logo
Historian likens becoming MBE to receiving ‘monumental bunch of flowers'

Historian likens becoming MBE to receiving ‘monumental bunch of flowers'

Independent15 hours ago

An historian who founded the Borders Book Festival has said being recognised in the King's Birthday Honours feels like receiving a 'monumental bunch of flowers'.
Alistair Moffat, 74, is celebrating becoming a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) in recognition of services to literature and culture in the same week as this year's festival.
He has written more than 40 books on Scottish history and is considered one of the most popular Scottish historians.
He founded the Borders Book Festival 22 years ago, and is based in Ettrick and Lauderdale in the Borders.
The festival has become one of the UK's most highly regarded literary festivals, attracting an international audience, and now draws more than 30,000 visitors who have contributed an estimated £3 million to the local economy.
Mr Moffat was also a critical figure in the creation of The Great Tapestry of Scotland in 2010, acting as co-chairman and narrative creator, which tells the history of Scotland in visual panels, similar to the Bayeux Tapestry.
The Great Tapestry of Scotland, now installed in its purpose-built museum in Galashiels, in the Borders, has become a major tourist attraction and was visited by the King and Queen in 2023 on its 10th anniversary.
It was a collaboration of ideas shared between Mr Moffat, author Sir Alexander McCall-Smith and artist Andrew Crummy and was hand stitched by 1,000 women from across Scotland.
The tapestry tells the story of 420 million years of Scottish history, heritage, innovations and culture through its 160 panels.
Mr Moffat receives the royal honour for showing a 'strong and consistent commitment to bringing the arts to local communities', including through the tapestry.
Mr Moffat said: 'It is just a monumental bunch of flowers to get.
'One of the reasons was for starting the Borders Book Festival, which starts on Thursday.
'The announcement will be in the middle of the book festival, which started 22 years ago.
'It has a big, beneficial impact on the region, and it brings in lots of visitors. The MBE has been very well-timed.
'The Great Tapestry of Scotland began 15 years ago, Alexander McCall-Smith rang me to say 'go and look at a tapestry in Edinburgh about Bonnie Prince Charlie'. It had 50 panels, I was astounded at how beautiful it was.
'I started working on the idea of The Great Tapestry of Scotland, it ended up with 150 panels.
'I had always dreamed of doing something like this.
' The King and Queen opened it in 2023, I showed them around. It is telling Scotland's history in pictures, and it was made by women.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Levein back for Sacked in the Morning after triple bypass
Levein back for Sacked in the Morning after triple bypass

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Levein back for Sacked in the Morning after triple bypass

As excuses go for delaying a popular podcast go, having triple bypass heart surgery is right up Craig Levein is in fine fettle after the procedure and Sacked in the Morning is back for series eight on former Scotland manager suffered a heart attack in the summer of 2018 and had stents latest ordeal started with a Saturday night trip to Accident & Emergency in Kirkcaldy."I was struggling to walk and breathe at times, if I was going up any hills," Levein told co-host Amy Irons."It had to be done. They offered me more stents, something like five, and I was like, 'not for me'."The other option was the triple bypass and it's been a good decision. I'm feeling really good." The 60-year-old was sacked by St Johnstone in September of 2024, having also been in charge at Hearts (twice), Leicester City and Dundee began his podcasting career in October 2021, with Tony Pulis the first Saunders, Viv Anderson, Andy Cole, Alistair Campbell and Si Ferry are among those who will appear in the new Levein promises to be more cogent than he was in the days after his operation."I couldn't sleep," he recalled. "I was on about 14 different pills. I had delirium. I had no idea what was going on."I woke up, and I'm sitting on my bed, and there's a nativity play going on, and there's kids running about. And I swear, I think it's real. "Then I look across to the other side of the ward, and there's a cubicle, and the curtain's open, and the devil's in there."There was also a vivid hallucination involving a fight between doctors and a subsequent union row over the fictional that Levein is on the mend, there are sure to be more stories of real fisticuffs, embarrassing moments, great sporting achievements and, of course, what it's liked to be sacked in the questions for Craig and Amy can be emailed to sackedinthemorning@

Literary star Catherine Lacey: ‘The editor saw my draft and worried about libel laws'
Literary star Catherine Lacey: ‘The editor saw my draft and worried about libel laws'

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Literary star Catherine Lacey: ‘The editor saw my draft and worried about libel laws'

As I sit on the patio of a French restaurant in Brooklyn, the beautiful and intimidatingly tall sommelier comes over, and tells me that there'll shortly be a reading in the bar. I ask who's reading. 'A novelist!' she says, beaming. I decline, and resist telling her that not only do I have my own novelist on the way, but it's Catherine Lacey. It would be easy to be awed by Lacey; many people in the literary world are. She has only just turned 40, but she's already on her fifth book, the first four having earned critical acclaim; her second, The Answers (2017), in which an ill young woman becomes a narcissistic actor's hired girlfriend, is being adapted for television by the dir­ector Darren Aronofsky. She was named one of Granta's best young American novelists in 2017; she has received a Guggenheim Fellowship and a Whiting Award. Lacey, in other words, has scored the rare hat-trick, among leading young writers, of accolades, prolificity and cultural cachet (or to put it more bluntly, coolness). Her extraordinary new work, The Möbius Book, is a tête-bêche, meaning that it's formed of two autonomous though related parts. You can start reading from either end, and when you get to the ­middle, you flip and restart. In one direction, it's non-fiction, a relatively straightforward chronological catalogue of the mental disarray that followed the end of a relationship between Lacey and her partner of several years, known as 'The Reason', a man whose behaviour is portrayed as coercive, controlling and obliterating. Lacey doesn't use the word ­'abusive' in her account, but readers are bound to ask whether it's applicable. The Reason's behaviour is depicted as imbued with rage. He has a tantrum when Lacey wants to leave a light on in the stairwell for a female friend sleeping in their guest room. When Lacey looks at her phone during a film he had wanted her to watch, he punches a wall so hard that he breaks a part of it. He habitually slaps her on the backside – ' playfully (his word)' – despite her voicing her dislike of it, and then is outraged at how she reacts. Until their 2021 break-up, Lacey had been in the relationship for six years. The end came when Lacey received an email from her partner, who was in another part of their house, to tell her he'd met another woman the previous week and so was ending the relationship. She writes: 'This isn't what I want so much as what you want, he told me, and when I said it wasn't what I wanted he simply said yes, it was.' 'The first chapter of the non-­fiction,' she explains to me today, 'is exactly what I wrote in the bedroom as it [the break-up] happened. I was like: 'This is what's ­f------ going on.' And I didn't edit that part, I think, at all.' She wrote the non-fiction part of The Möbius Book first. The fictional part introduces us to two friends, Marie and Edie, who meet around Christmas and discuss the painful fallout of their failed relationships. Across the hall, a substance that may or may not be blood emerges from beneath a neighbour's door. Why the two-part form? 'I showed the non-fiction to my agent,' Lacey says, 'and she was really happy with it... I'm close to my agent and she was p----- off for me [about the relationship], so I think she was happy to see a book that was this fire-pit of p------off-ness.' Not everyone was satisfied. 'My editor told me that with memoirs, because libel laws are different, sometimes things that can be published safely and legally in the US can't really be published in the UK. And I was thinking: my very angry book, yes, there might be things in there... 'But I also started thinking: why did I have to write about this thing? Why does it have to be non-fiction? I started thinking about rewriting the whole work as fiction, in a different shape. Or maybe I could publish it in the UK as a novel and in the US as non-fiction, but give it the exact same title. I think, now, that the libel issue was an excuse for me not to publish the book as it was. There was nothing untrue, but it wasn't fully right.' Lacey wrote a piece on Substack last year about adding to The Möbius Book, late in the editing ­process, a scene between herself and The Reason that she had tried, in real life, to forget. The passage, she tells me, describes him observing that Lacey had gained a negligible amount of weight, and providing her with a workout plan and guidance on what to cut out of her diet. 'He was concerned,' she writes. 'He didn't want this to begin a pattern.' 'His logic would be there,' Lacey says now, 'and I would go along with it because it was rhetorically very powerful. That was one of the details [where] I was kind of sickened by the idea of it being published – partially because of my own self-betrayal in accepting that from him, and then the idea of my whole ­family knowing it. I got kind of mangy for a few years. There was nervousness around my basic mental and physical health. And here was more evidence that when I had thought I was doing fine, I was not.' Lacey was born in 1985, and raised devoutly religious in Mississippi. She wanted to be a preacher as a child. When she began to lose faith in God at the age of 15, the shock took away her appetite. Though Pew (2020), her third novel, was also concerned with faith – a ­mercurial stranger with no memory arrives in a devout town and reflects its contradiction back – The Möbius Book is her most direct addressing of the subject so far. It investigates faith in many different forms: cycles of existence; the impossibility of conclusion when it comes to portraying a life. Why return to the topic? 'I've been trying to write about faith for as long as I've been an adult,' she says. 'But I think I needed to get a lot further away from the period of time [in which] I stopped believing in order to see it. I needed to have my metaphysical understanding of the world changed a few times. 'I needed to stop being so p----- off and self-righteous about the ­culture I grew up in. And I needed to have experiences that humbled me again out of my just-as-­dogmatic atheism. What was going on in ­my life in my mid- to late-30s changed the way I saw the past. It uncovered things I'd been unable to look at or understand.' How does she think of romance now? 'I see my friends as angels sent from God, the finest human beings to ever walk the planet. And I have seen them at their worst, but I still think that. There's something kind of Christian there – the idea that you should treat everybody like they're Jesus. That radical idea of Christianity is part of what I connected to as a child. I felt very odd.' She smiles as she describes what an ideal, rather than realistic, ­rendering of Christian faith might look like, a faith where the radical offering of acceptance and love was actually universalised: 'In my Southern town, I didn't fit in, and I was always attracted to this beautiful idea of that Christianity. All these people say they're Christian. I'm like, if they can only see it, right? We can be in paradise.'

Winner of 2025 Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction announced
Winner of 2025 Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction announced

Edinburgh Reporter

time4 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Winner of 2025 Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction announced

Andrew Miller has won the 2025 Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction for his novel The Land In Winter, which is set in a remote English community during the long, hard winter of 1962/63. The Prize's definition of 'historical' is a book set at least 60 years ago, meaning Miller's novel fell just within the criterion. Shortlisted for the prestigious Prize on two previous occasions, Miller was at the Borders Book Festival in Melrose on Thursday 12th June to receive the award from Matthew Maxwell Scott, the great-great-great-great grandson of Walter Scott and trustee of The Abbotsford Trust, which runs the Prize, alongside Prize founder the Duke of Buccleuch. The panel of judges, chaired by writer Katie Grant, said: 'A true master craftsman, Andrew Miller has painted big themes on a subtle canvas of tiny detail. With rare and delicate skill, The Land in Winter opens up the lives of Bill and Rita, Eric and Irene in ways that will sing differently to each reader, and sing differently again on each re-reading. 'With prose as softly dazzling as the snow of the 1962/63 winter in which the novel is set, Andrew Miller takes his richly deserved place amongst the Walter Scott Prize pantheon of great contemporary writers.' Andrew Miller said of his inspiration for the book: 'The people in my novel] … came walking slowly out of a blizzard. 'I leaned quite heavily into the early married lives of my parents, and some of the people they knew, all of whom are long dead now. One of the few advantages of getting older is that your own past becomes material for an historical novel.' The Walter Scott Prize is one of the UK's major literary awards, with previous winners including Sebastian Barry, Robert Harris, Andrea Levy and Hilary Mantel. It is open to novels published in the previous year in the UK, Ireland or the Commonwealth, and set at least 60 years ago to reflect the title of Scott's first historical novel, Waverley, or tis sixty years since. The judging panel for this year's Prize comprised writer Katie Grant (Chair), art historian James Holloway, children's author Elizabeth Laird, broadcaster James Naughtie, writer and filmmaker Saira Shah and two judges new to this year's panel – previous Young Walter Scott Prize winner Rosi Byard-Jones, and award-winning bookseller Rosamund de la Hey. Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store