Rob Holland: Stunt pilot killed in plane crash
Mr. Holland previously piloted the carbon-fibre, custom-built MXS-RH, a single-seater aircraft made by the same Australian company whose experimental plane crashed.He was approaching the runway "for a normal landing" when the crash happened, NTSB's lead investigator Dan Boggs said at a news conference on Friday. "There was no acrobatic (sic) manoeuvres or nothing planned at that time."Jim Bourke, president of the International Aerobatic Club, said Mr Holland "revolutionized our sport, not just within the USA but on the world stage, arriving on the aerobatic competition scene like a wrecking ball laying waste to everyone who challenged him".John Cudahy, president of the International Council of Air Shows, told the Associated Press, Mr Holland "demonstrated what the end of the road for a pursuit of excellence looks like".He performed at the 2023 edition of the biennial air show at the base and won several competitions for his daring stunts in the cockpit. He won the U.S. National Aerobatic Championships a record 13 consecutive times with his last win being in 2024. In 2012, he was the recipient of the Art Scholl Award, which is presented by the International Council of Air Shows.His website details a list of his 2025 appearances, including airshows in Chicago, Milwaukee and Gold Coast, Australia.Mr Holland was from New Hampshire and was a teenager when he first qualified as a pilot, according to his website. He also studied aviation at a now-defunct New Hampshire college."Even with an absolutely impressive list of accomplishments, both in classical competition aerobatics and within the air show world, Rob was the most humble person with a singular goal to simply be better than he was yesterday," the Facebook statement said.The air show this weekend is expected to draw over 100,000 visitors, the air base said a day before the crash.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 days ago
- Scottish Sun
Warning over common garden decoration that's costing you thousands & causing ‘serious structural damage' this summer
Plus, the five warning signs your fence is under stress OF-FENCE Warning over common garden decoration that's costing you thousands & causing 'serious structural damage' this summer SUMMER may feel like the perfect time to decorate your garden with twinkling fairylights and colourful hanging baskets - but they can cause thousands of pounds worth of damage. A fencing expert has shared how hanging decorative items can cause serious structural damage over time - but there are some ways to prevent it. 2 Decorating your garden fence can look pretty but cause damage Credit: Getty Dale Smith, Founder of Fence Guru, an Australian fencing supplier, has witnessed firsthand the costly consequences of well-intentioned decorating choices. Advertisement What appears to be harmless decoration could actually be compromising the structural integrity of your fence, leading to expensive repairs that homeowners never see coming. He said: 'People love to personalise their outdoor spaces, and I completely understand that. 'However, what they don't realise is that most residential fences simply aren't designed to handle the additional weight and stress that comes with hanging decorations.' EXPENSIVE DAMAGE The vertical posts and horizontal rails work together to withstand wind loads and their own weight, but adding decorations changes this delicate balance. Advertisement He added: 'When you hang string lights, planters, or decorative mirrors on your fence, you're introducing weight the structure was never meant to handle. 'Even lightweight items create stress points that get worse over time.' Popular decorative choices like hanging baskets filled with soil and plants, which can weigh several kilograms when watered, make the problem particularly acute. Hanging planters present multiple problems beyond just weight. Advertisement The constant moisture from watering can seep into fence boards, particularly around fixing points where holes have been drilled. Amazon is selling a 'high bamboo' privacy screen for just 24.80 – it's perfect to create a 'relaxing' backyard space This moisture creates perfect conditions for rot and mould, especially in timber fences. String lights might seem harmless, but their weight combined with wind resistance creates a constant pulling force along the fence line. During storms or high winds, this tension multiplies dramatically, potentially ripping fixings from posts or snapping boards entirely. Thankfully, there are four ways to protect your fences. Advertisement 2 The constant moisture from watering can seep into fence boards, causing damage Credit: Getty HOW TO PREVENT DAMAGE Rather than abandoning your decorating dreams entirely, Dale suggests these safer approaches that protect your fence: 1. Use freestanding plant supports Install separate posts or tripods near your fence for hanging baskets and planters. This gives you the visual impact without putting undue stress on your fence. 2. Install dedicated wall brackets If you have a brick or rendered wall nearby, mount heavy decorations there instead. Advertisement Masonry can handle weights that would damage timber fencing. 3. Build a simple pergola A basic pergola structure can support string lights and hanging decorations while adding value to your property. 4. Choose fence-friendly lighting Solar stake lights or LED strips that attach with removable clips distribute weight evenly and avoid creating stress points.
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
How doomsday prepping went mainstream
Read more: 'Do I need to purchase camels?' Australian preppers have found their voice since Covid, but tough questions remain
Spectator
7 days ago
- Spectator
Down with exclamation marks!
Punctuation is a gendered thing. I've been trying to stop myself overusing exclamation marks and it's been difficult. Exclamation marks are girly because they're a way of taking the sting out of what you say; they make any pronouncement seem more tentative, less serious. They're the equivalent of a disarming smile, the marker that says: 'No offence!' You add them at the end of a sentence to prevent anyone thinking that you're being bossy or critical. They're an economical form of non-confrontation. Women use them far more than men. Almost 20 years ago, a study in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication found that women used nearly three-quarters of the exclamation marks in electronic messages, but it identified the tic as 'markers of friendly interaction'. As far as I can work out, nothing has changed since. Reviewing, gloomily, my own record of 'Hope that helps!' or 'Yes please!' I find this is less to do with enthusiasm than with a desire to please, or at least a desire not to seem pushy. I've just sent someone a message saying, 'Get ahead of the herd' (I meant, 'Just get on with it') and I've had to stop myself putting in an exclamation mark to take the sting out of being bossy. Now he probably does think I'm bossy. Then I ask myself whether the silverback males I know use punctuation the same way, and the answer is nope. My rule from now on is, if Sir Paul Dacre wouldn't use it, I shouldn't either. Kisses, or Xs, serve something of the same purpose, with the difference that women mostly use them with other women. Xs are another marker of non-aggression. They say: friend, I come in peace, even though I may be complaining or telling you what to do. It's a bit like how younger people use the Australian uplift at the end of sentences, turning every statement into a question. It's a way of avoiding seeming dogmatic or assertive, but that's generational rather than gendered. One friend has beaten me to austere punctuation. 'Nowadays when I write to men,' she says, 'I am brief, unapologetic and focused on the message. This is a recent thing. I realised that for as long as I have been writing to other people, I had thought I needed to charm them. I thought this was what everyone wanted. They don't, particularly men.' She's now binary in her communications: entirely dispassionate or psychotically overnuanced. There is a place for charm in written social intercourse in which punctuation plays a role, but part of the problem of contemporary interaction is that our categories are now blurred. We write to our bank manager (if we've got one) with the same easy informality as to a close friend. We've gone from 'Dear Madam' to 'Hi Melanie' (a very tetchy message to me from the press office of the Metropolitan Police began that way), and we sign off with 'Cheers' in both contexts, which means we use with colleagues or superiors the same sort of formula we'd use socially. It's the democratisation of communication, and it's confusing. Perhaps we should stop being ingratiating – exclamation marks and kisses are just that – and go for plainness if that's what's needed. The words 'please' and 'thank you' work well, though again, it's all about nuance. As for the other trick to ensure you don't sound dogmatic, ellipses, I wonder if they're gendered too. These are deep waters…
