Regeneration plan for Seafield 'unrealistic' landowners say
Hundreds of new affordable homes at Seafield will 'help address the city's housing emergency' amid a record 5,000 homeless households in the capital, council planning convener James Dalgleish said last year.
Read more from our new investigation, The Future of Edinburgh:
However the ambitious project is unlikely to come to fruition for decades yet, largely due to a number of hurdles. Chief among them is landowners unwilling to sell up. The relocation of Lothian Buses' Marine Depot, at the east of the site, also poses a significant challenge.
'They don't necessarily want to move'
Iain Whyte, the Conservative councillor for Craigentinny-Duddingston, which includes Seafield, told The Herald: 'The biggest blocker, frankly, to anything happening there is the landowners of a significant chunk of it have tenants in place, a steady income, that suits their financial and business model and they don't want to change that.
'When they speak, they speak on behalf of some of the others that are there as well and I think that means this, if it's a plan that's going to work, you're probably talking 20 years before you see anything significantly change there.
'I just think the biggest problem the council has got is that it allocated that site for nearly 3,000 houses in its plan for the city, the 2030 City Plan for development, to try and find the housing numbers that are needed for the growing population.
'Doing things like that when there's no prospect of it being developed within the timescales they're talking about gives you an indication of why we're not meeting the housing numbers needed — and is the real reason, if any, why they're having to declare a housing emergency.'
He added: 'I don't know if anyone's ever asked Lothian Buses where they think they're going to move their depot to. Because I don't think it's easy for them. It's fine for the council to sit there and say 'oh well, car showrooms aren't a very good use of the land' but there's an awful lot more in there and they don't necessarily want to move.'
'Their land should not be considered for housing'
Council documents reveal some developers hold concerns about 'timescales and the difficulty of delivering a masterplan when such a small area of the plan is actually capable of coming forward in the short/medium term'.
They also show that Royal London, which owns Seafield Industrial Estate covering a large part of the proposed development site, 'do not support proposals for residential development on their site'.
In their response to a consultation on City Plan 2030, an agent representing the pensions and investment giant warned that the site 'does not present a realistic option for residential development'.
They said: 'The owner [...] has no intention of releasing the land for housing use over the Plan period and their land holding should not be considered for residential or urban area housing led mixed use.'
The response went on to say Royal London was not approached by the council prior to the land being identified for consideration for redevelopment. 'The identification of their land holding for this purpose is considered to be inappropriate,' it said.
Proposed redevelopment site at Seafield (Image: City of Edinburgh Council)
The estate, consisting of 18 fully let industrial units, has been under the company's ownership for over 25 years, is 'one of the larger complete industrial holdings' within their property fund.
The agent said 'significant capital investment' has been directed into the industrial units in recent years including 'acquisition of adjacent holdings, replacement roofs, cladding renewal, unit subdivision and road/service yard replacement ensuring the accommodation is fit for modern requirements'.
They added: 'Tenants undertake a range of business operations comprising urban industry, trades, distribution and local services which support their local market, of which a significant proportion comprises the established urban area of north east Edinburgh.
'The removal of an established employment area against a backdrop of limited industrial supply and constrained demand will only serve to exacerbate poverty rates in the local area.'
Royal London was contacted for comment.
Read more from The Future of Edinburgh series:
Councillor Whyte compared the plan to proposals for the local authority's ongoing regeneration of Granton Waterfront 'which we were talking about developing 30 years ago and is only now starting to come to fruition'.
He said: 'I think this will take a very long time indeed.'
Asked about the prospect of the council using Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs) in a bid to accelerate work, he said: 'That would be incredibly expensive and the council doesn't have much money.
'We're in the top five most indebted councils in the UK, so would it make sense to go further into debt and have the interest payments to CPO land that private individuals and companies are making best use of in the market at the moment?'
However, he added it was 'useful to have a masterplan so you don't get piecemeal development along there'.
'Fabulous opportunity'
Cathy Maclean from Action Porty, the community group behind Scotland's first ever urban community land buy out in Portobello, agreed it would be 'quite a while before things get going' as 'a lot of the people who own those sites don't want to sell and have no plans to sell'.
But she stressed the site presented a 'fabulous opportunity' as there were so few capital cities with 'a brownfield site right on the beach to develop".
Seafield is currently mostly car showrooms and industrial units (Image: Google) She said more housing was badly needed and 'so much' had been built in Portobello in recent years 'with a dramatic loss of amenities at the same'.
This led Action Porty to successfully complete a community buyout of Portobello Old Parish Church after the Church of Scotland announced its intention to sell the property. It reopened as Bellfield, a community centre, in 2018.
Maclean said if the Seafield redevelopment ever goes ahead it would be 'welcome from Portobello as a sort of sister community, rather than particularly part of it,' however added: 'In practice it will become a part of Portobello because that's the way people are, they enjoy walking along the Prom.
'At some point it's all going to join up between Leith and right the way along Seahaven.'
'There has to be continuity between the two areas'
While Seafield's regeneration is clearly still a long-way off, some details in the masterplan are already raising eyebrows.
The council's visualisation of what the area could look like one day shows people enjoying the would-be promenade and leafy waterfront park.
'If you look at it it looks amazing,' said Kirsty Pattison, chair of Craigentinny and Meadowbank Community Council, whose boundary includes Seafield, 'but if you dig into the details and look at what the masterplanning is and the height of the buildings proposed, it doesn't correlate with that picture at all.'
A visualisation of the council's Seafield masterplan (Image: City of Edinburgh Council) She said in terms of the height of the buildings there is 'tension between what it's supposed to look like and what is actually being proposed'.
'What they're proposing, from the top of the prom if you're looking south-east it gives you expansive views of the beach and you can see Joppa. Some of that might be lost, so it's important to preserve this place.'
Ensuring the new neighbourhood is well connected with adjacent communities will be crucial, Ms Pattison said. 'We want to make sure there's improved landscape connections between Craigentinny and Seafield, because Seafield is part of our district.
'There has to be continuity between the two areas so we can preserve popular beach walks.
'There's a beach walk that connects Craigentinny to the western part of the beach and we want that put into the masterplan to make sure it's preserved. That is vital. People use it all the time - it's such a popular connection.'
'There's also issues around rising sea levels, it's all fine and well saying we're going to redevelop Seafield - but what are we going to put in place for flooding?'
Ms MacLean similarly raised concerns over the impact of climate change in the future. 'I don't think you can say any flood defences are going to be effective when you don't know what's coming,' she said.
'A lot of the standards these environmental consultants look at are based on what used to be called once in every 200 year chance of flooding. That's changed quite dramatically. Nobody really knows, if the truth be told.'
Edinburgh Council said the risk of coastal flooding 'is increasing due to rising sea levels and coastal erosion caused by climate change,' adding: 'This is a key consideration in the redevelopment of Seafield.'
Since initial engagement about the plans in 2023 'we have needed to take additional time to engage with a range of stakeholders,' it said. 'This is to ensure that places are developed along the coastline that are resilient in the face of climate change impacts'.
Read more:
Now, the authority is preparing a Coastal Change Adaptation Plan and said it will 'update the draft masterplan in line with the recommendations'.
The 'Seafield stench'
One of the biggest constraints historically associated with making the area residential has been the 'Seafield stench' from the waste water treatment plant to the west - the largest of its kind in Scotland.
Odours emitting from the works are a longstanding issue. Between 2022 and 2024 Scottish Water and Veolia invested over £10 million to add additional capacity and address concerns around the smells. However, the council said last year the issue 'has not been fully resolved at this time'.
It said: 'The Council, along with SEPA, carry out ongoing monitoring of odours relating to the Works. However, the council does not have the ability to force all odours to be stopped.
'Scottish Water has committed to developing a new facility to replace the Seafield facility after 2030. This should be considered alongside the timescales of the masterplan as it is likely to reduce the impact of odours around the facility.
'Odours relating to the Works are not a significant issue for the bulk of the masterplan area. However, if odours persist, this is likely to shape how development of the northernmost part of the area comes forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
7 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
'Newport's Queensway is full of multimillion-pound flops'
First up, Admiral House. After building works were completed in May 2014, it was sold for £20 million. Nine years later, Admiral Insurance shockingly left the building, with its employees working remotely from home. In 2023, it was reported, the building was up for sale at £14.9 million (around £5 million less than its owner paid for it). It was sold a year later to Admiral Insurance, however the building presently sits empty - 'available to rent'. Behind the railway station, we have the former Royal Mail 'Sorting Office' on Mill Street. In 2018, plans were approved for Garrison Barclay Estates to redevelop the building into approximately 50,000 square foot of 'Grade A' office space. A £12 million council loan was provided to assist, however the building presently sits empty - 'available to rent'. Up next is the Cambrian Centre. Scarborough Group International were behind ambitious plans to redevelop the so-called Station Quarter area. The project included another huge office block, next to Admiral House. In 2013, a contract worth around £14 million was awarded to SDC Construction to complete the building work. Planning permission was granted in 2016, however construction has yet to start? Then there's the old Railway Station. It was built in 1928 by Great Western Railway (GWR). This was converted into an office block after the new station opened in 2010. It's since housed the council's Information Station and later an 'Innovation Station'. The latter was part of a £1.89 million project partly funded by Newport Council. Is this building now empty also? What of the controversial new Railway Station? In the past it has been described as one of Britain's ugliest buildings. In 2013, the BBC claimed the revamp cost £22 million, including £13 million from the Welsh Government. Many have questioned the need for the new station. Could the former Railway Station building have been internally remodelled at a fraction of the cost? Finally, what of the new walkway bridge that connects Mill Street to the Queensway i.e. the Devon Place bridge. It opened last year at a whopping cost of £10.5million. A bridge was needed, but £10.5 million? There's been an obscene amount of money spent on development projects around the Queensway area. What have we got? Empty office blocks? We now understand Transport for Wales wants to blow another £40 million (estimated) on redeveloping the Queensway, including the Old Green roundabout. It feels like throwing good money after bad. How about investing money on our City Centre where it's really needed i.e. revamping Commercial Street, High Street and Charles Street. Mike Enea is a Conservative campaigner and blogger. These views are his.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Dining across the divide: ‘It was like a communist interrogation'
Occupation Data engineer Voting record Usually Conservative, but didn't vote in the last two elections – 'The parties seem broadly the same. Nobody really stands by the manifesto' Amuse bouche This isn't Michael's first career – he started his working life as a history teacher Occupation Mainly a student, but works on social media and campaigns for the Workers party Voting record The Workers party; has also voted Green Amuse bouche Sophia can recite the full lyrics to Billy Joel's We Didn't Start the Fire. Can also sing it, but only when she's been drinking Michael She was covered in a bunch of communist pins; it came off as a little bit of an intentional caricature. My first impression was: younger than I thought and wearing her politics on her sleeve, literally. Sophia I was expecting someone more rightwing, more Reform-like, but I found him pretty interesting, in regard to his abstinence from voting and his lack of interest in any of the key parties. Michael I ate some salt and pepper squid and a cod loin. Sophia I had the sourdough margherita pizza and a couple of glasses of rather nice Romanian red wine. Michael Governments' first duty of care is to their own citizens, which means migration needs to serve the interests of the people already here. Relatively unchecked mass migration doesn't seem to do that. Being someone who went through all the legal hoops – moving to the UK from Canada – the idea that I could have simply lost my passport, shown up and not had to wait in line for anything, that's not ideal. Not being able to do anything about foreign people who take advantage of the UK's astonishing generosity isn't great. Sophia He was essentially saying, 'We need growth but how are migrants going to generate that?' He felt that it would be detrimental to the migrants' own countries, in that they'd be losing their own assets. But they're leaving because they aren't seen as assets. They're leaving because of corruption, poverty, different human rights. It's not as simple as he thinks: migrants don't necessarily have a choice. Michael The situation we're in serves large corporations and keeps everyone addicted to low-wage labour. It makes our GDP look good, but it's reducing our standard of living, and that includes the people we're importing. If we want to help the whole world thrive, are we doing anyone else any favours by saying to other countries, 'Yes, we'll have all your doctors and nurses, thanks'?Sophia He looked at everything from his individual perspective as an economic agent. I think he lacked empathy, and I said that to him. He responded that I was being overly idealistic – but he was being idealistic as well, in terms of his own capital interests and what served them. If I had a penny for every time he called me idealistic, I could repair the economic conditions he's so worried about. Michael She was very keen to talk about Gaza. I don't think either side is very nice in this case. I don't have a strong opinion, except that it is atrocious. Sophia I don't see it as a war. I see it as unjustifiable violence for nationalist aims. Having a two-state solution is completely wrong, because it's only rewarding Israel for what it's done. It should be one democratically run state. Michael Everybody should have the right to be left alone. When we start having laws around misgendering, I think: look, I prefer people to be polite, but people are allowed to be impolite, and making special rules based on someone's whim is weird. Sophia I'm a gender abolitionist. He doesn't like jargon, whereas I quite like that people use labels, because that makes it feel more real, as opposed to people thinking they're abnormal. Michael I tried to be polite and stay for the duration, while she was eating. Looking back, I berate myself for not walking away sooner. It was the most communist interrogation a guy can have without ending up with bamboo shoots under his nails. Sophia It wasn't that the conversation dried up or that we hated each other; we just said goodbye. I think it was on good terms. I was probably not the sort of person he'd choose to interact with. Additional reporting: Kitty Drake Michael and Sophia ate at Riding House, London WC1 Want to meet someone from across the divide? Find out how to take part
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
How Kevlar could save Scotland's crumbling concete homes
The ReGrid system, which has been developed by Windsor-based firm Structural Repairs, is a lightweight reinforcing mesh which consists of 'high-strength' carbon fibres interwoven with Kevlar threads. It can be directly applied to surfaces affected by reinforced aerated autoclaved concrete (RAAC), the brittle building material linked to several collapses in recent years. RAAC campaigner Wilson Chowdhry. According to the company, installation would take around two days for a standard RAAC-affected home, and would not require residents to be relocated. It has already been used to repair RAAC-affected properties owned by National Rail. Chowdhry told The Herald: 'We urge the Scottish Government and the UK Government to commission an urgent feasibility study into this product, and for local authorities nationwide to engage directly with Structural Repairs Ltd to fully understand the scope and potential of this innovative RAAC solution. 'Time is running out for RAAC homeowners, who face mounting pressure from local authorities intent on pressing ahead with costly and highly disruptive remediation or demolition schemes — creating deep uncertainty and distress for affected families.' In March 2025, Aberdeen City Council approved plans to demolish and rebuild more than 500 RAAC-blighted properties in the city's Balganask neighbourhood. The project, which would result in the demolition of 366 council owned properties and 138 private homes, could cost as much as £150m. Meanwhile, in Clackmannanshire, three blocks of flats in the town of Tillicoultry have been empty since residents were evacuated in October 2023. Chowdhry has approached both local authorities with the ReGrid proposal. He told The Herald that the plan could prove to be a 'game changer' for homeowners facing the threat of eviction from their homes. People were evacuated from dozens of flats in Tillicoultry. (Image: Scott Barron) The veteran campaigner said: 'The ReGrid system offers a credible, non-intrusive, and far more affordable alternative to full roof replacements. 'Because ReGrid is only a fraction of the cost of conventional approaches, a national funding programme from the Scottish Government or UK Government becomes a realistic and achievable proposition — bringing hope to thousands of families who currently see no affordable path forward. 'We call on decision-makers to pause existing schemes, properly investigate this technology, and immediately begin a study of ReGrid — because every week of delay leaves more families trapped in limbo.' Homeowners affected by RAAC have previously told The Herald of the mental anguish caused by the crisis. Lynn Winstanley, who lives in Balnagask, said earlier this year: 'It's been very stressful for everyone. We weren't planning on selling our home, we would have picked a better economic state. 'People can't afford to take a loss on their homes. It's so difficult for everyone, especially those with young kids." Now, campaigners hope that the ReGrid solution could provide homeowners with a second chance at staying in their properties. Read more: 'No respect from day one': Where do the RAAC-hit residents of Balnagask go from here? 'We hold the cards': residents hit out at 'measly' council RAAC payments Calls for public inquiry to reveal origins of RAAC concrete crisis In a letter to Aberdeen City Council, Chowdry wrote: 'I would like to draw your attention to a potential solution that could significantly enhance Aberdeen City Council's approach to RAAC remediation. 'This approach could serve both council-owned and privately-owned RAAC homes in Aberdeen more quickly, cost-effectively, and with far less disruption than current replacement-roof proposals. It may also ease the financial and logistical pressures facing adjoining private homeowners who are presently tied into council-led repair programmes. 'If agreeable, I can arrange an introduction with the developers, who have offered to carry out a site survey, structural scan, and pull test on my daughter Hannah's RAAC-affected home in Aberdeen as a pilot demonstration. 'Such a test case could provide valuable evidence in evaluating its suitability for use within the city." Roger Line, Structural Repair CEO, told The Herald: "We believe that with the right engineering expertise and proven reinforcement technology, many RAAC-affected structures can be made safe, serviceable, and sustainable for decades to come." A spokesperson for Clackmannanshire Council said: 'Following consultation with the affected residents, the Council recently agreed to move forward with a plan for roof repairs at the three blocks of flats in Tillicoultry evacuated due to RAAC. 'Council officers are continuing to engage with everyone affected by the RAAC evacuations and we are committed to doing all we can to support residents through this ongoing process. 'We have also reached out to Aberdeen City Council to find out more about the proposed use of this material.' Aberdeen City Council has been approached for comment.
