South Africa's steel and aluminium sectors brace for impact as US doubles tariff charges
Banele Ginindza | Published 3 hours ago
South Africa must adapt to new challenges as US President Donald Trump announced a fresh round of import tariff hikes of up to 50% on steel and aluminium this week, compounding the effects of April's 25% increase, according to stakeholders and analysts.
The local sector is still grappling with disrupted global supply chains, rising manufacturing costs, and reduced competitiveness for South African automotive products in the US market.
Many South African businesses are now exploring alternative markets in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East to reduce reliance on the US. The announcement came as South Africa and other countries trading with the US benefited from a 90-day tariff suspension beyond the 10% base tariff, providing a window for strategic negotiations to safeguard key exports and explore new trade avenues during a recent meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and his US counterpart.
Friday's decision to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminium from 25% to 50% escalates Trump's global trade war, coming hours after he accused China of violating an agreement to mutually roll back levies and trade restrictions on critical minerals. The European Commission responded on Saturday, signaling readiness to retaliate against the US plan, raising the prospect of an escalating trade conflict between major economic powers.
Donald MacKay, the founder and CEO of XA Global Trade Advisors, noted that while South Africa's steel exports to the US are limited, the impact will still be felt. 'Aluminium is exported in far greater volumes, but the US has limited aluminium production, so prices will likely rise. This isn't good, but it's not devastating either,' MacKay said.
South Africa's aluminium sector had previously been exempted from emergency tariff decisions due to the commodity's scarcity status.
Muzi Manzini, the CEO of the Aluminium Federation of South Africa, expressed optimism about a potential deal involving South Africa purchasing US liquefied natural gas for a minimum of 10 years in exchange for steel and aluminium tariff exemptions.
'Unless we're back to the US's haphazard tariff policy, the trade court's ruling that the President lacks authority to impose tariffs may hold, despite the appeal. If this stifles Trump's tariff plans, we could revert to rules-based World Trade Organisation processes,' Manzini said.
According to a PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report, US Tariffs vs South Africa: A New Economic Era? , published on Friday, the tariffs have disrupted trade volumes and supply chains, reducing South African exports to the US due to higher costs. In response, businesses are leveraging the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement to boost intra-African trade and regional economic integration while prioritizing the transformation of raw materials into higher-value finished goods to mitigate tariff exposure and drive innovation.
The report highlights that the tariffs will likely impact key export sectors, particularly agriculture and automotive, which are critical for revenue and youth employment. As the US is South Africa's second-largest bilateral trading partner, these changes could lead to reduced exports, lower selling prices to offset higher US landed costs, and potential job losses as US buyers turn to alternative sources.
Despite these challenges, PwC notes that free trade agreements like the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) and AfCFTA offer significant opportunities. 'Although Agoa's future remains uncertain, it continues to be a valuable tool for South African exporters to maintain competitiveness in the US market,' the report stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
31 minutes ago
- IOL News
Court orders RAF to honour R1. 4 million payment to undocumented Malawian immigrant injured in car crash
The Western Cape High Court has dismissed an application by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to rescind a judgment mandating the payment of over R1.4 million to a Malawian man who has been in the country illegally. Image: Pexels The Western Cape High Court has dismissed an application by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to rescind a judgment mandating a payment of over R1.4 million to an undocumented Malawian man. Charles Jeka Chipofya has been living in the country since 1994 and has been married to a South African woman since 2008. They have two children. Despite his long-term residence, his attempts to obtain citizenship through marriage were thwarted due to evident abuse of the system by some African nationals. The Road Accident Fund found itself at the centre of controversy after Chipofya was involved in a severe car accident in Plettenberg Bay in September 2016. He filed a claim with the RAF, culminating in a proposed settlement of over R1.4 million in November 2022. In January 2023, a draft order was presented to the court on mutual consent between the parties, and RAF was ordered to pay Chipofya over R1.4 million. However, two years later, RAF reneged and wanted the court to rescind the order claiming that when it was made, it was unaware that Chipofya was an illegal immigrant. RAF said that when Chipofya submitted a copy of a passport, it referred to him as Charles Chipeta and not as Charles Jeka Chipofya, and this was suspicious. In response to this suspicion, RAF investigated to ascertain the circumstances surrounding his dual identity and it came to light that Chipofya owns two passports, one naming him as Charles Jeka Chipofya and the other as Charles Chipeta. RAF stated that when Chipofya was confronted about having two passports, he tried to attribute the discrepancy to a data capture error. However, in RAF's view, his explanation was unlikely, as it is improbable that such an error could occur. Subsequent to that, RAF said investigations revealed that one of the passports did not exist at the time of the accident. Additionally, the movement system record revealed that the visa on the other passport expired in December 2012. Moreover, there were no records showing that Chipofya left the country using the old passport or that he entered the country with a new passport after December 2012. In RAF's view, this could imply that Chipofya was either not present in the country on the date of the accident or was potentially in the country illegally. RAF argued that the order was erroneously granted and had the court been made aware that Chipofya was an illegal immigrant, the court would not have granted the order. Furthermore, RAF contended that the Immigration Act prohibits illegal immigrants from being in the country and extending claims of damages to illegal immigrants will create an enormous burden on the State. In response, Chipofya's legal representative argued that RAF had prior knowledge of his nationality and legal status before reaching a settlement agreement. Moreover, it was argued that Chipofya never misrepresented his status in the country and the settlement agreement was not based on the assumed existence of his legal status in the country. Judge James Dumisani Lekhuleni who presided over the matter, sided with Chipofya, and noted RAF had reduced the claim amount specifically because Chipofya was an illegal immigrant at the time of the offer, a fact that had been openly discussed during negotiations. "This conclusion is fortified by the fact that RAF's legal representatives advised Chipofya's attorneys that his claim would be reduced because he was an illegal immigrant. This averment was not disputed by the RAF or RAF's counsel," he said. In addition, he said Chipofya's medical reports and some of his documents, showed that he didn't have a valid visa and despite this, RAF settled his claim and consented to have the draft order endorsed in court. Regarding the different names, the judge said Chipofya provided a plausible explanation regarding the names and when RAF made the offer, it was aware of the discrepancies. Judge Lekhuleni emphasised that RAF is legally bound under the RAF Act to provide compensation for losses arising from road accidents, asserting that the Act does not discriminate based on a claimant's immigration status. "In my opinion, the current legislative framework of the RAF Act does not support the fund's position to exclude illegal immigrants from the application of RAF. "Eligibility for the RAF fund is not contingent upon a person's legal status within this country. An individual's legal standing does not influence their eligibility for RAF benefits. Simply put, it is not the person's immigration status in the country that makes a person legible to the RAF benefits," he said. RAF's application was dismissed. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.


Eyewitness News
44 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Musk blasts Trump mega-bill days after farewell
WASHINGTON - Tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump erupted Tuesday as the world's richest man derided the president's key piece of economic legislation in a startling rupture just days after exiting a controversial job in the White House. Musk was lauded by the Republican leader as he left his advisory role atop Trump's "Department of Government Efficiency" last week, despite criticism over his failure to deliver on promises of radical spending cuts. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk posted on X as he followed its progress from the sidelines, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's agenda. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill" which is set to add $3 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programs. But Musk's previous criticism was more restrained, with the Tesla and SpaceX magnate offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. On Tuesday he said the bill - being considered by Congress - would burden "citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." His post laid bare an increasingly tense relationship between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's 2024 election campaign. Musk has become disillusioned, US media reported, as his goals for White House action that would benefit him personally have gone unrealised. The bill he was criticising cuts the electric vehicle tax credit - bad news for Tesla - while Axios reported that Musk was rebuffed in his efforts to extend his role beyond the statutory 130-day limit. He also failed to have his Starlink satellite system used for air traffic control, according to Axios, and was angered by Trump withdrawing the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be NASA chief. The normally pugilistic Trump has pulled his punches, aware of his biggest backer's enormous influence over young, tech-savvy and historically apathetic voters - a key Trump constituency in 2024. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. The spat came with House Republicans set to pass legislation sent from the White House to enshrine into law $9.4 billion of DOGE's cuts, mostly money destined for public broadcasting and foreign aid. House Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk's comments "disappointing," adding that he had walked the entrepreneur through the bill on Monday, and that he "seemed to understand." BURGEONING DEBT As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's "incredible service." Trump even insisted that Musk was "really not leaving" after a turbulent four months in which the South African born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. DOGE led an ideologically driven rampage through the federal government, with its young "tech bros" slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But its achievements fell far short of Musk's original boast that he could save $2 trillion - more than the government's entire discretionary spending budget for 2024. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers less than a tenth of that total - just $180 billion - and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. Senate Democrats released a report Tuesday itemising 130 examples of "unethical or potentially corrupt" administration actions they say have helped Musk dodge regulation and add $100 billion to his wealth. The report came as senators began what is expected to be a fraught month of negotiations on Trump's mammoth policy package, expected to add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over a decade. Trump said on Monday it was "the single biggest Spending Cut in History," although he added: "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse."


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
The 2025 RMB Latitudes Art Fair showcases over 300 art works at Shepstone Gardens
The Rand Merchant Bank (RMB) Latitudes Art Fair's third edition took place in the enchanting Shepstone Gardens in Houghton from May 23 to 25. Read more: RMB Latitudes Art Fairs third edition comes to Shepstone Gardens The art fair worked with over 50 galleries and over 300 artists, who showcased their talent over the course of the weekend. From major local galleries, such as Southern Guild, Stevenson, and Everard Read, to nomadic gallery FEDE Arthouse, Strauss & Co auction house, and new Nigerian space AMG projects, every aspect of the art ecosystem was represented. Co-founder of Resevoir Projects Shona van der Merwe said the exhibition, which was founded in 2021 by herself and Heinrich Groenewald, is an independent partnership specialising in collaborative curation. Also read: RMB Latitudes Art Fair returned with diverse African perspectives She added that their 2025 RMB exhibition featured six of their artists: Bulumko Mbete, Cathy Abraham, Keith Henning, Luis MS Santos, Mankebe Seakgoe, and Seretse Moletsane. The fair's 2025 international platform took a deliberate and engaged focus on neighbouring country Botswana, with several exhibitors, working collaboratively to create a presentation that respects the balance between contemporary art and more traditional, foundational art practices in that region. In the gardens, an outdoor exhibition: Disturbed Currents: Art for a Warming World, explored how it is we inform the climate, and how it, in turn, informs our own lived experience. While Essay sees stoneware sculptures by doyenne of South African Ceramic Sculptors Amalie von Maltitz shown alongside charcoal drawings by Sydney Kumalo. Van der Merwe added that in 2023, Reservoir opened a space for solo exhibitions by independent artists on Bree Street in Cape Town. Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts! Related article: Popular RMB Turbine Art Fair goes virtual