logo
Starmer backtracked on winter fuel cut ‘amid fears of electoral disaster'

Starmer backtracked on winter fuel cut ‘amid fears of electoral disaster'

Telegraph21-05-2025

Sir Keir Starmer performed an about-turn on winter fuel payments after being warned by senior Labour figures that his decision to cut the benefit would spell disaster at the polls in Scotland.
The Telegraph understands that in recent weeks, senior Scottish Labour figures have been lobbying the Prime Minister to reverse his decision to cut the annual payment to OAPs.
They are said to have warned him the move had inflicted serious damage on the party's hopes of making big gains in next year's Holyrood election.
A series of polls have shown that support for Labour has collapsed in Scotland, particularly among pensioners, with Nigel Farage's Reform UK threatening to become the second-largest party in Holyrood.
In addition, Scottish Labour insiders were worried that the cut was undermining the party's campaign in a by-election for Holyrood's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse seat, scheduled for June 5.
Imogen Walker, the Labour MP who holds the equivalent Hamilton and Clyde Valley seat at Westminster, is married to Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff and political svengali.
Although the SNP is expected to comfortably win the by-election, Labour is facing the threat of being pushed into third place by Reform in what would be a big humiliation.
Sir Keir's decision to means-test winter fuel payment applied to all pensioners in England and Wales, with control over the benefit devolved to SNP ministers at Holyrood.
But John Swinney, the First Minister, has argued that he had no choice but to follow suit as the decision south of the border led to a £147 million reduction in the SNP government's funding through the Barnett formula.
The payment of between £100 and £300 went to 130,000 Scottish OAPs in receipt of pension credit and other means-tested benefits last winter – 900,000 fewer than the previous year.
Mr Swinney then used the record funding his government received from Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, to announce that all pensioners would receive a payment of at least £100 before this winter.
Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, then tried to limit the political damage to his party by promising to reinstate the full benefit of up to £300 if he became first minister after next year's election. However, his pledge appeared to cut little ice with voters, with polls showing no sign of support for Scottish Labour recovering.
Mr Sarwar welcomed the Prime Minister's rethink, tweeting: 'Last year I made it clear that a Scottish Labour government led by me will reinstate the winter fuel payment.'
Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, said the Chancellor ' had to stabilise the economy ' when she announced the cut to the benefit 'and now we're seeing the fruits of that'.
But Mr Swinney tweeted: 'A reminder to everyone in Scotland that Labour cut the winter fuel payment for pensioners and @theSNP brought it back.'
The social media post included a picture of himself with Katy Loudon, the SNP candidate in the by-election, in front of a campaign billboard.
The left-hand side of the poster was red and contained a picture of Sir Keir with the slogan: 'Labour cut your winter fuel payment.' The right-hand side was yellow with an image of Mr Swinney with the caption: 'The SNP is bringing it back.'
Stephen Flynn, the SNP's Westminster leader, said: 'Voters have lost trust in the Labour Party, which has broken the promises it made at the election. Keir Starmer is scraping around in desperation to recover the ground he has lost, but the damage is already done. Trust in his Government is broken.'
'Righting their own wrong'
Liz Smith, the Scottish Tories' shadow social security secretary, said: 'Labour's decision was quickly followed by the SNP in Scotland, who are now trying to also claim credit for partially righting their own wrong, which won't fool the nearly one million Scots pensioners who were hit by that decision.
'Which pensioner will ever trust Keir Starmer again over the winter fuel payment, given his constant shift in position on it?'
Adam Stachura, the director of policy at Age Scotland, said: 'While there is very little detail of how it will be reintroduced in other parts of the UK, it is vital that any new money coming to Scotland as a result is used by the Scottish Government to directly increase the pension age winter heating payment.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said employers should be able to decide if their staff can wear burkas in the workplace. Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'

Minister dismisses US misgivings over Chinese 'super embassy' in London - as Tories warn of 'espionage base'
Minister dismisses US misgivings over Chinese 'super embassy' in London - as Tories warn of 'espionage base'

Sky News

time35 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Minister dismisses US misgivings over Chinese 'super embassy' in London - as Tories warn of 'espionage base'

A minister has dismissed reported US misgivings about plans for a Chinese "super embassy" near London's financial districts. Peter Kyle told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips that security concerns will be "taken care of assiduously in the planning process". According to The Sunday Times, the White House has warned Downing Street against the proposed massive embassy at Royal Mint Court. The site is between financial hubs in the City of London and Canary Wharf and close to three data centres, raising concerns about espionage risk. Asked for the government's view on the risk, Mr Kyle said: "These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process. "But just to reassure people, we deal with embassies and these sorts of infrastructure issues all the time. "We are very experienced and we are very aware of these sorts of issues constantly, not just when new buildings are being done, but all the time." He added that America and Britain "share intelligence iteratively" and if they raise security concerns through the planning process "we will have a fulsome response for them". However, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said he shared the US's concerns. He told Trevor Phillips: "I agree with the United States. We think it is a security risk in the government. "The Conservatives were very clear. We should not be allowing the Chinese to build the super embassy. It is likely to become a base for their pan-European espionage activities." He added that underneath the sites are cables connecting the City of London to Canary Wharf and these could be intercepted. China has been attempting to revise plans for the Royal Mint building, opposite the Tower of London, since purchasing it in 2018. The proposal for the embassy, which would be China's largest in Europe, was previously rejected by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. However, Beijing resubmitted it in August after Labour won the election, and the plans were "called in" by Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister and housing secretary. It means that an inspector will be appointed to carry out an inquiry into the proposal, but the decision ultimately rests with central government rather than the local authority. Two large protests were held at the site in February and March, which organisers claimed involved thousands of people.

UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle
UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle

Rhyl Journal

time44 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

UK will handle US security concerns over new Chinese embassy plan, says Kyle

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle indicated the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any concerns raised by allies amid suggestions that US opposition could undermine transatlantic trade negotiations. Mr Kyle sought to reassure the public that the Government deals with similar 'infrastructure issues' relating to embassies 'all the time'. 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme. He added: 'These are the issues that we talk about as two countries all the time… we're in the Five Eyes agreement, America and Britain share intelligence… If people raise security issues even though it relates to planning, then I'm sure we will have a fulsome response for them. 'But look, the key thing is these are issues which are quite routinised in the way that we deal with the security of our country.' A senior US official had told the Sunday Times: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The matter is believed to have been discussed during US-UK trade talks, with diplomats saying the Trump administration would have reservations about intelligence sharing with the UK if the building went ahead. More than a thousand demonstrators gathered earlier this year for a rally against the proposed Chinese 'super-embassy' because of concerns about its potential proximity to Canary Wharf and the City of London. The redevelopment plans at the former site of the Royal Mint were 'called in' last year, which means the Government will make the final decision following a report from the Planning Inspectorate. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store