CFA looks to continue message building
Authority members discussed recent presentations with interested parties in Conneaut, Andover, Orwell and Jefferson regarding projects that could spur economic growth around the county. The organization receives a portion of bed tax revenue collected in the county.
CFA President Holly Mayernick said she was disappointed with the attendance at the four meetings. CFA member Lara Reibold said some people in the southern part of the county thought the meeting was for elected leaders only, which affected attendance.
The meetings were intended to share information from a study related to needs for lodging in different parts of the county. Mayernick asked members what should be the next step.
Former Geneva City Manager James Pearson, a CFA member, suggested trying to gather a leadership team from each of the four communities to come to the next meeting.
Other board members suggested inviting potential investors and economic development agencies from the county as well.
'We definitely want to talk about what our next step is,' Mayernick said.
Nathan Hessler, an attorney and advisor to the authority, said it is important to get the message out to as many people as possible so investors and business leaders know what the authority has to offer.
Hessler agreed with the idea of a combined meeting of economic development officials and leadership teams representing the various areas.
Pearson said he would be willing to help facilitate the creation of leadership teams from each of the areas.
'Each of the communities need their cheerleaders,' Ashtabula County Commissioner Casey Kozlowski said.
CFA member Meeghan Humphrey said she believes it is important to qualify in detail what the authority is and is not able to do.
Authority members talked about a website, which could detail ways they can help a development project.
Hessler said one way the authority can help projects is through ancillary assistance such as sidewalks or other infrastructure, which could lower the cost of a project.
Kozlowski reported it appears state Senate Bill 43, which would eliminate the portion bed tax that goes to the CFA, is not active, but he is monitoring potential opportunities for it to be placed in the state budget bill.
'I think we are in good shape,' he said after thanking all the local people who contacted state legislators about the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Frank Sands Reduces Shopify Inc. Holdings by 38.31% in Q2 2025
Exploring the Strategic Moves of Sands Capital Management Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted the 13F filing for the second quarter of 2025, providing insights into his investment moves during this period. Frank M. Sands, Jr., CFA is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Sands Capital Management, an investment management firm focused on investing in quality growth businesses throughout the world. He spends most of his time on investment research and decision making, as well as business strategy. Sands Capital Management was founded by his father, Frank M. Sands, Sr. in 1992. Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio), Jr. joined the firm in 2000 after working for six years as a research analyst and portfolio manager for Fayez Sarofim & Co., an institutional investment management firm based in Houston, Texas. Since joining Sands Capital Management, working alongside his father, the firm has continued to produce strong investment results for its clients. Sands Jr. earned a BA from Washington & Lee University, an MS from Johns Hopkins University and an MBA from the Darden School at the University of Virginia. Sands Capital believes that over time, stock prices reflect the earnings growth of their underlying businesses. Their team is dedicated to identifying the relatively small number of truly exceptional growth businesses that they expect to own for many years. The firm has two primary concentrated growth strategies: Select Growth, emphasizing rapidly growing innovative businesses, and Global Growth, emphasizing rapidly growing business all over the world. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. Summary of New Buy Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) added a total of 3 stocks, among them: The most significant addition was On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON), with 4,614,347 shares, accounting for 0.69% of the portfolio and a total value of $240.18 million. The second largest addition to the portfolio was Carlisle Companies Inc (NYSE:CSL), consisting of 426,360 shares, representing approximately 0.46% of the portfolio, with a total value of $159.20 million. The third largest addition was Palo Alto Networks Inc (NASDAQ:PANW), with 154,863 shares, accounting for 0.09% of the portfolio and a total value of $31.69 million. Key Position Increases Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of 25 stocks, among them: The most notable increase was Intercontinental Exchange Inc (NYSE:ICE), with an additional 2,620,310 shares, bringing the total to 5,313,039 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 97.31% increase in share count, a 1.38% impact on the current portfolio, with a total value of $974.78 million. The second largest increase was Arthur J. Gallagher & Co (NYSE:AJG), with an additional 918,618 shares, bringing the total to 1,121,249. This adjustment represents a significant 453.35% increase in share count, with a total value of $358.93 million. Summary of Sold Out Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) completely exited 12 holdings in the second quarter of 2025, as detailed below: Uber Technologies Inc (NYSE:UBER): Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) sold all 3,913,222 shares, resulting in a -0.97% impact on the portfolio. Nike Inc (NYSE:NKE): Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) liquidated all 3,754,580 shares, causing a -0.81% impact on the portfolio. Key Position Reduces Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced positions in 37 stocks. The most significant changes include: Reduced Shopify Inc (NASDAQ:SHOP) by 4,653,206 shares, resulting in a -38.31% decrease in shares and a -1.51% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $99.95 during the quarter and has returned 39.39% over the past 3 months and 41.15% year-to-date. Reduced Inc (NASDAQ:AMZN) by 1,864,520 shares, resulting in a -16.81% reduction in shares and a -1.21% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $197.77 during the quarter and has returned 6.24% over the past 3 months and 2.36% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview At the second quarter of 2025, Frank Sands (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 66 stocks, with top holdings including 9.78% in NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), 5.81% in Inc (NASDAQ:AMZN), 5.56% in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (NYSE:TSM), 4.35% in Netflix Inc (NASDAQ:NFLX), and 4.22% in Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT). The holdings are mainly concentrated in 8 of the 11 industries: Technology, Consumer Cyclical, Communication Services, Financial Services, Healthcare, Industrials, Energy, and Basic Materials. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
08-08-2025
- Forbes
5 Factors To Consider When Investing In A Changing World
Daniel S. Kern, CFA®, CFP®, is the chief investment officer of Nixon Peabody Trust Company. The S&P 500 returned more than 13% per year from 2015 through the end of 2024, conditioning many investors to expect a continuation of double-digit equity returns. Unfortunately, several factors that have contributed to positive returns have either run their course or are likely going into reverse. Globalization is reversing amid trade conflict and a post-pandemic need to create less fragile supply chains. The Russia-Ukraine War was a turning point for countries that have underinvested in defense since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Plans by many of these countries for increased defense spending will create budget challenges, likely leading to higher budget deficits. Inflation remains above central bank targets in many countries. Supply chain disruptions, aging societies and climate instability are among the factors that may make inflation, rather than deflation, one of the defining challenges of the next decade. AI adoption may help mitigate some of these negative trends by helping businesses optimize their supply chains and automating repetitive tasks, but the timing and magnitude of the boost from AI is uncertain. I expect equity returns to remain positive over the next decade, but likely at a lower level and with more volatility than experienced over the past decade. Consequently, the strategies that were successful in the past decade may need to be adjusted in response to changes in the investment environment. Following are five considerations for investors as we look toward the next decade. 1. Inflation is likely to be higher and less stable. Deflation was the primary worry for central banks in the years that followed the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Central banks intervened with rate cuts during periods of economic weakness, helping to cushion the blow when equity markets were under pressure. The rise in inflation during the pandemic was a preview of a world in which 2% could be the floor for inflation rather than the ceiling, largely as a result of supply shocks. Although tariffs are considered a one-time increase in prices rather than a persistent rise in the rate of inflation, realignment of supply chains may add stickier longer-term costs. Climate-related disruption of food supplies, as well as immigration policies that reduce the supply of labor, will likely make inflation more volatile. Investors should assess the implications of higher and less stable inflation for their investments. 2. The role of fixed income may change over the next decade. Bonds will be a less reliable hedge against equity downturns in an environment of higher and less stable inflation. The experience of 2022, when stocks and bonds both performed poorly, may repeat itself in future years. Consequently, investors should diversify portfolios to include inflation-resistant holdings. These may include real estate, infrastructure and real assets such as commodities. Government and investment-grade bonds provided limited income for much of the past decade and were commonly used for diversification rather than income. Short- and intermediate-term bond yields are now high enough to provide meaningful income supporting the returns needed to achieve financial goals. 3. U.S.-China competition may be the defining geopolitical trend of the next decade. Although most of the current focus of attention is on tariffs imposed on goods imported directly or indirectly from China, multinational companies that have significant sales in China face underappreciated risks. Chinese brands are increasingly competitive and may continue to capture market share from high-profile U.S. brands. Also underappreciated is the degree to which the U.S. services economy has benefited from Chinese tourists and students. Investors should revisit the outlook for holdings with direct and indirect exposure to China, looking for relative winners and losers in a decoupling between the U.S. and China. Investors can also explore opportunities outside the U.S. created by competition between the two countries, with China an important innovator in areas such as AI, electric vehicles and robotics. 4. The U.S. may be less 'exceptional' relative to the rest of the world. U.S. equities have far outpaced the world since the GFC, helped by leadership in technology innovation, higher profitability of U.S. firms, favorable demographics and energy security. Policy mistakes by several leading economies outside the U.S. also contributed to the performance gap between the U.S. and the rest of the world, in my opinion. Non-U.S. stocks have rebounded strongly during the first half of the year as countries such as Germany and China made long-overdue economic and policy changes. Although the U.S. is expected to continue to grow faster than other developed international markets, the growth premium between the U.S. and the rest of the world may narrow. Investing in international markets, which remain much less expensive than the U.S., should be an important strategy for investors seeking to diversify beyond the U.S. market, which remains expensive and highly concentrated. 5. Investors should consider whether private equity and private credit should be added to diversified portfolios. The case for including private assets is a shift in how capital is raised in today's economy. The stock of public equity is shrinking, with fewer companies going public (see Private Equity section, "U.S. public vs. private equity") and many successful private companies staying private for longer. In the credit markets, the share of credit coming from commercial banks has also been shrinking. Although returns from equities during the next decade may fall short of the double-digit returns of the past decade, there are abundant opportunities to be found in equity markets. Opportunities can also be found in credit markets, a welcome change after a disappointing decade for most bond investors. Investors who can adapt to the changing investment landscape will be well-positioned to reach their investment goals for the next decade. Investments in securities are not insured, protected or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are opinions and/or forward-looking statements (including words such as 'believe,' 'estimate,' 'anticipate,' 'may,' 'will,' 'should' and 'expect'). Although we believe that the beliefs and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?
Forbes
07-08-2025
- Forbes
Choosing The Right Trustee And Why It Matters
Royce Ramey, CFA, is co-CEO of Versant Capital Management, a multifamily office in Dallas and Phoenix serving ultra-high-net-worth families. Trusts are a powerful tool for families to transfer their wealth and help achieve other financial goals, such as asset protection and privacy. But one of the most important, and often overlooked, decisions when creating a trust is choosing the right trustee. Each trust needs a trustee to make the decisions governed by the trust document. Serving as a trustee is a significant responsibility that requires time, specific skills, knowledge and dedication. Selecting a trustee well-equipped to handle these duties is one of the most important decisions the person setting up the trust—aka the grantor—can make. A trustee's responsibilities are multifaceted. As fiduciaries, trustees are charged with managing trust assets, making distributions according to the trust's terms and adhering strictly to the grantor's intent and the language in the trust agreement. Trustees must have expertise in investing, tax planning and tax return preparation, as well as the ability to understand legal documents. To the extent a trustee does not have this expertise, they can hire professionals to assist them. Throughout my career advising multigenerational families, I've seen firsthand how the selection of a trustee can either preserve or erode a family's legacy. At Versant Capital Management, I help families navigate complex estate planning decisions as part of our comprehensive family office services. Yet, too often, choosing the right trustee is an afterthought, when in reality it can profoundly shape the outcomes and dynamics of a trust for years to come. Distribution Decisions An important role of the trustee is making distribution decisions. A trustee is holding assets for the beneficiary's benefit, and he or she must distribute those assets as the trust document lays out. The trustee must interpret the trust document's provisions carefully so that distributions align with the grantor's intentions. This decision-making process can require balancing the needs of current beneficiaries with those of future generations, a task that demands fairness and foresight. Grantor's Intent The trustee's understanding of and commitment to the grantor's intent are equally important and at the heart of what it means to be a trustee. A trustee should demonstrate a deep familiarity with the grantor's values and priorities so that their decisions reflect the spirit of the trust's mission. Exercising sound discretion while remaining faithful to the grantor's wishes is a delicate balancing act that requires insight and judgment. For example, consider a situation where a trust names two beneficiaries with very different financial circumstances. A thoughtful trustee would need to understand the grantor's intent. Did they want distributions to be equal regardless of each beneficiary's needs, or did they want the trustee to consider each individual's financial situation when making distribution decisions? Interpreting and honoring that intent is a core part of the trustee's role. Relationship With Beneficiaries The relationship between the trustee and the beneficiaries is another important factor to consider. Trustees must approach this relationship with sensitivity and impartiality, building trust and addressing any conflicts that may arise. An effective trustee is skilled in conflict resolution and adept at maintaining open communication while prioritizing the trust's objectives. Balancing empathy with objectivity is key to ensuring that all beneficiaries feel their needs are considered fairly. Capacity And Responsiveness Capacity and responsiveness are additional considerations when selecting a trustee. A trustee must have the time and resources necessary to manage the trust effectively. This level of commitment includes being available to provide individualized attention to the trust's specific requirements and responding promptly to beneficiary requests, which could include emergencies or unforeseen circumstances. Trustee Options Grantors can choose from a few different types of trustees, each with distinct advantages and challenges. Individual trustees are often family members or trusted friends who bring personal knowledge of the family's dynamics and a strong alignment with the grantor's values. However, they may face challenges such as conflicts of interest, a lack of expertise in complex financial or legal matters and limited availability. Additionally, the finite lifespan of an individual trustee necessitates careful succession planning to maintain continuity. Corporate trustees, on the other hand, are professional institutions specializing in trust management. They offer a high level of objectivity, efficiency and expertise, with teams of specialists in the legal, tax and investment fields. Their unlimited lifespan eliminates concerns about succession, providing long-term stability for the trust. However, corporate trustees may lack the personal connection to family dynamics that an individual trustee might provide. Co-trustees can combine the strengths of individual and corporate trustees. By pairing an individual trustee's family insights with a corporate trustee's professional expertise, co-trustee arrangements balance understanding family relationships with ensuring effective administration. While this approach offers significant benefits, it also requires careful coordination and communication to avoid conflicts or inefficiencies between co-trustees. Questions To Ask When evaluating potential trustees, grantors should consider several key questions: • Does the trustee have experience managing trusts of similar size and complexity? • How will they handle conflicts among beneficiaries? • What steps will they take to maintain compliance with the trust's terms and the grantor's intent? • How will they manage investments and distribution decisions? • Can they dedicate sufficient time and attention to the trust's needs? • What fees will the trustee charge? Asking these questions can help you determine whether a potential trustee possesses the necessary expertise, judgment and capacity to fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities effectively. Whether appointing an individual, a corporate institution or both, grantors should weigh their options carefully. By making a thoughtful and informed choice, grantors can safeguard the trust's purpose and promote harmony among beneficiaries. The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation. Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?
