Vanuatu's Market Mamas Forced To Move After December Earthquake
Fresh produce seller Leidab David said when the earthquake struck they were at the national market in town and they all ran. Grace Tinetali-Fiavaai, RNZ Pacific Journalist
Port Vila's 'mamas' had to adapt to feed their communities after being displaced by the 7.3 magnitude earthquake which damaged the city's main market house in the centre of town.
At the Port Vila Show Ground Market, groups of women sold their produce under a marquee-style tarpaulin shelter set up beside a permanent concrete verandah.
Those operating under the temporary shelters once sold their wares at the Central Market House in downtown Port Vila before it was damaged in the quake.
The earthquake killed 14 and injured more than 250. The NDMO said 80,000 people were effected and 1473 displaced from their homes.
Fresh produce seller Leidab David said when the earthquake struck they were at the national market in town and they all ran.
'We did not know where to go to do our market,' she said.
'After some days, weeks and months had passed now we have come together again. We have found ourselves here in the market house at Seaside.'
Each mama pays a table fee to the Port Vila Municipal Council to sell their goods.
Under the marquee there are approximately 16 to 20 tables – about 8 to 10 on each side.
Those on the concrete verandah are largely vendors who had already been based at the Show Ground Market.
'Now the public and vendors know that the mamas that used to market in town, which is damaged – they are all coming to this place,' David said.
'Now we are starting to sell and now the room, the place is small.'
David said the manager has told them that if they come and it is full, sellers can go to Fres Wota Park and to Anamburu Park.
For two older mamas, Susan Esau (63) and Elsie Solo (72), selling their produce daily earns them up to 20,000 vatu (US$165.48) a week.
Solo, who sells coconuts, said she has seven people in her family to feed while Easu, who sells fruit, said she has six mouths to feed.
'Yes, it is enough' they say to help provide and put food on the table for their family.
The Show Ground Market is now one of the few satellite markets with access to toilets and running water, an essential service for vendors who spend long days at their stalls.
Leidab David said they need a better venue.
'We need a big building; we need a safe place for all of us to come to and be safe,' she said.
'We want a good one like at the national market. Right now we are just doing things individually. We need a big space for us vendors to come to and be safe.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Raw Milk Faithful Keeps Dairy Farmers On The Hop
Article – RNZ It's a busy time of year for Stacey Faith, calving 300-plus cows, rearing their calves and keeping the Faith Farm's roadside milk dispensing outlet going, providing locals with milk fresh from the cows over the fence – with the cream on top. , for Country Life Heading along the Kāpiti Coast's old state highway, you might spy a black and white cow on top of a shiny red shed. Not a real cow, mind you. It's a sign to pull off and pick up some milk, fresh from the cows grazing just over the fence. The customers come and go from Faith Farm Fresh, filling bottles and loading chilly bins at the fancy automated machines. Keeping the milk flowing here is all in a day's work for dairy farmer Stacey Faith, who, with her husband Andrew and farm workers, milks 360 cows at their farm between Ōtaki and Waikanae. 'You know, it's all about being local and fresh,' one of the Faiths' regulars said, topping up a glass bottle with milk from the dispenser. She was used to unpasteurised milk as a child – brought home in a bucket straight from the udder. Most of the Faith's milk goes to Fonterra, but 20 of the Friesians form the 'raw herd', producing only A2 milk, and milked separately to supply the roadside shop with unpasteurised milk – also known as raw milk. 'We had no clue when we opened well over five, nearly five-and-a-half years ago now. I mean, we sat down with the bank, and they said, 'Oh, well, how much would you like to sell a day?' and we thought 100 litres would be good. And we average now 300 litres a day,' Stacey Faith said. In New Zealand, the milk bought in shops must be pasteurised. Consumers are also allowed to buy raw milk, but producers must be registered, meet hygiene requirements, test milk for pathogens, keep records of sales and make sure consumers are aware of the risks of consuming raw milk. Faith said many of her customers have told her that raw milk helps them with ailments. 'A lot of our customers come here because they're diabetic, they have psoriasis, they have skin conditions. I'm a dairy farmer. I'm not a doctor. 'This is what our customers tell us, it's better for their health.' The demand has surprised them. On the odd occasion, she said they've even had to close their doors, 'because we had no milk until we milked the cows. And then it was just catch up that whole week, trying to get them back to milking three, four o'clock that afternoon.' The big 18-wheeler trucks used to stop before the new highway opened, Faith said. They would take bottles of the milk to Auckland, but that's stopped now that the little red shed is on a side road. 'We're allowed 30 hours to sell the milk, but we sell out sometimes before 24 hours.' With the special hygiene and testing regime required for raw milk, it's all a lot of extra work for the busy dairy farmers. One of them must always be available between 6am and 10pm every day of the year in case there's a coin jam or one of the pumps stops working. 'So, you get a phone call, 'I've only got half a bottle of milk', you've got to come down and sort it out'.' The cows must be specially cleaned at milking time too, taking at least twice as long as the main herd, which supplies Fonterra. The milk from the main herd will be pasteurised – heated to a high temperature to kill bacteria – once it reaches the processing plant. 'As a place that sells raw milk, that's the only thing we don't have control of … people coming in and filling a dirty bottle. We do everything in our power to make it as clean as we can.' Calving a niche The need to keep the milk taps flowing year-round means calving is an extended season for the Faiths. On top of tending to the shed, testing and working as a swim coach, Faith will rear 300-plus calves this season, with the help of some automated feeding machines. Apart from the Friesians reared as replacements for the two herds, her meatier Hereford cross calves are sold to be grown on by lifestyle block owners nearby. While she takes it all in her stride, all the extra work the little red shed involves prompts the question – what's the point? 'I just love the idea that we're getting rid of plastic because we've got glass bottles … how it used to be back in the day. 'It's great to see so many people bringing the bottles back to refill.' She also likes supporting local suppliers and enterprises like the local MenzShed, where the bottle crates are made. 'It's all got to be good for the planet and sustainability, supporting all the local people.'
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?
RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Send your questions to I recently separated and managed to buy the house and own it myself with a mortgage ... I have been seeing someone that I don't plan to live with. So my question is if you have a relationship with someone for a length of time that you don't live with or share bills with do I need to protect myself with a prenuptial agreement? When does the relationship need to have documentation of what I own and never want to share? People normally think of relationship property issues arising when a couple lives together but you can sometimes be captured even if you're living apart. Victoria University law professor Nicola Peart said this question came down to whether a relationship would qualify as 'de facto' . She pointed to the Property Relationships Act, which sets out a definition of a de facto relationship. But she said none of the criteria were essential to decide that someone was in such a relationships. The act says that the things taken into account include the nature of the relationship, the extent of common residence, whether you have a sexual relationship, the amount of financial interdependence between the parties, the ownership and use of property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the performance of household duties and the public aspects of the relationship, as well as the care of children. So it's possible you could tick off those factors while still maintaining separate homes. "Not living in the same house or not sharing finances does not exclude the possibility that a de facto relationship exists. If in doubt, contract out to preserve separate property ," Peart said. My partner of 11yrs received his inheritance last September. Just wondering if I'm entitled to any of it ... we split up just five weeks ago due to an argument. It sort of depends what he did with it when he received it. If it went into a joint bank account you both contribute to and pay bills from, or into a mortgage on your family home, for example, then it's likely to have become relationship property and you would be entitled to a share of it. But if he has kept it separate, you might not be. This would be a good thing to talk to a lawyer about as you work through your separation agreements. If property investors are making a loss, can't they still get something back on taxes? Through a rebate scheme? I thought I heard something about that. It used to be the case that property investors who made a loss on their rental investments could offset that against their other sources of income, such as the salary and wages they received from their job. That would reduce the tax they paid and sometimes meant they got a tax refund at the end of the year. That ended when "residential loss ring fencing" rules were introduced in 2019. "Broadly, these rules quarantine any losses from residential property so they can only be offset against profits from residential property, either carried forward to a future year or offset against other properties in a portfolio. There are some minor exceptions to these rules, for example for property which is or will be taxed on sale, and a property that is also a person's main home," said Robyn Walker, a tax partner at Deloitte. What you might have heard about recently is the reintroduction of interest deductibility. From 2021, investors' ability to include interest payments in their calculation of property profits was phased out. That's returned now, which will usually reduce their tax bills. Walker said another thing you might be thinking of is the Investment Boost policy. "This allows a 20 percent deduction for the cost of new assets which are used for business purposes on or after 22 May 2025. There are some restrictions on this as it does not apply to residential property or improvements to residential property. This restriction covers the building itself, it's possible that Investment Boost can apply to other assets which are included in a residential property but are not part of the property itself - separately identifiable chattels like a fridge. Again, any deductions available under the Investment Boost are also subject to the ring fencing rules." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Alternative Alert System ‘Mothballed' Despite Benefits
Article – RNZ The founder of an alternative alert framework says officials never gave it a look-in when they were setting up the under-fire Emergency Mobile Alert system. The founder of an alternative emergency alert framework says officials never gave it a look-in when they were setting up the under-fire Emergency Mobile Alert system. And he reckons his was better, proving its worth during the aftermath of the Christchurch quakes. The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) is investigating glitches in the current system following the magnitude 8.8 earthquake off Russia on Wednesday. Some Kiwis say they received up to 50 alerts, while some did not receive any at all. Matthew Nolan founded an alternative system, Readynet, which was used during the Christchurch Earthquakes and to mobilise volunteers cleaning up the Rena oil spill. 'I think that the NEMA system – which costs them the best part of $20 million – has miscued for them, and it's certainly not the first time,' he told Morning Report on Friday. 'There is a record of it waking people up at night for messages that were text messages only, and as well as circumstances where people did not get the alert that they should have got.' NEMA spokesperson John Price told Checkpoint on Thursday there were many reasons for the differences. 'It could be different providers and different cell towers. There's a lot of possibilities, but this is something we're working through. We'll look into it, absolutely.' Nolan criticised the NEMA system as being 'one-way' only, and unable to tell if people had actually received the message as no information was sent back. 'Whereas other systems and a better system, and yes, our system was interactive, and we could see where the messages had been received. 'So for example, you send a message out into an area where there's a big river and cell towers have been wiped out. Our system would tell you that all the people in that river have not received the message – all the people in that river valley have not received the message. You can deduct from that, that in fact, the cell phone towers are out.' He claimed the Emergency Mobile Alert system 'can't target messages'. 'It's a modern equivalent of a World War 2 fire siren. It alerts people that something's happening and it gives them a brief message, but it can't target messages. 'So for example… people in Upper Hutt got no message. In Lower Hutt, lots of people got the message. So, you know, why is there a difference between one area and another?' According to the NEMA website, the current system can 'broadcast to all capable phones from targeted cell towers to areas affected by serious hazards'. 'You may not receive an alert if you are out of mobile coverage, mobile phone towers are damaged, or there is a power outage.' Price said the variation in coverage 'could be different providers and different cell towers, there's a lot of possibilities'. Nolan suggested the system was not working as well as it could because it was now owned by 'a banking conglomerate out of New York'. New Zealand's system was provided by Dutch company one2many, which is now a division of Everbridge Public Warning, an American software company that specialises in alert systems. 'Now, those sorts of companies are chasing the big markets, the multi-million markets, and I think New Zealand is a very small end of that market,' Nolan said. 'There is no office of that organisation in Wellington to work alongside emergency services in New Zealand… 'I think that a New Zealand-owned, developed, supported, helpdesked system is the best, and that's what we had built, and our system is now mothballed.' He said he asked officials to look at using Readynet for the national system, but 'they never ever fully examined what we had, even though it was used during Christchurch to communicate after the Christchurch earthquake, to communicate with all the residents and contractors left inside the cordons. 'And that was, information such as, well, 'The cordon will be open on the corner of such and such street at four o'clock this afternoon to allow people in and out for shopping there.' That's the sort of stuff you can't put on Facebook.' As of Friday morning, a tsunami advisory remained in place. Pacific nations emerged relatively unscathed.
