Former Mauritanian president jailed for 15 years following appeal
Mauritania's President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz attends the closing session ofÊSudan's National Dialogue at the Friendship Hall in Khartoum, Sudan, October 10, 2016. REUTERS/Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah/File Photo
NOUAKCHOTT (Reuters) - Mauritania's former president, Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, was on Wednesday sentenced to 15 years in prison on corruption charges following an appeal to a Nouakchott court by both the state and Aziz's defence against a sentence imposed in 2023.
Abdel Aziz led the West African country for a decade after coming to power in a 2008 coup, followed by an election a year later. He was an ally of Western powers fighting Islamist militants in the Sahel region.
Abdel Aziz, who has denied corruption allegations, was found guilty of economic crimes and abuse of power. He was initially handed a five-year prison sentence in December 2023 before the state appealed against the leniency of that punishment and Aziz's team appealed the ruling, saying only a high court of justice was qualified to try a former president.
"It is a decision that reflects the pressure the executive branch exerts on the judiciary," defence lawyer Mohameden Ichidou told Reuters, adding that the defence would appeal against the decision to the Supreme Court.
Brahim Ebety, one of the plaintiff lawyers for the Mauritanian state, welcomed the ruling.
"All the evidence has established that the former president, who single-handedly ruled the entire country, is the perpetrator of illicit enrichment, abuse of power, and money laundering," he said.
Abdel Aziz was elected on a five-year mandate in 2009 and for a second term in 2014. An election in 2019 led to a peaceful transfer of power to Mohamed Ould Ghazouani, initially an ally of Abdel Aziz, but whose parliament later brought charges against him.
(Editing by Portia Crowe, editing by Ed Osmond)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown
FOR Stephen Miller, the architect of United States President Donald Trump's hardline migration policy, the protests in Los Angeles were nothing less than the frontline of a "fight to save civilisation itself". Hyper-loyalist Miller, 39, has carved out a niche as Trump's most powerful and hawkish adviser on the Republican's signature issue of immigration. A combative presence on the White House driveway, Miller is frequently rolled out in public to double down on the president's comments in front of the cameras and frequently spars with reporters. But the sharp-suited adviser's comments on Los Angeles — which echo hard-right talking points about the decline of the West as it faces an "invasion" of migrants — underscored that the topic is not just political for him, but existential. His fingerprints have been all over the White House's unprecedented assertion of its right to use presidential power to pursue its agenda, often using centuries-old or rarely cited laws to deport migrants. And Miller, who is formally Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Adviser, is at the sharp end of things, too. It was Miller who, according to the Wall Street Journal, issued US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with orders last month to step up its work after the number of daily deportations under Trump fell below those carried out by Joe Biden's administration last year. Those orders led to the immigration raids on a Home Depot in Los Angeles that triggered clashes between protesters and federal agents — and Trump's decision to send in thousands of troops. Miller has since taken to social media to battle Democrats who accuse Trump of authoritarianism. "We've been saying for years this is a fight to save civilisation. Anyone with eyes can see that now," he said on X on Sunday. A few days earlier, he set out his right-wing worldview more explicitly as he pushed for Trump's new "big, beautiful" spending bill, which contains provisions for migration. "We will be debating these matters over the ruins of the West if we don't control migration," he wrote on June 4. Critics say such comments echo the far-right "replacement theory" about migration undermining Western society. Indeed, during Trump's first term, Miller's hardline stance made him something of an outlier. As a young firebrand, Miller was one of the architects of the so-called "Muslim travel bans" in Trump's first presidency, which later ran into legal difficulties after they were poorly drafted. Miller largely avoided the chaotic feuding that engulfed Trump's first White House, resulting in somewhat more moderate voices winning out on immigration policies. Miller, however, remained loyal, and stuck by his boss even as Trump's first term ended in the disgrace of the US Capitol attack on Jan 6, 2021. In the second Trump administration, Miller's views have become mainstream. "I call Stephen 'Trump's brain'," Republican former House speaker Kevin McCarthy told the New York Times just before Trump's inauguration. Miller was the driving force in particular behind the use of an obscure 200-year-old wartime law to deport undocumented migrants — and a vocal defender when that crackdown saw a man wrongly deported to El Salvador. He also outraged Democrats when he said on May 9 the White House was "looking into" suspending habeas corpus, which would prevent migrants targeted for mass deportations from appealing for their right to appear in court. One blip, however, came when Miller and his wife Katie found themselves caught up in the split between Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Katie Miller had been a senior adviser and spokesman in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. But the couple now find themselves, professionally speaking, on opposite sides of the break-up between the world's richest person and its most powerful.
New Straits Times
36 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: How to stop the slaughter in Gaza
The unexpected has happened. Britain has joined Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Norway to impose sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, both illegal West Bank settlers known for inciting hatred against Palestinians. Unexpected because this is the first time Western countries have imposed sanctions against Israeli ministers. The sanctions come with asset freezes and travel bans. In a joint statement, foreign ministers of the five countries said: "Extremist rhetoric advocating forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous." There must not be any unlawful transfer of Palestinians out of Gaza or the West Bank, nor any reduction in the territory of the Gaza Strip, they added. Britain has been under tremendous pressure by the British legal fraternity, including former members of the Supreme Court, warning 10 Downing Street that if London did not act against Israel, it would face allegations of complicity in the war crimes that Tel Aviv is committing in Gaza and the West Bank. More than 54,500 Palestinians have been killed since Oct 7, 2023. The British government is also facing a legal challenge in the High Court brought by Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq and the Global Legal Action Network alleging that it is complicit in violations of international law, including the Genocide Convention, due to its continued licensing of arms export to Israel. The indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians has turned the debate in Westminster into a highly charged one. In a speech there on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories on May 20, British Foreign Minister David Lammy, referring to Smotrich's announcement a day earlier of "cleansing" Gaza, of "destroying what's left" and of Palestinians "being relocated to third countries", he responded thus: "We must call it what it is: it is extremism, it is dangerous, it is repellent, it is monstrous and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms." The British Parliament hasn't heard such words from ministers for the longest time. Neither has the Foreign Office been questioned by its own staff as it is being challenged now. According to The Guardian, four letters have been sent to top officials in the ministry expressing fears that the government had become complicit in Israel's alleged war crimes. The staff's views are in line with those of the British legal fraternity, the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Israel is committing war crimes. The ICJ even went further, advising countries to stop supplying arms to Israel to avoid complicity in Tel Aviv's war crimes. Sanctioning the Israeli ministers is a good move, but a better first move would have been to stop supplying weapons to Israel, which Tel Aviv is using to destroy the very foundation of a two-state solution that five countries and other Western nations are pushing for. But the five nations, especially Britain, must not stop the pressure on Israel until Palestinians have their own state. Any other solution is a recipe for a muddled Middle East.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Czech government faces no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal
FILE PHOTO: Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala attends a meeting in Belgrade, Serbia, November 6, 2024. REUTERS/Zorana Jevtic/File Photo/File Photo PRAGUE (Reuters) -The main Czech opposition party on Thursday called a no-confidence vote in the government, accusing it of corruption over the acceptance of a payment to the state by an ex-convict worth $45 million in bitcoin. The vote, scheduled to take place on Tuesday, is likely to fail as the government has a majority in parliament - but it could still dent the ruling centre-right coalition's chances in an October 3-4 election in which it trails the opposition. Political veteran Pavel Blazek resigned as justice minister on May 31 for accepting the payment for the state, though he denied doing anything illegal. Opposition groups including the ANO party led by former prime minister Andrej Babis have called on Prime Minister Petr Fiala to quit and said the payment was evidence of corruption. "We have no choice," ANO vice-chair Alena Schillerova said on X after filing the no-confidence motion. The man who made the donation of 468 bitcoins to the state was in jail from 2017 until 2021 after being convicted of involvement in the drug trade, fraud and illegal possession of weapons. Blazek has faced criticism for possibly legitimising the ex-convict's assets, instead of turning to prosecutors or police to help secure them. Opinion polls show Babis's ANO party with a clear lead over the main group in the government coalition led by Fiala's ODS party. (Reporting by Jason Hovet; Editing by Andrew Heavens)
