iGaming proposal for lottery and casinos dead for the session
A move to legalize online gaming won't move forward this session. (Getty Images)
A push to legalize online lottery and casino games won't move forward this legislative session, House Speaker Todd Huston confirmed Thursday.
House Bill 1432 passed easily out of the House Public Policy Committee earlier this year but didn't get a hearing in the Ways and Means Committee, which would've taken a closer look at the financial aspects of the proposal.
Huston called it a complex bill with a 'lot of different moving parts.' He continued, 'And I think, you know, just trying to find something there was some consensus on, felt like it was a pretty tough spot to be.'
The legislation would have allowed Indiana's licensed casinos to offer interactive electronic gaming alongside the Hoosier Lottery. Supporters said Hoosiers are already gambling online so it makes sense to regulate and tax it.
Rep. Ethan Manning, R-Logansport, authored the bill and estimated that the digital lottery and casino games, coupled with sports wagering tax hikes, could bring the state of Indiana more than $300 million annually in new revenue.
Huston complimented Manning on his stewardship but said the bill would impact members of the gaming industry differently. At least one casino opposed the move.
'There's all sorts of moving parts about how it impacts certain communities, what it does to the overall gaming environment in Indiana. I think all those things just make it complex to work through,' Huston said.
Some were concerned that online options would cannibalize in-person gaming or lottery sales.
The legislation also would have established a new program for responsible gambling and gambling addiction — with new fines on casinos to fund it. Where Indiana's past efforts have focused heavily on awareness campaigns, the new program could've also funded treatment and research.
The Hoosier Lottery, a quasi-public organization, backed online lottery legalization. Indiana would have joined 14 other states with digital lottery games, including Kentucky, Illinois and Michigan.
The lottery said it was needed to grow revenue and player base into the future.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
75 Democrats Express 'Gratitude' to ICE in Antisemitism Vote Amid LA Riots
Seventy-five Democrats broke ranks on Monday, joining Republicans in voting for a House resolution condemning antisemitism and expressing "gratitude" for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other law enforcement personnel. Why It Matters Monday's vote comes as Los Angeles is reeling from days of political unrest after ICE raided several downtown city neighborhoods and arrested more than 50 people, sparking widespread anti-ICE demonstrations. The arrests are part of the Trump administration's broader crackdown on undocumented migrants, which has also swept up people who are legally permitted in the United States and resulted in the deportations of those who haven't been convicted of a crime. President Donald Trump deployed 4,000 National Guard troops to L.A. since the protests started unfolding and mobilized 700 Marines to respond if the strife escalates. Local officials and California Governor Gavin Newsom said they do not want a military presence in the city and the L.A. police chief said it creates logistical challenges for safely handling the protests. What To Know Monday's resolution condemned this month's antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, in which the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, faces 118 criminal charges. Soliman is accused of targeting a march calling for the return of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The resolution also "affirms that free and open communication between State and local law enforcement and their federal counterparts remains the bedrock of public safety and is necessary in preventing terrorist attacks; and expresses gratitude to law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland." Of the 212 Democrats in the House, 113 voted against the resolution, which was introduced by Republican Representative Gabe Evans. Seventy-five Democrats voted in favor of the measure, including Representative Joe Neguse, of the district in which the Boulder attack occurred. Six lawmakers—five Democrats and one Republican—voted "present." A second, more broadly focused antisemitism resolution led by Representatives Jeff Van Drew, a Republican from New Jersey, and Neguse, received much wider bipartisan support, passing 400-0. Two lawmakers voted "present": Representatives Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat from Michigan, and Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Adams, Alma (NC-12) Auchincloss, Jake (MA-4) Beatty, Joyce (OH-3) Bell, Wesley (MO-1) Bishop, Sanford (GA-2) Brown, Shontel (OH-11) Budzinski, Nicole (Nikki) (IL-13) Bynum, Janelle (OR-5) Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila (FL-20) Cohen, Steve (TN-9) Courtney, Joe (CT-2) Craig, Angie (MN-2) Cuellar, Henry (TX-28) Davids, Sharice (KS-3) Davis, Donald (NC-1) Elfreth, Sarah (MD-3) Frankel, Lois (FL-22) Gillen, Laura (NY-4) Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie (WA-3) Golden, Jared (ME-2) Gonzalez, Vicente (TX-34) Goodlander, Maggie (NH-2) Gray, Adam (CA-13) Harder, Josh (CA-9) Hayes, Jahana (CT-5) Horsford, Steven (NV-4) Hoyer, Steny (MD-5) Kaptur, Marcy (OH-9) Keating, William R. (MA-9) Kennedy, Timothy (NY-26) Krishnamoorthi, Raja (IL-8) Landsman, Greg (OH-1) Lee, Susie (NV-3) Lynch, Stephen (MA-8) Magaziner, Seth (RI-2) Mannion, John (NY-22) McBath, Lucy (GA-6) McClain Delaney, April (MD-6) McDonald Rivet, Kristen (MI-8) Meng, Grace (NY-6) Min, Dave (CA-47) Morelle, Joseph (NY-25) Moskowitz, Jared (FL-23) Moulton, Seth (MA-6) Mrvan, Frank (IN-1) Neal, Richard (MA-1) Neguse, Joe (CO-2) Pallone, Frank (NJ-6) Panetta, Jimmy (CA-19) Pappas, Chris (NH-1) Pettersen, Brittany (CO-7) Riley, Josh (NY-19) Ruiz, Raul (CA-25) Ryan, Patrick (NY-18) Schneider, Brad (IL-10) Schrier, Kim (WA-8) Scott, David (GA-13) Sewell, Terri (AL-7) Sorensen, Eric (IL-17) Soto, Darren (FL-9) Stanton, Greg (AZ-4) Stevens, Haley (MI-11) Subramanyam, Suhas (VA-10) Suozzi, Thomas (NY-3) Swalwell, Eric (CA-14) Sykes, Emilia (OH-13) Thanedar, Shri (MI-13) Torres, Norma (CA-35) Torres, Ritchie (NY-15) Tran, Derek (CA-45) Vasquez, Gabriel (Gabe) (NM-2) Vindman, Eugene (VA-7) Wasserman Schultz, Debbie (FL-25) Whitesides, George (CA-27) Wilson, Frederica (FL-24) What People Are Saying House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized Evans' resolution, telling reporters: "Who is this guy? He's not seriously concerned with combating antisemitism in America. This is not a serious effort. Antisemitism is a scourge on America. It shouldn't be weaponized politically." Evans responded to Jeffries on X: "I served our nation in uniform in the Middle East, as a cop in Colorado, & now as a Congressman. This wildly offensive sentiment from Democrat's Leader is why antisemitism persists. The Left is unserious about finding real solutions." Representative Dan Goldman of New York, who is Jewish, criticized the resolution during floor debate: "You weren't here, Mr. Evans, last term, but there were about 10 antisemitism resolutions that effectively said the same thing solely to score political points. We Jews are sick and tired of being used as pawns." Van Drew defended Evans' measure: "Yes, it is different than mine. Mine focused purely on antisemitism here in the world. But he brings up a valid point not only for Jews, but for many innocent victims... Illegal immigration is not a good thing." David Axelrod, ex-adviser to former President Barack Obama, posted to X: ".@BarackObama deported far more illegal immigrants than Trump, targeting those w/criminal records & the newly arrived. It was done carefully, responsibly & lawfully. What we're seeing in LA is calculated to provoke & escalate. It's a made-for TV reality show, produced by Donald J. Trump." Greene wrote on X after voting "present": "Antisemitic hate crimes are wrong, but so are all hate crimes. Yet Congress never votes on hate crimes committed against white people, Christians, men, the homeless, or countless others." What Happens Next California sued the Trump administration over its deployment of the National Guard to L.A., accusing Trump of an "unprecedented power grab" because he bypassed Newsom to send in the guardsmen. The last time a U.S. president circumvented a governor to deploy the National Guard was in 1965, when Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights activists.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Election results: Vacant House seats in OKC, Tulsa area filled during special election
The polls have closed on three legislative races to fill vacant seats in the Oklahoma House of Representatives, including one in Oklahoma City. House lawmakers finished this year's session with empty seats after three members resigned to take other jobs. The seats were filled in special elections held in Oklahoma County and the Tulsa area. The state Senate filled its own vacancy in May with the election of Republican Bryan Logan, who is the new state senator for a district in eastern Oklahoma. In House District 97, JeKia Harrison and Aletia Haynes Timmons faced off for the Democratic primary to fill a seat that was vacated in April by Jason Lowe after Lowe won election to the Oklahoma County Commission. Shortly after the polls closed at 7 p.m., Timmons was leading, according to early tabulated results posted by the Oklahoma State Election Board. This primary was a winner-take-all election. No Republicans or independents filed for the open House of Representatives seat. District 97 includes portions of far northeast Oklahoma City, plus the metro-area communities of Spencer, Lake Aluma and Forest Park. The district also includes voters in parts of Jones and Midwest City. Timmons, 64, was an elected Oklahoma County district judge for about a decade before she retired from the position in March. Before joining the bench in 2014, she was an attorney working on civil rights and employment law, and also worked for a time in the Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office. Timmons is a graduate of OKC's John Marshall High School and earned a bachelor's degree in political science at Oklahoma State University. She obtained her law degree from the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Harrison, 35, has worked at the Oklahoma State Capitol as a legislative assistant for Tulsa state Rep. Meloyde Blancett. Harrison previously worked as child welfare specialist for the Oklahoma Department of Human Services and also owns a political campaign consulting business called Pen 2 Paper Consulting. She is a graduate of Millwood High School, which is located in House District 97, and earned a bachelor's degree in psychology from Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee. House District 71 is a sliver of land along the Arkansas River in south Tulsa. The seat became vacant after the resignation of Democratic state Rep. Amanda Swope, who left state government to work for the city of Tulsa. In the district's special election, Democrat Amanda Clinton was on track to win a wide victory over Republican attorney Beverly Atteberry. With more than half of the precincts reporting, Clinton had 86% of the votes counted. Clinton, 46, runs a public relations firm and is an adjunct professor at Oklahoma State University. She also sits on boards for Planned Parenthood and the OSU Foundation Board of Governors. Clinton previously said she's an advocate for reproductive health freedom, access to medical care, clean water and minimizing "state Superintendent Ryan Walters' impact on public schools." She is also active in tribal policy. "District 71 deserves leadership that shows up, speaks truth, and fights like hell for working people, and that's exactly what I plan to do," Clinton said in a news release celebrating her victory. Although once a Republican stronghold, District 71 has been held by a Democrat since 2018. More: One election may have reshaped Oklahoma Senate GOP's politics. Could it shift even further right? Democrat Amy Hossain faced off against Republican nominee Kevin Wayne Norwood in Owasso's House District 74. As precincts began reporting votes after 7 p.m., Norwood took a strong lead in the count. The district straddles Tulsa and Rogers counties in northeastern Oklahoma. Voters have elected a Republican in that district for 25 years. The seat became vacant in December when Mark Vancuren took a job in Tulsa County government. Norwood, 58, is a pastor and works with community initiatives like Keep Owasso Beautiful and Owasso Cares. Norwood has said he wants to build a vibrant economy, safer communities and strong infrastructure and to give Oklahomans tax relief. His priorities also include revitalizing community main streets, and he criticized the "green energy grift" on his website. Hossain, 50, is the chief human resources officer Tulsa's Domestic Violence Intervention Services. She is also the president of the nonprofit Khan Ohana, which works to "break the cycle of poverty among college students." Her priorities include raising the minimum wage, better funding for public schools, access to affordable and accessible health care and housing, according to her website. (This is a developing story and has been updated to add new information.) This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Oklahoma election results for House Districts 97, 74, 71


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Gen Z Wants To Own Homes—So Why Is It Still Out of Reach for Most?
Gen Z is falling behind on the path to homeownership. In 2025, they made up just 3% of all homebuyers, according to the National Association of Realtors®, the smallest share of any generation and a sharp contrast to baby boomers, who accounted for 42% of buyers. While high interest rates and higher home prices have made it harder for young adults to break into the market, new research suggests another force might be working against Gen Z: how they manage their money. Advertisement According to PYMNTS Intelligence, a payments data provider, despite valuing homeownership, Gen Z's top financial goal isn't buying a home. It's paying off debt. The average Gen Z adult carries an average of $94,101 in personal debt, with credit card debt being the most common. With so much of their income tied up in monthly payments, even high earners in this generation are struggling to save for a down payment or qualify for a mortgage. Debt, not disinterest, might be the real reason Gen Z is falling behind—at least for now. 4 Gen Z's biggest financial concern is how they are going to pay off their debt. Getty Images Advertisement 'Though Gen Z Americans may dream of homeownership, still-high housing costs mean that stepping onto the property ladder may not be possible at this point in time,' says Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at 'By prioritizing paying off debt, Gen Z prospective buyers are setting themselves up for success when homeownership does become more feasible.' The 2 financial personas and where Gen Z fits in PYMNTS Intelligence identifies two key money management mindsets: Planners , who proactively save and pay off credit cards , who proactively save and pay off credit cards Reactors, who handle bills as they come and often rely on credit or loans Advertisement Gen Z overwhelmingly falls into the latter group. A striking 73% of Gen Zers are classified as reactors, making them more likely to live paycheck to paycheck, carry high-interest debt, and struggle to build savings. That reactive approach can seriously undermine major financial goals, like buying a home, because it prioritizes short-term survival over long-term stability. Even more surprising, the reactor mindset is gaining ground among high earners across generations. Since February 2024, the share of six-figure earners who identify as planners has dropped by 25%. Now, 52% of top earners are reactors, a shift that underscores how widespread short-term financial thinking has become, even among those typically viewed as having the means to plan ahead 4 Even high earners in this generation are struggling to save for a down payment or qualify for a mortgage. Getty Images/iStockphoto Risk over security: The Gen Z money mindset Unlike baby boomers, 54% of whom are planners focused on long-term stability, Gen Z is chasing growth. According to the PYMNTS report: Advertisement Just 7.7% of Gen Z cite retirement saving as a top financial priority, compared with 22.1% of baby boomers. Nearly 7% of Gen Z say their No. 1 goal is starting a business, making them eight times more likely than boomers to focus on entrepreneurship. 'Gen Z Americans have time on their side and may be more willing to take big swings financially, while older generations are more risk-averse,' says Jones. While starting a business can lead to long-term wealth, it typically comes with short-term financial instability, exactly what makes it harder to qualify for a mortgage or build up a down payment. Irregular income, high credit utilization, and limited savings make it much harder to qualify for a mortgage under traditional lending models. Even high-earning Gen Z entrepreneurs might struggle to demonstrate the consistent income or financial reserves lenders expect. This risk-oriented mindset might be a reaction to the current conditions of the housing market. Buyers now need to earn 70% more than they did just six years ago to buy a home, to say nothing of the difference between buying a house now than in the 1960s and '70s, when many baby boomers bought their first homes. These conditions have made many in Gen Z feel that shooting for the moon in business is a more realistic goal than saving for that white picket fence. 4 Gen Z is more willing to take risks than previous generations. Getty Images/iStockphoto Why buying a home is still a priority—just not the first one Homeownership hasn't fallen off Gen Z's radar, but it's taking a back seat to paying off existing debt. Buying a house ranks as this generation's second most important financial goal, with 14.1% of Gen Zers ranking it as a priority. But deprioritizing homeownership, even temporarily, can come at a long-term cost. In a market where prices keep climbing, every year spent focusing elsewhere can make the eventual buy-in more expensive. And because lenders heavily weigh savings, credit usage, and income consistency, Gen Z's current financial behaviors—like revolving debt and low reserves—can delay homeownership even further, regardless of intent or income. Advertisement In other words, Gen Z still wants to own, but the reactive financial path they're following makes it harder to get there. Without a shift in priorities, many might find themselves stuck in a cycle where the dream of owning a home never quite catches up to their ambition. 4 The generation is mostly concerned with first paying off existing debt, putting homeownership on the back burner. Getty Images What Gen Z can do differently To bridge the gap between ambition and ownership, Gen Z might need to rethink how they prioritize and manage their money. The good news is that paying off debt, Gen Z's top financial priority, will eventually help them buy a house by lowering their debt-to-income ratio. The area where they can make the biggest changes, though, is in moving from a reactive mindset to a planning mindset. Here's how they can get started: Advertisement Automate savings to gradually build up a down payment. Track spending patterns to identify areas to cut back. Use credit strategically, aiming to pay in full each month. Pursue both goals in parallel—treat debt repayment as a priority, but not at the cost of building a safety net to support future homeownership. Gen Z hasn't turned away from homeownership, but when the top priority involves risk or volatility, it can make the second one harder to reach. With the right habits and tools, Gen Z can build both the freedom to pursue big dreams and the foundation to one day own a piece of them.