Kent MacDonald acclaimed as federal Liberal candidate in P.E.I.'s Cardigan riding
For the first time in nearly 40 years, the federal Liberals have a new candidate in eastern P.E.I.'s Cardigan riding.
Kent MacDonald, a seventh-generation dairy farmer from Little Pond, was acclaimed as the party's candidate for the riding this week.
"The Liberal party's platform is what I believe in," MacDonald is quoted as saying in a news release.
"The federal Liberals have put millions into our communities through school lunch programs, health care for Island seniors, and low-interest loans for housing. This is supporting families and working people."
MacDonald will look to hold the seat for the Liberals after Lawrence MacAulay announced he would not seek re-election after a 36-year political career and 11 straight election wins in Cardigan.
MacDonald is a past director, vice-chair and chair of Dairy Farmers of P.E.I., and was a director and vice-chair of the P.E.I. Federation of Agriculture.
He is the current president of Pondsedge Farms, his family's dairy and beef operation.
The race to succeed MacAulay as Cardigan's MP also includes Conservative nominee James Aylward, a former MLA and provincial cabinet minister; and former educator Lynn Thiele, who's running for the NDP.
On Tuesday, the Green Party of Canada told CBC News that it has candidates for three of the four federal ridings on P.E.I. and intends to announce their names "later this week or at the beginning of next week."
The next federal election is supposed to be held on Oct. 20 under Canada's fixed election date system.
However, it is widely expected to be triggered this spring — by the minority Liberal government under new Prime Minister Mark Carney calling a snap general election, or by the opposition parties voting against a motion on a supply bill or a specific motion of no confidence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
22 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
CUPE sues government to block 'unconstitutional' power used to end flight attendant strike
OTTAWA — Canada's largest union is suing the federal government to stop it from ever again invoking the controversial legal tool the Liberals used to order striking Air Canada flight attendants back to work. In a lawsuit filed on Monday, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) — which represents over 750,000 members including Air Canada flight attendants — laid bare its outrage towards the airline and the Liberal government. The union accused Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu of disregarding, undermining and nullifying the flight attendants' constitutional right to strike by invoking section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to order an end to the strike. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The lawsuit asks a Federal Court judge to quash the minister's decision and declare that the power she invoked is both unconstitutional and exceeds her jurisdiction. In the meantime, CUPE is also seeking an emergency injunction against Hajdu's order. 'In issuing her direction, the Minister overrode, abrogated and effectively precluded the Union's ability to exercise its legal right to strike and its only legal means of asserting and leveraging economic power within the scheme of the Canada Labour Code,' CUPE argued in the lawsuit obtained by National Post. 'The Minister erred in law, inappropriately exercised her jurisdiction, authority and/or discretion, based her decision on erroneous findings of fact that she made in an arbitrary and abusive manner and/or issued an unreasonable decision' when she issued her order on Saturday, CUPE added. The federal government has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit. A spokesperson for Employment and Social Development Canada did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The controversial section says the minister can direct the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to do what she deems necessary to 'maintain or secure industrial peace' or create favourable conditions for a deal during labour disputes. In recent years, the Liberals have taken that to mean that they can order the tribunal to declare a strike illegal, compel federally regulated employees back to work or mandate binding arbitration between parties. Since 2024, they've invoked the power to end numerous port and railway strikes as well as a work stoppage at Canada Post in December. On Saturday, barely hours after flight attendants went on strike and hundreds of Air Canada flights were cancelled, the Liberals again invoked section 107 to demand the CIRB order strikers back to work and parties enter binding arbitration. During a press conference, Minister Hajdu rejected accusations that her government is anti-union. 'We believe that unions are an essential part of a healthy and growing economy. However, in a case like this, where multiple efforts have been made to conclude an agreement that satisfies both parties and it is clear that they are at an impasse, it is very clear they need some help in arbitrating the final items,' she said. But after the CIRB ordered flight attendants back to work Sunday, CUPE leadership publicly ripped up the decision and called on members to continue striking. On Monday morning, the board declared the strike to be illegal, but it continued regardless as the Canadian Labour Congress voiced its support for CUPE. Then early Tuesday morning, CUPE announced that it had reached a tentative agreement with Air Canada and that the strike was over. CUPE's lawsuit also alleges that shortly after flight attendants overwhelmingly voted for a strike mandate in early August, Air Canada 'ceased bargaining' and focused on lobbying the Liberals to block the strike. 'On August 12, 2025, Air Canada presented a detailed brief to the Minister requesting that the Minister intervene and pre-emptively order that the Union and its members not be permitted to exercise their legal and constitutional right to strike,' CUPE wrote. 'Relying on anticipated intervention from the Minister, Air Canada withdrew from any genuine effort to reach an agreement through good faith collective bargaining.' An Air Canada spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. National Post cnardi@ Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here .
Calgary Herald
22 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
CUPE sues government to block 'unconstitutional' power used to end flight attendant strike
Air Canada flight attendants picket outside of Terminal 1 at Toronto Pearson International Airport on Monday August 18, 2025. Photo by Ernest Doroszuk / Ernest Doroszuk/Toronto Sun/Post OTTAWA — Canada's largest union is suing the federal government to stop it from ever again invoking the controversial legal tool the Liberals used to order striking Air Canada flight attendants back to work. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Calgary Herald ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Calgary Herald ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors In a lawsuit filed on Monday, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) — which represents over 750,000 members including Air Canada flight attendants — laid bare its outrage towards the airline and the Liberal government. The union accused Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu of disregarding, undermining and nullifying the flight attendants' constitutional right to strike by invoking section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to order an end to the strike. Your weekday lunchtime roundup of curated links, news highlights, analysis and features. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again The lawsuit asks a Federal Court judge to quash the minister's decision and declare that the power she invoked is both unconstitutional and exceeds her jurisdiction. In the meantime, CUPE is also seeking an emergency injunction against Hajdu's order. 'In issuing her direction, the Minister overrode, abrogated and effectively precluded the Union's ability to exercise its legal right to strike and its only legal means of asserting and leveraging economic power within the scheme of the Canada Labour Code,' CUPE argued in the lawsuit obtained by National Post. 'The Minister erred in law, inappropriately exercised her jurisdiction, authority and/or discretion, based her decision on erroneous findings of fact that she made in an arbitrary and abusive manner and/or issued an unreasonable decision' when she issued her order on Saturday, CUPE added. The federal government has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit. A spokesperson for Employment and Social Development Canada did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The controversial section says the minister can direct the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to do what she deems necessary to 'maintain or secure industrial peace' or create favourable conditions for a deal during labour disputes. In recent years, the Liberals have taken that to mean that they can order the tribunal to declare a strike illegal, compel federally regulated employees back to work or mandate binding arbitration between parties. Since 2024, they've invoked the power to end numerous port and railway strikes as well as a work stoppage at Canada Post in December. On Saturday, barely hours after flight attendants went on strike and hundreds of Air Canada flights were cancelled, the Liberals again invoked section 107 to demand the CIRB order strikers back to work and parties enter binding arbitration.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Michael Taube: Poilievre proved Alberta separatists were never a force to be reckoned with
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre easily won Monday's Battle River-Crowfoot byelection with 80.4 per cent of the vote. If anyone actually expected a different outcome in this extremely safe Alberta riding, they were fooling themselves. Article content While his victory wasn't surprising, the fact that he was in this potentially precarious position to begin with certainly was. Article content Article content Article content Poilievre had served as an MP since 2004 in two Ottawa-based ridings: Nepean-Carleton (redistricted in 2012) and Carleton. He lost to little-known Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy in the April 28 election. Several factors likely contributed to it, including: voters having turned away from Conservative candidates in the Ottawa region, concerns related to U.S. President Donald Trump and tariffs, and, as Poilievre suggested in a July 12 interview with CBC's The House, his campaign promise to cut public service jobs led to a 'very aggressive campaign, particularly the public sector unions … to defeat me on that basis.' Article content Article content No matter the reason or reasons, Poilievre needed to find a new parliamentary seat. This occurred when Conservative MP Damien Kurekresigned from his Battle River-Crowfoot seat and opened the doors to a byelection. Article content Battle River-Crowfoot has long been regarded as one of the safest Conservative ridings in Canada. Many residents in this rural Alberta riding have a fiscally conservative approach to politics and economics and socially conservative sensibilities. While the independence movement in Western Canada has some sway in these parts, its overall impact clearly didn't affect the byelection result. Article content The safeness of the seat didn't stop a slew of comments from the media and candidates like Bonnie Critchley, the independent military veteran who finished a surprising second in Battle River-Crowfoot, that Poilievre was an outsider in this race, and so would be at a disadvantage. While it's true that he had never lived in the riding, he was born and raised in Calgary and didn't move to Ottawa until 2000. Nevertheless the separatists in the riding pushed the narrative that because he called himself patriot, he didn't have the riding's best interests at heart — or the province's. They also pointed to his support of equalization payments and supply management as evidence of this. Article content Article content It didn't amount to much. This is one of the safest Conservative seats in Canada, and any perceived weaknesses in Poilievre's policies and beliefs was clearly exaggerated by his opponents. Article content The riding's current boundaries were created during the federal re-election distribution in 2012. There hasn't been a close election result to date. Kevin Sorenson won with 47,552 votes, or 80.91 per cent of the vote, in 2015. He was replaced by Damien Kurek, who won with 53,309 votes (85.49 per cent), 41,819 votes (71.3 per cent) and 53,684 votes (82.84 per cent) in 2019, 2021 and 2025, respectively.
