding to know their political affiliations.
Meanwhile, the scene at Gwanghwamun, Seoul's central boulevard traditionally used for mass demonstrations, was surprisingly sparsely populated after firebrand evangelical pastor Jun Kwang-hoon relocated his pro-Yoon rally to Hannam-dong the previous night. Large screens were installed nonetheless, displaying live feeds from other protest sites.
By 10 a.m., the area around the presidential residence in Hannam-dong had become a study in contrasts. Police in riot gear created buffer zones between opposing crowds positioned just hundreds of meters apart. Reporters passed through multiple ID checkpoints to access the secured perimeter where the sides gathered in anticipation.
Verdict's release
When the court's ruling began streaming live, a profound hush descended across both sides of the divide. The crowd listened as the Constitutional Court methodically dismissed, one by one, all points raised by Yoon's defense — from claims of presidential immunity to questions about procedural technicalities.
The reaction to the verdict played out like a real-time illustration of the nation's political schism. At the anti-Yoon rally sites, celebration erupted instantly. Kwon Oh-hyeok, head of Candle Action, a civic group that has led anti-Yoon rallies in recent years, addressed the jubilant crowd near the Constitutional Court: "We stand at a new starting line today. We've proven that the people are the true owners of this republic. Let's fight on to build a new democratic government!"
A former Marine in his 40s among the anti-Yoon protesters took a more pointed approach. "Now that the Yoon regime has been decapitated, it's time to dissolve the People Power Party as an unconstitutional insurrectionist party," he exclaimed. "We can't let up now."
Particularly emotional was the mother of a victim of the 2022 Itaewon crowd crush disaster, which had become a rallying point for Yoon's critics. "We didn't give up, and we won," she said. "But this dismissal is just the beginning. Now we can finally begin proper mourning for our loved ones."
By noon, anti-Yoon demonstrators had begun marching westward from around the Constitutional Court toward Gyeongbokgung, singing along to aespa's "Whiplash" as they moved through the streets.
For weeks, pro-Yoon speakers had invoked the "right to resist" and warned of massive demonstrations should the court rule against the president. Their rhetoric stoked fears of potential unrest, with some even suggesting that South Korea could face a civil crisis if Yoon were removed.
However, the response from Yoon's supporters remained restrained. While some protesters had run-ins with police — one was arrested for breaking a police bus window near the Constitutional Court — most expressed their anger through shouts and tears. Small clusters of protesters lingered, their heated exchanges with police officers occasionally escalating into shouting matches before subsiding again.
Near the presidential residence in Hannam-dong, Kim Kyung-hee, 54, stood clutching a Korean flag, tears welling in her eyes. "We need to resist like during the April 19 Revolution," she said, referring to the 1960 student uprising that led to President Syngman Rhee's resignation.
"I cannot accept the court's decision. The real issue is election fraud. Yoon should have received more votes, and other elections have been rigged too," she said, vowing to remain at the protest all day and attend a planned demonstration at Gwanghwamun the following day.
A group of four middle-aged women confronted police officers, saying: "Wake up! You're becoming Lee Jae-myung's dogs," referring to the opposition leader widely considered a front-runner in the upcoming presidential election. "If Lee becomes president, we could be imprisoned like in Hong Kong."
The feared explosion of violence did not materialize. Even the Rev. Jun, whose fiery rhetoric had riled up crowds for months and who, earlier in the morning, had urged resistance, struck an unexpectedly conciliatory tone after the ruling.
"Millions should gather at Gwanghwamun by 1 p.m. tomorrow," he told the crowd in Yongsan. "But we absolutely must not fight with the police. If we get hit, we take it. We must follow the law to pass down a free republic to future generations."
By early afternoon, many pro-Yoon demonstrators across Seoul had left the protest sites, even as debate broke out among those who remained about whether to stay or go home.
At Tapgol Park, the crowd had thinned considerably, while small clusters of supporters near the Constitutional Court huddled in conversation and weighed their options.
Hundreds of Yoon's supporters in front of the War Memorial of Korea in Yongsan, just across the street from the presidential office, began dispersing by noon. A woman in her 60s, who requested anonymity, said with visible frustration, "I've been coming out here for four months now, rain or snow. I'm about ready to pass out."
Accusing the media of bias, she added,"I don't accept this ruling, but I'll keep showing up at protests. This isn't a country our kids can live in anymore."
In a symbolic gesture marking the end of Yoon's presidency, government officials lowered the flag bearing the presidential emblem — the image of two phoenixes rising over Korea's national flower — from the presidential office building in Yongsan.
The Korea Herald reporters Kim Jae-heun, Park Yuna, Jie Ye-eun, Park Jun-hee, Lee Si-jin, Hwang Dong-hee, Lee Jung-joo and No Kyung-min contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
APEC adopts joint pledge to boost food security
Member economies of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation pledged to accelerate innovation to bolster food security, adopting a joint declaration at their ministerial-level meeting in Seoul on Sunday. According to Korea's Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, the declaration reflects a shared commitment to advancing sustainable agri-food systems among the 21 APEC member countries. The grouping includes 12 economies in Asia — seven of them members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations — five in the Americas, three in Oceania, and Russia. 'In the face of complex challenges, food security remains a significant issue with localized areas of acute hunger,' the joint statement read. 'Advanced technologies, policy tools and practices can enhance efficiency, boost productivity and improve resilience across the production, manufacturing, distribution and consumption of agri-food products.' It outlines strategies to tackle food security threats at every stage of production, distribution and consumption, while advancing the adoption of new technologies and bridging the digital divide. It also sets out future-oriented directions based on Korea's priority agendas of rural revitalization, support for young farmers and improved food accessibility. Following the adoption of the declaration, the meeting, chaired by Korea, continued discussions under the theme 'Driving Innovation in Agri-food Systems for Shared Prosperity.' Key discussions included a mid-term review of the 2030 food security roadmap, adoption of detailed operating rules for working-level food security policy talks, sharing of innovation-driven practices and cooperation on the use of artificial intelligence. 'It is deeply meaningful that all member economies have united to adopt the Ministerial Declaration at a time when food security carries profound global significance,' Agriculture Minister Song Mi-ryung said at the meeting. 'I hope this meeting will help promote Korea's agri-food innovation policies, rooted in our experience in overcoming food crises, along with the value and excellence of K-Food+, thereby contributing to enhancing our nation's global standing.' While holding bilateral meetings with Vietnam and Malaysia to actively explore ways to expand exports of Korean agri-food products, Korea will also host a trilateral agriculture ministers' meeting with China and Japan on Monday to further strengthen cooperation on sustainable agriculture.


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
N. Korea begins dismantling loudspeakers against S. Korea along border: JCS
North Korea on Saturday began dismantling loudspeakers installed along the border for noise campaigns against South Korea, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) said. The JCS said it detected the movement in parts of the front-line area, adding further verification is needed whether it will take place in all border areas. Earlier this week, South Korea completed dismantling its anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers along the heavily fortified border. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's bid for leniency on binding plastic cuts in UN treaty faces scrutiny
Despite President Lee Jae-myung's pledge to 'de-plastic' by the end of 2025, South Korea is drawing scrutiny for proposing softer language for a key provision in UN-led treaty negotiations aimed at reducing plastic waste. The South Korean government submitted amendments in tandem with Brazil to a draft provision mandating countries to reduce hazardous plastic products during the resumed fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee tasked with finalizing a legally binding international treaty on plastic pollution. The INC-5.2 began Tuesday in Geneva and will continue until Thursday. The second part of the INC-5 was launched as participating country representatives failed to reach a full consensus on what should and should not be included in a binding agreement against plastic pollution during the first INC-5 at Busan in December 2024. The original text, proposed jointly by Switzerland and Mexico, stated that each supporting state 'shall reduce' harmful plastic products with legally binding force. The definition of harmful plastics included plastics that risk leaking into the environment or human bodies, contain chemicals with potential health or environmental impacts, cannot be feasibly recycled or reused at scale or significantly obstruct circular economy efforts. A total of 77 countries — including all 27 EU member states and 14 Pacific Island nations formally backed the proposal, according to the UN Environment Program. However, the proposal submitted by South Korea and Brazil sought to revise the text to a more suggestive tone — requiring parties to 'take appropriate measures to address, manage, reduce or prohibit' harmful plastic products. In the proposal, two countries also suggested taking each country's 'circumstances, capacities and socioeconomic factors' into consideration when determining what constitutes an 'appropriate measure' to counter plastic waste. This is not the first time Seoul has aligned with Brazil in global plastic negotiations. A similar proposal was made during the first INC-5 meeting last year under the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration. Local climate advocacy groups sharply criticized the Korean government's stance throughout talks held so far at INC-5.2. 'President Lee made de-plasticization one of his core pledges during his presidential campaign and even promised to come up with a roadmap by the end of this year to combat plastic waste. Introducing a watered-down language during the treaty talks goes directly against that commitment,' said Solutions for Our Climate through an official statement issued Friday. Claiming that a legitimate response to the climate crisis is 'fundamental reduction, the group added that 'managing or addressing plastic pollution is not enough.' 'Korea must step up and lead on real solutions, not backtrack,' the group added. In response to mounting criticism, the Ministry of Environment denied claims that Korea was attempting to block plastic reduction efforts. 'We're not opposed to the reduction of harmful plastics,' a ministry official told The Korea Herald. 'From our knowledge, several countries have expressed difficulty in accepting the proposal presented by Switzerland and Mexico in its current form. Korea's intention was to facilitate dialogue by introducing alternative language that could help break the deadlock.'