
Karnataka Govt suspends senior IFS officer R Gokul over stand on forest land donated to HMT Ltd in Bengaluru
The government issued the suspension order stating that 'in exercise of the powers under Rule 3(1) (a) of the All India Service (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1969, Sri R. Gokul, IFS, Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests & Director General, EMPRI, Bengaluru, is placed under suspension with immediate effect, pending inquiry.'
The reason for Gokul's suspension has been cited as his actions regarding the 'denotification of lands granted to HMT measuring 443 Acres 6 guntas situated at Peenya Jalahalli Plantation'. According to the government order, an interlocutory application was filed by forest officials before the Supreme Court in 2020 'without obtaining the approval of the then minister-in-charge or sanction from the state cabinet' for permission to denotify 443.6 acres of land granted to HMT at the Peenya Jalahalli Plantation.
Initially, the state government issued notices to Sandeep Dave, a retired IAS officer and the former additional chief secretary for Forest, Ecology and Environment; Vijay Kumar Gogi, retired IFS officer and the former principal secretary for Forest, Ecology and Environment; Smitha Bijjur, IFS, ex-principal secretary, Forest, Ecology and Environment and Gokul.
The government has reported receiving replies to the notices from three of the four officers (other than Sandeep Dave) but said that Gokul had written to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) after receiving his notice 'seeking protection' in an illegal mining case from the 2010 period where he is a key witness against a mafia that was operated by political figures.
The IFS officer also did not obtain permission or inform the government when he filed an 'Intervention Application (113311/2025) in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India against IA (190307/2024 WP (C) 337/1995) filed by the State Government in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India for withdrawal of the IA (60477/2020 in WP (C) 337/1995) related to the de-notification of lands belonging to HMT Ltd,' said the suspension order.
The government order said the conduct of Gokul 'is in violation of Rule 17 of All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, and the State Government is prima facie satisfied that it is necessary' to place him under suspension with immediate effect.
Last week, Karnataka Minister for Forest and Environment Eshwar Khandre announced that the government had recommended action against two serving IFS officers, one retired IFS officer, and one retired IAS officer for filing of an application in the Supreme Court 'seeking permission for denotification of HMT forest land worth over Rs. 14,000 crore'.
'This plantation is owned by HMT. It is illegal for the organisation to sell to government departments/organisations and private individuals. However, the fact that forest officials did not make any attempt to recover the land and, without even drawing the attention of the Cabinet, submitted an Interim Application (IA) to the Supreme Court seeking denotification in 2020 is a cause for doubt,' Khandre has said.
The controversy pertains to 599 acres of land in a plantation in the Peenya Jalahalli region in North Bengaluru, which was declared a forest in 1896 and was later transferred to HMT in the 1960s to create industrial infrastructure through a donation deed by the district collector. In recent years, large portions of the land given to HMT by the forest department for industrial purposes have been used to facilitate major real estate projects through the connivance of state and central government officials.
Over the last year, a dispute arose over the land between the Union Heavy Industries Ministry headed by H D Kumaraswamy, who is looking at monetising the land to resuscitate the fortunes of HMT, and the state forest department, which is trying to recover the HMT land by arguing that it remains a forest land.
In November last year, the Karnataka Government issued notices to the forest officials concerned over the filing of the IA in the SC on the HMT forest land. In January this year, the state government ordered that since 281 acres of the 599 acres of land donated to HMT is vacant land 'without any building,' the forest department must take possession of the vacant forest land.
Over 200 acres of the HMT land in Bengaluru have been handed over to private players and others, even as HMT Ltd has collapsed in the last four decades. One of the major transfers of land happened between 1999 and 2004 when the Congress was in power, leading to the construction of apartment complexes by some of the big real estate developers of Bengaluru.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Rs 4.25 lakh stolen from prison-run cafeteria near Poojappura central jail in major security breach
THIRUVANTHAPURAM: In a shocking security lapse, Rs 4.25 lakh was stolen from the office of the cafeteria being run by prison inmates right near the Poojappura central prison on Sunday night. The Poojappura police said they received a complaint of theft from the prison officials on Monday morning. "The theft reportedly took place on Sunday night. When the prison staff came on Monday morning, they noticed that the cash was missing, " said a police officer. The cash which was from the last three days sale was to be deposited in the treasury on Monday. The culprit/culprits broke open the door of the cafeteria, known as 'Food for Freedom', and decamped with the cash that was kept in the locker. The police said they have started a probe and the investigation is in the preliminary phase. The police sources said someone having intimate knowledge of the place could've carried out the crime. The cops are perusing CCTV visuals from nearby buildings to identify the culprits. The cafeteria, shockingly, did not have any working CCTV cameras.


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
What happens to your credit score if you close an unused credit card
Banks evaluate the rewards program for their existing credit cards regularly. They also keep launching new credit cards regularly based on the evolving customer preferences. So, a change in the rewards program on your existing credit card or the introduction of a new credit card may make you wonder whether you should close an existing credit card and/or apply for a new credit card. In this article, we will look at some of the reasons why people close their old/unused credit cards and their impact on the credit score. There are various reasons why people close their credit cards. In the last few years, there has been a steady shift in why customers close their credit cards. The decision is no longer just about dissatisfaction. It's about economics, evolving benefits, better alternatives, etc. Some of the reasons why people close their old/unused credit cards include the following. High annual fees: Some banks give some of their credit cards as first-year free (FYF). In the case of some banks, they charge the first-year fee. But, in return, they provide adequate welcome benefits that compensate the cardholder for the fee paid. Some banks charge the first-year fee. However, the joining fee is reversed if the cardholder spends a specified amount in the first 90 days or so of card issuance. In all the above scenarios, the cardholder gets a chance to use the features and benefits of the card in the first year without feeling the impact of the joining fee. The bank levies the annual or renewal fee from the 2nd year onwards. Most banks link the reversal of the annual or renewal fee with the spending in the previous card anniversary year. If the cardholder is not able to achieve those spends, they have to pay the annual or renewal fee. Customers holding multiple cards for different types of spending often miss the milestone spends for the annual fee waiver. If the annual fee is high and there are no or inadequate renewal benefits, the cardholder opts to close the credit card. Rewards program devaluation: When a new credit card is launched, the bank usually offers a higher reward rate to attract new customers. Once the bank achieves a specific number of cardholders or market share, it re-evaluates the rewards program. Some of the changes they may make can include: A reduction in the reward points for every Rs. 100 spent for all categories or specific categories, exclusion of specific categories from earning reward points, capping on monthly reward points that can be earned, reduction in the redemption value per reward point, reduction in the ratio for transfer of reward points to partners, etc. If the rewards program is massively devalued in one or multiple categories as mentioned above, there may be little to no case left for continuing with the card. In such a scenario, the customer may close the credit card before renewal. For example, in September 2023, the Axis Bank Magnus Credit Card saw a devaluation in its rewards program. Some of these devaluations include discontinuation of the monthly milestone benefit of 25,000 EDGE Reward Points on Rs. 1 lakh monthly spends, downward revision in the transfer ratio from 5:4 to 5:2 for transfer of EDGE Reward Points to various airline and hotel partners. Some features have been reduced or withdrawn: Many credit cards offer various features and benefits like a specific percentage discount on a specific merchant/category, BOGO offer on movies, complimentary airport/railway lounge access, complimentary golf access, airport meet and greet service, complimentary annual memberships (Amazon Prime, Swiggy One, etc.), etc. While these features and benefits add value to the customer, they come at a cost to the bank. From time to time, banks review the features and benefits offered on the cards. The bank may reduce or remove one or more benefits to make the program sustainable so that it can be offered for the long term. What if the customer has taken a credit card specifically for a particular benefit, and that benefit has been substantially reduced or taken away completely? There is no case to continue with the card. Loss of key features plays a role in card closure. Complimentary airport lounge access, for example, became a marquee benefit a few years back. Over the last couple of years, most banks have either linked complimentary airport lounge access to monthly/quarterly spends, reduced the number of complimentary lounge accesses, or discontinued it. Such changes prompt customers to rethink whether the card is worth keeping. For example, effective 15th July 2025, the EazyDiner Credit Card saw a major devaluation in the features and benefits. Some of these devaluations included a capping of Rs. 2,000 on the monthly discount, discontinuation of complimentary airport lounge access, discontinuation of the BOGO offer on movie tickets, etc. The credit limit is low: There can be a difference between the proposed and actual limit given on a credit card. When the customer avails of a pre-approved credit card offer and gets a lower credit limit than expected, it is disappointing. In such a case, the customer may not activate the card at all. As per RBI rules, if the card is not activated within 37 days of issuance, it must be closed automatically. 'At ZET Partner, which is our B2B2C distribution business, we see roughly 5–8% of customers closing cards simply because they are unhappy with the credit limit,' said Manish Shara, Co-founder and CEO, ZET. ZET is on a mission to help 400 million unserved and underserved Indians build their credit score and enhance their financial health. Sometimes, the bank reduces the credit limit on existing credit cards for its customers. For example, if the bank perceives a difficult macro situation, it may reduce the credit limit for several credit card customers as a precautionary measure. At times, if the bank systems flag risks due to a strange behaviour by an individual credit cardholder, the bank may reduce the credit limit for that particular cardholder. Better cards are available: From time to time, banks introduce new credit cards with better features and benefits compared to existing ones in the market. In such a scenario, the customers may apply for the new credit cards to enjoy better features and benefits. It leaves existing cards unused, leading to their closure. In the earlier section, we understood some of the reasons why customers close their credit cards. Let us now look at the impact of credit card closure on the credit score. Increase in the credit utilisation ratio: The credit utilisation ratio measures the percentage of the credit limit being used from the total credit limit available. For example, a cardholder has a credit limit of Rs. 10 lakhs across all credit cards and spends Rs. 2 lakhs/month with them. In this case, the credit utilisation ratio of the cardholder is 20%. When you close a credit card(s) and maintain the same monthly spending, your credit utilisation ratio will increase. Continuing our earlier example, suppose the cardholder closes two credit cards with a total credit limit of Rs. 5 lakhs. The cardholder will be left with a credit limit of Rs. 5 lakhs across the remaining credit cards. If the cardholder continues spending Rs. 2 lakhs/month, the credit utilisation ratio will increase to 40% from the earlier 20%. Credit Information Companies (CICs) like CRIF High Mark use the credit utilisation ratio as one of the parameters for calculating the credit score. A credit utilisation ratio of 30% or lower contributes positively towards increasing the credit score. On the other hand, a credit utilisation ratio of more than 30% contributes to decreasing the credit score. 'The impact of closing a credit card depends largely on the credit utilisation ratio. After credit card closure, if your overall utilisation ratio crosses around 40%, the effect starts turning negative. At a 50–75% credit utilisation ratio, your score can drop by 20–50 points. Between a 75–90% credit utilisation ratio, the drop in credit score may be 50–75 points. Above a 90% credit utilisation ratio, you could lose more than 75 points almost immediately,' adds Manish Shara. Reduces the length of the credit history: When you close an old credit card, it reduces the length of your credit history. Credit age is one of the parameters that goes into calculating the credit score. A higher credit age contributes positively to increasing the credit score. On the other hand, the closure of an old credit card contributes to decreasing the credit score. 'Closing your oldest card can shorten your credit history, which influences how lenders view your stability. While it may be sensible to close newer unused cards, it is rarely wise to close your longest-held account,' adds Manish Shara. We have discussed how closing an old credit card can increase your credit utilisation ratio and reduce the length of your credit history. Both, these factors impact your credit score negatively. So, what can you do instead? You can request the bank to make the credit card lifetime free instead of closing it. Once the card becomes a lifetime free card, you need not worry about closing it. All you need to do is do a small transaction every few months to keep the card active. Also, if you have to close an old credit card, there will be a short-term impact on your credit score. However, when you continue making regular, timely bill payments and maintain a credit utilisation ratio at 30% or lower, the credit score will recover in the next few months. 'The takeaway is simple: the decision to close a card should be strategic, not emotional. We advise customers to weigh the benefits lost against the potential impact on their credit profile. We tell them to always consider how it affects both utilisation and credit age, before taking the final call,' concludes Manish Shara. Gopal Gidwani is a freelance personal finance content writer with 15+ years of experience. He can be reached at LinkedIn. Disclaimer: Mint has a tie-up with fintechs for providing credit; you will need to share your information if you apply. These tie-ups do not influence our editorial content. This article only intends to educate and spread awareness about credit needs like loans, credit cards, and credit scores. Mint does not promote or encourage taking credit, as it comes with a set of risks such as high interest rates, hidden charges, etc. We advise investors to discuss with certified experts before taking any credit. For all personal finance updates, visit here.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
23 minutes ago
- Business Standard
When can you tap into your PF savings? EPFO withdrawal rules explained
From job loss to medical bills or marriage, know when and how much you can withdraw from your provident fund without hurting your retirement savings Amit Kumar New Delhi The Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) is designed to secure your retirement, but life often brings expenses that need urgent attention. The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) allows subscribers to withdraw from their provident fund account under certain conditions, though experts advise using this option sparingly, as it reduces your retirement corpus. What is EPF and how much do you contribute? Private sector employees enrolled under EPF contribute 12 per cent of their basic salary plus dearness allowance each month. Employers make a matching contribution. For FY25, the interest rate has been fixed at 8.25 per cent. · Partial withdrawal (advance for specific needs) When can you withdraw PF money? EPFO allows withdrawal in the following situations: · Unemployment: If you are out of work for over one month, you may withdraw up to 75 per cent of your balance. After two months of unemployment, you can take the remaining amount. · Housing needs: After three years of membership, you can withdraw up to 90 per cent of your PF savings for purchasing or building a house. The amount can also be used for home loan repayment, subject to conditions. · Medical treatment: For self or dependents, you may withdraw the lower of six months' basic pay plus dearness allowance, or your own contribution with interest. · Marriage or education: After seven years of service, up to 50 per cent of your own contribution with interest can be withdrawn for a child's education beyond Class 10, or for marriage expenses. · Special cases: Advances may be taken if your employer has closed the establishment or delayed salary for over two months. Things to keep in mind · Withdrawals before completing five years of service may attract tax. However, withdrawals below Rs 50,000 are exempt from TDS. · You do not need to withdraw funds when changing jobs. With an active Universal Account Number (UAN), balances can be transferred seamlessly. · Final settlement can be claimed at age 58, when members retire. How to apply for EPF? Members can apply for withdrawal online via the EPFO portal using their UAN, or offline through the Composite Claim Form (Aadhaar or non-Aadhaar). While EPF withdrawals can be a lifeline during emergencies or big-ticket expenses, financial planners caution against using them frequently. Each withdrawal chips away at your retirement savings, money that could otherwise grow steadily with compounding interest.