UAE: Man overpays loans by Dh338,000, wins case against bank
The court also instructed the bank to unfreeze his salary—held since November last year—and awarded him Dh10,000 in compensation for the emotional and financial stress he endured. Additionally, the bank must issue a clearance letter confirming he has no outstanding debts and cover all related court fees and expenses.
The case began when the man, a salaried employee, noticed that his monthly salary—regularly deposited into his account—had been suddenly frozen by the bank. This was despite having no active debts at the time.
According to the plaintiff, he had been a long-time customer of the bank before it merged with another institution. During that time, he received various financial facilities and paid them off diligently, with installments automatically deducted from his salary.
No clear explanation
Things took an unexpected turn when, after settling all his dues, the bank froze his salary without any clear explanation. To make matters worse, the bank asked him to sign new documents claiming he still owed money—something he firmly denied.
Wanting clarity, the customer requested the court to assign an independent financial expert to review his banking history from the very beginning of his relationship with the institution up until the day the lawsuit was filed.
The court agreed and brought in a banking expert. After a thorough review of the accounts and supporting documents, the expert confirmed that the customer had paid off all his loans and credit card balances—and had actually overpaid by more than Dh 338,000, including the withheld salary. The report also confirmed that the last deduction from his salary was made in October 2024 and that no remaining debts existed that could justify withholding his income.
The bank's legal team tried to dismiss the case, arguing that the law did not allow such claims under regulations related to current accounts. But the court disagreed, ruling that this was not about correcting an account—it was about returning money that had been wrongfully taken. The case, it concluded, should be handled under general civil law.
Emotional damage
The court made it clear: if someone pays money they don't legally owe, they have every right to get it back. And if someone receives money they weren't entitled to, they're obligated to return it. In this case, the bank's actions—particularly freezing the man's salary—were unjustified and amounted to a mistake that warranted compensation.
The court acknowledged the damage done went beyond the financial. By denying the man access to his income, the bank caused unnecessary stress and hardship—emotionally and financially. For that, the court awarded an additional Dh10,000 in damages, plus 9% annual interest on the excess amount paid, calculated from the date the claim was filed. Interest will also be applied to the compensation amount once the ruling becomes final.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
2 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Oman Police Arrest Six Men, Seize 55 Kg of Drugs
The Royal Oman Police (ROP) has arrested six men of Asian origin for possession of narcotics, including 32 kilograms of crystal meth and 23 kilograms of marijuana. The operation was carried out by the Directorate General for Combating Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, which confirmed that legal action is now underway against the suspects. Earlier this month, Omani authorities also intercepted a drug smuggling attempt through a shipping company, where two individuals tried to conceal 15 kilograms of opium inside water pumps destined for Europe. Meanwhile, in a related case in Dubai, a man was sentenced to five years in prison, fined Dh50,000, and ordered deported after purchasing drugs online for his wife.
Sharjah 24
9 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Australian court fines Qantas US$59 million for illegal layoffs
Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said he wanted the penalty to be a "real deterrence" to firms that might be tempted by the financial rewards of breaching employment law. Qantas decided to sack the workers and outsource their jobs in August 2020, a period of lockdowns and border closures when no Covid-19 vaccine was widely available. Australia's Federal Court subsequently found that Qantas had acted illegally despite its stated "commercial imperatives" because it prevented staff from accessing their rights to collectively bargain or take industrial action. It later dismissed an appeal by the airline. Long-dubbed the "Spirit of Australia", 104-year-old Qantas has been on a mission to repair its reputation, which was hit in recent years by the illegal sackings, soaring ticket prices, claims of sloppy service, and the selling of seats on already-cancelled flights. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson took over in 2023, promising to improve customer satisfaction. She replaced Alan Joyce, who stepped down earlier than planned as Qantas endured criticism over its treatment of workers and passengers, despite delivering bumper profits for shareholders. 'We sincerely apologise' Qantas said it accepted the penalty. "The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families," Hudson said. "We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result," she said in a statement. Qantas had worked for 18 months to change the way it works and "rebuild trust", the airline boss said. "This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost." Qantas' fine is to be paid in two parts, the court said, with Aus$50 million going to the Transport Workers Union and Aus$40 million being held for future payments to the former workers. The penalty is in addition to a compensation payment of Aus$120 million for affected former employees that Qantas agreed to last year. "It has been five long years. Today is a victory, not just for our colleagues but for all Australian workers," said Anne Guirguis, who worked at Qantas for 27 years cleaning aircraft before being laid off. "We can close this chapter and move on now," Guirguis told reporters outside court. Transport Workers' Union National Secretary Michael Kaine described Monday's decision as a "final win" for the Qantas workers. "Qantas was not sorry to workers when it illegally outsourced these workers, many finding out they'd lost their jobs over a loudspeaker in the lunch room," Kaine said. "Qantas is only sorry now that it has to pay the largest penalty fine of any employer in Australian corporate history."
Filipino Times
a day ago
- Filipino Times
Abu Dhabi Court Orders Woman to Repay Dh216,000 Loan After WhatsApp Evidence
The Abu Dhabi Court for Family, Civil, and Administrative Cases has ordered a woman to pay Dh216,000 plus legal interest to a man after finding she borrowed money but failed to settle the full amount. The man said he had lent the woman Dh390,000 in instalments over time, relying on their friendship when she faced financial difficulties after her trading accounts were closed. She repaid Dh102,000, leaving Dh288,000 unpaid despite repeated reminders. Although no written receipts were signed, the man presented WhatsApp messages in which the woman acknowledged owing money. In one exchange, she admitted to a debt of Dh312,000, while he claimed the figure was Dh318,000. The woman insisted she had only borrowed and repaid Dh102,000, but the court ruled the evidence supported the man's claim. Since both parties acknowledged the Dh102,000 repayment, the court concluded that Dh216,000 remained outstanding and ordered her to pay the amount plus interest.
