logo
Beekeepers swarm to rescue millions of escaped bees after truck crash

Beekeepers swarm to rescue millions of escaped bees after truck crash

USA Today01-06-2025
Beekeepers swarm to rescue millions of escaped bees after truck crash
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Warmer temperatures could put western honey bees at risk
Warmer temperatures could put western honey bees at risk of collapse. Researchers at Washington State University and the Department of Agriculture point to warmer autumns and winters causing big problems.
Fox - Seattle
Beekeepers swarmed to the rescue this weekend, saving millions of honeybees after a semi-truck carrying their hives crashed.
The truck was hauling 70,000 pounds of beehives when it overturned in a rural county in northern Washington state, letting loose about 14 million bees, according to the Whatcom County Sheriff's Office.
Sheriff's deputies responded to the pre-dawn crash on Friday, May 30. So did master beekeepers – two dozen of them, according to the sheriff's office.
Beekeepers began the careful work of rebuilding about 300 beehives, said Derek Condit, one of the beekeepers who responded to the scene.
"Today, I had the incredible privilege of helping to rescue millions of honey bees," he said in a Facebook post with a video showing workers in protective white suits and hoods, their backs slathered in bees as millions swarmed in the air, searching for their queen.
In a statement, the sheriff's office thanked the "wonderful community of beekeepers" who showed up to "help ensure the rescue of millions of pollinating honey bees would be as successful as possible."
One-third of North America's native bee species are at risk of extinction, according to a study published in the scientific journal of the National Academy of Sciences.
Flowering plants need pollinators like bees to aid their reproductive process. About 90% of wild flowering plants and 75% of food crops around the world depend on pollination to produce fruits and seeds, according to the National Park Service.
The bee recovery work at the crash site was complete by Sunday morning, according to the sheriff's office, though it wasn't immediately clear how many of the bees were saved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are sharks an ‘overwhelming problem' in Florida? What the experts say
Are sharks an ‘overwhelming problem' in Florida? What the experts say

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Are sharks an ‘overwhelming problem' in Florida? What the experts say

Florida anglers say sharks are snatching their catches at unprecedented rates, calling it an 'overwhelming problem' and blaming a boom in Gulf shark numbers. But scientific research paints a more complicated picture. Scientists who study sharks acknowledge that depredation — the act of fish being eaten by an underwater predator while on a fisherman's line — is a growing concern in some areas, especially Florida. They cite several potential drivers of increased shark-human conflict, including climate change-related shifts in shark behavior and rebounding populations of some species. But they note that changes in human behavior — such as more people fishing and heightened awareness of shark encounters through social media — may also play a role. Now, researchers are working to learn when and why these encounters happen and how to prevent them. Matt Ajemian, an associate research professor studying the issue at Florida Atlantic University's Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, cautions against calling shark depredation a crisis, noting that historical accounts show similar encounters have long occurred. 'I don't call it a problem,' he said. 'I try to call it a challenge.' Ajemian and research coordinator Mike McCallister are leading a NOAA-funded project launched in 2021 to study when and where depredation happens and what might reduce it. Their team has turned to anglers for help, gathering information through surveys, video footage, genetic testing and social media reports to identify patterns. In their surveys, about 43% of Florida anglers said sharks had stolen their catch, with rates ranging from 10% to 60% depending on the region, season and species, researchers said. When it happened, sharks took nearly a third to almost half of the day's haul. The data came from quarterly surveys of 4,000 randomly selected saltwater fishing license holders over a year, with about 2,200 responding. Because participation was voluntary and limited to license holders, researchers said, the results don't represent all Florida anglers. They also tracked posts in a Facebook group with more than 6,500 members, logging real-time reports from offshore anglers across the state. Researchers said survey responses and online reports point to clear patterns in when and where depredation occurs. It was most common in the spring and summer, with hotspots in Southeast Florida, the Keys and the Panhandle. Rates spiked during busy fishing periods such as red snapper and grouper season openings. Snapper and grouper were the most frequently lost catches, followed by king mackerel, cobia, tuna and sailfish, according to the study. McCallister said the data also showed longer fights gave sharks more time to strike, and anglers targeting deep-water or migratory species were more likely to be affected than those fishing inshore. Bull sharks and sandbar sharks were the main culprits, based on angler accounts and genetic swabs from bitten fish, but they weren't the only ones. 'The videos have shown us that it's not always sharks that are the problem,' said Mike McCallister, FAU research coordinator. McCallister said goliath grouper, a massive fish that can weigh up to 800 pounds, is another species that can target an angler's catch underwater. 'Most of these depredations occur below the water line, where people can't see them,' said McCallister. Many anglers blame a growing shark population for increasing depredation. Researchers say that while some shark populations appear to be rebounding after past declines, their numbers likely remain below historical levels. 'My inkling is that sharks are returning on an increasing trajectory thanks to solid management and a lot of federal effort,' Ajemian said. He and McCallister note that in the 1960s and 1970s, U.S. agencies even encouraged commercial shark fishing to diversify the seafood supply. But when shark populations declined sharply in the 1980s and early 1990s, it prompted the launch of national management plans in 1993. Recently, NOAA Fisheries credited these management efforts with increases in several shark species in the Atlantic, including blacktip, sandbar, tiger and white sharks. Mahmood Shivji, director of the Guy Harvey Research Institute at Nova Southeastern University, also cites research that juvenile bull shark numbers are rising in Gulf estuaries. However, scientists say that it's important to put the numbers in context. Mike Heithaus, a marine ecologist at Florida International University, says that while some populations are recovering, most remain below historical levels. For younger anglers, today's encounters may feel unprecedented, but researchers say they could be closer to historic norms. 'That shifting baseline concept is real,' McCallister said. Scientists say broader environmental changes may also be driving shark encounters. Overfishing and warming waters could be affecting where sharks go and what they eat, Shivji said, and climate change is altering how deep they dive and how they reproduce. 'Environmental conditions also impact the distribution of natural prey species that sharks eat, and as these prey species move to different locations, the sharks follow their food,' Shivji said. Sharks themselves are also vulnerable. Heithaus says that climate change could further disrupt food webs, create low-oxygen zones and push predators and prey into new areas. 'Climate change is also going to have big effects on shark prey and their competitors, which is likely to disrupt predator-prey interactions,' Heithaus said. Researchers say more study is needed to pinpoint the causes of angler-shark encounters and whether depredation is actually increasing or simply being reported more often, including through social media. To help answer that question, McCallister is examining long-term recreational fishing records for his doctoral research. In the meantime, McCallister says many frustrated anglers are already adjusting tactics, switching gear, moving spots or cutting trips short to account for shark behavior. 'Most anglers are trying to reduce depredation on their own,' McCallister said. Researchers are also testing ways to keep sharks at bay, including deterrent devices that use magnets to disrupt their electrical senses. So far, they've shown mixed results. One device, called the Zeppelin, showed early promise but only works for bottom fishing, as it can cling to metal parts of a boat or tackle, fouling lines, researchers said. It costs around $80. Other deterrents being tested, such as devices that emit electric pulses, can cost more than $1,000. Some anglers told Ajemian and McCallister the price is too high, especially since the device can be lost during use. The search for answers is also playing out at the federal level. The SHARKED Act passed the House in January. If it gets signed into law, it would create a federal task force to study shark depredation and recommend solutions. Until then, scientists say continued research will be key to helping anglers, policymakers and the public better understand the challenge and the best ways to address it. While recognizing that shark activity can frustrate anglers, scientists also emphasize that the predators play a vital role in the ecosystem — one that is important to protect as their populations continue to decline globally. 'We are still learning a lot about how important they can be, but they can keep populations of prey in check and help protect the base of food webs, like seagrasses, by keeping them from being overgrazed,' Heithaus said. 'The big picture is that many shark species have been severely overfished worldwide, and many species, especially the ones that live in the open ocean and on reefs, have declined by around 50 to 90%,' Shivji said. 'Their now-rapid population declines are very concerning given the essential roles that sharks play in keeping our oceans in balance and healthy,' Shivji added, 'making it very important to appreciate these amazing animals, their essential place and role in ocean ecosystems, and helping to prevent many species from going extinct.'

Thousands of catfish seen climbing waterfalls in Brazil for first time. See them
Thousands of catfish seen climbing waterfalls in Brazil for first time. See them

Miami Herald

timea day ago

  • Miami Herald

Thousands of catfish seen climbing waterfalls in Brazil for first time. See them

In a river near a police department in southern Brazil, thousands of catfish amassed at the base of a waterfall and began to climb. The unusual fish gathering caught the attention of police officers — and for good reason. It turned out to be a first-of-its-kind sighting. A department of the Environmental Military Police in Mato Grosso do Sul State contacted a team of scientists in November 'to report the occurrence of a massive aggregation of bumblebee catfishes' near their headquarters, according to a study published Aug. 8 in the peer-reviewed Journal of Fish Biology. Intrigued, researchers visited the river near the headquarters and were stunned to find thousands of small catfish 'clustered and slowly moving upstream,' the study said. They watched for 20 hours as the fish climbed the waterfalls. A video, shared by Fish in the News in an Aug. 9 Facebook post, shows the bumblebee catfish 'at night, climbing vertical rocky walls' along the edge of a waterfall, researchers said. The orange-and-black fish almost seem to wiggle their way upward, even as the angle of the wall becomes steeper. In flatter areas, the fish 'aggregation was so massive that specimens were seen above each other, climbing the large cluster of fish,' the study said. Another video, also shared by Fish in the News, shows the bumblebee catfish climbing over the top of a waterfall one at a time. Researchers identified the vast majority of the fish as Rhyacoglanis paranensis, a species of bumblebee catfish, but also noticed a few individuals of three other fish species. In general, Rhyacoglanis catfish are 'relatively rare' and their lifestyle is 'virtually unknown.' The sighting in Mato Grosso do Sul State was 'the first time' Rhyacoglanis paranensis catfish had been seen in a 'massive aggregation' and the first time the species had been seen climbing, the study said. Based on dissections of a few catfish and the timing of the sighting, researchers concluded the bumblebee catfish were likely migrating upriver to spawn and were not eating during the migration. 'The migratory movements of smaller (fish) species remain largely unknown, mainly because these events occur briefly, under specific environmental conditions, and are challenging to detect in highly diverse ecosystems,' researchers said. 'Field observations, such as those in this study, provide valuable insights into the ecology of smaller fish species, representing most of the native ichthyofauna in South America,' the study said. Mato Grosso do Sul is a state in southwestern Brazil and along the border with Bolivia and Paraguay. The research team included Manoela Marinho, Eris de Paula, Francisco Severo-Neto, Yasmim Santos and Heriberto Gimênes-Junior.

The Jessica Radcliffe Orca Attack Video Is Fake, But Why Is It Even On TikTok?
The Jessica Radcliffe Orca Attack Video Is Fake, But Why Is It Even On TikTok?

Forbes

timea day ago

  • Forbes

The Jessica Radcliffe Orca Attack Video Is Fake, But Why Is It Even On TikTok?

Viral videos can take many forms, and not all of them are real. A recent example? There's a Jessica Radcliffe orca attack video that has popped up on TikTok and Facebook recently, but it's entirely fake. In fact, there isn't an orca trainer named Jessica Radcliffe, according to multiple sources. In the video, which I haven't watched because it is apparently gruesome in nature, an orca trainer is attacked and killed. The hoax was generated by AI and has all of the signs of being computer generated, starting with the fact that the story would have made national news. Most AI-generated videos don't pass the uncanny valley test, even as they are improving in quality. We are still able to spot something that's fake, and there are a few giveaways. For starters, when you see a human in a video that seems fake, look at the fingers—the way they move is often not very realistic yet. For companies like TikTok and Facebook, it would seem they have the technology to look for watermarks or other signs that a video is fake. The issue has more to do with what makes a video go viral in the first place. Why we are drawn to the Jessica Radcliffe orca attack video To understand how that works, we really need to look in the mirror. The problem is us. We tend to gravitate toward the sensational. Studies on why social media videos go viral indicate that we are drawn to negative news more than anything, which has been true since the first news report ever aired. If someone is harmed, in pain, or in a car wreck we are more likely to pay attention. Part of the reason for that could have something to do with our own protection instincts. In the book Morbidly Curious: A Scientist Explains Why We Can't Look Away by Coltan Scrivner, the author explains that we might pay attention to bad news (or slow down to look at a car wreck) because we're trying to figure out how we would respond in that same situation. We seem to have a fascination with horror and dark thrillers, he writes, because we're trying to evaluate what we would do if we encountered the same issue. The same might be true of viral videos that feature something gruesome or troubling. We have a fight or flight mechanism in us that is always poised to react, and social media is constantly taking advantage of that impulse. Should TikTok even allow the Jessica Radcliffe orca attack video? This all raises the question about why the video is even on the social media platform in the first place. The cynic in me wonders if many of the worst examples of viral videos are still online because they have such high engagement and high traffic. The most negative and spurious viral videos are the ones that are leading to the most views for advertisers. What could help counteract all of this negativity? It turns out the real responsibility is not with the social media companies but the creators themselves—and the viewers. Producing more engaging viral content that has a positive message, reporting on the more uplifting side of the human condition, and focusing on innovation and progress will help stem the tide of all the negative viral content like the Jessica Radcliffe orca attack video. At least it's a step in the right direction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store