Farage and the prophets of doom have got Britain wrong
Farage talks of 'societal collapse' while Reeves complains of the 'worst economic inheritance' since the Second World War.
Not that they are talking from the same page. These two doom-laden narratives are obviously instructed by very different motives.
For Farage, it's about playing on voter discontent to cement his party's surge in the polls. He's got plenty of material to draw on – seemingly broken public services, failure to address popular concerns on immigration, spiralling public debt, and more than a decade of stagnant living standards, to name but some of them.
For Reeves, it's about getting her excuses in early, and seeking to blame the previous government for any disappointment there might be in her own. Already it's wearing a bit thin. A year into government, and it's pretty clear that she has made matters worse, not better.
The public seems to agree. In a recent Ipsos poll, some 68pc of respondents said they thought economic conditions would get worse over the next 12 months, against just 12pc who thought they would improve.
This is the most downbeat such finding one year after the election of a new government Ipsos has ever recorded.
You have to go all the way back to Mrs Thatcher's first government in 1980 – when unemployment was soaring and vast swathes of British industry were being closed down – to find anything remotely comparable.
Rarely have people felt so pessimistic. Britain is widely said to be a 'tinderbox' awaiting its final inferno. It is common to talk of some fast approaching societal and economic apocalypse, a deadly reckoning in which the true awfulness of the nation's circumstances will be violently exposed.
Is this perception well founded? No it is not, though it is certainly true that it might become so without corrective action. But the doomsters are disingenuously overegging it.
That the British economy is in a particularly tight spot is not in doubt. Inflation is proving more persistent in the UK than the US and much of the rest of Europe, and after years of abundance, the labour market is plainly stalling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reform: We'll blacklist Mauritius over Chagos deal
Reform UK has declared it would blacklist Mauritius if it did not hand the Chagos Islands back to Britain. Nigel Farage's party vowed on Monday to rip up the controversial deal struck by Sir Keir Starmer. The party also set out the ultimatum it would offer the east African country. If Mauritius refused to give back control of the British Overseas Territory, Reform would cancel all Mauritian visas, impose restrictions on flights and sever diplomatic ties. The announcement by Reform came after official figures revealed by The Telegraph showed Sir Keir's Chagos deal would cost 10 times more than he claimed. In May, Sir Keir had claimed that the deal would cost £3.4bn over 99 years, accounting for inflation and other discounts, but the Conservatives said it would total £30bn. Documents now released under the Freedom of Information Act show the handover was first estimated at £34.7bn, in nominal terms. Downing Street disputed the figure on Monday and continued to defend its plan to give sovereignty over the islands to Mauritius, despite the country never previously having controlled them. Richard Tice, the Reform deputy leader, said that the party – which is leading the opinion polls – would 'rip up the Chagos deal' were it to win the general election. Mr Tice told The Telegraph: 'We will rip it up, we'll stop the payments, we'll reclaim sovereignty. 'And we will say to Mauritius you've got to accept it, otherwise we will close your embassy, stop direct flights and stop all visas.' As well as concerns over its cost, Sir Keir's deal has prompted security fears because of deepening Mauritian ties with China and Russia. The government of Mauritius has said it would use almost £500 million in payments under the terms of the agreement to pay off its national debt. This will allow ministers to abolish income tax for more than 80 per cent of Mauritians, while also raising minimum salaries. The deal includes rent payments to Mauritius in order to allow the continued use of Diego Garcia, a US-UK military base. It also creates a pot of money for development spending. Alex Davies-Jones, the victims minister, claimed on Monday that the 'true cost' of signing away the British Indian Ocean Territory was the £3.4bn figure publicly cited by Sir Keir. The £34.7bn figure comes from an official document produced by the Government Actuary's Department, which explains how the Government used inflation estimates to lower the cost. Civil servants were told to lower the cost of the deal on paper to £10bn, factoring in an estimated annual inflation rate of 2.3 per cent over 99 years. It was then reduced further using the Treasury's social time preference rate, which assumes that money spent immediately has more value than funds for future spending. Asked about the row, Ms Davies-Jones told GB News: 'I want to be very clear with your viewers today that we do not recognise that figure at all. 'The Prime Minister has been forthright in saying that the true cost of this is that £3.4bn figure. It is less than 0.2 per cent of the defence budget, which is less than the cost of an aircraft carrier and all of that in order to keep national security safe. 'The United States are on board with this agreement to make sure that we can maintain that military base on Diego Garcia for national security. And we think that is what's needed in order to protect our British citizens.' The justice minister went on to add that she believed the Government was taking 'the right course of action' and had arrived at 'the right deal' with Mauritius. The £34.7bn sum is equivalent to 10 Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers, or more than half the annual schools budget. The Chagos Islands deal represents the first significant loss of British territory since Hong Kong became independent in 1997. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, has defended the handover by claiming a legally binding territorial judgement against the UK would have been 'inevitable' if the agreement with Mauritius was not reached. He has also touted it as proof that the UK is committed to meeting its obligations under international law.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
JD Vance visits farm shop owned by Tory donor's wife
JD Vance has been pictured visiting a Cotswolds farm shop owned by the wife of a Tory donor. The US vice-president visited Daylesford Farm, owned by Baroness Bamford, on Monday during his holiday in the Cotswolds. The businesswoman, who founded the Daylesford Organic farm shops chain, is the wife of Lord Bamford, the chairman of construction equipment manufacturer JCB. The Tory peer, his brother Mark, and their company have donated more than £10m to the Conservatives over the past 20 years. Lord Bamford reportedly gave £3.94m to the party during the 2019 election campaign. Boris Johnson's wedding to Carrie Symonds in 2022 was also held at Lord Bamford's 18th-century estate, Daylesford House, in Gloucestershire. Mr Vance arrived at Daylesford Farm Shop in a convoy of armoured cars. He was shown around by Lord Bamford and took interest in the bread counter, where he was seen trying samples during his three-hour visit. A room inside was closed off for Mr Vance to enjoy lunch before he left via a back door. The Daylesford Farm Shop sells a variety of high-end organic produce, including bread, meat, fish, and seasonal fruits and vegetables. It also provides ready-to-cook meals, organic wines, candles and skincare products. Mr Vance, his wife Usha and their three children, began their summer holiday in the UK being hosted by David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, at Chevening, his grace-and-favour country house in Kent. The vice-president's break has been peppered with official meetings on topics such as Ukraine and an intervention over the state of freedom of speech in Britain. On Sunday, the Vances were given exclusive access to Hampton Court Palace, the former home of Henry VIII. Mr Vance toured the grounds as a throng of tourists massed at the gates, watched over by secret service agents.
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
UK nuclear safety rules to be relaxed to speed up new power plants
Ministers are preparing to relax Britain's nuclear safety rules after a government report found that a culture of 'gold-plating' and 'risk aversion' was responsible for huge delays and ballooning costs. In an effort to speed up the development of Sizewell C and a new generation of small modular reactors (SMR) ministers will pledge to take on the 'needless bureaucracy' that can add billions of pounds to the costs. A taskforce appointed by Sir Keir Starmer found that regulation in the nuclear sector had become unnecessarily 'complex and inconsistent' and 'lacked proportionality'. It said a 'culture of risk aversion' was inflating the costs and timescales of new clean power projects as well as increasing the cost of replacing the UK's nuclear deterrent. The report, first reported by The Times, called for 'more fundamental and meaningful changes' to environmental protections than ministers have so far been willing to countenance. It said fast-track planning processes should be introduced for a new generation of SMRs built to standard designs and that a ban on nuclear reactors in 'semi-urban' areas must be rethought. The government's change of approach comes amid growing concerns from industry that regulators are taking an overly cautious approach to the risks posed by nuclear power stations. In one case, developers of a planned nuclear power station in Wales were told they would have to install filters to reduce radioactive discharges equivalent to one fiftieth of the dose from a dental x-ray. Under current rules reactors must be designed so that, even in the event of a meltdown, the radiation released would be no greater than natural background levels found in Cornwall. This is an event with a likelihood of occurring once in a million years. In June the government announced that Rolls-Royce had been selected as the preferred bidder to build the country's first SMRs with £2.5 billion of government support. The decision came a decade after George Osborne, then chancellor, championed the technology and pledged government support to get it off the ground. Ministers have so far commissioned just three reactors, none expected before 2035. The Czech Republic chose Rolls-Royce to supply six SMRs within a year, with plans for up to six units from the mid-2030s. The taskforce is due to propose a number of specific recommendations to ministers in the autumn and government sources said the intention was to implement them rapidly. Miatta Fahnbulleh, the minister for energy consumers, said it was time for a 'new approach' to nuclear regulation. 'For too long, big British infrastructure projects have been held back by needless bureaucracy,' she said. 'It's time for a new approach to getting nuclear projects off the ground more quickly, and at a lower cost. We look forward to working with the expert taskforce to modernise outdated regulations so we can unlock growth, jobs and energy security for the British people.' • Hinkley Point C's soaring costs blamed on red tape Tom Greatrex, chief executive of the Nuclear Industry Association, said: 'If the UK is serious about energy security and creating good jobs, we need a regulatory framework that is more proportionate and built for delivery — one that upholds safety and public trust while giving investors the confidence to move at pace. 'Smarter regulation will mean projects are approved faster, built more efficiently, and delivered at lower cost to consumers. The nuclear industry stands ready to work with government and regulators to make that happen.'
