Corbyn throws his weight behind striking Birmingham bin workers
Addressing more than 100 workers and other protesters at a 'mega-picket' event outside a council refuse depot in the Tyseley area, the MP for Islington North, told the crowd: 'It wasn't the Birmingham bin workers that spent ludicrous amounts of money on the Commonwealth Games.
'And it wasn't the bin workers who created any of the problems that Birmingham faces. They are the people that keep this city clean.
'I am here today to support you but also to make this point.
'Birmingham is not isolated and Birmingham is not alone – the financial issues that affect Birmingham are actually there in almost every local authority in the country, particularly in the big urban cities.
'And those problems are that they have not enough money. The Government is not spending enough money on local government.'
Mr Corbyn warned: 'Local government services are under pressure and in many cases, even without the Birmingham model, still facing cuts.
'If we win in Birmingham and they are not allowed to cut wages, not allowed to destroy conditions, not allowed to damage the working rights of bin workers, that's a huge victory.
'But if we lose, think which city is going to be next.
'That is the point. And so I say to the wider community – get behind the Birmingham bin workers.'
The second, so-called mega-picket, with speakers from other trade unions, following a similar event in May, involved members of 26 organisations protesting at fives sites in Birmingham and Coventry on Friday.
The city council said on Thursday night that it had had 'persistent evidence' of a breach of a court order previously agreed with Unite.
A city council spokesperson said: 'We are taking this step to ensure the safety of our city and the safety of our workforce, including those who are on strike.
'Our injunction prevents the blocking of our refuse collection vehicles, both at our depots and on the streets. Despite writing repeatedly to Unite for several weeks to highlight what we believe to be clear breaches of the injunction, the situation has worsened.
'Since the injunction was granted, vehicles have been blockaded on roads to and from our depots, with Unite representatives and members stepping in front of, and even leaning against, moving heavy vehicles and blocking road junctions.'
A Unite spokesperson said: 'The court application is the latest distraction from the real task of resolving the ongoing dispute.
'The court papers will be subject to a careful review and the interests of Unite and our members will be fully represented at any future hearing.'
Speaking after his speech, Mr Corbyn urged the leader of Labour-run Birmingham City Council, John Cotton, not to dig himself into a hole and to settle the dispute.
Mr Corbyn said: 'There has to be a settlement and they should not be facing a wage cut.
'We just don't need to stretch this thing out.'
Asked what his message to Mr Cotton would be, he added: 'John, get a deal. Get a settlement, get the bin workers back to work.
'And remember, a lot of the public support the bin workers even though obviously it (the strike) does create difficulties.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie is paid $3.5MILLION direct to his bank account by the government - here's how his life unraveled after he was seen withdrawing money from ATMs
An Aussie father who was wrongly paid $3.5million by a government agency has been exposed as an alleged scammer, after an eight-month investigation uncovered several crucial mistakes. Saif Nafel, 38, from Lurnea in south-west Sydney, emailed an NT government agency last November, allegedly purporting to be a contractor from a construction company it was engaging with for an Aboriginal housing project. The construction company was NT-based Bukmak Constructions, which bills the government $3m a month over five years to build 87 homes. Nafel allegedly provided a completed vendor identification form with updated bank details. Multiple employees who appeared to work at the construction company were CC'd in on the email. Nafel then allegedly registered the business, Bukmak Construction Group, to closely resemble the legitimate contractor, and opened a bank account to receive the fraudulently obtained funds. The government agency then paid $3,583,363 to Nafel's alleged bank account, believing it was linked to the legitimate construction company. An AFP investigation was launched days later, when banking giant ANZ noticed a number of suspicious transfers. The phone number linked to the vendor identification form eventually led investigators to the alleged fraudster almost 4,000km away in Sydney. Nafel was allegedly captured multiple times on CCTV lining up at an ATM to withdraw cash from his bank account. The alleged scheme finally came to a dramatic end when police raided Nafel's home last Wednesday. Electronic devices and documents relating to the registration of the fake company were seized during the search warrant. Nafel was charged with one count of dealing with proceeds of crime worth $1 million or more. He appeared in Liverpool Local Court last Thursday, where he was granted bail to reappear in court in September. Nafel faces up to 12 years behind bars if convicted. Fortunately for the government agency, all but $11,603 of the allegedly stolen funds have been recovered, thanks to ANZ's efforts. Business email compromise and fraud were among the most common self-reported cybercrimes for Australian businesses and individuals in 2023-24, according to the AFP. 'It is crucial to double check emails, particularly if there is a request for a change in banking details,' Detective Superintendent Marie Andersson said. 'Call the party you are engaged with to confirm the request is legitimate – and use a phone number that you've previously used or independently verified – don't call a number in the suspicious email. 'If you have fallen victim, report it immediately to your bank and the police to give us the best chance of recovering your money.' ANZ's Milan Gigovic added: 'In response to this growing threat, ANZ's Financial Crime team is proactively collaborating with industry, government, and law enforcement agencies — including the Australian Federal Police's JPC3 team — to detect and stop these scams before they cause harm.' 'Together, we are strengthening our defences, preventing fraudulent payments and protecting Australian businesses.' Nafel will appear in Campbelltown Local Court on September 17.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Radical tax and retirement proposal that could affect every Aussie: What you need to know
Public servants within Anthony Albanese 's own government have suggested access to the age pension needs to be wound back for wealthy baby boomers because it's too costly. The Department of Social Services - in an incoming brief to new Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek - suggested lower-income Australians were paying for the lifestyles of the rich, who were living off the age pension under existing rules exempting the family home from the assets test. 'Low-and-middle income taxpayers are subsidising the retirement incomes of seniors with significant wealth in addition to their homes,' it said. The departmental brief, prepared independently of the new Labor minister's office, noted couples could still receive the age pension even as they continued to earn six-figure annual incomes from their investments. 'Age pension continues to be payable to couples with income of almost $100,000 a year or assets of almost $1.05million, in addition to their principal home of unlimited value,' it said. The department said this was unfair compared with the treatment of the unemployed, who had to wait 13 weeks to receive JobSeeker if they had more than $11,500 in the bank. A spokeswoman for Ms Plibersek said the government had no plans to impose a stricter assets test for the age pension. 'The government appreciates independent, frank and fearless advice from its agencies,' she told Daily Mail Australia. The Department of Social Services - in an incoming brief to new Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek (pictured) - suggested lower-income Australians were paying for the lifestyles of the rich, living off the age pension under existing rules exempting the family home from the assets test 'The government has no plans to include the family home in the pension assets test.' This is despite Treasury forecasting an 'expected increase in the number of age pension recipients as the Australian population ages'. More than $109billion is set to be spent on aged care in 2025-26 as government spending as a proportion of the economy hits the highest level since 1986 outside of Covid. Capital gains tax discount Ahead of the government's Economic Reform Roundtable next month, Westpac chief economist Luci Ellis has suggested scrapping the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, introduced in 1999, because it fuelled property market speculation and made houses unaffordable. 'There is a lot of prior work pointing out the incentives to speculate in property created by discounted CGT,' she told Daily Mail Australia. 'The issue is that discounting CGT, as currently, means that people would rather have capital gains than cash income from an investment. 'So it means people are better off from a tax perspective buying an existing property than investing in a business or some other productivity-enhancing investment.' Ms Ellis, a former assistant governor at the Reserve Bank of Australia, has proposed replacing the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount with indexation fixed at 2.5 per cent, or the mid-point of the RBA's two to three per cent inflation target. 'This is easier to calculate and doesn't require people to know the history of inflation to calculate their tax liability,' she said. 'My proposal to instead charge full marginal tax rate on CGT will eliminate the incentive to favour capital-gains-producing investments over productivity-boosting ones.' Ms Ellis' call to axe the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, on behalf of Westpac Economics, is shared by grassroots group Labor for Housing and the Greens. She put that view last week to teal MP Allegra Spender's tax roundtable in Canberra, but Labor had ruled out that option in Opposition after losing the 2016 and 2019 elections with that policy. Her call on the capital gains tax is not the view of the Westpac Banking Group, which is this week putting in a separate submission to the government's Economic Reform Roundtable. With only deficits forecast in coming years, the Department of Social Services noted funding welfare for the elderly would be a financial challenge, with the proportion of Australians older than 65 increasing by 31 per cent since 2000. Almost two-thirds, or 65 per cent, of people aged 65 and over receive income support payments, with 92 per cent of them getting the age pension. Australians can access the age pension at 67. 'Australia's demographics are evolving and will have broader implications for fiscal and social policy and demands for services,' the department said. 'Life expectancy is rising, and fertility rates are declining, reducing the working age population and influencing family composition and structures.' The department also suggested Australia would continue relying on high immigration so there was tax revenue from a working age population to support older Australians. 'Overseas migration is expected to continue to support population growth, offsetting demographic and economic challenges to some extent, as higher immigration correlates with higher tax revenue and increases in working-age population,' it said. Unaffordable housing was likely to see younger generations become increasingly reliant on their parents for housing. 'Concerns of intergenerational inequalities are growing, and young people's circumstances are falling short of their expectations,' the Department of Social Services said. 'As more rely on family for financial support and/or housing well into adulthood, they experience delayed milestones including education, employment, family, and home ownership. 'Many also struggle with compounding and competing responsibilities of paid employment and unpaid care. 'This has implications on household incomes, workforce participation, gender equality, and may have greater social, economic, and intergenerational ramifications.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The worst wreckers of Birmingham? The judges
Forty years after the defeat of the miners saw mass picketing discredited and disowned by the union movement itself, it has returned to the streets of Britain. It came in support of the ongoing strike by refuse collectors in Birmingham, with the aim of ensuring that residents' nightmare conditions, living just yards away from filthy, rat-infested piles of uncollected waste, will not end without victory for the unions. 'Mass picketing is back. The trade union movement has shown it is at its most powerful when it acts together. Workers supporting workers,' said Henry Fowler, co-founder of the Strike Map Group, which organised the 'Five sites, one day' picket involving 26 organisations from across the trade union movement, including the RMT, ASLEF, NEU, NASUWT, and the BMA. The strike is, of course, being supported by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader and now leader of a new hard-Left party that has yet to be named. Last week he was in Birmingham to address protesters outside Atlas Depot in Tyseley, where the gates were shut due to the demonstration. There are so many villains in the tale of how Birmingham, second city of the Empire, became such an eyesore and modern embarrassment to the country. The strike by refuse workers is in its fifth month and has resulted in a plague of rats and maggots across the city as an estimated 17,000 tons of domestic waste go uncollected. So the trade union Unite and its members must take at least some responsibility. Then there is the city council itself, whose incompetent handling of Birmingham's finances – an example of which was last year's revelation that it wasted £90m on a botched IT system – has been painful to watch. And then of course there is the UK Labour government which is only too keen to blame everything that's going wrong in Birmingham, not on the city's own leadership and certainly not on those hard-working Unite members who also happen to contribute part of their salaries to the Labour Party, but to '14 years of Tory austerity'. But the main culprit in all of this, the central villain, is none other than our misinformed and meddling judges. The reason the council has been left with a potential £760m liability, which it is now striving to manage with unpopular changes to refuse collectors' staffing and conditions, is that the courts made an absurd ruling last year that the jobs of teaching assistant, cleaner and bin collector are all 'similar'. And according to Britain's employment law, work done by men and women in 'similar' posts cannot be paid different salaries. The problem is that teaching assistants and cleaners tend to be women and refuse collectors men, and historically, the men who emptied the bins were paid more. Perhaps if a judge were to consider which of those jobs was the most unpleasant, which one he or she would rather not do if they found themselves turfed off the bench tomorrow, then they might have drawn a different conclusion. Unpleasant though essential jobs tend to come with higher financial compensation in order to attract enough recruits. How any judge can conclude that refuse collection and teaching assistance are similar is a mystery that may remain unsolved. The legal ramifications, however, are much clearer than their honours' logic and the only way the council can make ends meet is to start cutting costs. And that includes its budget for refuse collection. With so many culprits responsible for the national embarrassment that has consumed Birmingham, it should be no surprise that none of them is actually willing to take any blame whatsoever.
