Suspended Ekurhuleni official threatens legal action against Xhakaza over alleged defamation
Monyepao alleges that Xhakaza has unwittingly implicated him in the murder of slain senior municipal auditor Mpho Mafole.
Earlier in July, Xhakaza disclosed that Mafole was investigating a significant R2 billion revenue shortfall at the time of his murder.
Monyepao was suspended in April on allegations of negligence for failing to take the necessary steps to prevent the revenue loss.
Xhakaza previously questioned why auditor Mafole was killed shortly after submitting a report that implicated suspended officials in the disappearance of R2 billion.
'It's one thing you prepare a charge sheet for suspended officials, and once you deliver it, something happens. We don't want to draw up linkages, but if you are involved in this type of work and you get shot, it can't just be a random thing.'
Monyepao claimed that Xhakaza's comments have indirectly associated him with the killing of the auditor.
Monyepao has since issued a letter of demand to Xhakaza, calling for a retraction of the statements. He has warned that failure to do so will result in a defamation lawsuit.
He insisted the mayor's remarks have tarnished his reputation and firmly denies any involvement in Mafole's murder.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Former rugby player fined for failing to submit tax returns
The Paarl magistrate's court has fined former Springbok rugby player Schalk Burger Sr and his company Welbedacht Wines for failing to submit VAT, pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) and income tax returns. The court fined the company R6,000 on each count of failing to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023 and a monthly employer declaration return for March 2023. Burger, 69, was convicted on 14 counts, which included failure to submit a VAT201 return for February 2023, a monthly employer declaration (EMP201) return for March2023 and IT12 income tax returns for the period 2011 to 2022. He was fined R6,000 or 12 months imprisonment on each count, of which R2,000 or four months imprisonment was suspended for five years. 'This amounts to a payable fine of R56,000, or 112 months imprisonment and a further R28,000 or 56 months imprisonment suspended for five years on specific conditions,' National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said. Burger successfully requested the court to grant him a deferred fine and was ordered to pay the R56,000 in instalments of R6,000 per month and a final payment of R8,000. The accused entered into a plea and sentence agreement with the state. The court confirmed the agreement and convicted and sentenced him accordingly. According to the agreement, Burger admitted that Welbedacht Wines was registered for VAT and PAYE at the Paarl office of the South African Revenue Services. Burger failed to submit the returns on behalf of the company. In addition, Burger, in his personal capacity, was registered for income tax at the Paarl Sars office . 'Following his successful registration for e-filing in 2011, he failed to submit his IT12 income tax returns for the tax years of 2011 to 2022. This was despite Sars' best efforts to encourage all taxpayers to submit their income tax returns.' It was only after the institution of a prosecution and his being summoned to appear in court that he submitted all outstanding returns relating to himself and his company, and both are currently tax compliant. 'The accused's son, Christiaan Francois Burger, was on July 21 also convicted and sentenced on 12 counts of failing to submit his IT12 personal income tax returns for the 2011 to 2022 period.' The 40-year-old was sentenced to a fine of R48,000 or 96 months imprisonment, and a further R24,000 or 48 months imprisonment, suspended for five years on conditions. The NPA said the sentence sent a strong message of deterrence. 'With the filing season for income tax currently under way, this is a clear message that failure by persons and juristic persons to file their Income Tax returns will not be tolerated. It is a serious offence that impacts negatively on the fiscus,' he said.
The Star
16 hours ago
- The Star
High Court dismisses R4 million defamation claim
Chevon Booysen | Published 1 hour ago A would-be R4 million defamation of character claim has failed in the High Court of South Africa, at the Mpumalanga Division (Mbombela Main Seat), after a municipality employee could not prove defamatory statements were publicised. Sinenhlanhla Manqele, employed as a technical director at the Thaba Chweu Local Municipality, sought that an attorney and the firm that were mandated to compile a report to investigate the causes of sewer spillage contained 'false and defamatory statements'. Manqele sought that the firm and the attorney each pay him R2 million and interest on the amounts, based on the claim that the contents of the report were intended to tarnish his reputation. Jimmy Baloyi, a lawyer at Baloyi Masango Inc. Attorneys, compiled the report after the local municipality mandated him to investigate a criminal guilty finding of the municipality for the sewage spill. Regarding the sewage spillage, the guilty finding necessitated the municipal manager to sign an admission of guilt, having been found guilty of transgression of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act (NEMWA Act). Baloyi was mandated to investigate whether the municipality could have avoided the transgression; whether there was any sort of negligence by any of the municipal employees; whether there was proper accountability to workflow of the relevant departments that are necessarily in charge of compliance and to reflect on the criminal case brought against the municipality, and demonstrate the complexities and seriousness of the problem surrounding unlawful municipal sewage discharge. Manqele was one of several employees interviewed during the investigation, and when it was concluded, the report was tabled at the municipality council sitting during August 2022. At the time, the privileged document was presented to 28 councillors. An extract from Baloyi's report read: 'There is an emergency in the technical department that has not been recognised as such by the technical services director and technical services management team. There is a lack of knowledge and skills among the people who ought to be managing the department. 'Whether this is a result of a lack of basic approach to employment or not, there is a lack of will when it comes to applying oneself in the position that one is employed in, from the technical director down to the plumber in the command chain. We were unable to interview the technical director, as he had taken a stand against this by involving an attorney, who indicated that we cannot have a conversation with the technical director without the attorney involved. 'This, on its own, indicated that the technical director knows exactly what is happening in the department. The technical director, in this regard, has no skills to occupy the position he is occupying, which is the reason why he does not comprehend the severity of the impact of the pollution of the sewer spillages around and within the municipal boundaries. 'The technical director does not even comprehend the emergency and urgency that this issue had to be addressed in.' In his delictual claim, Manqele rebutted that 'the report intentionally and maliciously makes false, wrongful, unlawful and defamatory statements against him'. He added that the readers of the report understood the above to mean that he is 'incompetent, unethical and unprofessional; that he is unqualified and occupies the position of a technical director through a dubious appointment; that he lacks skills and knowledge in the portfolio of technical director; and that he is corrupt, insolent and engages in unlawful activities in the municipality.' Judge Lindiwe Vukeya said: 'This report was not only about his personal or professional persona, it also involved other employees of his department… From the outset, it is clear that the plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to present his account of events concerning his department, but elected not to do so. The plaintiff had the opportunity to provide an explanation regarding the origin of the problem, its causes, and the circumstances surrounding the expenditure of R9 million, which he declined to offer. 'Furthermore, in his evidence, the plaintiff could not provide any tangible evidence regarding how this privileged report was leaked to other employees. His evidence was that it was shown to him, at his request, by the security manager, who has since passed away. On his own evidence, he is the only person outside of the council meeting who saw the report.' [email protected]
IOL News
17 hours ago
- IOL News
High Court dismisses R4 million defamation claim
A municipality high ranking official's defamation of character R4million claim failed in court this week. The employee said the comments made in a report were 'false and defamatory". Image: Pexels A would-be R4 million defamation of character claim has failed in the High Court of South Africa, at the Mpumalanga Division (Mbombela Main Seat), after a municipality employee could not prove defamatory statements were publicised. Sinenhlanhla Manqele, employed as a technical director at the Thaba Chweu Local Municipality, sought that an attorney and the firm that were mandated to compile a report to investigate the causes of sewer spillage contained 'false and defamatory statements'. Manqele sought that the firm and the attorney each pay him R2 million and interest on the amounts, based on the claim that the contents of the report were intended to tarnish his reputation. Jimmy Baloyi, a lawyer at Baloyi Masango Inc. Attorneys, compiled the report after the local municipality mandated him to investigate a criminal guilty finding of the municipality for the sewage spill. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Regarding the sewage spillage, the guilty finding necessitated the municipal manager to sign an admission of guilt, having been found guilty of transgression of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act (NEMWA Act). Baloyi was mandated to investigate whether the municipality could have avoided the transgression; whether there was any sort of negligence by any of the municipal employees; whether there was proper accountability to workflow of the relevant departments that are necessarily in charge of compliance and to reflect on the criminal case brought against the municipality, and demonstrate the complexities and seriousness of the problem surrounding unlawful municipal sewage discharge. Manqele was one of several employees interviewed during the investigation, and when it was concluded, the report was tabled at the municipality council sitting during August 2022. At the time, the privileged document was presented to 28 councillors. An extract from Baloyi's report read: 'There is an emergency in the technical department that has not been recognised as such by the technical services director and technical services management team. There is a lack of knowledge and skills among the people who ought to be managing the department. 'Whether this is a result of a lack of basic approach to employment or not, there is a lack of will when it comes to applying oneself in the position that one is employed in, from the technical director down to the plumber in the command chain. We were unable to interview the technical director, as he had taken a stand against this by involving an attorney, who indicated that we cannot have a conversation with the technical director without the attorney involved. 'This, on its own, indicated that the technical director knows exactly what is happening in the department. The technical director, in this regard, has no skills to occupy the position he is occupying, which is the reason why he does not comprehend the severity of the impact of the pollution of the sewer spillages around and within the municipal boundaries. 'The technical director does not even comprehend the emergency and urgency that this issue had to be addressed in.' In his delictual claim, Manqele rebutted that 'the report intentionally and maliciously makes false, wrongful, unlawful and defamatory statements against him'. He added that the readers of the report understood the above to mean that he is 'incompetent, unethical and unprofessional; that he is unqualified and occupies the position of a technical director through a dubious appointment; that he lacks skills and knowledge in the portfolio of technical director; and that he is corrupt, insolent and engages in unlawful activities in the municipality.'
