logo
Only Nigel Farage benefits from another ‘summer of riots'

Only Nigel Farage benefits from another ‘summer of riots'

Independent9 hours ago
"We must not let Reform dominate the summer," Kemi Badenoch told Conservative MPs in an end-of-term pep talk. True, she grabbed some headlines with a limited shadow cabinet reshuffle, but so far, Reform UK is dominating the summer.
Other carefully constructed Tory initiatives go largely unreported, to the party's frustration, while Nigel Farage makes news with that smirk or by raising an eyebrow.
He is now widening his pitch beyond immigration, which he has banked as a vote-winner, and will campaign on law and order over the summer. His pledge to halve crime at a cost of £17bn doesn't add up. But it still garnered positive headlines; Reform is judged by different standards to rival parties. It is now seen as the best party on handling law and order.
Farage got lucky with his timing. Yesterday's Daily Mail front page, on his crime campaign, was manna from heaven: 'Britain is facing societal collapse, warns Farage.' His backing of the protests outside an asylum hotel in Epping, Essex – and his dismissal of those arrested as 'a few bad eggs' – might have been attacked by other parties in normal times.
But deputy prime minister Angela Rayner made a highly significant intervention at yesterday's cabinet meeting, warning that Britain could face a repeat of the riots almost a year ago unless the government addresses people's concerns, and that immigration is having 'a profound impact on society'. It seemed to validate Farage's warning of 'civil disobedience on a vast scale', and sparking fears of another summer of violence.
Downing Street's briefings on cabinet meetings are normally as dry as dust. Its release of the deputy prime minister's remarks tells us that the government does not want to look flat-flooted and not 'in control' if there is more civil unrest this summer.
Nor can Labour allow Farage a monopoly on proposals to crack down on illegal migration. Hence today's announcement of a deal between the government and food delivery companies to tackle hotspots of illegal working, sometimes near asylum hotels. 'This is a pull factor for migrants crossing the Channel,' one government insider admitted.
On other issues, Reform has been less lucky. It sometimes shoots from the lip without thinking things through. Richard Tice, its deputy leader, sent shockwaves through industry by suggesting the party would scrap renewable energy contracts if it wins power, before half-retreating and saying a Reform government would oppose 'any form of variation' to the contracts. Labour warned that one million jobs would be at risk from Reform's plan. Tice temporarily forgot his party's pitch to the red wall: left on economics and right on social issues.
He appeared to translate people's concerns about the cost to them of net zero measures like heat pumps and electric cars into opposition to climate change measures. In fact, a majority of Reform supporters back policies to combat climate change.
With Reform consistently ahead in the opinion polls, the business world must take Farage seriously as a future prime minister, but its attempts to engage with his party are proving difficult. Business wants to know about Reform's policies, but the party has no formal policy-making process. As with his pal Donald Trump, policy seems to be whatever Farage thinks when he wakes up in the morning or announces on the hoof.
"Policy is what Farage says – everything is decided by him," one business figure told me. 'It's hard to work out what is just another headline and a serious policy.' Farage has started to hold business round-tables. "Everyone gets a bit p***ed, but we don't learn much," another company executive said.
How will Reform deliver its pledge to raise the personal tax allowance from £12,570 to £20,000 at a cost of between £50bn and £80bn? We don't know. Will this promise survive a rigorous policy process than the grown-ups in Reform know the party needs?
Such fantasy economics, based on deep spending cuts – with Reform sometimes pledging to spend the same billions of savings more than once – are Farage's Achilles heel. That's what other parties should target.
"Farage is a vibe," one minister said, 'it's hard to attack a vibe.' But the other parties need to find a way.
For now, many voters are not bothered about whether Reform's sums add up. The public will have a free hit at next May's elections to English local authorities, including London and Birmingham, and the Scottish and Welsh parliaments. That is bad news for both Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch, whose leadership will come under pressure if their parties do badly, as they probably will.
But voters will care about the detail of Reform's economic pitch when they come to choose a government at the next general election. A vibe will not be enough.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rotherham abuse prisoner found guilty of raping another teenager
Rotherham abuse prisoner found guilty of raping another teenager

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rotherham abuse prisoner found guilty of raping another teenager

A man who was jailed for 19 years in 2016 for subjecting a girl to a 'campaign of violent rape' in Rotherham has been found guilty of raping another vulnerable teenager in the town. Sageer Hussain, 39, was one of three men found guilty of rape at Sheffield Crown Court on Wednesday following a trial which heard how he targeted his victim 25 years ago, the National Crime Agency (NCA) confirmed. Hussain is already serving a lengthy sentence after he was jailed for 19 years in 2016 for raping a 13-year-old girl in the South Yorkshire town. He will be sentenced again in November after was found guilty on Wednesday of raping a girl alongside two other men – Kessur Ajaib and Mohammed Makhmood – who were convicted of raping a second teenager. The convictions are the latest to arise out of the NCA's Operation Stovewood, which is the huge investigation into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. A jury heard how the girl Hussain raped was about 14 at the time and is now in her 30s. Hussain, who was about the same age, led her down an alleyway in Rotherham town centre and said he would not let her back out unless she had sex with him. Prosecutors told the jury how Hussain raped her with two other people present, one female and one male. They said she cried throughout the ordeal as her exit was blocked. The second girl was also about 14 when Ajaib and Makhmood raped her, the court heard. Prosecutor Andrew Bailey told the jury how Ajaib was about 18 when he raped her in an alleyway. Mr Bailey said Makhmood, who was about 18 or 19 at the time, raped the same girl in an old graveyard in Rotherham as she fought against him. He said that he called her a 'slag' and a 'dirty b****' before spitting at her and laughing. Mr Bailey said she 'did not dare tell anyone'. The offending took place between 1999 and 2002, the court heard. Hussain is due to be sentenced again on November 7, the NCA confirmed. Ajaib and Makhmood are due to be sentenced on November 21. All three were remanded in custody by Judge Charles Thomas. NCA senior investigating officer Alan Hastings said: 'Ajaib, Hussain and Makhmood subjected two young girls to devastating acts of sexual abuse, the consequences of which the victims have lived with for almost 25 years. 'Those victims have now, at last, had their voices heard and their accounts believed. 'While this could never eradicate the suffering caused by their attackers, I hope it will pave the way for the women to move forward with their lives.' Liz Fell, specialist prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service 's organised child sexual abuse unit, said: 'These men deliberately exploited the victims' youth and vulnerability to manipulate and control them. 'They sexually abused the victims, who were children, in the most horrendous way. 'The treatment these young girls endured was appalling – they were attacked in isolated locations and subjected to humiliation and verbal abuse.' The NCA says Operation Stovewood is the single largest law enforcement operation of its kind in the UK and has identified more than 1,100 children involved in the exploitation. The agency said 46 people have now been convicted. Ajaib, 43, of Walter Street, Rotherham, was found guilty of one count of rape and one of indecent assault. He was found not guilty of a further count of rape. Makhmood, 43, of Falding Street, Rotherham, was found guilty of one count of rape. Hussain, 39, formerly of Rotherham and currently a serving prisoner, was found guilty of one count of rape. He was acquitted of two counts of raping the girl who was raped by the other two defendants. Hussain was jailed in 2016 alongside seven other men by the same judge who had previously sentenced his brothers Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras to 35, 25, and 19 years in prison respectively. The judge in 2016 heard how Hussain's victim, who was abused by all eight of the co-defendants, had complained to police in 2003 but the inquiry was dropped, partly because she was so terrified of her abusers. Judge Sarah Wright told the eight men: 'She was targeted, sexualised and subjected to acts of a degrading and violent nature.'

Goldman Sachs boss: City's status is at risk
Goldman Sachs boss: City's status is at risk

Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Times

Goldman Sachs boss: City's status is at risk

London's position as a global financial centre is 'fragile', the head of Goldman Sachs has warned. David Solomon, 63, said a combination of Brexit and not retaining increasingly mobile talent and capital put the City's status at risk. 'The financial industry is still driven by talent and capital formation. And those things are much more mobile than they were 25 years ago,' Solomon told The Master Investor Podcast. • Rachel Reeves refuses to rule out wealth tax despite fresh warnings Solomon is one of the world's most powerful investment bankers and has been chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has about 6,000 employees in the UK, since 2018. He said he was 'encouraged by some of what the current government is talking about in terms of supporting business and trying to support a more growth-oriented agenda. But if you don't set a policy that keeps talent here, that encourages capital formation here, I think over time you risk that.' On July 15, Rachel Reeves unveiled a number of measures aimed at cutting red tape in Britain's financial services sector as part of attempts to kickstart the economy. The chancellor said in her Mansion House speech that Labour placed financial services, one of eight key growth sectors under the industrial strategy, 'at the heart of this government's growth mission'. However, there has been speculation the Treasury could target profits in the banking sector, which have been boosted by higher interest rates, with tax rises to help bolster the government's fiscal position. Reeves with Solomon and his Goldman Sachs co-CEOs Kunal Shah, left, and Anthony Gutman, right, in Wednesday's meeting SIMON WALKER/HM TREASURY Reeves is facing pressure over reforms to the non-dom tax regime, with research by New World Wealth, an intelligence firm, recently suggesting Britain has lost 18 billionaires over the past two years, more than any other country in the world. In the podcast, Solomon said: 'Incentives matter. If you create tax policy or incentives that push people away, you harm your economy.' Reeves also pledged in her speech last week to make 'meaningful reforms' to ringfencing, rules brought in following the 2008 financial crisis which forced lenders to legally separate their high street businesses from riskier investment banking divisions. • Why is the FTSE 100 so high when the UK economy is stuttering? Solomon pressed the chancellor, with whom he met in 11 Downing Street on Wednesday along with his co-CEOs Kunal Shah and Anthony Gutman, to 'follow through', saying: 'It's a place where the UK is an outlier, and by being an outlier, it prevents capital formation and growth. 'What's the justification for being an outlier? Why is this so difficult to change? It's hard to make a substantive policy argument that this is like a great policy for the UK. So why is it so hard to change?' The ringfencing regime has also faced criticism from the bosses of some of Britain's biggest banks, who called on the chancellor in April to abolish the rules, arguing that they were inefficient and had been superseded by other reforms.

Britain could be sued over causing climate change
Britain could be sued over causing climate change

Telegraph

time5 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britain could be sued over causing climate change

The UN has opened the door to Britain being sued over its historic contribution to climate change. In a significant legal opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) said failure by countries to meet their climate obligations could, in specific cases, allow other states affected by climate change to sue them. It also cleared the way for lawsuits over historic emissions, which could leave the UK, the birthplace of the industrial revolution, at risk of legal action from other nations. The advisory opinion issued on Wednesday in The Hague is a way of clarifying specific questions of international law, and is not legally binding. However, it carries legal weight and moral authority and is expected to be influential on the future of environmental litigation. The UK implemented an ICJ advisory opinion when it agreed to hand back the Chagos Islands to Mauritius last year in a deal in which Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, played an influential role. The new opinion will raise fears that Lord Hermer would back any attempt by a foreign country to use the opinion to sue Britain. 'Hermer has demonstrated he does not bat for Britain,' said Richard Tice, deputy leader of Reform UK. The Tories and Reform both rejected the ruling and said they would not pay any damages if they were in government. Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, said: 'The ICJ has lost its core purpose and is now joining political campaigns and bandwagons based upon ideological obsessions on issues such as reparations and destroying the sovereign rights of national governments. 'The Labour Government is equally ideologically obsessed with this nonsense. Activist-led court rulings like this should never be treated as binding. 'This is the process of lawfare that led to the Chagos surrender and must not be replicated on this issue. We challenge Labour to put Britain's interest first and make clear they do not intend to act on this ridiculous advisory ruling.' Mr Tice said: 'Under no circumstances would a Reform government pay any ludicrous climate reparations. Nor will we not be beholden to any foreign court. 'This is another non-binding advisory judgment by the ICJ, who absurdly said we should give up the Chagos. They just hate us.' The case was put forward by a group of Pacific island law students. Ultimately, 132 nations supported it in the ICJ. The opinion ran to 133 pages and took two hours to read out. The opinion by the ICJ, also known as the World Court, was welcomed by environmental groups and by those living in islands at risk from rising sea levels and extreme temperature caused by climate change. Vanuatu is the island most at risk from climate change. Ralph Regenvanu, its minister of climate change adaptation, said Vanuatu would take the ICJ ruling to the UN General Assembly and 'pursue a resolution that will support implementation of this decision'. He said 'The Global South is bearing the brunt of a crisis it did not create. Families are losing their homes, entire cultures are at risk of disappearing, and lives are being shattered by man-made climate disasters. 'The nations most responsible for emissions should be held accountable for any violations of legal obligations and they must also step up and lead in providing resources and support to aid those most affected.' Legal experts said the judgment was a victory for small island and low-lying states that had asked the court to clarify states' responsibilities in 2019. Such countries are particularly vulnerable to climate change and have been frustrated by the lack of progress in tackling the problem. The Pacific islands, for example, are at the forefront of the risks of climate change, but are responsible for less than 1 per cent of total greenhouse gas emissions. UN negotiations over how to curb global warming have often been stymied over how to balance the obligations of richer developed countries that polluted heavily with poorer nations being asked to cut their emissions. Developed countries, including Britain, argued that existing climate agreements like the 2015 Paris Agreement were enough and no further obligations should be imposed. On Wednesday, Judge Yuji Iwasawa, the president of the ICJ, rejected that argument. He said broader international law applied and countries not signed up to the Paris Agreement – or which, like the US, want to leave it – must still protect the environment He said developing nations have a right to seek compensation for the impacts of climate change, for example an extreme weather event destroying buildings and infrastructure. The amount of damages that a country could pay if a claim was successful is not clear. £2.8tn cost of climate change in 20 years The science journal Nature has previously published analysis estimating that climate change caused $2.8tn of losses between 2000 and 2019. But Judge Iwasawa warned it would be difficult to prove which countries were responsible for which part of climate change. The Foreign Office said the judgment was non-binding and there was no basis for the UK to pay reparations. A spokesman said: 'Tackling climate change is and will remain an urgent UK and global priority. Our position remains that this is best achieved through international commitment to the UN's existing climate treaties and mechanisms. 'It will take time to look at this detailed, non-binding, advisory opinion before commenting in detail. 'We will continue to collaborate closely to create the conditions for greater ambition and action, including with Brazil as it prepares to host COP30, and will tackle the climate crisis in a way that makes the British people better off.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store