Lobbying scandal related to Huawei: What we know so far
A major corruption investigation shook the European Parliament in March, focused on allegations that Chinese tech giant Huawei engaged in illicit lobbying practices to sway EU policy in its favour. The probe has led to several arrests and office raids in the Brussels' seat of the Parliament, and provoked as a reaction a temporary ban on Huawei lobbyists.
Belgian prosecutors are probing whether Huawei orchestrated a covert influence campaign within the European Parliament. Investigators are examining whether from 2021 Huawei representatives offered bribes to MEPs and their assistants.
The corruption 'is said to have been practised regularly and very discreetly, under the guise of commercial lobbying ', according to the Belgian prosecutor, and included remuneration, excessive gifts such as food and travel expenses or regular invitations to football matches.
These incentives were allegedly aimed at securing favourable political positions on topics of interest to the Chinese company.
What has the Belgian prosecutor decided so far?
On 13 March Belgian authorities conducted 21 searches across Belgium and Portugal, including raids on Huawei's Brussels headquarters and the offices of some parliamentary assistants. These actions resulted in several arrests and the seizure of documents and electronic devices.
Subsequently, eight individuals were charged with offences including corruption, money laundering, and participation in a criminal organisation. Among these, three remain in custody, three are under electronic surveillance, and two were released under conditions, according to the latest information provided by the Belgian prosecutor.
The prosecutor has not named any of the suspects, but several media outlets reported the name of Valerio Ottati, a Belgian-Italian lobbyist who is Huawei's EU public affairs director and had been working as assistant to several MEPs in the Parliament. Ottati is considered a central figure in the alleged bribery scheme. He has not replied to Euronews' requests of comment.
Abraham Liu, chief representative to the EU Institutions for Huawei is also involved in the case, according to media reports.
The Belgian Prosecutor also asked to lift the immunity of five members of the European Parliament, in order to be able to investigate their involvement.
Three of them belong to the center-right European People's Party: the Italians Salvatore De Meo, Giusi Princi and Fulvio Martusciello. The others are the Maltese Socialist MEP Daniel Attard and the Bulgarian Renew Europe's MEP Nikola Minchev.
Offices of assistants to MEPs Marco Falcone (Italy/EPP) and Nikola Minchev (Bulgaria/Renew Europe) were sealed during the investigation, while in Italy the assistant Lucia Simeone was put under arrest and subsequently released.
Italian newspaper La Repubblica has cited a 2021 letter signed by eight MEPs advocating for the continued development of 5G technology in Europe without geopolitical hindrances as germane to the investigation.
The letter - promoted by Martusciello's office - did not explicitly mention Huawei, but prosecutors believe it was crafted to promote the company's interests. Investigators allege that payments were made to the letter's author and co-signatories, disguised as consultancy fees and campaign expenses, according to reports. Have the prosecutors given no information on this?
Five of the eight MEPs who signed the letter and who are still members of the Parliament, told Euronews that they received no payments from Huawei.
The European Parliament immediately suspended Huawei lobbyists from access to its premises, as a precautionary measure. This means that the company's representatives cannot enter Parliament's premises in Brussels, Strasbourg, and Luxembourg.
The European Commission also suspended relations with Huawei. 'The Commission shall not meet with any lobby groups and/or trade associations that represent Huawei's interests and/or speak on its behalf," the executive said in a statement.
Huawei has stated that it takes the allegations seriously and is committed to cooperating with the investigation, emphasising that the company has a 'zero-tolerance policy toward corruption or other wrongdoing' and is 'committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations at all times'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
OPINION: The Macron-Trump bromance is heading for a bust-up
On Sunday President Emmanuel Macron will become the first French leader ever to make an official visit to Greenland. He will be the first EU leader to set foot in the vast Danish autonomous territory since Donald Trump began to make bullying comments about the manifest right of the United States to grab all the real estate on its northern borders. Trolls were originally part of Danish, Swedish and Norwegian folklore. Macron is 'trolling' Trump – on his way to a G7 summit in Canada where he will meet the US President that he calls a 'friend'. Something has changed in Macron's obsequious public approach to Trump in the last few weeks. Other members of the French government – the Prime Minister François Bayrou and the foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot – have overtly criticised the US President. In March Bayrou said that Donald Trump planned to 'destroy the international order' and 'make the world even more dangerous'. In public, Macron has been careful not to attack Trump by name. He claims a 'friendship' with the US president from their first terms of office. He said in March that he speaks to Trump at least once every two days. Advertisement In private, Macron, I am told, has no illusions about the US leader. He returned from his visit to the White House in February disturbed by what he heard off-camera. He told senior political and military figures in France that his conversations with Trump and senior US administration figures had been 'bizarre, brutal and sometimes racist'. Macron believes nonetheless – or once believed - that nothing can be gained by frontal attacks on Trump. Something useful might still be achieved, he once hoped, for Ukraine and for transatlantic trade, by a mixture of flattery, cajolery and a patient separation of facts from Trumpian obsessions and inventions. Four months later, something is shifting. Macron has still not attacked Trump directly. But the French president is moving towards the kind of open challenge to the Trumpian worldview that is likely to strain their strange bromance. On his visit to south-east Asia last month, Macron called on Asian countries to ally with Europe to resist bullying attempts by 'big powers' to build 'spheres of coercion'. Officially, he was talking about China and Russia. In the context, he was also clearly referring to the United States. Speaking at a conference on the future of the oceans in Nice on Tuesday, Macron said that 'ocean depths are not for sale, any more than Greenland is for sale'. Referring to his visit to the Danish territory this weekend, he said that his intention was to make it clear that 'predation' and 'threats' were not acceptable. Where all this is heading is unclear. Trump may not yet have noticed the change in Macron's tone. It may suit both men to continue the fable of their unlikely friendship. But I expect that we are heading for a bust-up. The French President has almost two years left in power but no majority in parliament and little real influence on domestic policy. The second coming of Trump offered him vindication at home and pivotal, diplomatic influence abroad. His appeals in the last eight years for Europe to build its own 'strategic autonomy', independent of the US, have proved to be visionary. Macron remains an important figure in Europe and internationally. It was the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland prime minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen who invited him to 'troll Trump' by joining them in talks on the territory's future this weekend. But Trump's return to office has also confronted the French President with his own contradictions. After appealing for years for the EU to move towards military and diplomatic autonomy, Macron finds that France's own future defence investment is compromised by the state budget deficits that have piled up during his eight years in office. At the Nato summit in The Hague later this month, Trump will push for European countries to increase defence spending to 5 percent of GDP (while doing everything he can to undermine their economies). Macron has spoken vaguely of increasing the French defence budget to 3.5 percent of GDP but there is no obvious way that can happen without cutting social spending or missing France's deficit-cutting targets. Advertisement In alliance with Sir Keir Starmer, Macron hoped that he could persuade Trump that Vladimir Putin had no plans to end the war in Ukraine. It was time to intensify international sanctions on Russia, not weaken them. Trump seems to have accepted that his disjointed and floundering peace initiative is going nowhere. But there is no sign that he is willing to join the EU in new sanctions or that he is prepared to continue military aid to Ukraine. On transatlantic trade, Trump continues to speak nonsense about the size of the US-EU trade deficit and refer to the EU as a 70-year-old conspiracy to damage the United States. The Trump State Department published an unhinged new doctrine on Europe last month in which France, Britain and Germany are America's enemies and Marine Le Pen and 'Christian Hungary' are America's friends. Advertisement In sum, the chances of a big quarrel between the US and Europe in the next month are high. Trump has given way on China; he will be looking for a diversionary squabble elsewhere. The French president, marginalised in domestic politics, is understandably tempted to prove that he still exists by playing a pivotal role in European and international affairs. But at some point soon he will have to make a clear choice. Will he continue to humour and flatter Trump or will he stand up to him?
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Japan, China trade barbs over fighter jet manoeuvres
The Japanese government had complained to China over the incident, in which no Japanese military personnel were reported injured. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet from the Shandong aircraft carrier followed a Japanese P-3C patrol plane for 40 minutes on Saturday, according to the Japanese defence ministry. Two J-15 jets then did the same for 80 minutes on Sunday. "During these long periods, the jets flew unusually close to the P-3C, and they flew within 45 metres" of the patrol plane on both days, an official from the Japanese ministry told AFP. Also on Sunday, Chinese jets cut across airspace around 900 metres (3,000 feet) ahead of a P-3C Japanese patrol plane at the same altitude -- a distance a P-3C can reach within a few seconds at cruising speed, Tokyo said. "We do not believe that this approach was made by mistake," the Japanese military's chief of staff Yoshihide Yoshida told reporters on Thursday. "Given it happened for 40 minutes and 80 minutes, for two days in a row, our understanding is that it was done on purpose," he said. Beijing's foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian hit back at the Japanese description of the events. "The root cause of the risk to maritime and air security was the close reconnaissance of China's normal military activities by a Japanese warplane," he said. "The Chinese side urges the Japanese side to stop this kind of dangerous behaviour." 'Abnormal approaches' The incident followed the sighting in recent days of two Chinese aircraft carriers sailing in the Pacific simultaneously for the first time. Japan said this week the aircraft carriers' activity -- described by China as "routine training" -- showed the expanding geographic scope of Beijing's military. Yoshida said on Thursday loosening Japan's surveillance, information-gathering or countermeasures against intrusion "would encourage attempts to change the status quo by force". Tokyo's top government spokesman Yoshimasa Hayashi earlier told reporters in regard to the fighter jet incident that "such abnormal approaches can lead to an accidental collision, so we have expressed serious concerns" to the Chinese side. US ambassador to Japan George Glass said on social media platform X that the manoeuvres by a Chinese fighter "put Japanese crewmembers' lives in peril". "Whether it's harassing Philippine ships, attacking Vietnamese fishermen, or firing flares at Australian aircraft, Beijing knows only reckless aggression. Not so much a charm offensive as offensive harm," Glass said. Similar incidents were last reported in May and June 2014, when Chinese Su-27 fighter jets flew within 30 metres (100 feet) of Japanese military planes in the East China Sea. Japan summoned the Chinese ambassador at the time, while the two sides traded accusations of blame. Daisuke Kawai, director of the University of Tokyo's economic security and policy innovation programme, told AFP this week that the timing of the aircraft carrier movements could be linked to US-China economic tensions. "Beijing calculated that the United States would be less willing or able to respond militarily at this precise moment, seeing it as an opportune time to demonstrate its expanding military capabilities," he said.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
President Trump says he'll set unilateral tariff rates within weeks
US President Donald Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he would send letters to trading partners in the next week or two, outlining unilateral tariff rates. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' Trump said at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington. 'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out. And I think you understand that, saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it,' he added. This would put Trump ahead of his tariff deadline, as the president previously paused so-called 'reciprocal' duties for 90 days until 8 July. The higher rates are set to kick in on the 9th. Trump told reporters at the Kennedy Center that a delay to the deadline is unlikely, although US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent previously suggested there may be some flexibility. "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." The US has thus far only managed to secure a trade framework with the UK, as well as clinching a tariff deal with China. Trump was nonetheless upbeat about negotiations on Wednesday. "We're rocking in terms of deals," he said. "We're dealing with quite a few countries and they all want to make a deal with us." Following talks in London, Trump said on Wednesday that magnets and rare earths would be supplied up front by China and that the US would allow Chinese students into its colleges and universities. The president added that a 55% tariff would be applied to Chinese imports. A White House official, who was not authorised to discuss the terms publicly, said the 55% was not an increase on the previous 30% tariff on China because Trump was including other pre-existing import taxes. Specifically, the president was tallying up his 10% baseline tariff, the 20% fentanyl trafficking levy and a 25% pre-existing tariff on China. In May, the US agreed upon a trade framework with the UK, which allows US goods to be fast-tracked through customs and reduces trade barriers on a number of products. The framework lowers US duties on British steel, aluminum and cars, although there are some knots to work out, meaning the specifics of the deal could arrive later than the 9 July deadline. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Wednesday that a deal with the European Union will likely be among the final trade agreements concluded by the United States. 'I'm optimistic that we can get there with Europe. But Europe will be probably [at] the very, very end,' Lutnick told CNBC. In May, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on EU goods coming to the US, although he later said he would hold off on this threat until 9 July. The president originally placed a 20% so-called 'reciprocal' levy on EU goods, but this duty was lifted during the 90-day pause window. Disney and Universal sued popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney on Wednesday. This is the first time major Hollywood companies have taken legal action against a maker of generative AI technology that could upend the entertainment industry. The copyright lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorized copies' of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from 'Despicable Me'. 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint. The studios also say the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney didn't respond to a request for comment but its CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit in a weekly conference call with users on Wednesday after someone asked if it would endanger the tiny startup's future. 'I can't really discuss any ongoing legal things because the world isn't cool like that, but I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time,' Holz said. "I think everybody wants us to be around.' In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Holz described his image-making service as 'kind of like a search engine' pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He presented the process as a form of creative inspiration, rather than plagiarism. 'Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?' Holz said. 'Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine.' The lawsuit against Midjourney comes as a number of other AI companies have sought to make inroads into Hollywood and the video game industry, providing AI tools that can aid filmmakers and game developers generate new videos, synthesise voices and edit footage. A movie industry group, the Motion Picture Association, said in a statement on Wednesday that 'strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry' and it supports a 'balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centred innovation'. The Recording Industry Association of America, a music publishing group fighting its own legal battles against firms that make AI-generated music, endorsed the lawsuit as a 'critical stand for human creativity and responsible innovation'. Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. At the same time, many big tech companies are increasingly looking to make licensing deals to pay for the content their AI systems need. The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is underway in London, pitting Getty Images against Stability AI, maker of an image-generating tool that competes with Midjourney.
