logo
California homeowners rejected a property tax. Now, fire districts struggle

California homeowners rejected a property tax. Now, fire districts struggle

Yahoo07-08-2025
Multimillion dollar homes around Folsom Lake in Granite Bay offer exclusive views.
The tree-lined neighborhoods in the suburb — containing the Sacramento region's highest median household income — is at a very high fire risk, according to Cal Fire.
Yet, 53.1% of residents in this wealthy enclave rejected Proposition 218, a fee on properties, in 2022 to raise money for the South Placer Fire District, the local station serving Granite Bay, Loomis and southern portions of Penryn and Newcastle. Two stations out of six shut down in September 2022 as funding streams failed to keep apace with expenditures.
Firefighters for years have raised the alarm about fire protection districts pinching pennies as scant dollars cannot cover soaring costs of fire trucks and equipment. Industry standards recommend replacing each after a certain amount of years to protect first responder. A fire truck can cost $1 million, which at times, can be impossible to buy for small, rural fire protection districts, such as those scattered across Yolo County.
But agencies in well-populated areas — such as Granite Bay and Truckee — also contend with financial shortages. The problems, five fire district chiefs across Yolo and Placer counties say, stem from referendums about taxes and legislative decisions made in the last century which whittled away money.
Prop. 13 limited property tax gathering; Prop. 172 created a public safety sales tax for first responders, but none went to Placer County fire protection districts; and the Legislature also earmarked a certain portion of property taxes must flow to schools.
'How do we keep going in the face of what seems to be a daunting task of the increasing cost?' said South Placer Fire District Chief Mark Duerr, who serves about 38,000 people.
On Tuesday, this struggle reemerged at the Placer County Board of Supervisors. Wayne Nader, a former board member for the North Auburn and Ophir Fire Safe Council, raised concerns during public comment about the difficulties of buying a ladder truck which he said could cost $3 million and take years for it to be delivered.
Fire protection districts are categorized as special districts and only serve a county's unincorporated areas. They are independent from a county's budget and reliant upon funds raised by its communities.
Placer County does not directly give money to fire districts out of its $1.4 billion budget, but has offered support to firefighters by waiving the cost of special elections and offering dispatch services for free, said county spokesperson Chris Gray-Garcia.
Unless changes are made, fire chiefs said, fire protection districts could face increasing challenges to provide services.
'I cannot fathom a world that exists in the next three to five years where small one to two stations can afford to operate,' Duerr said.
How Prop. 13 cut away funding
There have been three cost measures the Placer Hills Protection Fire District — which serves the communities of Applegate, Meadow Vista, Weimar, Clipper Gap and Eden Valley — embarked on in recent years to meet costs.
Residents in the 34 square miles approved Measure A in 2019 to levy a special property tax. The district, containing about 12,500 residents, also approved raises in 2020 and in 2024 to raise fire impact fees.
But those increases do not come close to offsetting capital costs, said Placer Hills Fire Protection District Mark D'Ambrogi in an interview. Residents have been supportive, willing to fork over $300 to $400 per year for medical services and fire protection measures, said Alex Harvey, a Placer Hills Protection Fire District board member.
'There comes a point, though, when you can't keep taking money,' Harvey said.
The main concern for fire chiefs boils down to how exactly Prop. 13 is allocated. California voters approved Prop. 13 in 1978, a watershed decision, limiting property taxes collected by local government.
Before Prop. 13 was approved, municipalities could determine it's own property tax rate based on the land's market value, or the monetary value it would be sold for, according to the California Legislative Analyst's Office. But the new referendum capped property taxes while only assessing properties based on its value at the time of purchase.
'As a result, under Proposition 13 the taxable value of most properties is less than their market value,' according to the Legislative Analyst's Office.
In the South Placer Fire District, only 5 cents from every $1 collected of property tax goes to special districts and distributed to all special districts across Placer County, Duerr said.
There's also a disparity across the fire districts who receive funding. The Placer Hills Fire Protection District gets about 6 cents, while the Newcastle Fire Protection District gets about 3 cents, D'Ambrogi said.
This division in property tax has led to lawsuit between one fire district and Placer County.
The Truckee Fire Protection District — which serves Truckee and other unincorporated areas of Placer and Nevada counties — filed a lawsuit earlier this year alleging Placer County is 'withholding at least $200,000 per year of property taxes from Truckee Fire needed to fund its essential fire safety and medical services.'
The lawsuit alleges county officials withheld property taxes from Martis Valley and areas called 'Zone 7,' required to be allocated under Prop. 13 and Assembly Bill 8, the legislation which codified the tax referendum.
'After years of failed efforts to persuade Placer County to honor the law, Truckee Fire now seeks judicial assistance in righting this historic wrong — before it is too late to protect its communities from wildfire,' according to the lawsuit filed in February.
Placer County denied the allegations, and said enough time has passed that some allegations listed in the lawsuit fail to 'constitute a cause of action,' according to the county's court documents.
In addition, none of the funding allocated for public safety agencies under Prop. 172 in Placer County. The referendum, approved in 1993, created a half-cent sales tax to law enforcement.
The Placer County Sheriff's Office receives the largest amount, with about $46 million, according to the county.
Truckee Fire Chief Kevin McKechnie serves a large district which grows around peak travel times as tourists flock to beautiful California resort. In the summer and winter, the population triples to about 60,000 people, he said.
He commended his community for passing Measure T in 2021, which placed a $179 tax per parcel, and will sunset in eight years. Money raised under this measure can only be spent on fuel reduction and wildfire prevention projects.
But the voter-approved initiative does not allow him to buy fire trucks, pay firefighters or fix stations.
'It's one of the best tools I have right now,' McKechnie said. 'But it is limited.'
Dual worries weigh on McKechnie. To sufficiently provide services to his community, the same personnel must operate different types of equipment, which require different skillset.
He also seeks to buy new fire trucks, some of which he's had for 30 years. But funds are scarce.
'I gotta be honest with you,' he said, 'I don't have a plan for that.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proposed congressional maps in California could help Democrats flip 5 seats
Proposed congressional maps in California could help Democrats flip 5 seats

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Proposed congressional maps in California could help Democrats flip 5 seats

Proposed new congressional maps in California that are expected to be put to voters in a special election this fall indicate the redrawn district lines could help Democrats flip five Republican seats and bolster around five Democratic incumbents in toss-up districts. The new maps, posted on the California State Assembly website on Friday evening, are draft proposals and are subject to be changed or reworked by the state legislature, which is set to start working next week. The legislative action follows California Gov. Gavin Newsom's call on Thursday for a special election on new maps, in an attempt to counter mid-decade redistricting being pushed by Republicans in Texas. MORE: California will move forward with redistricting vote to counter Texas, Newsom says The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the campaign arm of House Democrats, took credit Friday for submitting the maps to the California legislature, saying in a statement they believe they will have widespread support among California legislators and voters. "We anticipate this proposal will have widespread support both among California office holders and various stakeholders across the state," DCCC Executive Director Julie Merz said in a statement. "We will not stand by as Republicans attempt to rig the election in their favor and choose their voters. It's increasingly clear that Republicans will do anything to protect their narrow majority because they know they can't win on their disastrous legislative record which has raised costs and rips away health care for millions, all to give the ultra-wealthy a tax break." Paul Mitchell, a redistricting and data expert who drew the maps, told ABC News San Francisco station KGO-TV in an interview on Friday afternoon before the draft maps were posted online that eight of the proposed redrawn districts are unchanged; another 20 are changed very little, and that overall the goal was "pushing back on Texas without doing something that would radically disrupt the congressional district lines." MORE: Texas Democrats to return after governor ends special session that included redistricting, sources say Mitchell added that beyond making five Republican-held seats favor Democrats -- as a counter to the proposed congressional maps in Texas that could flip five seats to favor Republicans -- the proposal also strengthens the districts of around five Democratic "frontline candidates" who face more difficult challenges from Republicans. "[The legislature has] got some time next week to put it together, along with all the other language for a statewide ballot measure. And I think the point for voters is, this is a way to push back on what Texas Republicans are doing, on what Trump is doing," Mitchell told KGO-TV. Republicans continue to cry foul, saying that Newsom's gambit for new maps is politically motivated. NRCC chair Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) wrote in a statement before the proposed maps were posted: "Gavin Newsom failed to solve the homelessness, crime, drug, and cost epidemics plaguing the Golden State. Now he is shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters to prop up his Presidential ambitions. "Californians oppose Newsom's stunt because they won't let a self-serving politician rig the system to further his career. The NRCC is prepared to fight this illegal power grab in the courts and at the ballot box to stop Newsom in his tracks."

Democrats release plan to boost party's California US House seats in fight for Congress
Democrats release plan to boost party's California US House seats in fight for Congress

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats release plan to boost party's California US House seats in fight for Congress

LOS ANGELES (AP) — In a display of cutthroat yet calculated politics, Democrats unveiled a proposal Friday that could give California's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control of Congress next year. The plan calls for an unusually timed reshaping of House district lines to greatly strengthen the Democratic advantage in the state ahead of midterm elections, when Republicans will be defending a fragile majority. It amounts to a counterpunch to Texas, where the GOP is trying to add five seats to its House delegation at the urging of President Donald Trump as he tries to avoid losing control of Congress and, with it, prospects for his conservative agenda in the later part of his term. If approved by voters in November, the California blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state. The Democratic plan is intended to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43. The campaign arm of House Democrats, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, released the maps Friday, and the Democratic-led Legislature later posted them online. State lawmakers plan to hold hearings and vote on the new maps next week. 'This is about more than drawing lines on a map. It's about drawing a line in the sand to stop Texas and Trump from rigging the election,' state Senate Democratic leader Mike McGuire said in a statement. New districts have boundaries to boost Democratic edge While a general notion behind drawing districts is to unite what's called communities of interest — neighborhoods and cities that share similar concerns or demographic traits — the proposed remapping would create a jigsaw of oddly shaped districts to maximize Democratic clout. The 1st Congressional District is currently anchored in the state's conservative far northeast corner and is represented by Republican Rep. Doug LaMalfa, a Trump supporter. The district has a nearly 18-point GOP registration edge. Under the proposal, Democrats would end up with a 10-point registration advantage there after drastic reshaping to include parts of heavily Democratic Sonoma County near the Pacific Coast. In a post on the social platform X, LaMalfa called the proposal 'absolutely ridiculous.' In the battleground 41st District east of Los Angeles, home to long-serving Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, Democratic and Republican registration is currently split about evenly. But in the redrawn district, Democratic registration would jump to 46% with GOP registration falling to 26%. Other Republicans whose districts would see major changes intended to favor Democrats include Reps. Kevin Kiley in Northern California, David Valadao in the Central Valley farm belt and Darrell Issa in San Diego County. Also, embattled Democratic incumbents would see their districts padded with additional left-leaning voters. Newsom promises fight with Trump Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country,' Newsom said. The announcement marked the first time any state beyond Texas officially waded into Trump's fight, though several governors and legislative leaders from both parties have threatened such moves. Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, who heads the House GOP campaign arm, accused Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, of 'shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters.' 'Californians oppose Newsom's stunt because they won't let a self-serving politician rig the system to further his career,' said Hudson, who heads the National Republican Congressional Committee. The looming question: How will voters react? A big risk for Democrats is whether voters will be open to setting aside district boundaries crafted by an independent commission for ones shaped for partisan advantage. Some people already have said they would sue over the effort. Republican former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a longtime opponent of partisan redistricting, signaled that he will not side with Democrats even after talking to Newsom. He posted a photo of himself Friday at the gym wearing a T-shirt that said, 'Terminate gerrymandering.' 'I'm getting ready for the gerrymandering battle,' Schwarzenegger said. What's next in Texas? The release of the plan came the same day that Texas Republicans began a second special session to approve new congressional maps sought by Trump. The first special session ended without approving new maps, thwarted by Democrats who staged a nearly two-week walkout that meant not enough lawmakers were present to pass any legislation. Gov. Greg Abbott then called a second session that started without the necessary quorum to conduct business. Absent lawmakers have said they will return to Austin once California Democrats take more formal steps on their own redistricting plan. Trump is trying to avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms, when the GOP yielded control during his first presidency to a Democratic majority that stymied his agenda and twice impeached him. The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of the resulting battle, which has reached into multiple courtrooms and statehouses controlled by both parties. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows chided colleagues who left Austin, accusing them of 'following Gov. Newsom's lead instead of the will of Texans.' The speaker said, however, that he has 'been told' to expect a quorum Monday. House control could come down to a few seats in 2026 On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census — the last being in 2020. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions with the task. ___ Nguyễn reported from Sacramento, Blood from Los Angeles and Barrow from Atlanta. Associated Press writer David Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri, contributed. Michael R. Blood, Trân Nguyễn, Nadia Lathan And Bill Barrow, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store