Scotland lacking emergency response to drug deaths crisis, expert says
Kirsten Horsburgh, chief executive of the Scottish Drugs Forum (SDF), said public policy was heading in the right direction.
But she warned that 'intent without action' was the 'major problem' facing the country.
Speaking during an event at the Festival of Politics at Holyrood chaired by SNP MSP Audrey Nicoll, Ms Horsburgh said drug legalisation should be 'on the table' as part of the solutions to the crisis.
And she said safer drug consumption rooms, such as the one in Glasgow, should be rolled out 'at scale'.
Ms Horsburgh told an audience at the Scottish Parliament: 'There are things we are doing well in Scotland and there are obviously things we are not doing well.
'The things we are doing well is finally reaching a point where we have the right policy direction.
'But policy intent without action, the implementation gap and pace are the major issues here.'
She added: 'All these things require urgency.
'We've described the issue in Scotland as a public health emergency but what we've done so far is far from a public health emergency response – it's lacking in pace and attention that the issue really needs.'
Ms Horsburgh said pilots such as the safer drug consumption room in Glasgow, the first of its kind in the UK, should be done 'at scale'.
The SDF chief executive said policies such as drug legalisation should also be 'on the table', but admitted it was something unlikely to be looked at by the UK Government, which controls drug laws.
Catriona Matheson, professor of substance use at the University of Stirling, also appeared on the panel.
She said poly-drug use, the use of more than one drug by a person, was now common in Scotland.
Prof Matheson said the Government had to adapt and respond quickly to a drug market that 'changes all the time'.
The academic stressed the importance of 'psycho-social' support for people with addiction that could help get to the root of the issue, which the panel said included issues such as trauma, poverty and mental wellbeing.
But she warned that 'previous negative experiences' from people seeking rehabilitation services acted as a 'barrier' in the support offered to those in need.
'That's something that needs to be overcome,' Prof Matheson said, 'and it's not easy to fix.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Quiz candidates on user road charges: Michael Enea
Here is one crucial question I would ask all the prospective candidates. Will your political party categorically rule-out a motorway toll or "road user charge" on the M4 around Newport? Why ask this question you may say? After the M4 Relief Road was sensationally scrapped by Mark Drakeford in June 2019, a commission was set-up to look at so-called "alternatives" to tackle the traffic congestion on the motorway around Newport. This commission was chaired by Lord Burns. Section 239 of the final Burns Report stated: 'We are in favour of a comprehensive UK wide pay-per-mile road user charge.' The report continued: 'This could be within 10 to 15 years given the projected trajectory for the decline of traditional motoring tax revenues.' The report also stated: 'We recommend future policy decisions on road user charging in south east Wales reflect our findings, in particular - the case for higher charges in peak times and in places with the worst congestion air quality.' Can it get any worse? The report went on to say: 'We would support local authorities taking earlier steps to implement local charging schemes to address congestion, improve environment outcomes, or raise revenue to invest in public transport schemes.' You may say I'm scaremongering? Well, why not read the Welsh Government's own National Transport Delivery Plan. Section 3.3.3 states: 'We will also motivate people to move away from private car use. The Wales Transport Strategy includes a commitment to develop a national road user charging framework.' So in their own words, they are "committed" to developing road user charges. In November 2023, the Welsh Senedd then passed the Environment (Air Quality and Soundscapes) Act 2024. This gives ministers the power to introduce Clean Air Zones (CAZs) on trunk roads to tackle air pollution hotspots. Could the floodgates now open over the next decade? Well, Cardiff Council has already given serious consideration to the installation of a congestion charge or road user scheme for its city centre. Luckily, after strong opposition, it has since backed away from idea (for now). So will Newport City Council follow Cardiff's lead and look to introduce a "congestion charge" for its city centre? Thankfully, the answer is no. But what of the M4 around Newport? Now that's an entirely different question. It's a valid question you should seriously ask every Senedd candidate when they turn-up on your doorstep pitching for your vote. Can you imagine the utter carnage and chaos on Newport's side-streets and A-roads should a "road user charge" be introduced on the M4? Michael Enea is a Conservative campaigner and blogger
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Fishing leaders call for immediate halt to wind farm expansion ‘stampede'
Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a "stampede" and a "gamble" as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents | PA Industry demands no more offshore consents and an end to 'gamble' on renewable energy expansion Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a 'stampede' and a 'gamble' as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents. The Scottish Fishermen's Federation (SFF) said Scottish Government plans to install up to 40GW of offshore wind capacity by 2040 are 'far too high'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It said achieving the target will cause irreversible damage to the marine environment and displace fishing fleets from grounds they have worked for generations. Fishing leaders in Scotland have described wind farm expansion as a "stampede" and a "gamble" as they demanded an immediate stop to further offshore consents | PA The call is included in the SFF's official responses to two major Government consultations, the updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement and the draft Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy. The Government outlines that offshore wind could ensure Scotland meets its net zero target by 2030 and provide scores of green jobs as part of the just transition away from dependence on oil and gas. Last month, First Minister John Swinney visited Scotland's newest wind farm – Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) off the coast of Fife. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During his visit he said offshore wind is 'one of Scotland's greatest modern success stories'. He said: 'Driving economic growth and tackling the climate emergency are two of my Government's priorities, and NnG is a shining example of how these priorities can work hand-in-hand to reshape Scotland's future for the better.' The UK Government has also expressed support for the expansion of Scotland's wind farms. It announced in March that the Port of Cromarty Firth in the Highlands will be a major hub for the UK's world-leading floating offshore wind industry, and it awarded more than £55 million for its expansion. 'Slam on the brakes' Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the SFF – which is Scotland's biggest fishing industry body – said: 'This isn't a plan – it's a stampede. The Government is charging ahead without the faintest idea how to protect the people and places that will be trampled in the rush. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We've been telling them for years these plans will seriously damage our industry, but they haven't listened. Now their own assessments show the harm that will be done to fishing, and the environment on which it depends. 'Until they can prove our industry and our seas will be safeguarded, the only responsible choice is to slam on the brakes.' The SFF said current mitigation measures are almost non-existent and there is no credible plan to compensate fishing businesses for the losses they will face. It also says the Government's updated Offshore Wind Policy Statement published in June made repeated references to economic benefits but failed to mention the climate crisis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Macdonald added: 'Fishing is one of Scotland's original green industries. The Scottish fleet has been putting healthy, renewable and sustainable food on plates for generations. 'But we're being shoved aside for projects that feel like a last gamble for a Government to revive an ailing Scottish economy.' Fishing leaders say the cumulative impact of existing and emerging marine conservation policies, renewable energy projects alongside fishing being expected to offset environmental impacts of offshore wind developments, is leaving the industry at 'breaking point'. Environmental damage Ms Macdonald said: 'The Scottish Government's approach is picking winners and losers, and fishing seems to lose every time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'We need ministers to step up and support our industry with positive action. 'Renewable food cannot be the price to be paid for renewable energy. Betting the house – and Scotland's fishing industry – on offshore wind that is far from 'clean' and where all the evidence points to both known and not yet fully known environmental damage is a very high-risk strategy.' Shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie said: 'Scotland's fishing industry has been let down by the SNP government for too long. They must finally listen to these legitimate concerns from the Scottish Fishermen's Federation about the impact future offshore wind could have on Scottish fishing activities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Fishermen are already being hit by damaging SNP policies and the threat of Labour's sell-out to the EU as part of their trade deal looms large. They are understandably sick and tired of both SNP and Labour politicians ignoring their interests. 'Ministers must engage with these concerns to guarantee the industry is not damaged by their plans and offshore developments must always be done in ways that minimise the harm to the sector.'
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Scotland is experiencing a political stalemate, why Holyrood needs to evolve
PA The pursuit of a single policy for the last 18 years has become a distraction from political reality Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... At the Edinburgh Book Festival on Monday a new book titled, 'Unfinished Business-The Evolution of Devolution' was published. Co-authored with Professor James Mitchell of Edinburgh University, the book reviews, the history of Devolution since the early debates on Home Rule at Westminster in the 1870s, the start of the Scottish Parliament in 1999 and developments over the past 25 years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The book argues that Scotland's politics must move beyond the narrow preoccupation about whether Scotland should be independent or whether another independence referendum should be held. Instead other ideas, issues, policies and challenges demanding our attention are being ignored or neglected. The focus on independence and the divisions it creates are exhausting the political energy of the nation, avoiding much needed social and economic reforms, and undermining the Nation's resilience. New thinking on a range of policies is not happening. We are more like Westminster, than we think! Many issues could be taken out of the constitutional debate allowing for greater inter party collaboration across the political divide. This is not to deny the importance of long term aspirations driving political parties, but Scotland is experiencing a political stalemate. The nation is stalled, major issues lie unresolved, the policy agenda looks frayed, political mood is low, independence has lost momentum and electors are anxious, angry and keen to protest. There is no unity of national purpose or intent. Governance looks tired and lessons are not being learned. An atmosphere of uncertainty and electoral insecurity exists as political parties prepare for the Scottish Parliament elections in May 2026: likely to be the most important since 1999. Scottish politics is understandably low on the public agenda as the chaos and trauma of global, European and UK issues capture the attention of voters. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Campaigning and governing are different mindsets. Governing requires constructive engagement, mutual respect, trust and compromise. But issues of importance often become embroiled in battles within the governing party. The growth of populism, feeding on disillusionment and disruption and speculation on the possibility of a major breakthrough for the Reform Party, previously UKIP and the Brexit party, cannot be ignored. We need to reflect on the successes and failures of devolution and build a programme of reform, which could be embraced by a broad swathe of public and political opinion: a new conversation is long overdue. Tim Harford in a column in the Financial Times in November 2014 noted that, 'in countries gripped by anger and frozen by polarisation there is not enough room for the curious, humble practical problem solving of the experimenting society'. This book is a contribution to how fresh thinking and good ideas might be achieved. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Opinion polling suggests that electors are less trusting of the importance of devolution. This is worrying as electors may be influenced by party performance at Westminster when they vote in the 2026 Holyrood elections. The Scottish Parliament as an institution has not yet become sufficiently important in its own right. This reinforces the need for Scottish politics to raise its game in its political offering for next year and tackle more seriously the issues that require urgent attention. Political parties in Scotland must embrace the comments of the late Donald Dewar speaking at the opening of the Scottish Parliament. He said, 'A proud moment. A new stage in a journey which began long ago and which has no end.' No party has a monopoly of wisdom on Scotland's future. But to focus on a single issue at the expense of less exciting, but hugely more significant issues of real concern to the public, is divisive. Making Scotland a better place to live is the overriding priority. Traditional political parties must adopt a more distinctively Scottish approach to major political and policy issues-free from the suffocating influence of Westminster. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Parties have been reluctant to discuss more radical policies or take issue with Westminster fearful of being associated with independence or nationalism, or undermining the Union or of being too 'Scottish.' This thinking is dangerous and allows one party to monopolise Scotland's future. Westminster and Whitehall view devolution as an event completed rather an ongoing process requiring change at the centre. Something more akin to a 'federal culture' has not developed. There is need for greater respect and appreciation of Scotland in London. For Labour there is an important lesson to be learned: more independence of thought, comment, policy and action is needed. After 18 years of virtual one party rule, the SNP is vulnerable to the idea, that this is a time for change with little if any progress being made on their campaign for independence. After the 2026 elections, our new book argues that the Scottish Parliament must be freed from the stifling control of the Scottish government, whatever colour, and become much more responsive to the needs of the electors, more governing, less campaigning. It is time to energise the committees of the Parliament to become a more powerful, assertive and authoritative legislative entity. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Devolution has been an undoubted success but the next 25 years provide an opportunity to consolidate success and to address substantial areas of policy where performance has been less than it might have been. The pursuit of a single policy for the last 18 years has become a distraction from political reality. Making devolution work shouldn't exclude any longer term vision for Scotland. The foundations of our parliament may not yet be secured. Farage is a divisive figure embracing a darker democracy, a vehicle for protest, but still dangerous. Whether Scotland becomes independent, federal, devolved, confederal or something different in the next 25 years, much more remains to be done to evolve into a more successful, progressive, and resilient world class nation.
