Opinion - Trump can't blame Biden forever
President Trump's recent trip to the Middle East was all about making deals. He returned with promises of trillions of dollars of future purchases and investments in the United States. He also was given a gift by Qatar, a Boeing 747 luxury jetliner that he hopes to use as Air Force One, after which it will be housed at his presidential library. Of course, modifying the airplane to meet the safety and security standards of Air Force One will likely take several years, costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, making the gift rather costly.
Any time a negotiation or event works out well, Trump is quick to take credit for it. Yet when things go sour, it appears that the kneejerk reaction is to blame it on former President Biden.
President Trump has been in office since Jan. 20, 2025 — four months. This is fast approaching 10 percent of his second term next month. He has issued an unprecedented number of executive orders covering a swath of issues, including energy, immigration, climate and DEI, to name just a few. Those garnering the most attention have focused around tariffs on goods imported into the nation, with the intent to reduce the trade deficit by encouraging more domestic production. Yet whenever unfavorable news comes in, the first response has been to blame his predecessor.
This has become the theme of the administration.
For example, when Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was asked about overspending her budget during a Senate Appropriation Committee meeting, her answer was that it was Biden's fault. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins blamed Biden for the rising agriculture trade deficit, even though the dollar value of agriculture exports from 2021-2024 were the highest ever recorded. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent blamed Biden for the recent U.S. credit rating downgrade by Moody's, even though every president since Herbert Hoover has contributed to the growing national debt.
When Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy held a press conference to announce sweeping changes in the air traffic control system, he blamed Biden for the travel delays at Newark Liberty International airport. Yet problems in the air traffic control system and its infrastructure have persisted across several administrations, as Duffy also noted, including Trump's first term, from 2017-2021.
When a new president takes office, he must accept and address the current challenges, whatever they may be. This is the case with Trump, as it was with Joe Biden in 2021 and Trump back in 2017. Such initial conditions are not a new phenomenon and are a reflection of complex societal issues that transcend administrations. They have been faced by every new president when implementing his agenda and setting up his administration.
Blaming the previous president may appease the president's most committed supporters. However, it demonstrates weakness. Whining about the 'hand that you have been dealt' does not change the cards. As Harry Truman said, 'the buck stops here.'
Given that the president has been in office for well over 100 days, the initial conditions on many issues have begun to dampen and fade. For example, the impact of the president's tariffs on the economy are quickly washing out economic policies instituted by Biden. If the tariffs turn the economy sour and push the nation into a recession, there is no one to blame but Trump.
As long as the president continues to blame Biden for anything that goes awry or what he cannot fix, he is figurately allowing Biden to live rent-free in the White House. Using an aging man who is battling prostate cancer as his whipping boy and default excuse is unbecoming of the person who holds the most powerful position in the world.
No president has all the answers to every issue they must confront and every problem they must address. That is why presidents who surround themselves with intelligent and thoughtful advisers, who can help him execute an agenda that serves the best interests of the people and the nation, are a good predictor of his success. A review of Trump's choices for his Cabinet and inner circle demonstrates his emphasis on loyalty rather than experience.
Not everyone may agree with Trump's agenda and how he is attempting to reshape America. However, blaming the former president when things go astray is, shall we say, unpresidential.
Sheldon H. Jacobson, Ph.D., is a professor in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. A data scientist, he uses his expertise in risk-based analytics to address problems in public policy.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warning to Australia over fears China's military actions could trigger 'nuclear cascade'
Alarm bells are ringing over the Chinese-led military build up taking place in Australia's region, with fears a "nuclear cascade" could unfold as more nations seek to obtain weapons of mass destruction. Australia's Defence Minister has warned about an Indo-Pacific arms race, but at the same time has signalled Australia preparedness to increase military spending. Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles has warned of the developing dynamic of China's arms build up and Russia's strategic ties with North Korea, saying the arms control framework previously developed by Western allies to combat nuclear proliferation during the Cold War might not be enough to meet today's challenges. The US called on Australia to increase defence spending as leaders met over the weekend at Asia's top security summit in Singapore. Mr Marles noted that Australia's defence budget will rise to about 2.3 per cent of GDP within the decade, from the two per cent it currently hovers at, saying the planned expansion represented the "single biggest peacetime increase in defence expenditure in Australia's history". "So we are beginning this journey," he said. The former Fox News host and now US Defence Secretary, Pete Hegseth, has personified the changing nature of the White House after the re-election of Donald Trump, but his message on China has been broadly the same to his predecessor, says Ely Ratner, the former Assistant Secretary of Defence for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs under the Biden administration. But he warned of a growing threat to stability in the region. "I think it is very complicated by the fact that China is undergoing the largest peacetime military build up in history," he told ABC radio on Monday. "They haven't explained why they think they need such a large arsenal of nuclear weapons and they're putting real pressure on other countries both in the region and in the world when it comes to nuclear weapons. It is quite a destabilising military build up we're seeing from China. He said the challenge is not just about how to manage nuclear armed nations like India and Pakistan which have been involved in recent skirmishes, but how to stop more nations feeling like they need to acquire them, leading to "the potential of nuclear cascades". "If China grows its nuclear arsenal to such a size that countries like South Korea … and then potentially others start thinking they might need their own nuclear weapons, then we're in a much more dangerous world," he warned this morning. When asked if allies like Australia could trust the Trump administration is committed to defence in the broader Indo-Pacific region, Mr Ratner said "I think for the time being the broad answer is yes". He added that he didn't believe China was more likely to invade Taiwan due to President Trump being in office, saying the Asian giant was in a "wait and see mode". Speaking at the summit on Saturday Mr Hegseth called on allies in the region to share the burden of deterrence by upgrading their own defences. "There's no reason to sugar coat it," he told the Shangri-La Dialogue. "The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent", suggesting an invasion could take place within the next two years. Responding to questions from reporters on Sunday, Mr Albanese said Australia's position on Taiwan was "very clear" and included a bipartisan stance to support the status quo. China views Taiwan as its own territory, and slammed the US as the biggest "troublemaker for regional peace and stability". with AAP Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US dollar declines as traders assess tariff outlook
By Kevin Buckland TOKYO (Reuters) -The U.S. dollar edged lower on Monday, giving back some of its gains from last week, as markets weighed the outlook for President Donald Trump's tariff policy and its potential to constrict growth and unleash inflation. The greenback starts the week on the back foot after Trump said late on Friday that he plans to double duties on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from Wednesday. The U.S. currency has been whipsawed for weeks by Trump's on-again-off-again trade war, falling when a flare up in tensions stokes worries of a potential U.S. recession. The dollar witnessed weekly tumbles of 3% against major peers in the days after the April 2 "Liberation Day" tariffs and 1.9% two weeks ago, when Trump threatened 50% levies on Europe. Last week, the greenback got a bit of respite, rising 0.3% after talks with the European Union got back on track and a U.S. trade court blocked the bulk of Trump's tariffs on the grounds that he overstepped his authority. Although an appeals court reinstated the duties a day later as it considers the case, and Trump's administration said it had other avenues to implement the levies if it loses in court, many analysts said it shows there are still checks in place on the President's power. The dollar dropped 0.3% to 143.57 yen as of 0023 GMT, giving back some of its more than 1% rally from last week. The euro gained 0.2% to $1.1372, and sterling advanced 0.3% to $1.3489. The Australian dollar added 0.3% to $0.6454. The U.S. dollar index, which measures the currency against six major peers, eased 0.2% to 99.214. The dollar has also been weighed down by fiscal worries in recent weeks, amid a broad "Sell America" theme that has seen dollar assets from stocks to Treasury bonds dropping. Those concerns come into particular focus this week as the Senate starts considering Trump's sweeping tax cut and spending bill, which will add an estimated $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade. Many senators have already said the bill will need major revisions, and Trump said he welcomes changes. The fate of section 899 of the bill could be crucial, according to Barclays analysts. "S899 would give the U.S. free rein to tax companies and investors from countries deemed to have 'unfair foreign taxes' (and) could be seen as a tax on the U.S. capital account at a time when investor nervousness towards U.S. assets has grown," they said in a research report. "Actively reducing foreigners' total return on their U.S. investments would dent inflows and weigh on the dollar, all else equal," they added. "While dollar sentiment/positioning remains close to extreme negativity, the path ahead is by no means clear cut."
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does SIA Engineering (SGX:S59) Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' While a well funded company may sustain losses for years, it will need to generate a profit eventually, or else investors will move on and the company will wither away. So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like SIA Engineering (SGX:S59). Now this is not to say that the company presents the best investment opportunity around, but profitability is a key component to success in business. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. If you believe that markets are even vaguely efficient, then over the long term you'd expect a company's share price to follow its earnings per share (EPS) outcomes. Therefore, there are plenty of investors who like to buy shares in companies that are growing EPS. It certainly is nice to see that SIA Engineering has managed to grow EPS by 27% per year over three years. If growth like this continues on into the future, then shareholders will have plenty to smile about. Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. EBIT margins for SIA Engineering remained fairly unchanged over the last year, however the company should be pleased to report its revenue growth for the period of 14% to S$1.2b. That's encouraging news for the company! In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. To see the actual numbers, click on the chart. See our latest analysis for SIA Engineering You don't drive with your eyes on the rear-view mirror, so you might be more interested in this free report showing analyst forecasts for SIA Engineering's future profits. It's a good habit to check into a company's remuneration policies to ensure that the CEO and management team aren't putting their own interests before that of the shareholder with excessive salary packages. Our analysis has discovered that the median total compensation for the CEOs of companies like SIA Engineering with market caps between S$1.3b and S$4.1b is about S$1.8m. SIA Engineering's CEO took home a total compensation package worth S$1.4m in the year leading up to March 2024. That is actually below the median for CEO's of similarly sized companies. CEO remuneration levels are not the most important metric for investors, but when the pay is modest, that does support enhanced alignment between the CEO and the ordinary shareholders. It can also be a sign of good governance, more generally. For growth investors, SIA Engineering's raw rate of earnings growth is a beacon in the night. The fast growth bodes well while the very reasonable CEO pay assists builds some confidence in the board. Based on these factors, this stock may well deserve a spot on your watchlist, or even a little further research. What about risks? Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for SIA Engineering you should know about. There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of Singaporean companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
