logo
Ban on taking crayfish from Northland's east coast on the cards

Ban on taking crayfish from Northland's east coast on the cards

RNZ News27-05-2025
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says a ban on taking crayfish from Northland's east coast is on the cards as warnings grow about the species' "perilous" decline.
Jones said consultation on the proposal would start soon and would be controversial.
The details were still being worked out, but it would likely entail a closure from a point south of Mangawhai to the Muriwhenua area at the top of the Far North.
The ban would apply to both recreational and commercial fishers.
"I know that closing down crayfish over the Christmas holiday period will be quite a controversial decision, so the engagement is going to be very, very tricky," Jones said.
"The challenge will be, if recreational users are denied crayfish as it recovers, then should similar rules apply to tangata whenua through the kaimoana permit system that was agreed to in the Sealord settlement in 1992? I've already attracted quite a lot of adverse commentary from Northlanders about this, but it's a trade off … The resource genuinely is under extreme stress."
Crayfish could be off the menu on Northand's east coast this summer as the population plummets.
Photo:
Supplied
The minister said measures to protect the species were necessary both because of "legally adverse" decisions against the Crown, and the dire state of the crayfish population.
"The scientists have advised me that it's in a perilous state, and despite my status as an industrial champion of the fishing industry, it does get perilous if we're not following the best scientific advice. But I accept that for a lot of holiday makers and a lot of stakeholders in Northland, it will be a significant change," he said.
"These decisions are not for the faint hearted, but sometimes you've got to act and make very harsh calls, and I fear this may be one of them."
The inner Hauraki Gulf
, just south of the proposed new ban, had already been closed to crayfish harvesting for a period of three years starting from 1 April this year.
Jones said local concerns about declining crayfish numbers in the Hauraki Gulf had been backed up by independent research.
"A number of recreational stakeholders are fearful that closure will never, ever be removed, but the scientists continually tell me that things are perilous."
Jones said the ban would apply to red crayfish, also known as spiny rock lobsters, the species best known to Northlanders.
It would not apply to the packhorse cray because its population was not as threatened.
It would also not include Northland's west coast, where most commercial crayfish harvesting took place.
The "legally adverse decisions" Jones referred to include a
High Court ruling in February
this year on the government's revised quota management plan for crayfish in Northland.
The court found the plan did not do enough to address "an urgent marine crisis" unfolding off the region's east coast.
Photo:
EnviroStrat_ Kinamonics
Jones has also embarked on law changes to encourage increased harvesting of kina, or sea urchins.
Kina are an important food source for crayfish and large snapper, but the predators' decline has led to an explosion in kina populations.
That has caused the proliferation of "kina barrens", effectively underwater deserts where large numbers of kina have stripped away anything edible and reduced the seabed to bare rock.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Project 10: How the government kept the pay equity law change secret
Project 10: How the government kept the pay equity law change secret

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Project 10: How the government kept the pay equity law change secret

Photo: RNZ Internal documents reveal how ministers worked to keep sweeping pay equity changes secret until the last minute - a move designed to prevent a surge in claims and protect the government balance sheet. In emails and briefings, the ministers and their staff acknowledged their plans would bypass public scrutiny, extinguish existing claims, and potentially breach people's rights. They pushed on anyway, guarding the release of information, so the news would not leak out before the Bill was introduced in May this year. The announcement was sudden, and the bill passed under urgency. The changes led to protests across New Zealand. Photo: RNZ / Rowan Quinn It halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving work had been historically undervalued to support a claim. Claims then had to start again under the new threshold. In the Budget it was revealed the savings from tightening the regime amounted to about $12.8b in total over the next four years. The documents, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, revealed ministerial meetings, including one involving the Prime Minister, were carefully managed, with instructions to withhold their proactive diary release under confidentiality provisions. Ministerial meetings, including one with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, were carefully managed. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii One email from Minister Brooke van Velden's office instructed officials to manually remove digital access to cabinet papers, warning that leaving the default settings in place "will give access to ministers but also SPSs [senior private secretaries] and some ministerial advisors. So you might want to remove that and we can add individual named ministers instead." Another memo described how hard copies were hand-delivered to ministers' offices to avoid creating digital trails. "If you really need a soft copy, I can email it through," wrote an official from the office of Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety, Brooke van Velden. "(For context, I swear I'm not being weirdly difficult - this was the method of distribution that has been advised.)" The strategy was internally referred to as "Project Ten". A comprehensive communications pack was prepared in advance, to be released only after the bill had been introduced and passed. "We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the Bill," one paper said. Minister Brooke van Velden. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii "This is because there is a risk of a large increase in the number of claims being raised if information about the proposed changes is made public beforehand." That advice was followed. The government released the Equal Pay Amendment Act 2025 on May 6 without warning, introduced it under urgency, and passed it through all three readings in a single day - leaving no opportunity for public consultation. The legislation stopped 33 active claims overnight , some of which had been underway for years, and implemented a stricter legal test for future ones. The documents make clear that fiscal concerns were central to the push - a key driver was to significantly reduce costs to the Crown. Officials stressed the need for the law to be passed in time for Budget 2025 , reinforcing the cost-cutting motive. But, they acknowledged the truncated timeline meant there was no opportunity for public submissions on the Bill - a process later criticised as "particularly unusual and draconian". Officials also conceded limited testing and analysis of the policy proposals due to the short timeframe, and raised concerns about unintended consequences arising once the Bill has been passed. Despite the rushed process, the internal discussions reveal the government was aware of the contentious nature of the changes. Officials noted the proposed transitional arrangements, which "retrospectively remove and alter people's rights," were "most likely to be contentious" and "may engage the Human Rights Act and Bill of Rights Act". It proceeded anyway. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Southland mayoral candidate berates CEO, brags about sporting accomplishments at meeting
Southland mayoral candidate berates CEO, brags about sporting accomplishments at meeting

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Southland mayoral candidate berates CEO, brags about sporting accomplishments at meeting

Wendy Baker is upset at the council over a letter she received — the contents of which remain a secret. Photo: LDR / Supplied A Southland mayoral hopeful has taken shots at a council chief executive during a fiery public speech. On Wednesday, Wendy Baker presented to district councillors about the council's dog control policy and bylaw review. But her presentation began on an unrelated note when she read out a letter she had received from the minister of sports and recreation about her sporting accomplishments. "I wanted to bring that up because it's a positive letter of praise. And unfortunately, just recently, your CEO - who is extremely well-paid - sent me a letter which was very upsetting to me," Baker said. "This letter as you all know has gone to the ombudsman. A leader needs to build people up, and I will not be bullied when I do amazing amounts of volunteer work which your council ignores formally, I feel." Baker would not divulge the contents of the chief executive's letter, but confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting it was not related to the minister's letter. The letter was out of the blue, unnecessary and untimely, she said. "They should be praising the work I do and not sending a letter that upsets me." In response to questions, council chief executive Cameron McIntosh was tight lipped. "We have raised some matters with Baker. They are between council and Baker," he said. "We will leave it with Baker to decide if she wishes to share the contents of the letter with media." Baker's presentation also took aim at the council over a perceived lack of dog control. She said a dog had come onto her property twice in three weeks - once on the eve of Anzac Day attacking a possum and once attacking a back fence at 4am in the morning. "I pay $4099.50 in rates to SDC... and what do I get for it? Stuff all." Baker said she had begun watching a programme called Mastering Leadership: Common Canine Misbehaviours, and planned to donate it to animal control staff or the library. The mayoral hopeful is one of three candidates currently in the running for the top job this October. At the 2022 election, she finished last out of six candidates with 211 votes. - LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store