
Disabled people ‘could face extra annual costs of £15,000 by end of the decade'
Disability equality charity Scope has warned that Government concessions on welfare cuts will simply lead to a 'two-tier system' where 'huge numbers' of people in need are still out of pocket.
Its analysis has estimated average monthly costs – not taking into account welfare reforms – to cover extras such as higher energy bills or specialist mobility equipment, are likely to rise to £1,244 for disabled people in the UK, totalling almost £15,000 a year, by April 2029.
'The concessions put forward by Government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip. James Taylor, Scope
The annual disability price tag report comes just a day before MPs are expected to debate and vote on the Government's welfare reform Bill.
Ministers were forced into an eleventh-hour climbdown on Friday in the face of a major backbench rebellion, offering concessions on some aspects of Labour's proposed cuts plan.
The Government's original package, first presented in March, included restrictions on eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit.
But, in the face of pressure from more than 100 Labour MPs, the Government U-turned last week, saying existing claimants would be protected, with tightened eligibility only applying to new claimants.
While Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said his welfare reforms now strike 'the right balance', Scope argued the changes will still result in 'catastrophic cuts', with some disabled people protected and supported but others not.
The charity's latest report is based on analysis of the Family Resources Survey (FRS) and makes calculations using Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) inflation forecasts to show the likely extra costs faced by disabled people in the coming years.
It does not take into account the impact of the welfare reforms, with the charity warning that the figures highlight that those people who do not get Pip could end up in a 'precarious financial position and will still face high extra costs'.
It estimated extra costs for disabled people are currently at £1,095 a month, up from last year's price tag, which stood at £1,010.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has made concessions on his Bill in the face of opposition from Labour MPs (Paul Currie/PA)
Scope said benefits do not cover the entirety of these costs, with a current monthly shortfall of around £630, likely to rise to a £704 shortfall by the end of the decade.
James Taylor, executive director of strategy at Scope, said: 'Life costs an enormous amount more when you're disabled. Whether it's higher electricity bills because of medical equipment to power, or higher heating bills because of health conditions affected by the cold.
'Our latest analysis finds the price tag of disability is now £1,095 a month. A figure only set to increase in the coming years unless action is taken.
'The concessions put forward by Government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip.
'The Government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now, and properly co-produce with disabled people on how to reform our welfare system.'
Responding to the 'two-tier' claims from other critics last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'The changes that we are introducing will make sure existing claimants are unaffected, but we also all agree that there do need to be changes in the future to make sure that people who can work do, so we protect those who can't but we make the welfare state sustainable for the future.'
While all of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland.
The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.
A Government spokesperson said: 'We're delivering one of the biggest packages of welfare reforms in a generation – including scrapping the Work Capability Assessment, rebalancing Universal Credit, and investing in tailored employment support.
'Protecting people is a principle we will never compromise on, which is why we're delivering long-lasting and meaningful change that puts the welfare system on sustainable footing so the safety net will always be there for those who need it.
'We're restoring trust and fairness in the system, ensuring existing Pip claimants will be able to keep their award and putting the voice of sick or disabled people at the heart of our plans, whilst ramping up support to help them into work.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer's disability benefit concessions are not enough, says rebel Labour whip
The Labour whip who resigned in protest against disability benefit cuts has said Keir Starmer's concessions do not yet go far enough to win her over, as No 10 launched a fresh attempt to stem the revolt against its welfare bill. Vicky Foxcroft, who quit her frontbench role over the welfare bill a little more than a week ago, urged the government to work jointly on the changes with disabled people and to publish the review of the system before bringing in cuts. In an interview with the Guardian, Foxcroft said she had not made up her mind how to vote on Tuesday but would need assurances about further improvements. 'I would hope that actually we start to ensure we listen to disabled people and their organisations right across government. This isn't just about warm words. This is about making sure we get policy right,' she said. Starmer is facing a challenging 48 hours as No 10 battles to persuade Labour MPs to back the welfare bill now that the government has promised that current claimants of personal independence payment (Pip) will not be subject to proposed cuts. It also pledged that the health element of universal credit will rise at least in line with inflation. The Department for Work and Pensions will on Monday publish the terms of reference for a review of personal independence payment (Pip) to be undertaken by a minister, Stephen Timms, which the government says will be 'co-produced' with disabled people. It will set out £300m of employment support to be brought forward over the next three years, and publish draft regulations on the 'right to try' – allowing disabled people to try work without risking their financial support. Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, said: 'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our plan for change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.' However, critics of the welfare cuts will be looking carefully at the timetable for the Timms review, as many want to see it published before the reduction in Pip due in November this year. Alternatively, they want to see the cuts delayed until after the review of the system is published. Dozens of Labour MPs appear yet to be convinced, with estimates that 50 to 60 would like to see further changes, although one of the leading original critics, Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary, said she was now likely to back the legislation. Meg Hillier, the Treasury committee chair, has also switched to say she will back the bill, but many others are waiting to see further details. In her first interview since quitting, Foxcroft said it was 'good to hear that people won't be losing their benefits who are currently on them' but said there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement'. The MP said one of the biggest issues was the need for co-production with disabled people and disability groups, and that should have happened 'absolutely from the start'. 'This is the problem. And this is why a lot of people have said, 'Can we delay this? Can we pause this until we ensure that we properly get it right?' Right now, we're kind of tinkering in terms of things to make it the least worst situation we can, and we need to learn lessons from that and make sure that we get these things right going forward,' she said. The former shadow minister for disabled people said she would also like to see the Pathways to Work review by Timms published before the implementation of the bill that would bring in cuts. The 12-week consultation period began on 7 April. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Foxcroft said she did not see herself as a rebel and had not wanted to resign but felt welfare bill plans would hurt the most vulnerable and she knew she could not whip or vote for something she did not believe in. She said the whips had been 'raising … for months' that Labour MPs were not happy with the disability cuts and that potentially part of the problem for Downing Street had been 'maybe ensuring that you listen to what the chief whip says'. But she said it was important that the prime minister 'appreciates he needs to be in listening mode more … and I think you've got to really respect it when somebody does come out and say that'. Starmer acknowledged in an interview with the Sunday Times that he did not get a grip on the Labour rebellion over disability benefits earlier because he was focused on foreign affairs. The prime minister acknowledged he had not got it right, and said he would have wanted to make the concessions earlier. 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did,' Starmer said. 'I'm putting this as context rather than an excuse.' Foxcroft is one of dozens of Labour MPs who remain worried about the changes, despite concessions made by Kendall in a midnight email on Thursday. Marie Tidball, a Labour MP who has a disability and chairs two all-party groups on autism and disability, wrote in the Guardian on Sunday that she wanted the bill to be produced along with disabled people, to promise more consultation over the summer, and to do better on enabling more people to work. 'Fundamentally, I will be looking for further reassurances that the detail will fulfil Labour's manifesto commitments to disabled people,' she said. Olivia Blake, one of the few Labour MPs with a disclosed disability, also accused the government of creating an 'unethical two-tier system' by its welfare bill concessions – and urged rebels to stand firm. The Disability Labour-affiliated group is also asking all MPs to oppose the legislation. In another development, a legal opinion commissioned by the union Equity and given by Jamie Burton KC of Doughty Street Chambers, concluded that 'the aggressive measures set out in the government's proposals will inevitably result in very serious breaches of the UK's obligations under the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights.' He added: 'They are likely to be condemned by the treaty-monitoring bodies, who have become all too familiar with very similar reforms designed to cut the welfare bill and promote work, but which ultimately result in yet further and longstanding human rights violations for disabled people.' A DWP spokesperson said: 'The secretary of state has carefully considered, and will continue to consider, all her legal obligations and is satisfied that these reforms are lawful.'


Daily Record
27 minutes ago
- Daily Record
WASPI women call for State Pension age compensation to complete trio of UK Government U-turns
A State Pension age compensation scheme for WASPI women is due for debate in Parliament this week. Following concessions on Winter Fuel Payments and proposed changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP), the Women Against State Pension Inequality campaign (WASPI), is urging the UK Government to complete a trio of U-turns by reversing its decision not to compensate women impacted by changes to their State Pension age. WASPI say the final major 'political blunder' of the Labour Government should be made right. Angela Madden, Chair of Women Against State Pension Inequality, said: 'Winter Fuel Payments and the PIP are but two of Labour's major political mistakes and betrayals. Compensation to WASPI women should now make for a hat trick of U-turns.' Ms Madden added: 'The independent Ombudsman's report was clear in endorsing compensation for 1950s-born women. Ministers should stop wasting taxpayers' money fighting us in court and agree to honour that recommendation.' WASPI announced last week that they had secured a vital legal safeguard in their bid for a High Court challenge. The campaign is seeking a judicial review to force the UK Government to reconsider its decision to rule out a compensation package for women affected by the way changes to the State Pension age were communicated. On June 23, WASPI said a limit has been placed on the campaign's liability for Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) defence costs. WASPI said the DWP had agreed to a costs capping order, protecting each side in the event they lose. The campaigners previously said they had received an update to say that their case is arguable, setting them on course for a court hearing. A previous report by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO), published in March 2024, suggested compensation ranging between £1,000 and £2,950 could be appropriate for each of those affected. But in December 2024, the UK Government said that, while it accepted the ombudsman's finding of maladministration and apologised for there being a delay in writing to 1950s-born women, a blanket compensation scheme, which could cost taxpayers up to £10.5 billion, cannot be justified. Campaigners submitted arguments in February for a legal case challenging the decision not to compensate women. WASPI said the capping agreement limits its liability for UK Government legal costs to £60,000. But campaigners are continuing to ask supporters to contribute to its legal 'fighting fund,' saying they must raise enough to cover not only the capped costs, but those of the legal team fighting the case. WASPI chairwoman Angela Madden, explained: 'Without this safeguard, we faced a real risk of financial ruin - of effectively being silenced by the threat of Government legal bills running into hundreds of thousands of pounds. 'We now have the certainty we need to press on - but the costs of fighting this case remain very real.' She added: 'This is the fight of our lives.' A DWP spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on live litigation. We have apologised for there being a 28-month delay in writing to 1950s-born women. 'However, we do not agree with the ombudsman's approach to injustice or remedy and that is why we have decided not to pay compensation.' The Chair of the Backbench Business Committee recently confirmed there will be a parliamentary debate on a motion over 'financial redress for 1950s women impacted by the DWP maladministration of the State Pension ' this week. Bob Blackman confirmed the debate will take place on Thursday, July 3.


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour benefits cuts latest: Starmer battles to quell 50-strong MP rebellion with just hours left until vote
Sir Keir Starmer is launching a last-minute attempt to win over dozens of Labour MPs rebelling against his welfare reforms. Around 50 Labour MPs are still thought to be planning to vote against the bill in a crunch vote on Tuesday, despite the prime minister offering concessions on the legislation last week. The original welfare bill proposed to introduce a higher bar for eligibility for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip), and cut the health-related element of universal credit. But after more than 100 Labour MPs called for these changes to be scrapped, the government said its proposed rules will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. Plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit have also been rowed back, with all existing recipients to have their incomes protected in real terms. The Government will amend the Bill at the Commons committee stage to put the changes in place ahead of the second reading on Tuesday. However, it is estimated around 50 to 60 Labour MPs are still planning to rebel against the bill, with some saying the concessions are not enough. A minister did not answer when asked whether any Labour MPs that rebel over welfare this week will have the whip removed. Baronesss Jacqui Smith was asked by Times Radio whether rebels would have the whip removed, she told the station: 'I think what's important and from – as you say – from my experience as a former chief whip, is to keep talking, keep explaining the moves that the Government has already made to recognise some of the concerns.' Pushed again on whether the whip would be removed, she later said that people would hear more from ministers on Monday. Athena Stavrou30 June 2025 09:35 Starmer's disability benefit U-turn not enough, says rebel Labour whip Sir Keir Starmer 's £3bn U-turn on his planned welfare cuts does not go far enough, a leading rebel who quit her frontbench job over the changes has warned. The prime minister is still facing the prospect of around 50 Labour MPs voting against his welfare reforms, with former government whip Vicky Foxcroft among those calling for fresh concessions. Ms Foxcroft dramatically quit this month in protest at the plans, saying she could not back cuts that will harm disabled people. And, in an interview with The Guardian after Sir Keir's U-turn, she said it was 'good to hear that people won't be losing their benefits who are currently on them' but said there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement'. Athena Stavrou30 June 2025 09:33 Starmer battles to quell 50-strong MP rebellion with just hours left until vote Sir Keir Starmer is launching a last-minute attempt to win over dozens of Labour MPs rebelling against his welfare reforms. Around 50 Labour MPs are still thought to be planning to vote against the bill in a crunch vote on Tuesday, despite the prime minister offering concessions on the legislation last week. The original welfare bill proposed to introduce a higher bar for eligibility for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip), and cut the health-related element of universal credit. But after more than 100 Labour MPs called for these changes to be scrapped, the government said its proposed rules will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. Athena Stavrou30 June 2025 09:31