logo
‘A big shift': Australia has elected its most diverse parliament. What impact will it have?

‘A big shift': Australia has elected its most diverse parliament. What impact will it have?

The Guardian16-05-2025

Ash Ambihaipahar grew up without seeing anyone like her in Australian politics. The young lawyer, who won the safe multicultural Sydney seat of Barton at the recent federal election, has a Sri Lankan background. She grew up with the support of Maltese and Italian families around her.
She says that's made her 'open-minded' and appreciate the full breadth of diversity of Australia.
'I didn't see a lot of people who looked like me in government roles,' she says.
'It's really nice to know that … with this new government, we've seen a big shift in representation – not just cultural diversity in that sense but also a lot of women.'
The 48th parliament is Australia's most diverse, welcoming the highest number of elected women, as well as an increase in multicultural representation.
More than 55% of Labor MPs and senators are women, an increase from 53% after the 2022 election.
One or two seats remain to be called, but in the House of Representatives women will make up a clear majority in the Labor party, with 50 out of 93 (or 94) members. There are 12 women and 11 men in the cabinet.
Women also have a majority in Labor's Senate team, with 18 out of 28 (or up to 19 out of 30).
In contrast the Liberals have remained stagnant in their gender split in the House, sitting at about 21%, the same as at the last parliament, although the party will be led by a woman, Sussan Ley, for the first time.
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
In the Senate, with the defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and the addition of Leah Blyth, who replaced Simon Birmingham in South Australia before the election, the Liberals will have 11 women out of 22 or 23 senators (with the count still continuing).
New faces will increase the number of non-European members among all parties to 20 (and up to 24), with eight First Nations MPs and senators out of 226 representatives.
Modelling for Media Diversity Australia's report Who Gets to Tell Australian Stories, using figures from the 2021 census, suggests 25% of Australia's population has a non-European cultural background, excluding First Nations people, who represent 3.2% of the population.
Back in 2019, six First Nations representatives sat in the chambers while just 11 representatives came from other non-European backgrounds.
Analysis by Osmond Chiu, a research fellow at Per Capita and a Labor party member, shows Australia still lags behind other comparable countries.
After this year's election in Canada, 18% of its MPs are from a visible minority, compared with 26.5% of its population. In the UK, 13.8% of MPs in the House of Commons come from Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, compared with 14% of its population.
Chiu says there has been a significant increase in the number of representatives with Asian backgrounds in Australia's parliament.
'We've seen a big increase in Chinese Australian representation, so in the last parliament there were only three people of Chinese heritage elected in the parliament, and that's going to be doubled in this parliament,' he says.
'We're seeing people from south Asian backgrounds and Asian representation more broadly.'
Labor has 13 culturally diverse members, which could increase to 16 once the tallies are finalised.
Cultural diversity in the cabinet hasn't increased, with just four of 23 cabinet ministers coming from a non-European or First Nations background. That includes the inclusion of the first Muslim woman to hold a cabinet position, Anne Aly, who was elevated to the small business portfolio. Ed Husic, the first Muslim man in the last cabinet, was dumped by his faction.
Husic said he attributed part of his dumping to speaking out on the issue of Gaza, something Aly has also been vocal about.
'You can't celebrate diversity and then expect it to sit in the corner silent,' Husic told the ABC last week. 'You need to speak up, when you bring the different views to either a cabinet table or a caucus.'
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
Following the outbreak of conflict in Gaza, Muslim vote community groups galvanised support across parts of western Sydney, with several high-profile candidates running against Labor cabinet ministers.
In Blaxland, held by the education minister, Jason Clare, independent Ahmed Ouf received nearly 20% of the primary vote. In the seat of Watson, held by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, independent Ziad Basyouny received nearly 15% of the primary vote.
Ambihaipahar says an increase in diversity will improve the outcomes of the government.
'I think we make better [and] fairer decisions when we have a parliament that looks like its community, and I think it is more powerful than just being symbolic, so to speak, around diversity,' she says.
The Liberal party has four non-European diverse members in the House and Senate (with Gisele Kapterian still waiting on the result in Bradfield) and two First Nations senators – Price and Kerrynne Liddle.
The incoming Liberal MP for McPherson, Leon Rebello, is the son of Goan migrant parents, who worked as a solicitor for a major law firm and as an adviser to the former foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop.
He says the increase in cultural diversity 'reinforces' the principle that all Australians, regardless of background, are 'stakeholders' of democracy.
But he says it will take more time until representatives fully reflect multicultural society.
'I want to strive to have more people of different backgrounds in parliament … I think it is something that does take time. We're obviously seeing this play out with women in politics as well, so there is a time factor.'
Rebello points to the work involved in becoming a candidate for a major party. He says it often takes years working in local branches and forging connections to support a preselection run.
'Now [there are] people of different backgrounds who have started those processes a few years ago, and we might see the result of that in the coming terms, and I think I'm a really good example of that,' he says.
Asked whether the Liberal party should do more to support that process for multicultural candidates, Rebello says there should be an 'even playing field' for all candidates and the party should engage more with communities.
'It's [about] making sure that we're actually selling and communicating [our] values to multicultural groups, that we actually have equal representation or proportionate representation of multicultural groups within our branches.'.
Ambihaipahar stresses the importance of picking candidates who represent their communities, particularly in multicultural areas.
She says people from diverse backgrounds need to be brave in putting their hand up.
'I think we overthink things too much and we're probably more conscious of how people might react – how much people react on socials or to your face.
'At the end of the day no one chose the colour of their skin so I think we just need to be really brave to put ourselves out there.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is Aukus, the submarine deal between Australia, UK and US?
What is Aukus, the submarine deal between Australia, UK and US?

BBC News

time40 minutes ago

  • BBC News

What is Aukus, the submarine deal between Australia, UK and US?

A multi-billion dollar submarine deal between long-standing allies - Australia, the UK and the US - has come under the spotlight after the Trump administration said it was reviewing how the deal fits in with its heavily-touted "America First" agenda. The Aukus security pact, Australia's biggest ever defence project, is set to play a key part in the country's ability to replace its ageing Collins-class submarine fleet - and, crucially, its military standing in the region. The 30-day review will be led by Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of Aukus. In a speech last year, he questioned why the US would give away "this crown jewel asset when we most need it". A US defence spokesperson said the review is about ensuring "this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda".Fears the review may torpedo the deal have been downplayed by the UK and Australia, with both saying the review is a normal process when a new government takes power. What is Aukus? Billed as a trilateral security partnership, the Aukus deal - worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn) over 30 years - involves two so-called pillars. Pillar 1 is about the supply and delivery of nuclear-powered attack submarines. Australia will buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US from 2032 with options to purchase two that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine model for the UK and Australian attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three 2 is about the allies collaborating on their "advanced capabilities". This involves sharing military expertise in areas such as long-range hypersonic missiles, undersea robotics and AI. What's the purpose of the deal? At its core, the deal is believed to be about countering China's growing presence in the Indo-Pacific region, and its role in rising tensions in disputed territories such as the South China none of the allies have directly pointed at China as a reason for the deal, the three countries have spoken about how regional security concerns have "grown significantly" in recent condemned the agreement as "extremely irresponsible" when it was first ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said it "seriously undermines regional peace and stability and intensifies the arms race". Who negotiated it? The deal was unveiled in September 2021 by three former leaders: Australia's Scott Morrison, the UK's Boris Johnson and the US's Joe Biden. The UK reviewed the security pact last year after Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government won the general election. What does Australia get out of it? For Australia, the deal represents a major upgrade to its military capabilities. The country is set to become just the second to receive Washington's elite nuclear propulsion technology, after the submarines will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet. They would also mean Australia would be able to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first the deal, sailors from the Royal Australian Navy are due to be sent to US and UK submarine bases to learn how to use the nuclear-powered submarines. What do the UK and US get out of it? From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western will also create about 7,000 jobs in Britain, with the design and construction of the new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines set to take place in the UK. The benefits for the US are less obvious - but sharing its defence technology could give the nation an opportunity to grow its presence in Asia-Pacific. Arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in a region that is far from their own.

Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans
Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans

Long-time Donald Trump ally and China hawk Elbridge 'Bridge' Colby will spearhead a US government review of the AUKUS submarine deal, as speculation mounts that the arrangement will be scrapped. The appointment, confirmed by a US defence official on Thursday, heightened expectations that the Trump administration will end or at least alter the deal under which Australia was to acquire nuclear-powered submarines to replace its current ageing fleet. Defence Minister Richard Marles downplayed the significance of a review, describing it as 'natural' given the policy was introduced by the Biden administration. But Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor has expressed serious reservations in the face of threatened abandonment. 'If AUKUS falls over, it is Australia that pays the price,' he said. 'We would face a dangerous gap in capability at a time when we lack the capacity to go it alone.' Australia jettisoned a deal to acquire French-made submarines - despite having spent almost $2.5billion - to instead join the deal with the US and UK governments. A collapse of the AUKUS deal would leave Australia to start from scratch in finding its next generation of submarines, with such deals taking many years between commissioning and completion. US Under Secretary of Defence Policy, Mr Colby will be at the helm during the period of review, as first reported by British publication the Financial Times. He has publicly spoken of his doubts about the strategic and cost value of the AUJUS deal. 'AUKUS, in principle, it is a great idea, but I have been very skeptical in practice,' Mr Colby posted on X in August last year. 'I remain skeptical, agnostic, as I put it, but more inclined based on new information I have gleaned. 'It would be crazy to have fewer SSNs Virginia class in the right place and time.' Asked to address this during a Senate hearing in March this year, prior to being approved as under secretary, he doubled down. Mr Colby said repeated that it was a 'great idea' but that the hope for an 'Australian capacity' for US military could not be dragged out over a lengthy time period. However he also referred to Australia as 'perhaps our closest ally in the world', noting that the Australian government has supported the US 'even in our less advisable wars'. 'It is a great idea for (Australia) to have attack submarines,' he told the committee. 'I think it should be the policy of the United States Government to do everything we can to make (AUKUS) work. 'This is getting back to restoring our defense industrial capacity so that we don't have to face these awful choices but rather can be in a position where we can produce not only for ourselves, but for our allies.' As of Thursday, he has not commented on his role overseeing the review of AUKUS but took to X to back the messaging of US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. '(Mr Hegseth's) Shangri-La Dialogue speech highlighted the Department of Defense's commonsense approach in the Indo-Pacific to achieve President Trump's Peace Through Strength and America First agenda.' He also fulfilled the label of 'China hawk' which media companies have given him, highlighting his concerns for the country's expanding influence in the Indo-Pacific region - an issue AUKUS was set up to counter. 'China's actions undermine peace and stability in the region,' he said, referencing its military build up and operations in the South China Sea and near Taiwan. 'These are the reasons driving the United States assessment that China is the most serious and pressing military threat,' he said. But, as a caveat, Mr Colby then quoted Mr Hegseth's recent statement that the US does not seek war or to 'dominate or strangle China'. The messaging is similar to that of the American defence official who confirmed to Daily Mail Australia that there would be a review of the AUKUS pact - and why. 'This review will ensure the initiative meets these common sense, America First criteria,' they said. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs,' the official said. In the seven-part thread, Mr Colby identified the US as an Indo-Pacific nation, commenting that prosperity and security of Americans is 'vitally linked with those of our allies and partners in the region'. Whatever his view on AUKUS, Mr Colby is not enthusiastic about formalising defence ties with a 'NATO-like' alliance in the region. 'I am not theologically opposed to it, Senator, but I have been skeptical,' he told the March hearing. 'Something may be building up to have more multilateralization in the region, but not the huge ambition of an Asia NATO,' he added. 'Especially because you have got Japan over here, India over here, Australia down here. Their circumstances are quite distinct.' Mr Colby is a long-time loyalist to Donald Trump and the US President's view of the world which is strongly critical of American involvement in overseas conflicts that do not serve US interests. During Trump's first term, he served from 2017 to 2018 as a deputy assistant secretary of defense. The key aim of his role was the reorientation of the defence department to prioritise the threat posed by China towards the US. Between Trump's terms, Mr Colby co-founded think tank The Marathon Initiative in 2019, which focused on preparing the US for an 'era of sustained great power competition'. A statement from the organisation when he was appointed back into the defense department praised Mr Colby's work shifting foreign policy away from the Middle East and Europe, towards China. 'He has worked persistently, persuasively, and intelligently to keep China at the forefront of the U.S. national security debate,' it said in April. 'His consistent message has been that America must prioritize the top threat facing the country—and that doing so will require tradeoffs. 'Bridge has sought to equip the United States with a coherent framework for ensuring its safety and prosperity against the most formidable rival in our history.'

Human rights experts and advocates alarmed as Queensland weighs fast return to public drunkenness laws
Human rights experts and advocates alarmed as Queensland weighs fast return to public drunkenness laws

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Human rights experts and advocates alarmed as Queensland weighs fast return to public drunkenness laws

Queensland's government is 'looking at' bringing back laws against public drunkenness and public urination, against the recommendation of the 1991 royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody and sparking serious concerns among human rights experts and advocates. 'The removal of those summary offences, whether it's public drunkenness or public urination, has hamstrung the police to be able to take action,' the state's police minister, Dan Purdie, said on Wednesday. Queensland was the last state to act on recommendation 79 of the royal commission to remove the offences. Both public drunkenness and urination offences were removed from the criminal code in August 2023, under Labor police minister Mark Ryan. The change took effect in September 2024. Victoria removed the offences in 2023, effective from November that year. The Northern Territory decriminalised public intoxication in 1974. The Country Liberal party passed new laws last year making those who breached it subject to a fine. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Since David Crisafulli's victory in October 2024, it has introduced several rounds of youth justice legislation to extend maximum sentences and remove legislative protection for young people. Two of these flagship 'adult crime, adult time' laws have overridden the Human Rights Act. When the removal of public drunkenness and urination laws was introduced, Ryan said the change reflected 'mounting public opinion that these behaviours require a health and social welfare-based response, rather than entrenching vulnerable people in the criminal justice system through preferring criminal charges' In parliament on Tuesday, Townsville LNP MP Adam Baillie criticised the decriminalisation decision as 'weakening' the law, and 'significantly impacting liveability in our beautiful part of the world'. 'The challenge of public intoxication, and antisocial behaviour that often accompanies it, is not a new problem for many communities across Queensland,' Baillie said. 'Under Labor, public drunkenness and public urination laws were revoked, paving the way for the antisocial behaviour that has been plaguing our great city for years.' Asked on Wednesday if the government was considering reversing Labor's move, Purdie said it was something the government was 'looking at'. 'We listen to our police, we listen to communities, we listen to victims, and if they need more laws or reinstated laws, like we reinstated the youth crime laws that Labor took away 10 years ago, we will do that … we'll give them the laws they need to do their job,' he said. Purdie said the government had been approached by people across the state asking for the laws to be brought back. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The police are telling us that they now struggle in some instances, to take appropriate action to protect the community and the amenity of people living in those areas since the removal of those summary offences acts,' he said. 'So we are having those discussions with those people, and will continue to listen'. Debbie Killroy, the CEO of advocacy group for incarcerated women Sisters Inside, said reversing the decision would be a 'dangerous and deeply irresponsible move that flies in the face of decades of evidence and advocacy'. 'This proposal is not just a policy reversal – it's an attack on Aboriginal lives,' she said. Queensland's Human Rights Commissioner, Scott McDougall, said 'a move to re-introduce these laws would represent another blow in a continuing assault on the rights of First Nations people in Queensland'. 'Police do not lack the powers to respond in the interests of community safety. The solution to these behaviours is a much greater investment in health and prevention,' he said. 'To reintroduce a public drunkenness offence would signal that the Queensland government has no interest in Closing the Gap or reducing deaths in custody.' The 1991 royal commission recommended removing the offences as a way of diverting Aboriginal people from police custody. It found the offence was being disproportionately and 'unfairly' applied to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community. 'The labelling of such behaviour as 'criminal' and dealing with it as part of the criminal justice process is unjustifiable,' the commission found. A 2022 parliamentary report found more than 47% of people charged with public intoxication in Queensland were Indigenous, 10 times more than the proportion of the state's overall population of 4.6%.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store