Tariff Legal Battle Plays Out
Reverse, reverse: Yesterday, I reported that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade had issued a ruling that would put a pause on President Donald Trump's tariffs announced on "Liberation Day," as well as those levied on Canada, Mexico, and China the month prior.
"The decision would have forced the Trump administration to unwind many of the president's steep tariffs over the next 10 days, but the government quickly petitioned a federal appeals court to intervene," reports The New York Times. The administration "asked a panel of judges to hold that order at bay while it weighed the administration's fuller arguments that its tariffs were lawful." This bid was successful, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a pause yesterday, allowing the tariffs to remain in place. This essentially gives the courts more time to consider the legal issues at play and to determine what type of authority the administration has, in a case that will probably be ruled on by the Supreme Court.
The case hinges on whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law that Trump has invoked, allows him to levy tariffs. The IEEPA gives the executive sweeping authority "to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy or economy" of the country. Trump has, of course, made bold "national security" arguments in an attempt to politically make the case for tariffs: First, the flow of fentanyl through our country's borders justified the imposition of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and—most especially—China. Then, national security arguments were used to justify further ratcheting-up of tariffs on China, with the administration arguing that the risk of relations with China souring at some point in the future means we must take steps to reshore critical industries right now. And, more broadly, the current trade deficit we run with many other countries has been portrayed as a threat to American competitiveness—whether true or false.
This is the first time IEEPA has been used by a president to impose tariffs, though. In the past "presidents have imposed tariffs in response to national security threats using Section 232 of a 1962 trade law," reports The New York Times. "That legal provision differs from IEEPA in part because it requires an investigation and report that has to be issued within 270 days. The provision also focuses on certain imports that 'threaten to impair' U.S. national security." In other words, there are slightly more strings attached when done via that mechanism, and the tariffs are generally expected to be more targeted and narrow in scope.
You might expect the administration to be in a sort of waiting posture, given that Trump's use of the IEEPA might at a future date be struck down by the Supreme Court. Instead, Trump has decided to attack the judges who initially ruled against his use of the act, asking "Where do these initial three Judges come from?…Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?'"
Well, for Judge Timothy Reif—a Trump appointee—probably not. Trump, never one to take responsibility for his choices or appreciate the independence of the judiciary, appears to recognize his culpability in appointing Reif (who committed the heresy of ruling against him!) and has now taken to attacking the Federalist Society, which helped recommend conservative judges during his first term.
More deportations in defiance of court orders: Earlier this month, a panel of federal judges with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals granted Salvadoran man Jordin Melgar-Salmeron permission to remain in the United States while his immigration case made its way through the court system. Twenty-eight minutes after that ruling was issued, Melgar-Salmeron was on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) flight from Louisiana, where he was being detained, to El Salvador's Izalco prison. "ICE officials argue in court filings that a communication breakdown left them unaware of the court's order until after his flight had departed," reports Investigative Post. His lawyer "said he plans to seek criminal contempt of court charges against the Trump administration. Such a request is due in court June 2."
I'm sorry, I love him: "After denouncing it as a propaganda tool for the left, Argentina's libertarian President Javier Milei is relaunching a state-run TV channel for kids set to feature a cartoon teaching free market economics while stressing the evils of taxes and communism," reports Bloomberg. The channel is Paka Paka, which was originally created by former President Cristina Kirchner in 2010, and it will soon start showing Dragon Ball Z, Tuttle Twins, and Zamba, a cartoon about history. "Thrilled to announce that Tuttle Twins will be coming to millions of Argentine kids on Paka Paka!" write the show's creators on X. "They're replacing literal Marxist cartoons with hilarious education about freedom, economics and individual rights."
"On the series, Ethan and Emily Tuttle travel through time and space with their libertarian grandma to learn about the glories of capitalism," adds Bloomberg. "In one episode, the siblings discover the evils of government overreach in a ravaged, garbage-strewn Cuba run by Fidel Castro. In another, they realize money loses its value when governments print too much." Here's a sampling:
Obviously, the best possible approach would be no state-run TV at all. But Milei is probably correct that decades of Peronism have led to plenty of citizens having an insufficient appreciation for free markets. If these cartoons can help restore a little bit of balance, then that may be a good thing.
My hopes that THC products will become legal here have been somewhat dashed, with Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick going on quite the tirade against them earlier this week.
"Roughly a half-dozen GOP lawmakers from Pennsylvania and other states with U.S. Steel operations launched a series of meetings and group text chains shortly after Trump's November election victory, developing a plan to pitch his top economic officials on the merits of the [Nippon Steel] sale," reports Politico. "Eventually, and somewhat unexpectedly, they got an audience with the president himself. The message the group delivered: If the incoming president did not reverse his predecessor, Joe Biden's, decision to block Nippon Steel's purchase of the country's second-largest steel producer, it would lead to major manufacturing job losses in Pennsylvania and other states in the steel production supply chain."
"China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!," Trump wrote on Truth Social this morning, portending escalations in the trade war. It's not clear which violations Trump is referring to.
Lol:
Just wildly unhinged takes from someone who used to be employed by The New York Times and The Washington Post (and we wonder why trust in media is low!):
The post Tariff Legal Battle Plays Out appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘60 Minutes' has history of cozy interviews and self-promotion
Beware of those who publicly declare that their stuff doesn't stink. Recently, CBS newsman and '60 Minutes' regular Scott Pelley made news and noise when he seized the close of the venerable program to deliver an appeal, threat or whatever, depending on how one heard it, to CBS News parent Paramount, as it was reportedly preparing to settle a lawsuit brought last year by President Trump over the show's very cozy interview with VP Kamala Harris during last year's presidential campaign. Pelley cited the week's resignation of '60 Minutes' executive producer, Bill Owens, adding, 'Paramount began to supervise our content in new ways. None of our stories has been blocked, but Bill felt he lost the independence that honest journalism requires. … Bill made sure they were accurate and fair. Advertisement 'He was tough that way, but our parent company Paramount is trying to complete a merger. The Trump administration must approve it.'
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spike in steel tariffs could imperil Trump promise of lower grocery prices
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's doubling of tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum could hit Americans in an unexpected place: grocery aisles. The announcement Friday of a staggering 50% levy on those imports stoked fear that big-ticket purchases from cars to washing machines to houses could see major price increases. But those metals are so ubiquitous in packaging, they're likely to pack a punch across consumer products from soup to nuts. 'Rising grocery prices would be part of the ripple effects,' says Usha Haley, an expert on trade and professor at Wichita State University, who added that the tariffs could raise costs across industries and further strain ties with allies 'without aiding a long-term U.S. manufacturing revival.' Trump's return to the White House has come with an unrivaled barrage of tariffs, with levies threatened, added and, often, taken away, in such a whiplash-inducing frenzy it's hard to keep up. He insisted the latest tariff hike was necessary to 'even further secure the steel industry in the U.S.' That promise, though, could be at odds with his pledge to reduce food costs. Rising grocery prices, Trump has said, were among the biggest reasons voters swung his way. A look around a supermarket makes clear how many products could be impacted by new taxes on steel and aluminum, from beer and soda to dog food to can after can of beans, fruit, tomato paste and more. 'It plays into the hands of China and other foreign canned food producers, which are more than happy to undercut American farmers and food producers,' insists Can Manufacturers Institute president Robert Budway. 'Doubling the steel tariff will further increase the cost of canned goods at the grocery store.' Budway says production by domestic tin mill steel producers, whose products are used in cans, have dramatically decreased in recent years, making manufacturers reliant on imported materials. When those prices go up, he says, 'the cost is levied upon millions of American families.' Food companies were already warily assessing the administration's tariffs before the latest hike, which Trump said would go into effect on Wednesday. The Campbell Co., whose soup cans are a staple for millions of Americans, has said it was working to mitigate the impact of tariffs but may be forced to raise prices. ConAgra Brands, which puts everything from cans of Reddi-Whip to cooking sprays like Pam on supermarket shelves, likewise has pointed to the impact steel and aluminum tariffs have. 'We can't get all of our materials from the US because there's no supply,' ConAgra CFO David Marberger said at a recent Goldman Sachs conference on global staples. Beyond the obvious products — canned foods like tuna, chicken broth and cranberry sauce — economists warn of a spillover effect that tariffs can have on a gamut of items. If the cost to build a store or buy a truck to haul food rise, the prices of products may follow. Most Americans will never buy a tractor, but Babak Hafezi, who runs a global consulting firm and teaches international business at American University, says a price spike in such a big-ticket item vital to food production will spill down to all sorts of other items. 'If a John Deere tractor costs 25% more, consumers pay the price for that,' Hafezi says. 'This trickles down the economy and impacts every aspect of the economy. Some of the trickling is immediate and others are slower to manifest themselves. But yes, prices will increase and choices will decrease.' Trump appeared before a crowd of cheering steelworkers to unveil the new tariffs at a rally outside Pittsburgh. In a statement, David McCall, president of the United Steelworkers International union, called tariffs 'a valuable tool in balancing the scales' but 'wider reforms of our global trading system" are needed. It may be harder to gauge the weight of tariffs on, say, a can of chickpeas versus that of a new car, but consumers are likely to see myriad indirect costs from the levies, says Andreas Waldkirch, an economics professor at Colby College who teaches a class on international trade. 'Anybody who's directly connected to the steel industry, they're going to benefit. It's just coming at a very high cost,' Waldkirch says. 'You may get a few more steel jobs. But all these indirect costs mean you then destroy jobs elsewhere. If you were to add that all in, you come up with a pretty large negative loss.' ___ Matt Sedensky can be reached at msedensky@ and Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
37 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Spike in steel tariffs could imperil Trump promise of lower grocery prices
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's doubling of tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum could hit Americans in an unexpected place: grocery aisles. The announcement Friday of a staggering 50% levy on those imports stoked fear that big-ticket purchases from cars to washing machines to houses could see major price increases. But those metals are so ubiquitous in packaging, they're likely to pack a punch across consumer products from soup to nuts. 'Rising grocery prices would be part of the ripple effects,' says Usha Haley, an expert on trade and professor at Wichita State University, who added that the tariffs could raise costs across industries and further strain ties with allies 'without aiding a long-term U.S. manufacturing revival.' Trump's return to the White House has come with an unrivaled barrage of tariffs, with levies threatened, added and, often, taken away, in such a whiplash-inducing frenzy it's hard to keep up. He insisted the latest tariff hike was necessary to 'even further secure the steel industry in the U.S.' That promise, though, could be at odds with his pledge to reduce food costs. Rising grocery prices, Trump has said, were among the biggest reasons voters swung his way. A look around a supermarket makes clear how many products could be impacted by new taxes on steel and aluminum, from beer and soda to dog food to can after can of beans, fruit, tomato paste and more. 'It plays into the hands of China and other foreign canned food producers, which are more than happy to undercut American farmers and food producers,' insists Can Manufacturers Institute president Robert Budway. 'Doubling the steel tariff will further increase the cost of canned goods at the grocery store.' Budway says production by domestic tin mill steel producers, whose products are used in cans, have dramatically decreased in recent years, making manufacturers reliant on imported materials. When those prices go up, he says, 'the cost is levied upon millions of American families.' Food companies were already warily assessing the administration's tariffs before the latest hike, which Trump said would go into effect on Wednesday. The Campbell Co., whose soup cans are a staple for millions of Americans, has said it was working to mitigate the impact of tariffs but may be forced to raise prices. ConAgra Brands, which puts everything from cans of Reddi-Whip to cooking sprays like Pam on supermarket shelves, likewise has pointed to the impact steel and aluminum tariffs have. 'We can't get all of our materials from the US because there's no supply,' ConAgra CFO David Marberger said at a recent Goldman Sachs conference on global staples. Beyond the obvious products — canned foods like tuna, chicken broth and cranberry sauce — economists warn of a spillover effect that tariffs can have on a gamut of items. If the cost to build a store or buy a truck to haul food rise, the prices of products may follow. Most Americans will never buy a tractor, but Babak Hafezi, who runs a global consulting firm and teaches international business at American University, says a price spike in such a big-ticket item vital to food production will spill down to all sorts of other items. 'If a John Deere tractor costs 25% more, consumers pay the price for that,' Hafezi says. 'This trickles down the economy and impacts every aspect of the economy. Some of the trickling is immediate and others are slower to manifest themselves. But yes, prices will increase and choices will decrease.' Trump appeared before a crowd of cheering steelworkers to unveil the new tariffs at a rally outside Pittsburgh. In a statement, David McCall, president of the United Steelworkers International union, called tariffs 'a valuable tool in balancing the scales' but 'wider reforms of our global trading system' are needed. It may be harder to gauge the weight of tariffs on, say, a can of chickpeas versus that of a new car, but consumers are likely to see myriad indirect costs from the levies, says Andreas Waldkirch, an economics professor at Colby College who teaches a class on international trade. 'Anybody who's directly connected to the steel industry, they're going to benefit. It's just coming at a very high cost,' Waldkirch says. 'You may get a few more steel jobs. But all these indirect costs mean you then destroy jobs elsewhere. If you were to add that all in, you come up with a pretty large negative loss.' ___ Matt Sedensky can be reached at [email protected] and
