Sanders blasts Trump on 'authoritarianism' for sending troops to LA
The protests come as the Trump administration has taken stronger actions to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants. Demonstrators allege the administration's immigration enforcement has violated civil and human rights.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on June 7 that Trump signed a memo deploying the guardsmen "to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester." Both California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, however, have criticized the move, saying it would only escalate tensions in the area.
"I would say that to a large degree, the future of this country rests with a small number of Republicans in the House and Senate who know better, who do know what the Constitution is about, and it's high time they stood up for our Constitution and the rule of law," Sanders said.
Oklahoma Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin, meanwhile, defended the president's move to Bash, arguing that the situation is not under control.
The Department of Homeland Security said that some protesters have hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings. Video footage of some of the protests showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks, lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds.
"The president has made it very clear. If the governor or the mayor of the city isn't willing to protect the citizens of his state or the city, then the president will. The American people elected him to restore the law and order back to our streets," Mullin said.
Contributing: Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Republican House chair of homeland security committee to retire early
Mark Green, the Republican chair of the US House's homeland security committee, announced Monday that he will retire from Congress once the House votes again on the sprawling tax and budget policy bill backed by Donald Trump. In a statement, Green said he was offered a private sector opportunity 'that was too exciting to pass up', so the Tennessee representative informed Mike Johnson, the House speaker, on Monday of his retirement plans. The move comes more than a year after Green announced he wouldn't run again in 2024, but changed his mind when fellow Republicans implored him to stick around. Green's next election would have been in 2026. He voted for Trump's sweeping legislation when it passed the House in May. The bill is now in the Senate's hands, and would need to return to the House for agreement on any changes. The president wants the bill on his desk for his signature by 4 July. Green's delayed departure could help with the Republicans' narrow margins in the House. Republican leaders need every vote they can get on their big tax bill, which they managed to pass in May by a single vote and will have to pass again once changes are made in the Senate. They now have a 220-212 majority. 'It was the honor of a lifetime to represent the people of Tennessee in Congress,' Green said. 'They asked me to deliver on the conservative values and principles we all hold dear, and I did my level best to do so.' Green's seat will be decided in a special election. The timing will depend on when he leaves office.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Investment glass seems half full near mid-point of 2025
LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - A consequence of U.S. President Donald Trump's global economic upheaval seems to be greater "home bias" in investing - going some way toward explaining the year's relative performance while seeming chaos sows stimulus around the world. Many of the half-year appraisals of Trump's often erratic trade and economic agenda attempt to cut through policy noise to suggest where the world will ultimately pan out. Larry Fink, boss of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, opined last week about a "second draft of globalization", one positioned somewhere between the rejected inequities of unfettered global trade and capital and another alternative of stifling economic nationalism and capital curbs. The new middle ground can still enjoy open markets, Fink reckons, but they will likely be steered, prodded and tempted home to ensure household savings first benefit the country of those doing the saving. "People will fuel their country's economic growth and own a piece of it," Fink argued in an op-ed in the Financial Times. For Fink, this "re-globalization" aims "not just to generate prosperity but to aim it towards the people and places left behind the first time." Trump's attempted re-industrialization of America is a version of this idea. Using trade barriers, bilateralism, carrots and sticks, he seeks to kick-start U.S. manufacturing while accepting that lower trade deficits will also see lower overseas investment flows to U.S. markets and smaller government to boot. The political pitch is to create more well-paid factory jobs instead of super-wealthy asset owners. Easier said than done. But whatever one thinks about Trump's "America First" strategy, that formula seems to be working best overseas. Germany's dramatic fiscal reboot this year, which was catalyzed by both Trumpism and far-right populism at home, also speaks to the new globalization theme. Europe at large now appears to be prioritizing investment in its own industrial base, security, digital infrastructure and green technologies - hoping to unleash both under-utilized savings at home and attract capital from Wall Street. Britain is apeing these industrial and defence policy trends, while Japan is attempting to unlock its domestic pension savings too. Meanwhile, Chinese fiscal stimulus has also risen. So while trade war jitters abound, it sets up potentially synched fiscal boosts next year. TS Lombard's Rory Green and Alexandros Xenofontos pointed out on Monday there could be strong fiscal stimuli in Europe, China and possibly the U.S. in 2026 - a trifecta that's only happened twice in 30 years, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. That possibility goes some way to explain why, despite all the market volatility and hype surrounding a U.S. cyclical slowdown, global stock markets are once again hitting record highs. It also explains why it's been a bad year for global sovereign bonds and the U.S. dollar - as stimulus requires more borrowing and foreign investors shed overweight U.S. holdings. Even though Wall Street stocks (.SPX), opens new tab are just about positive for the year, they are underperforming the likes of equity indexes in Germany (.GDAXI), opens new tab and Hong Kong (.HIS), opens new tab by 25%-40%. If even some of the estimated $7 trillion of European money that flowed into U.S. equities over the past dozen years were to be repatriated, markets would price such a move very quickly. And despite all the concern about the U.S. economic and political direction, American money is not rushing offshore. Mutual fund data shows net U.S. flows to global equity funds remain negative through this year. In fact, they're at their most negative in more than two years. Cash flowing to U.S. money market funds, meantime, has climbed back above $7 trillion again in the latest week, near the record high set in April. Does that data mean the ultimate outcome of Trump turning the world upside down could actually be positive? In an article for the Council on Foreign Relations' Foreign Affairs magazine titled"Tell Me How This Trade War Ends,", opens new tab Emily Kilcrease and Geoffrey Gertz reckon that despite all the Trump chaos, there is a "kernel of truth" in his insistence that the world trade system needs a re-set. They conclude there is no going back to a world where the U.S. championed ever freer trade. Neither is it inevitable that the world will retreat into outright protectionism, as long as Trump pushes other U.S. allies into a new, less-lopsided trading framework. "Trump's shock to the system may not be pretty. But it could open the way for a much better system," Kilcrease and Gertz wrote. "Trump has turned the United States into a revisionist power seeking to shatter what remains of the economic order. Thus far, his approach has been needlessly chaotic," they said. "But there is still an opportunity to wrest a positive outcome from the current tumult." At nearly the mid-point of the year, investors seem tempted by this "glass half full" view of 2025's disruption. The optimists are trying to see through the inevitable twists and turns ahead to focus on the possibility of a new, more positive equilibrium down the line. In truth, much remains murky and unknowable at this point. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Student loan quagmire frustrates borrowers - and alarms some Trump voters
June 10 (Reuters) - Kelly Belt, 33, a high school life-sciences teacher in Provo, Utah, is ready and willing to repay her student loans. But like 8 million other U.S. borrowers on an affordable repayment plan created by former President Joe Biden, she has not been able to for nearly a year. Federal courts halted parts of the Biden plan last spring and summer after Republican-led lawsuits and in February an appeals court blocked it altogether. But when Belt tried to switch to another plan in March - so she could resume payments - the Education Department had removed its online application portal. Even after the website was restored, it had technical problems that prevented Belt from switching to her preferred plan. Instead it offered Belt a third plan that would require her to make monthly payments of $608, more than triple her old rate of $198. The cost was more than she could afford on her public-school salary. President Donald Trump, who called Biden's efforts to alleviate crushing student loan debt "vile" on the campaign trail, is upending the system relied on by many of the 42.7 million Americans who borrowed money for their education and collectively owe more than $1.6 trillion in debt. Workforce cuts at the U.S. Department of Education, the ending of pandemic-era amnesty for defaulted borrowers, and the elimination of the most affordable repayment plans are impacting those with perfect repayment records like Belt as well as those delinquent in their payments who got amnesty during the pandemic but were required to start repaying their loans in May. Since Trump took office, thousands of complaints have poured in, according to internal data obtained by Reuters. The backlog of unprocessed applications for low-cost repayment plans has risen from 1,494,792 on February 4 to 1,985,726 on April 30, according to Education Department data. The Trump administration cut the Department of Education staff by 50% in March, vastly reducing its capacity to assist borrowers like Belt, according to six current or former department officials and student borrower advocates interviewed by Reuters. They say the changes are making it difficult for student loan borrowers to access affordable repayment plans just as the Trump administration is starting to crack down on borrowers who can't afford theirs. A Department of Education spokesperson blamed the Biden administration for the application backlog but acknowledged that the Trump administration had not started processing applications until three months after inauguration. The spokesperson did not comment on the number of complaints or the technical errors that prevented Belt from switching plans. In May, the Trump administration ended a pandemic-era program that allowed 5 million other borrowers who had defaulted on their loans to pause payments for five years. Those bills started coming due again in May; those who default face having their wages garnished. Trump is pushing to eliminate the most affordable loan repayment plans as part of the massive "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" now before the U.S. Senate. The Department of Education spokesperson said the bill would "simplify" the repayment process and hold "institutions financially accountable for defaulted student loans." In the meantime, Belt says she's struggled to sign up for a new plan via the department website or by calling the federal student aid help center where she has "been unable to get a hold of a person to help me navigate my options." The department has disbanded a support team that formerly reviewed and helped solve borrower complaints and removed a complaint button that used to appear prominently on every page of the department's student loan website, according to a current department official. Even so, through a harder-to-find "feedback" button, the agency has received 8,400 complaints about income-driven repayment plans since February 1, of which nearly half mention the plan Belt is now on, the official said. After she was unable to apply online, Belt mailed in a paper application for her preferred plan, but it might take months to process. Meanwhile, by the time her application is processed, her preferred plan could be outlawed by the tax-and-spending bill now before the Senate. Belt's predicament alarms her mother-in-law, Lesa Sandberg, one of 20 Trump voters Reuters is periodically interviewing about his administration's policies. Sandberg, who has been "on the Trump train" for a decade, said the administration is betraying its deal with borrowers like Belt by leaving them either unable to pay down their debt or stuck in unaffordable plans. Belt said she could have sought a more lucrative job, but she chose to teach at a public school in part because she was counting on affordable income-driven repayment options. "They make choices in their careers, based on having that loan program available, and now they don't. It's just wrong," Sandberg said. Sandberg says she still supports shuttering the Education Department because she favors state control over education. But she is disappointed that the administration has pursued that goal without allowing borrowers like her daughter-in-law to keep paying off their loans. "It doesn't look to me like there was a plan," Sandberg said. "I don't understand why people aren't inundating their representatives or even the White House with, 'what the heck are you going to do?'" 'I WISH I COULD REWIND THAT VOTE' Sandberg isn't the only Trump voter disappointed by how his administration is making student loan repayment more complicated. Tammy Sabens, 64, a grandmother in Kentucky, borrowed $25,000 in the 2000s to go back to school for a nursing degree. Today, accrued interest has left her with a nearly $52,000 balance, leaving her unable to retire despite a doctor's recommendation that she do so for her health. Sabens voted for Trump in November because she "didn't want our economy to turn into a socialist economy, which seemed to be the way it was heading under Biden," she said. But she, like Belt, was dismayed when the federal portal for changing repayment plans went down for a month, preventing her from adjusting her monthly payment to reflect her current income. Instead, she had to enter the same limbo as Belt, unable to make progress toward repaying her loan. "Boy, I wish I could rewind that vote," Sabens said of the ballot she cast for Trump. "I can't sleep at night worrying about all this stuff."
