logo
Morrisey hopeful for CON repeal in WV, denies claims that he tried to ‘force' votes in committee

Morrisey hopeful for CON repeal in WV, denies claims that he tried to ‘force' votes in committee

Yahoo01-03-2025
Del. Scot Heckert, R-Wood, asks questions during public testimony on House Bill 2007 on Feb. 20. The bill, as it was proposed, would have eliminated certificate of need laws in West Virginia. (Perry Bennett | West Virginia Legislative Photography)
Despite a defeat in the House Committee on Health and Human Resources this week, Gov. Patrick Morrisey remains hopeful that some sort of repeal for Certificate of Need will be adopted by lawmakers this legislative session.
In a news briefing Friday, Morrisey said that he expects to see 'a lot more activity' on the policy in coming days. While the end product may not be 'perfect' or exactly what the governor wants, Morrisey said there are still 'really good policies' that are being looked at.
A bill in the Senate that would repeal CON is still moving through the Legislature and could be brought up for consideration by the Senate Health Committee at any time.
'People declare things dead very early when things are not dead,' Morrisey said in response to a question from Ogden Newspapers' Steven Allen Adams. '… It's the nature of the process, right? That you have things that maybe you ask for and you get 90% of it. Let's not confuse perfect with really good. And so we're looking at really good policies. It may not be everything that is perfect, but we're going to make meaningful progress.'
CON is a regulatory process, overseen by the West Virginia Health Care Authority, that requires entities looking to create or expand health care services in the state to receive a legal document proving those new services fit an unmet need in the area.
Through the Health Care Authority, those interested in obtaining a Certificate of Need receive technical assistance before applying to see what need they are meeting. Services are approved through a needs methodology and different services — such as hospice care, ambulatory centers, clinics, private practices and specialty services — have different methodologies.
During his State of the State address, Morrisey called the process 'big government activism at its worst' and promised that by repealing it, the state would 'move toward the free market.'
It's unclear, however, how much support exists among lawmakers on the policy push for CON repeal.
Morrisey said Friday that he believes 'a majority' of Republicans — who hold supermajorities in both the House and the Senate — support policies that he says will lower health care costs and improve free market competition for health services in the state.
'We're in a position to make good changes that put our citizens first and make sure that competition occurs and that we have lower prices and we don't have what we have now: higher prices and the worst health care outcomes,' Morrisey said. 'We should all be focusing on those terrible healthcare outcomes to make progress, because it sickens me to be 50 and we are going to move.'
There is no West Virginia-specific data showing that repealing CON in the state — where the population is declining and where 75% of people are government payers, meaning they are insured through Medicare, Medicaid or the Public Employees Insurance Agency — would accomplish such goals.
And the total elimination of CON has, historically, been a hard sell to West Virginia legislators.
The bill has been introduced annually in the House since 2017. The 2022 regular session was the first time it made it to a committee agenda. That year, after a grueling five hour debate and discussion, lawmakers on the House Health Committee voted it down 12-10.
Monday was the second time in nine years that the bill made it to committee and the second time it was voted down, as the current members of the House Health Committee voted 13-12 against House Bill 2007. Later in that meeting, the body doubled down on that vote by voting against a motion to reconsider the initial vote on the bill. Procedurally, that refusal means that specific bill will not be able to be brought up again in that committee.
'Obviously, the house has one set of issues. And we respect that people have different opinions, but I do believe that we need competition, and we're going to be advancing it through different means,' Morrisey said.
He did not specify what 'different means' entailed, though later in his comments Morrisey said that there were 'tools available' to the executive branch that could be used to help drive health care competition in the state.
There were murmurs after the defeat in committee that House Republican leadership was going to attempt to discharge the bill, bringing it straight to a floor vote and sidestepping the committee process. A motion to do such, however, has yet to happen.
And other rumors circulated in the rotunda this week, as well, regarding how Morrisey and members of his staff were handling the cacophony of 'no' votes in House Health against his efforts to repeal CON.
Del. Scot Heckert, R-Wood, said on the Charleston Gazette-Mail's Outside the Echo Chamber podcast on Wednesday that Morrisey and those working for him were trying to 'force' votes in favor of CON repeal this week. Heckert, a member of the House Health Committee, voted against HB 2007 and has been a vocal critic of repeal efforts.
'[Completely repealing CON] is one of the governor's priority bills, but the governor is trying to, for lack of better words, force people to vote his way just because it's his way and sending people around, pulling people out of committees to talk to them, to try to get them to switch their vote — we've gotten off to a bad start,' Heckert said. 'Now hopefully we've learned from this lesson. Hopefully something can be done, but who knows. When you start telling people what to do 'or else' – especially West Virginia people – that doesn't go very well.'
Heckert's allegations were echoed by other lawmakers who also sit on House Health after Monday's meeting.
Morrisey on Friday denied those claims, saying he was not going to 'get distracted' by people who don't support policies he believes will improve the state. He called such people 'outliers' who 'don't speak for their districts' or who are 'opposed to President Trump.'
'They're not part of the team. I get that, so I'm not going to worry about that,' Morrisey said. 'We're going to advance an agenda, and we're going to do it working with the vast majority of the Legislature that supports good changes.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump target on mail-in ballots stokes controversy in Nevada, nationwide
Trump target on mail-in ballots stokes controversy in Nevada, nationwide

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump target on mail-in ballots stokes controversy in Nevada, nationwide

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — President Donald Trump on Monday reignited controversy over how Americans vote, announcing plans on Truth Social to 'lead a movement' to eliminate mail-in ballots and certain voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Trump is preparing an executive order to mandate the change. However, legal experts warn he lacks the constitutional authority. 'Mail in ballots are corrupt you can never have a real democracy with mail in ballots,' Trump said. Trump said the voting machines that count those mail-in ballots are highly inaccurate. Democrats showed a stronger preference for mail ballots in the 2024 primary, with 79% of their votes cast via mail, compared to 60% of Republicans. 'We would get secure elections and much faster results. The machines say we will get the results in two weeks but with paper ballots you have the results that night,' Trump said. Statistics show 45% of the votes cast in the 2024 election in Nevada were mail ballots. Legal experts say any executive order Trump signs would almost certainly face lawsuits, and with primaries already on the horizon, it's unlikely states could overhaul their election systems in time, even if the courts allowed it. 'Nevadans have accepted and adopted mail in ballots, and the reason is Nevada is a 24/7 economy. We are a working community. We want to have as many people participate in the process as possible,' Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar said. Aguilar said when you take away the accessibility of mail-in ballots, it hurts the future of our state. 'Mail ballots are determined in Nevada by the legislature and the governor. Until they decide we're going to have a different process, we are going to continue with mail ballots,' Aguilar said. Trump's pledge to target mail-in ballots signals that election rules will remain a hot topic heading into next year's midterms. For now, though, the secretary of state said the chances of a nationwide ban appear slim. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Texas unveils state maps that could give Republicans 5 more US House seats
Texas unveils state maps that could give Republicans 5 more US House seats

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas unveils state maps that could give Republicans 5 more US House seats

WASHINGTON — Republicans could secure five more House seats in Texas after the state unveiled its proposed map for the 2026 midterm elections, following through with demands from President Donald Trump to find some cushion room protecting the party's slim majority. The Texas state legislature revealed the new boundaries on Wednesday, altering the map to create new districts in areas that Trump carried by more than 10 points in the 2024 election. Most of the new districts also reside in heavily Hispanic areas, a crucial demographic shift that helped secure Trump's victory in November — a risky gamble if Hispanic voters lean back toward Democratic candidates next year. The maps come as state lawmakers meet for an emergency session, which is scheduled to end on Aug. 19. However, Democrats in the legislature are considering whether to stage a walkout, denying Republicans the minimum attendance required to consider legislation. If the map is approved and no House members move districts, the new boundaries also set the stage for half a dozen incumbent-on-incumbent matchups next year. Republicans currently hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, a historically slim margin that has often made it difficult for the party to advance legislation even with a Republican trifecta. With control of the White House and Senate, Republicans have enjoyed total control of Washington — something that is at risk next November. Historical trends show that the party of the sitting president typically loses control of the House during midterm elections. If Democrats manage to flip the House, it would deal a massive blow to Trump and likely thwart his agenda for his final two years. But Democrats have made clear they won't just accept new maps without any defense mechanism of their own. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is expected to meet with Democratic state lawmakers on Wednesday to discuss a path forward as party leaders openly toy with the idea of revising other state maps in their favor. The top House Democrat said earlier this month he would engage in conversations with state delegations to 'explore what the opportunities and possibilities are in order to make sure that the congressional map in 2026 is as fair as possible.' Although Republicans may not face as many legal or political obstacles in Texas, they are likely to experience some voter backlash — potentially putting their majority at risk anyway. The state legislature sought to redraw the congressional map in 2011 to secure Republican-safe seats, only to watch those be flipped by Democrats in the so-called 'blue wave' of 2018. As a result, state Republicans were more careful when they adjusted the map in 2021 to preserve the GOP stronghold districts. Now, if Republicans attempt to drastically change the maps, they could face a similar defeat in 2026.

Texas Democrats tear ‘permission slips' imposed by Republican house speaker
Texas Democrats tear ‘permission slips' imposed by Republican house speaker

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Democrats tear ‘permission slips' imposed by Republican house speaker

Texas Democrats are tearing up 'permission slips' they signed in order to leave the chamber, joining state representative Nicole Collier ahead of Wednesday's vote on the controversial Texas congressional redistricting maps. The slips are part of new surveillance protocols set by Texas Republicans in the house chamber, stating that Democrats would 'be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated [Texas department of public safety] officer' who would ensure their return to the chamber. The move follows a two-week quorum break that had delayed Republicans' effort to redraw the state's congressional districts to align with Donald Trump's push to reshape the US House map in his favor before the 2026 midterm elections. On Tuesday, Collier chose to remain confined inside the Texas house chamber until lawmakers reconvene on Wednesday, refusing to comply with what she condemned as a 'demeaning' protocol. Related: Thousands join US 'Fight the Trump Takeover' protests against Republican redistricting plans Collier was among dozens of Democrats who left the state for the Democratic havens of California, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York to delay the Republican-controlled legislature's approval of redrawn congressional districts sought by Trump. When they returned Monday, Republicans insisted that Democrats have around-the-clock police escorts to ensure they wouldn't leave again and scuttle Wednesday's planned House vote on a new political map. But Collier wouldn't sign what Democrats called the 'permission slip' needed to leave the house chamber, a half-page form allowing Department of Public Safety troopers to follow them. She spent Monday night and Tuesday on the house floor, where she set up a livestream while her Democratic colleagues outside had plainclothes officers following them to their offices and homes. Linda Garcia, a Dallas-area representative, said she drove three hours home from Austin with an officer following her. When she went grocery shopping, he went down every aisle with her, pretending to shop, she said. As she spoke to the Associated Press by phone, two unmarked cars with officers inside were parked outside her home. 'It's a weird feeling,' she said. 'The only way to explain the entire process is: it's like I'm in a movie.' The trooper assignments, ordered by Dustin Burrows, the Republican house speaker, was another escalation of a redistricting battle that has widened across the country. Trump is pushing GOP state officials to tilt the map for the 2026 midterms more in his favor to preserve the GOP's slim house majority, and Democrats nationally have rallied around efforts to retaliate. Gene Wu, the house minority leader from Houston, and Vincel Perez, a state representative of El Paso, stayed overnight with Collier, who represents a minority-majority district in Fort Worth. On Tuesday, more Democrats returned to the Capitol to tear up the slips they had signed and stay on the house floor, which has a lounge and restrooms for members. Cassandra Garcia Hernandez, a Dallas-area representative, called their protest a 'slumber party for democracy' and said Democrats were holding strategy sessions on the floor. 'We are not criminals,' Penny Morales Shaw, a Houston representative, said. Collier said having officers shadow her was an attack on her dignity and an attempt to control her movements. Burrows brushed off Collier's protest, saying he was focused on important issues, such as providing property tax relief and responding to last month's deadly floods. His statement Tuesday morning did not mention redistricting and his office did not immediately respond to other Democrats joining Collier. 'Rep Collier's choice to stay and not sign the permission slip is well within her rights under the house rules,' Burrows said. Under those rules, until Wednesday's scheduled vote, the chamber's doors are locked, and no member can leave 'without the written permission of the speaker'. To do business Wednesday, 100 of 150 House members must be present. The GOP plan is designed to send five additional Republicans from Texas to the US House. Texas Democrats returned to Austin after Democrats in California launched an effort to redraw their state's districts to take five seats from Republicans. Democrats also said they were returning because they expect to challenge the new maps in court. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back after they left the state 3 August, and Greg Abbott, the Republican governor, asked the state supreme court to oust Wu and several other Democrats from office. The lawmakers also face a fine of $500 for every day they were absent. Democrats reported different levels of monitoring. Armando Walle, a Houston representative, said he wasn't sure where his police escort was, but there was still a heightened police presence in the Capitol, so he felt he was being monitored closely. Some Democrats said the officers watching them were friendly. But Sheryl Cole, an Austin representative, said in a social media post that when she went on her morning walk Tuesday, the officer following her lost her on the trail, got angry and threatened to arrest her. Garcia said her nine-year-old son was with her as she drove home and each time she looked in the rearview mirror, she could see the officer close behind. He came inside a grocery store where she was shopping with her son. 'I would imagine that this is the way it feels when you're potentially shoplifting and someone is assessing whether you're going to steal,' she said. Associated Press contributed to this report Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store