Iran says to submit own nuclear proposal to US soon
Live Events
'Strategic mistake'
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Iran said on Monday it will soon present a counter-proposal on a nuclear deal with the United States, after it had described Washington's offer as containing "ambiguities".Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear accord to replace the deal with major powers that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018.The longtime foes have been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment , with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington describing it as a "red line".On May 31, after the fifth round of talks, Iran said it had received "elements" of a US proposal, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi later saying the text contained "ambiguities".Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei criticised the US proposal as "lacking elements" reflective of the previous rounds of negotiations, without providing further details."We will soon submit our own proposed plan to the other side through (mediator) Oman once it is finalised," Baqaei told a weekly press briefing."It is a proposal that is reasonable, logical and balanced, and we strongly recommend that the American side value this opportunity."Also on Monday, Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi told state news agency IRNA that Iran's response "is a framework for agreement"."If we reach an understanding on this framework in principle, further extensive negotiations will begin on its details," he added.Iran's parliament speaker has said the US proposal failed to include the lifting of sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years.Trump, who has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign of sanctions on Iran since taking office in January, has repeatedly said Tehran will not be allowed any uranium enrichment under a potential deal.On Wednesday, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the US offer was "100 percent against" notions of independence and self-reliance.He insisted that uranium enrichment was "key" to Iran's nuclear programme and that the US "cannot have a say" on the issue.Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead.Western countries, including the United States, have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Iran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.The United Nations nuclear watchdog on Monday began a Board of Governors meeting in Vienna that will last until Friday to discuss Iran's nuclear activities among other topics."I call upon Iran urgently to cooperate fully and effectively with the International Atomic Energy Agency," said agency chief Rafael Grossi in his opening speech."Unless and until Iran assists the agency in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues, the agency will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful," he added.Earlier, the agency released a report criticising "less than satisfactory" cooperation from Tehran, particularly in explaining past cases of nuclear material found at undeclared sites.Iran has criticised the IAEA report as unbalanced, saying it relied on "forged documents" provided by its arch foe Israel.Britain, France and Germany, the three European countries that are party to the 2015 deal, are currently weighing whether to trigger the sanctions "snapback" mechanism in the accord.The mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions in response to Iranian non-compliance -- an option that expires in October.On Friday, Araghchi warned European powers against backing a draft resolution at the IAEA accusing Tehran of non-compliance, calling it a "strategic mistake".On Monday, Baqaei said Iran has "prepared and formulated a series of steps and measures" if the resolution is passed."Without a doubt, the response to confrontation will not be more cooperation," he added.rkh-mz-pdm/dcp
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Apple's WWDC event to put focus on 'existential risk' of AI struggles
Apple Inc. shares have been heavily tethered to US trade policies this year, but its annual developer's conference could refocus Wall Street's attention on a potentially bigger problem: its struggles with artificial intelligence. The iPhone maker's WWDC event kicks off Monday and isn't expected to feature much in the way of major AI releases. That could shine a light on Apple's shortfalls with the critical technology, threatening further weakness for its shares with few obvious catalysts on the horizon to turn things around. 'It's hard to argue that Apple's lack of standing with AI isn't an existential risk, and it would be a real surprise if it came out with a significant AI development or application at WWDC,' said Andrew Choi, portfolio manager at Parnassus Investments. 'If it can paint a future where it is integrating and commoditising AI, that would be compelling, because otherwise, what is going to get people to buy their next phone for a lot more money?' Shares are down almost 19 per cent this year, making them by far the biggest drag on the Nasdaq 100, which has advanced 3.6 per cent. While much of the selloff reflects Apple's exposure to President Donald Trump's tariffs and political uncertainty, its struggles with AI have been another significant headwind. The stock rose 0.4 per cent on Monday. The conference marks the one-year anniversary of the introduction of Apple Intelligence, which sparked an initial wave of optimism that the AI features it unveiled would prompt consumers to upgrade their iPhones in droves. That proved premature, however, as features failed to impress and were repeatedly delayed, culminating with an AI-version of the Siri digital assistant getting postponed for the foreseeable future. The lack of a robust AI offering stands in contrast to some Big Tech peers. Alphabet Inc. recently debuted a number of well-received AI features, and Microsoft Corp. is trading at all-time highs on AI optimism. Apple also faces potential competition from ChatGPT owner OpenAI, which said last month it's acquiring io, a device startup co-founded by Jony Ive, the legendary designer and former Apple executive. Of course, Apple still offers plenty of attractive characteristics, including a huge user base, its high-margin services business, and immense profitability that it taps to return capital to shareholders through buybacks and dividends. Those attributes still make the stock appealing to Mark Bronzo, chief investment strategist at the Rye Consulting Group, despite lagging in AI. 'I expect its AI features will be more functional than cutting edge, and that means there's nothing exciting about Apple where you'd want to own it over Nvidia, Microsoft, or Amazon, which have strong growth from their AI stories,' he said. 'The flip side is that Apple's cash flow and services business mean it can maintain its P/E in a downturn. It can sometimes be useful to be in a boring stock if the market goes sideways.' Still, Apple's AI struggles add to other investor concerns. Apple's revenue growth is projected to be about 4 per cent in fiscal 2025, compared with 14 per cent for Microsoft or 11 per cent for Alphabet. It also trades at 27 times estimated earnings, well below a recent peak around 34, but a premium to its average over the past decade of 21. Last week, Needham became the latest Wall Street firm to downgrade the stock. Generative AI innovations from competitors 'open the door for new hardware form factors that threaten iOS devices,' analyst Laura Martin wrote, cutting her rating to the equivalent of neutral. Fewer than 60 per cent of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg who cover the company recommend buying, the lowest such rate among the seven most valuable US technology companies, which include Microsoft, Nvidia Corp., Inc., Alphabet, Meta Platforms Inc., and Broadcom Inc. 'Apple is growing at a single-digit pace without much ability to expand its margins, plus it faces risks from tariffs and China exposure while competitors make inroads with AI and it trades at a premium price,' said Choi. 'There's nothing compelling about all that.'
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Apple WWDC 2025: After Microsoft, Tim Cook-led tech giant's annual software event interrupted by protest; Watch video
Tech conferences faced disruptions recently. At Apple's event, a protester displayed a keffiyeh. This followed a similar incident at Microsoft's 50th anniversary. A former employee, Vaniya Agrawal, criticized Microsoft's alleged role in violence in Gaza. She accused the company of aiding violence through its technology. Agrawal resigned and condemned Microsoft's ties with Israel. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Days after Microsoft, Apple saw interruption during its annual software developer conference on Monday by a protester who marched in and unzipped his jacket to reveal a protester spoke for about 30 seconds before security walked him out, reported The incident comes after a former Microsoft employee ignited controversy during the company's 50th anniversary celebration, confronting top executives including CEO Satya Nadella and former heads Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. The employee, Vaniya Agrawal, an Indian-American software engineer, accused the tech giant of aiding violence in Gaza through its technologies.'Fifty thousand Palestinians in Gaza have been murdered with Microsoft technology. How dare you. Shame on all of you for celebrating on their blood,' she declared before being escorted out of the who has since resigned from the company, described Microsoft as a 'digital weapons manufacturer' and condemned its alleged collaboration with the Israeli military. In a pointed critique, she called on Microsoft to end its ties with Israel, highlighting what she claimed was a $133 million agreement with Israel's Ministry of Defense involving AI and Azure Microsoft terminated another software engineer who disrupted CEO Satya Nadella's keynote address at the company's Build 2025 developer conference. The engineer, Joe Lopez, interrupted the speech in protest of Microsoft's business relationship with the Israeli military during the ongoing conflict in the keynote at the Seattle Convention Center, Lopez shouted from the audience: 'Free Palestine. How about you show them how Microsoft is killing Palestinians? How about you show them how Israeli war crimes are powered by Azure?' Security personnel quickly removed him from the venue. As he was being escorted out, Lopez continued, 'As a Microsoft worker, I refuse to be complicit in this genocide.'
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Israel seized a Gaza-bound boat with Greta Thunberg on board. Can it do that?
JERUSALEM: Israeli naval forces, far from the country's shores, intercepted and seized a Gaza-bound ship carrying international activists, including Greta Thunberg, in an early morning raid Monday. The operation sparked accusations that Israel's actions, apparently in the high seas, were a breach of international law. The activists say their journey was meant to protest Israel's ongoing war in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there. The ship was carrying aid destined for people in Gaza, including baby formula and food. The activists, including Thunberg, were detained and were headed to Israel for likely deportation. It's not the first time Israel has halted ships carrying aid bound for the Palestinian territory. A raid in 2010 descended into violence between activists and Israeli commandos, leaving eight Turks and one Turkish-American killed. Most of the other operations against Gaza-bound boats have ended uneventfully, with ships diverted and activists detained. Israel says the latest ship planned to violate its blockade on Gaza and says it acted in accordance with international law. Can Israel storm a ship in the high seas? Here is a look at the legal debate. Intercepted far off the coast of Gaza The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which organized the latest ship, says the Madleen was intercepted in international waters some 200 kilometers (124 miles) off the coast of Gaza, a claim that could not be independently verified. Israeli authorities have not disclosed the location where the ship was halted. Robbie Sabel, an international law expert and former legal adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, said the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea stipulates that a state only has jurisdiction up to 12 nautical miles (19 kilometers) from its shores. In general, states don't have the right to seize ships in international waters, but there are exceptions, including during armed conflict, Sabel added. He said that even before the latest war, Israel was in an armed conflict with Hamas, allowing it to intercept ships it suspected were violating its longstanding blockade of Gaza, which Egypt also enforced. Rights groups have long criticized the blockade as unlawful collective punishment against Palestinians. Sabel cited a U.N. report on the 2010 raid that ended in activist fatalities, which stated that 'attempts to breach a lawfully imposed naval blockade place the vessel and those on board at risk.' The debate over the legality of Israel's blockade remains unresolved among legal experts. The U.N. report urged states to be cautious in the use of force against civilian vessels and called on humanitarian missions to deliver aid through regular channels. It said a country maintaining a naval blockade 'must abide by their obligations with respect to the provision of humanitarian assistance.'
