What PM Wong's Cabinet reshuffle means
SMU law professor Eugene Tan and BowerGroupAsia's managing director Nydia Ngiow discusses the Cabinet reshuffle in this episode of The Usual Place.
The Usual Place Podcast What PM Wong's new Cabinet line-up signals for succession
The votes are in, the general election is over, and a new Parliament is taking shape.
The last piece of the GE2025 chapter was unveiled on May 21: Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's Cabinet line-up, which had a few surprises including just one deputy prime minister (DPM) position and a bumper crop of seven newly-elected MPs taking on political office.
In this episode of The Usual Place Podcast, I unpack the post-GE2025 Cabinet line-up with Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan and Ms Nydia Ngiow, the managing director of strategic advisory firm BowerGroupAsia.
(From left) SMU law professor Eugene Tan and BowerGroupAsia's managing director Nydia Ngiow speak with Natasha Ann Zachariah - correspondent and The Usual Place Podcast host - about the Cabinet reshuffle.
ST PHOTO: GIN TAY
For Prof Tan, not having a second DPM was a surprise move, and he noted that PM Wong is 'breaking that particular trend'.
He pointed out that Mr Chan Chun Sing, who will be Defence Minister and Coordinating Minister for Public Services, and Mr Ong Ye Kung, who will continue on as Health Minister and take on the role of Coordinating Minister for Social Policies, are both front runners for the DPM position, given that they are part of PM Wong's core team of senior leaders.
However, Prof Tan pointed out, 'the field may not be limited to them'. As the new government gets to work, other potential candidates may eventually stand out.
'I think nothing is cast in stone. There is certainly no inevitability from being coordinating minister to DPM.'
Going into the next term of government, Ms Ngiow said the much-talked about 4G leadership renewal is in place.
Given the publicity and talk around the new faces during the general election, she added: 'We can expect that the public will definitely scrutinise this Parliament and Cabinet a bit more closely. All eyes will be on how the 4G leaders will then be helping to lead and guide the younger generations moving forward.'
Highlights (click/tap above):
1:21 Was it a safe reshuffle, or were there surprises in PM Wong's new Cabinet?
3:03 One thing about the line-up that stood out for Prof Tan and Ms Ngiow
4:18 'Breaking the trend' when it comes to having two DPMs - and who could step up by the mid-term
7:46 Are Ministers Ong Ye Kung and Chan Chun Sing the front runners for the DPM spot?
10:11 On moving National Development Minister Desmond Lee to the Ministry of Education
11:20 A 'bigger canvas' at the Ministry of National Development: Prof Tan on Mr Chee Hong Tat's move
13:42 The task force at the Ministry of Trade and Industry
17:51 What does the post of Acting Minister mean?
19:48 The mix of new faces in the Cabinet
22:48 A bumper crop of people with 'political office-holder potential' sets the scene for leadership renewal: Prof Tan
24:46 Not getting a promotion in this Cabinet isn't necessarily a negative thing
27:22 Different people bring their own strengths, says Ms Ngiow on those who have stayed in their roles
28:56 On Dr Faishal Ibrahim's appointment as Acting Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs
31:22 Will we see labour chief Ng Chee Meng back in government at a later time?
35:21 People want to see what the PAP backbenchers can do; must show that they are relevant, says Prof Tan
37:17 With the 4G renewal complete, it's time to look at the next generation of leaders
40:50 Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong's role in this Government
Host: Natasha Ann Zachariah (natashaz@sph.com.sg)
Read Natasha's articles: https://str.sg/iSXm
Follow Natasha on her IG account and DM her your thoughts on this topic: https://str.sg/8Wav
Follow Natasha on LinkedIn: https://str.sg/v6DN
Filmed by ST Video: Joel Chng, Rubeen Raj and Marc Justin De Souza
Edited by ST Podcast producers: Teo Tong Kai and Eden Soh
ST Podcasts' executive producer: Ernest Luis
Follow The Usual Place Podcast here and get notified for new episode drops:
Channel: https://str.sg/5nfm
Apple Podcasts: https://str.sg/9ijX
Spotify: https://str.sg/cd2P
YouTube: https://str.sg/wEr7u
Feedback to: podcast@sph.com.sg
---
Follow more ST podcast channels:
All-in-one ST Podcasts channel: https://str.sg/wvz7
ST Podcasts website: http://str.sg/stpodcasts
ST Podcasts YouTube: https://str.sg/4Vwsa
---
Get The Straits Times app, which has a dedicated podcast player section:
The App Store: https://str.sg/icyB
Google Play: https://str.sg/icyX
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
37 minutes ago
- Straits Times
The Washington Post plans an influx of outside opinion writers
The Washington Post plans an influx of outside opinion writers in a new programme, known internally as Ripple. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - The Washington Post has published some of the world's most influential voices for more than a century, including columnists such as George Will and newsmakers such as the Dalai Lama and President Donald Trump. A new initiative aims to sharply expand that lineup, opening the Post to many published opinion articles from other newspapers across America, writers on Substack and eventually nonprofessional writers, according to four people familiar with the plan. Executives hope that the programme, known internally as Ripple, will appeal to readers who want more breadth than the Post's current opinion section and more quality than social platforms such as Reddit and X. The project will host and promote the outside opinion columns on the Post's website and app but outside its paywall, according to the people, who would speak only anonymously to discuss a confidential project. It will operate outside the paper's opinion section. The Post aims to strike some of the initial partnership deals this summer, two of the people said, and the company recently hired an editor to oversee writing for Ripple. A final phase, allowing nonprofessionals to submit columns with help from an AI writing coach called Ember, could begin testing this fall. Human editors would review submissions before publication. A spokesperson for the Post declined to comment. Mr Jeff Bezos, the founder and owner of the Post, has been trying to turn around the news organisation's struggling business. He has told confidants that he wants to broaden the publication's reach beyond its traditional audience of coastal elites. For years, Mr Bezos has also urged leaders at the Post to embrace aggregation, the practice of summarising and linking to journalism published by other outlets, to attract additional readers. Ripple would be a big step in that direction. Executives involved with the project believe that it could reach a potential audience of 38 million US adults, based on internal research, and that some of them would join a 'talent network' to submit their own writing, two of the people said. The company is also planning to explore subscription bundles with partner publishers, one of the people said. The Washington Post's traditional opinion section has undergone a significant shift in recent months. Mr Bezos decided shortly before the November election that the Post would no longer endorse a presidential candidate. That decision stopped the publication of the section's endorsement of Vice-President Kamala Harris. In February, Mr Bezos ordered the Post's opinion section to embrace 'personal liberties and free markets', prompting the section's editor, Mr David Shipley, to resign. Both decisions have drawn scrutiny from readers and inside the company. Ripple is the result of a research and development process that began more than a year ago. The Post's opinion section experimented in 2024 with local content from Kansas City, Missouri, and began brainstorming sessions to expand the idea that spring. Executives approved the plan for Ripple in January, and the Post started the project in April. Mr Will Lewis, the Post's CEO, has been looking for new ways to reduce costs at the company while finding new sources of revenue. In 2024, the Post created a road map to guide its efforts, with focus areas including artificial intelligence, new products and personalisation. Executives have already considered a list of potential partners that includes The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Salt Lake Tribune, popular Substack writer Matt Yglesias and The Dispatch, a right-of-centre politics site, two of the people said. Ms Lauren Gustus, CEO of The Salt Lake Tribune, said the nonprofit publication had declined to participate in the programme, preferring to focus on 'building relationships and trust here in Utah'. Mr Andrew Morse, the publisher of the Journal-Constitution, said the Post had not contacted him about the project, adding that the plan was not in line with his company's strategy. 'We are laser-focused on growing direct relationships with customers,' he said. 'We think scale is yesterday's war.' Ember, the AI writing coach being developed by the Post, could automate several functions normally provided by human editors, the people said. Early mock-ups of the tool feature a 'story strength' tracker that tells writers how their piece is shaping up, with a sidebar that lays out basic parts of story structure: 'early thesis', 'supporting points' and 'memorable ending'. A live AI assistant would provide developmental questions, with writing prompts inviting authors to add 'solid supporting points', one of the people said. The Post's plan to publish content by contributors is a familiar tactic in digital media. Forbes and HuffPost became online destinations for opinion writing submitted by users, leading to a boom in their digital audiences. But that approach has fallen out of favor in recent years as news organisations have placed a greater emphasis on building deeper engagement with users to create paid subscription businesses. Ripple is being developed by Mr Lippe Oosterhof, a strategic adviser at the Post who previously worked for Reuters and Yahoo. According to his LinkedIn profile, Mr Oosterhof is also a strategic adviser to a tool that uses artificial intelligence to assist professional journalists and corporate communications executives. One publication initially under consideration as a potential partner for Ripple was The Contrarian, an online publication co-founded by Ms Jennifer Rubin, one of the people said. Ms Rubin resigned from the Post after Mr Bezos stopped the endorsement of Ms Harris, saying the company's leaders had abandoned values central to the Post's mission. The Post has since removed The Contrarian from consideration. When told that she had been under consideration at all, Ms Rubin burst out in laughter. 'Did they read my public resignation letter?' she said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
UK economic team looks beyond Europe
THIS week marks the 50th anniversary of the United Kingdom's June 1975 referendum of its membership of the European Common Market, the precursor of the European Union (EU). Yet, some five decades later, the trade policy of the UK is increasingly looking beyond Europe, post-Brexit. In the last few weeks alone, the UK government has agreed a new trade deal with India, plus also a tariff agreement with the United States. UK ministers, including Chancellor Rachel Reeves, have said that this further deal could be finalised swiftly in the form of a new trade agreement with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) comprising Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Oman, Qatar and Kuwait. While the GCC economy is, collectively, not nearly as large as that of the United States or even India, the deal would be a significant prize with the Middle Eastern bloc's total GDP of around US$2 trillion in 2022. According to the World Bank, if the GCC continues to grow at a business-as-usual rate, combined GDP would grow to about US$6 trillion by 2050. A second reason why the UK government would celebrate a deal is that the GCC has signed relatively few such agreements to date, including a pact with South Korea. A further big prize for London of a GCC deal could be further, open access to investment from Gulf sovereign wealth funds which tend to be cross-sector investors who often take a long-term multi-decade economic perspective. Total UK-GCC bilateral trade is currently worth around £60 billion (S$104.5 billion). This makes the GCC bloc as a whole equivalent to the UK's fourth largest non-EU export market behind the US, China and Switzerland. A UK deal with the GCC is forecast to add as much as £1.6 billion to this existing bilateral trade in the short term. The UK government hopes that the value will rise by an additional £8.6 billion a year by 2035. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Wider developments It is possible that wider developments could reinforce this dynamic of closer UK-GCC economic cooperation. This includes potential steps toward implementation of a proposed India-Middle East-Europe Corridor to foster connectivity and integration with Asia via a proposed route from India and into Europe. The corridor – which would comprise vast road, railroad and shipping networks – was given new impetus in September 2023 at the G20 summit in New Delhi. A memorandum of understanding was signed to try to develop the project by the governments of India, United States, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and several key European nations. The potentially imminent new UK-GCC deal underlines, yet again, the emphasis London is putting on consolidating ties with key non-European Union nations, post-Brexit. One of the key ideas of some leavers in the 2016 EU referendum was rediscovering the UK's heritage as a formerly strongly-focused global trading nation. This includes former parts of the British Empire and now-Commonwealth, such as India and Singapore; plus other key emerging markets like the GCC states; and key industrialised countries such as Australia, Canada and the US. However, ambitious as much of this agenda is, some of it is a long way from being fully realised. Perhaps the best example is the apparently remote possibility of any UK trade deal with either of the two world's biggest economies: China and the US. For instance, while there has been much fanfare over a potential new UK-US trade deal, any such agreement looks unlikely. This even under the pro-Brexit Trump administration in the period to early-2029. Multiple challenges Equally, while London and Beijing have both been impacted by the disruptive diplomacy of the Trump administration, there are multiple political and economic challenges that appear likely to prevent any deal in the short to medium term. Certainly, a UK-China accord is not one of the deals closest to the finish line compared to potential others like South Korea, Switzerland, Canada, and Mexico, a number of which may potentially be concluded during the current UK parliament ending probably in 2028 or 2029. There are also human rights concerns about some of the agreements, including the GCC and India ones. The UK Trade Union Council has recently slammed such economic agreements with 'countries that abuse human rights and workers' rights, and violate international law'. It also welcomes the recent UK's decision to suspend trade talks with Israel because of the accelerated military offensive in Gaza and the country's decision to limit the amount of aid allowed into the Palestinian territory. A wider critique of the UK's post-Brexit trade deal strategy came last month in a report from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. It argues that the UK government's hyper focus on traditional broad-based trade agreements is misaligned with the country's service-based economy. The think tank, which is chaired by former UK prime minister Blair, asserts that time-consuming, goods-focused trade agreements offer diminishing returns on investment and are poorly matched to the UK's core strengths in services and digital trade. So, rather than doubling down on such slow-moving, broad trade pacts, it advocates instead a movement towards more targeted services-orientated, market access deals that can be negotiated faster and deliver bigger economic impact. The Blair Institute report highlights that, between 2020 and 2024, London inked only three new trade agreements, which are expected to boost exports by a comparatively small £9.5 billion in the long run. In contrast, over the same period, successive UK administrations resolved some 640 market access barriers, whose strategic bilateral market gains increasingly have the potential to deliver higher value, faster. One example cited as good practice is the UK's digital economic agreement with Singapore. This was negotiated relatively quickly in 2022, and leverages UK strengths as a tech and services leader. With the GCC agreement almost finalised, the Blair Institute recommendations are unlikely to significantly influence the end game of that negotiation. However, there could be scope for bringing the insights into wider negotiations with countries including South Korea, Switzerland, South Korea, Canada, and Mexico. This may require the UK Department for Business and Trade to reallocate resources and focus efforts on areas with the greatest potential return with a clearer strategic framework for driving new deals. Taken overall, Brexit is therefore offering new opportunities for the UK to reinvent its world role, especially in the context of trade relations. However, despite the flurry of recent deals, it will probably not be clear for some time exactly how successful this ambitious agenda proves to be, not least given the services orientation of the UK economy. The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Persistent pickleball noise disrupts residents' peace
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the ongoing noise disturbances caused by pickleball games at the badminton court below my residence at Block 524 Jelapang Road. Over the past few months, two groups of pickleball enthusiasts have been utilising the court daily, from 8am to 11am, including on weekends and public holidays. Unlike badminton, pickleball produces sharp, high-pitched sounds from the hard paddles striking the plastic balls. These sounds are particularly disruptive in the densely populated HDB environment, where noise reverberates off surrounding buildings. My husband, a night-shift security officer, struggles to rest during the day owing to the constant noise. A neighbour working night shifts faces the same issue. As I am expecting to become a grandmother soon, the prospect of caring for an infant in such a noisy environment is distressing. We approached the players respectfully, suggesting compromises. Unfortunately, these suggestions were dismissed. Some even suggested that if we couldn't tolerate the noise, we should consider moving – a response that felt dismissive and insensitive. While we support the Government's initiative to promote active lifestyles among seniors, it's essential to balance recreational activities with residents' well-being. I have a few suggestions: Designate specific hours for pickleball play in residential areas to minimise disturbance. Encourage the use of quieter equipment designed to reduce noise levels. Develop dedicated pickleball facilities in non-residential areas or sound-insulated indoor venues. I urge the authorities to consider these suggestions to ensure that recreational activities do not come at the expense of residents' peace and comfort. K.K. Wong More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
