Piloo Mody, a Parliamentarian Who Left a Mark With His Wit and Humour
This article is part of a series by The Wire titled ' The Early Parliamentarians ', exploring the lives and work of post-independence MPs who have largely been forgotten. The series looks at the institutions they helped create, the enduring ideas they left behind and the contributions they made to nation building.
Piloo Mody was an architect, politician, one of the founding members of the Swatantra Party and a veteran parliamentarian. He was elected to the 4th and 5th Lok Sabhas and served in the Rajya Sabha from 1978 until his death in 1983. As a parliamentarian he left his imprint, complete with humour.
Born into an affluent Parsi family on November 14, 1926, Mody was one of the sons of Sir Homi Mody. He had two brothers, Kali Mody, a pioneer of credit card operations in India and Russi Mody, a former chairman of TISCO Limited.
Piloo studied at the Doon School, Dehradun. After that, he studied architecture at Sir J.J. College of Architecture, Bombay (now Mumbai), and completed his Bachelor of Architecture. To pursue his master's degree in architecture, Mody attended the University of California, Berkeley, US. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who went on to become prime minister of Pakistan in the 1970s, was his college roommate as well as a close friend. After completing his studies, he married Lavina (Vina) Colgan, a Swiss-born-American and his classmate at Berkeley, on January 3, 1953.
After his stint at Berkeley he returned to India. He worked for two years on the Chandigarh Capital Project with Le Corbusier. Another significant building that Mody designed in collaboration with Durga Bajpai is the Oberoi Hotel in New Delhi. He also designed the Chennai headquarters of Engineering Construction Corporation, a former subsidiary of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. It won the Federation Internationale de la Precontrainte prize for excellence in pre-stressed concrete from India.
The couple set up an architecture firm, Mody and Colgan, in 1953 at Stadium House, Churchgate. Their first project was a residential apartment at Marine Lines for senior officials of TISCO. They also designed the front casing of one model of the Voltas Air conditioner.
Mody's other projects include residential project Olympus, three TELCO offices, the headquarters of Bharat Bijlee, Mukand Iron and Steel, Sandoz, Voltas and Diners Club and Business Service centres.
In political life, Mody was an advocate of liberalism and freedom. He was associated with the Swatantra Party as its founding member and was executive vice-president of the party.
As parliamentarian
In the 1967 general election, Mody was elected to the 4th Lok Sabha, representing the Godhra constituency in Gujarat. In 1971 he was re-elected and served in the 5th Lok Sabha until March 1977 but lost with a narrow margin in 1977. Mody merged his Swatantra Party with Charan Singh's Bhartiya Kranti Dal in 1974, which eventually merged with Janata Party in 1977. After an absence of a year from parliament, on April 10, 1978 Mody joined the Rajya Sabha and served there until his death in 1983.
Besides his professional pursuits, Mody was known for his constant use of wit and humour in his parliamentary speeches. Due to his conservative and pro-US views, Mody was often accused by the members of the ruling Congress party of being a 'Washington parrot'.
To counter that, once he came to the House wearing a placard reading, 'I am a CIA agent.' The chairman ordered him to remove it. He did so, remarking, 'I am no longer a CIA agent.'
Once, during a debate, J.C. Jain, a member of the ruling party, started needling Mody. He lost his temper and shouted at Jain, 'Stop barking.' Jain was up, yelling and pleading with the chair, 'Sir, he is calling me a dog. It is an unparliamentary language.'
Chairman Hidayatullah agreed and ordered, 'This will not go on record.' Not to be outdone, Mody corrected himself by saying, 'All right then, stop braying.' Jain did not know what the word implied, and it stayed on record.
Once, a minister, during a heated argument, said, 'I am not supposed to respond to every barking dog.' Then Mody rose to speak and said, 'Speaker, Sir, on the treasury benches, we have great people sitting, pillars of the government, pillars of democracy. And, we are dogs, and everyone knows how a dog treats a pillar.' The House burst out in laughter.
Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty
When Giani Zail Singh, as Home Minister, was piloting a bill in the Rajya Sabha, Mody participated in the debate. While replying to the debate, Gianiji, referring to Mody's comments on the Bill, stated in Hindi, ' Piloo Mody to bade seasonal member hain.'
The whole House started laughing. Another minister, sitting next to Gianiji, whispered to him to say that the word is 'seasoned'.
Thereupon Gianiji again said, ' Mujhe to angrezi thodi aati hai. Inko to inki biwi ne angrezi padhai hai.' Mody thumped his desk and raised a point of order. The whole House was looking at Mody. The Deputy Chairman asked, 'What is your point of order?' Mody stated, 'Gianiji is grossly misinformed. My wife did not teach me English. I taught her English.' The whole House burst into laughter again. Mody's wife was Swiss.
Similarly, once, there was a debate in Parliament about the import of railway tracks and wagons for quick replacement. Indradeep Sinha, an opposition member, believed these should be manufactured locally instead of importing because it caused delays. Mody interrupted to say that the delay was caused not by importing it but by manufacturing it. Sinha replied to Mody, 'You are not the sole importing agent. There are so many others.' The Chairman corrected Sinha, 'No, he is not an importing agent. He is an exporting agent.' Mody added, 'I export ideas in a barren market.'
When Shyam Lal Yadav was elected as the Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha, members of various political parties in the House started extending their congratulations to him. Mody congratulated and warned the newly appointed Deputy Chairman, 'I beg to move a vote of congratulations to my friend, Shri Shyam Lal Yadav. I have no doubt in my mind that my good friend will continue to be as partisan as he was in the past. I want to assure my friend, neighbour, and colleague that I wish him very happy times in the Chair with the least amount of acrimony and warn him that if he does not behave when he returns to this Chair, I will sit on him.' The Deputy Chairman, when not presiding, sits next to the Leader of the Opposition.
Mody's sense of humour was not only in his speeches but in his writings too. He was known to address Indira Gandhi as IG in his letters and sign off as PM (Piloo Mody). He often told Indira Gandhi, 'I am the permanent PM; you are temporary.'
In 1975, at the time of the Emergency in India, Mody was arrested on the orders of the Indira Gandhi government, using the controversial powers granted by the MISA and was in Delhi's Tihar Jail and Rohtak Jail for 16 long months.
Apart from being a humorous parliamentarian and brilliant architect, Mody was a renowned author, having two books to his credit.
His first book, Zulfi, My Friend (1973), was penned on the life and times of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Mody's second book was Democracy Means BREAD AND FREEDOM (1979), which he wrote during his 16 months in jail. The book was an attempt to trace the genesis of democracy and search for the origins of the attitudes and institutions that sustain it.
Mody also served as editor of an English weekly, March of the Nation, published from Bombay, and wrote numerous articles for the national and international newspapers and magazines.
A few days before he died in his sleep, Piloo Mody, the irrepressibly buoyant MP who for over a decade brought to Indian politics a special flavour of wit, wacky humour and wisdom, told India Today that "The world revolves around an idea. Every problem has its solution, given a clean heart, good intention and determination." He also explained his plans to start a new political party. But he passed away on January 29, 1983. He was 57.
Qurban Ali is a trilingual journalist who has covered some of modern India's major political, social and economic developments. He has a keen interest in India's freedom struggle and is now documenting the history of the socialist movement in the country.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Title IX explained: What it means for schools, students, and civil rights
Before 1972, the American education system was rife with invisible lines—lines that kept girls off playing fields, locked women out of laboratories, and routinely dismissed sexual harassment as a personal problem, not a systemic failure. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Then came Title IX. Passed as just 37 words tucked into the Education Amendments of 1972, Title IX has since become one of the most powerful levers for gender equality in U.S. history. While its language is deceptively simple, its implications have redefined what fairness means in schools, colleges, and federally funded educational programs. That legacy is now under fire. In a dramatic escalation, the Trump administration has accused California of violating Title IX by allowing transgender girls to compete in school sports—threatening to cut federal education funding unless the state reverses course. Yet more than 50 years later, Title IX stands at a crossroads: revered, contested, and increasingly pulled into the fiercest cultural battles of our time. From campus sexual assault to transgender inclusion, the law continues to shape and be shaped by the evolving definition of civil rights in American education. So, what exactly is Title IX? And why does this five-decade-old law remain one of the most relevant and polarizing tools in the nation's educational landscape? Let's break it down. What is Title IX? Title IX is a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving financial assistance from the U.S. government. Its core mandate is simple yet profound: 'No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.' Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This sweeping protection applies not only to public and private K–12 schools and colleges but also to vocational training centers, libraries, and rehabilitation programs that benefit from federal funds. All federal agencies that disburse such funds—chief among them, the Department of Education—are legally obligated to enforce this nondiscrimination rule. The scope of Title IX: Beyond the classroom While often associated with equal opportunities in school athletics, Title IX covers a far broader spectrum of sex-based discrimination. Its protections extend to: Sexual harassment and assault occurring within educational settings Pregnancy discrimination, including denial of accommodations for pregnant or parenting students Disparities in athletics, including unequal access to teams, facilities, and scholarships Bias in STEM education, where women and girls have historically been underrepresented Gendered enforcement of dress codes that disproportionately penalize one sex Retaliation against individuals who report or protest discriminatory practices Importantly, Title IX does not just penalize overt exclusion. It holds institutions accountable for systemic practices, whether through policy or culture, that perpetuate unequal treatment. Title IX: Enforcement and accountability The US Department of Education, through its Office for Civil Rights (OCR), is the primary enforcer of Title IX. Schools and institutions that fail to comply risk losing federal funding—an often existential threat. Enforcement can follow complaints from students, parents, or employees, and in recent years, it has become a powerful mechanism for driving institutional reform. In addition to responding to individual complaints, the Department also initiates investigations and audits when systemic violations are suspected. Resolutions may include policy overhauls, staff training, compensatory measures for affected individuals, and in rare but severe cases, legal proceedings. Evolving definitions of Title IX: A legal and cultural flashpoint Over the decades, Title IX has evolved alongside America's social fabric—and not without controversy. While early years focused on opening doors for girls in sports and STEM, more recent debates have centered around gender identity and transgender rights. The law's interpretation has shifted between administrations, especially regarding whether protections extend to students whose gender identity does not align with their biological sex. Under the Biden administration, Title IX was interpreted to include gender identity as part of its protections, but that expansion was struck down in federal court. The current Trump administration has adopted a biology-based interpretation, intensifying scrutiny of schools that allow transgender students to participate in activities aligned with their gender identity. This evolving legal terrain has left educators and administrators grappling with compliance dilemmas in a deeply polarized environment. Why Title IX still matters Title IX is not just a statute, it is a litmus test for how the nation values equality in education. Its impact has been felt in every corner of American learning: from ensuring that girls can compete in school sports to protecting survivors of campus sexual assault, and from securing maternity accommodations to challenging dress codes that unfairly target female students. At its heart, Title IX is about more than fairness. It is about access, dignity, and the right to learn free from bias. As the law continues to be interpreted and reinterpreted through shifting political winds, its original promise remains both urgent and unfinished. The bottom line Whether in a rural public school or a top-tier university, Title IX continues to safeguard students from sex-based discrimination. Its future, however, is increasingly shaped by how society defines sex, gender, and equality in an ever-diversifying educational landscape. As courts, Congress, and communities debate its reach, one thing remains certain: Title IX will remain a legal and cultural battleground for years to come.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Visa applicants, beware! US Embassy in India issues new warning - 'Omitting social media information could lead to...'
The United States (US) Embassy in New Delhi Thursday directed all visa applicants to stipulate details of all their social media handles from the past five years for background checks -- failure to comply could lead to visa rejection, the embassy said. This comes close on the heels of the United States' decision to require all student visa applicants to make their social media accounts public for vetting purposes. "Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used in the last five years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit," the embassy said in a statement on X. "Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas," it added. Citing "national security and public safety," the US had on Monday stated that all applicants for student visas must make their social media accounts public. 'Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under US law,' the US Embassy in New Delhi had said on Monday. The F-1 visa is issued to students pursuing academic studies, while the M-1 visa is for those enrolled in vocational or other non-academic programs. The J-1 visa, on the other hand, is granted to individuals participating in teaching, studying, research, or on-the-job training programs, typically lasting from a few weeks to several years. Last month, the Trump administration directed all US consulates around the world to stop conducting new interviews and accepting applications for student and exchange visitor visas. At the same time, US officials accused the Biden administration of allowing poorly vetted migrants into the country and claimed the system was full of fraud. In response, they announced stricter checks, including reviewing the social media activity of people applying to move to the US. Now, US consular officers will carefully check applicants' online activity. They will look for anything considered concerning — such as posts showing hostility toward American citizens, values, culture, institutions, or the country's founding principles. This change comes as the US Department of State begins requiring social media checks before granting visas.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
With 4 Hidden Tunnels And 100 Metre Depth, Is Pickaxe Mountain Iran's Nuclear Plan B?
Last Updated: Built over 100 metres deep, Pickaxe Mountain is believed to be far more fortified than Iran's Fordow facility, and possibly beyond the reach of even America's bunker-buster bombs In the heart of Iran's central Isfahan province lies a mountain with an ominous name and even more ominous purpose — Pickaxe Mountain. Known formally as Kūh-e Kolang Gaz Lā, this rugged terrain just south of Fordow and minutes from Natanz has quietly become the focus of global nuclear anxiety. Despite US President Donald Trump's recent claim that American stealth bombers 'obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme with a weekend airstrike, experts and intelligence assessments indicate that Tehran may have moved its most vital materials out of reach, into the depths of this mountain fortress. What And Where Is Pickaxe Mountain? Pickaxe Mountain is located about 145 km south of Fordow and just minutes from the Natanz nuclear facility, two of the three key sites bombed by US B-2 stealth jets using 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker-busting bombs. But unlike Fordow, which has two known tunnel entrances, Pickaxe has at least four—two on the eastern and two on the western slopes—each around six metres wide and eight metres tall. What makes Pickaxe more formidable than its predecessors is its extraordinary depth. According to The Telegraph, analysts estimate the underground facility is being constructed at more than 100 metres beneath the surface, far deeper than Fordow's 60–90-metre depth. This has raised concerns that even America's most powerful non-nuclear bombs may not be able to destroy it. 'The Kolang Gaz Lā or 'Pickaxe' mountain underground complex is intended to give the clerical regime a nuclear weapons site that even the US Air Force would have difficulty destroying with its largest conventional bombs," Reuel Marc Gerecht, a resident scholar at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, told The Telegraph. Open-source satellite images first drew attention to Pickaxe Mountain in 2023. Associated Press, after reviewing photos from Planet Labs PBC, confirmed that Iran was digging deep into the mountain. Security checkpoints and excavated tunnels were also observed. Experts fear that Iran is building not just a centrifuge manufacturing centre, but an enrichment hub for uranium itself. Steven De La Fuente, a research associate at the James Martin Centre for Nonproliferation Studies, told AP in 2023: 'So the depth of the facility is a concern because it would be much harder for us. It would be much harder to destroy using conventional weapons, such as like a typical bunker buster bomb." According to the Institute for Science and International Security, Iran could 'secretly deploy several thousand advanced centrifuges in the new tunnel complex", enough to continue uranium enrichment even if all other known sites are destroyed. Did Iran Move Uranium Before The Bombing? Despite Trump's repeated assertions that his surprise attack wiped out Tehran's nuclear infrastructure, evidence suggests otherwise. A leaked preliminary classified US report, quoted by The Telegraph, indicates that the strikes only set Iran's nuclear progress back by a few months. Officials told The New York Times that while parts of the facilities were sealed off, most underground structures remained intact. Adding to the concern, the NY Post reported that satellite images showed 16 cargo trucks queuing outside Fordow hours before the strikes. Sima Shine, a long-time Israeli intelligence official, told The Telegraph that 'hundreds if not thousands" of advanced centrifuges and a large portion of enriched uranium were likely moved to secret locations before the bombs fell. The most likely of those locations? Pickaxe Mountain. IAEA Stonewalled By Iran The international watchdog responsible for monitoring nuclear activity, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has been kept out of the loop. In April, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi revealed he had asked Tehran what was being constructed under Pickaxe Mountain. The response was blunt: 'It's none of your business." Grossi later told NY Post: 'Since it is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the programme are taking place, we're asking them, what is this for? They are telling us, it's none of your business." He added: 'It cannot be excluded that the tunnels would store undeclared material," noting that he has 'been raising this issue repeatedly, and will continue to do so." That concern has grown more urgent. On Wednesday, the Iranian parliament passed a bill to suspend all cooperation with the IAEA, calling it a 'political instrument". How Much Uranium Is Unaccounted For? According to the latest IAEA data cited by The Telegraph, as of May 17, Iran had 408.6 kg (about 900 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60 per cent purity. This was an increase of 133.8 kg from the agency's last report in February. After the airstrikes began on June 13, roughly the same amount — 900 pounds — has been reportedly unaccounted for. The suspicion is that it was moved to Pickaxe or another undisclosed location. Donald Trump disputes this. 'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast," he said during a press briefing. 'It would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it." Yet intelligence assessments reviewed by The Telegraph suggest that Iran not only managed the relocation, but retained enough capability to rebuild its programme in as little as six months. Macron's Warning And Israel's Unease French President Emmanuel Macron has echoed these concerns. 'The risk has indeed increased with what has happened recently," he said. 'We must absolutely prevent Iran going down this path." Israel is also watching closely. A shaky US-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel did little to halt hostilities. Israeli jets struck Iranian targets just hours into the truce, prompting Trump to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and demand restraint. 'They don't know what the f— they're doing," Trump later said, referring to both countries. What Happens Now? The future of Iran's nuclear programme appears increasingly decentralised and fortified. Intelligence experts say Iran has adopted a dispersal strategy, spreading critical capabilities across multiple sites to ensure redundancy in case of attack. Security analysts warn that in the event of an existential threat to regime survival, Iran may abandon its insistence on peaceful nuclear use and pursue weapons outright. Some hardliners in Tehran have already called for immediate nuclear bomb development. Even so, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei maintains that a religious fatwa prohibits nuclear weapons. Iranian MP Manan Raisi confirmed the fatwa 'remained in place", but noted such rulings in Shia Islam 'could change based on time and circumstances". Ahmad Naderi, another Iranian MP, went further: 'I believe we need to conduct a nuclear bomb test, and there is no other way for us." Pickaxe Mountain And The Next Phase What began as a remote construction site has now become the centrepiece of Tehran's nuclear resilience, and the biggest blind spot for Western intelligence. top videos View all With four reinforced tunnel entrances, a depth surpassing 100 metres, and signs of secure enrichment activity, Pickaxe Mountain could represent the next chapter of Iran's nuclear saga, one potentially shielded from the world's most powerful bombs, and even more so from its scrutiny. Unless international inspectors are granted access and surveillance is restored, the fortress under Pickaxe may remain just that — impenetrable, untouchable, and dangerously unknown. About the Author Karishma Jain Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @ More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump iran nuclear sites Israel-Iran tensions Uranium Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 26, 2025, 15:49 IST News explainers With 4 Hidden Tunnels And 100 Metre Depth, Is Pickaxe Mountain Iran's Nuclear Plan B?