Louisiana wind energy proponents change their tune as Trump pauses development
Wind energy advocates and lawmakers see potential for wind power expansion in Louisiana. (Creative Commons photo by Kim Hansen/CC BY-SA-3.0)
Wind energy has gained some momentum in Louisiana, where there has been bipartisan support for policy to launch the alternative power source off its coast. But that push faces hostility from the Trump administration, which has halted all offshore wind energy development in federal waters for the time being.
While wind power development in state waters isn't subject to the executive order, advocates are emphasizing their economic messaging — playing down the climate-friendly aspects of the renewable resource and focusing more on its ability to create jobs, save consumers money and address growing electricity demand.
Industry supporters honed in on economic value while making their case Monday to the Louisiana House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment. The panel was tasked with gathering information on solar and wind energy development in a House study resolution representatives approved last year.
Jenny Netherton, with the Southeastern Wind Coalition, acknowledged Louisiana's fossil fuel legacy when she made her pro-wind points to lawmakers.
'This is a once in a generation economic opportunity, the same way that Louisiana has capitalized on oil and gas,' she said.
Rep. Joe Orgeron, R-Larose, has authored multiple laws aimed at giving offshore wind development a foothold in Louisiana. They include an amendment to the Louisiana Constitution approved in November with 73% support that dedicates state revenue from offshore wind energy toward coastal restoration and protection.
Orgeron and other backers of offshore wind energy in the legislature have stressed how the existing workforce devoted to oil and gas exploration can be used to build and install wind farms in coastal waters.
'Now we finally have another energy job that's not related to the price of oil and gas that communities can make a living from,' said Orgeron, the committee's vice-chairman.
Blake Canfield, executive counsel for the Louisiana Department of Energy and Natural Resources, also affirmed the state's potential for wind energy.
'We are known worldwide we're being an energy state and for having done many years of oil and gas activity. A lot of the technical expertise, manufacturing and other attributes that make us … very good at oil and gas, I think also can carry over to offshore wind,' Canfield said.
Trump stalls wind work
An executive order from President Donald Trump led the Environmental Protection Agency to pause all development of offshore wind energy development. It also halts all leasing of federal waters for such projects while the agency reviews its permitting procedures.
'We're not going to do the wind thing,' Trump said at a rally following his Jan. 20 inauguration. 'Big, ugly windmills, they ruin your neighborhood.'
Trump has also made several false claims about risks from wind energy, like saying the noise from wind turbines causes cancer.
Rep. Brett Geymann, R-Lake Charles, chairs the Natural Resources and Environment Committee and authored the study resolution that led to Monday's presentation. He expressed concern for responsible wind energy development, referencing the current 'wild wild west' of solar regulation.
He advocated for state involvement in wind energy permitting, with Netherton noting such projects have a longer development timeline — around 10 years from the start of construction to when power is generated. She explained this could be an advantage in terms of creating uniform regulation.
'We support wind done right,' said Scott Eustis, community science director for the environmental advocacy group Healthy Gulf. He leaned in on the environmental angle, comparing the impact of wind projects to oil and gas development.
'Any project has a footprint. You want zoning, you want buffers,' Eustis said. 'We just don't see the hazard zone' with wind that fossil fuel infrastructure involves.
To account for massive turbines, a 2022 Louisiana law created a 25,000-acre area for wind energy leases in state coastal waters compared with 5,000 acres for oil and gas leases. Orgeron was co-author of the legislation.
Wind as a stabilizing force
Lawmakers and industry advocates alike spoke about the need for supplemental sources of electricity when demand on the power grid is at its greatest — during peak summer heat and extreme winter cold — and outages following hurricanes.
Netherton said wind energy avoids the spikes in commodity prices that can cause electric bills to increase. When natural gas prices increase utilities are allowed to pass along the expense to customers.
Although the initial investment in wind energy development is steep, Netherton said it ultimately benefits consumers in the long run.
'Both offshore and onshore wind are cost competitive when considered over the life of a project,' Netherton said.
The financial advisory firm Lazard's levelized cost of energy assessment for 2024 similarly found that renewable energy like wind and solar 'remain cost-competitive with conventional generation technologies under certain circumstances,' placing cost of onshore wind produced at a utility scale from $27 to $73 per megawatt/hour, some of the lowest cost energy available.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge: Trump administration can dismantle Institute of Museum and Library Services
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Assn. to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Assn. and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.


New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump says Elon Musk will face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Dems in future elections
WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Saturday that his former ally Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he starts bankrolling Democratic candidates for office after their nasty public split over a Republican spending bill working its way through Congress. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News' Kristin Welker in an interview. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' the president added. Advertisement 3 Musk and Trump have been feuding after the Tesla CEO spoke out on the president's 'big beautiful' bill. AP 'Is there anything else you just want people to know about the status,' Welker asked. 'No, not at all. We're doing great,' Trump replied. 'The bill is great. It looks like we're going to get it passed. Looks strongly like we're going to get it passed.' Advertisement 3 Musk was part of cabinet meetings during the first few months of Trump's second term. Molly Riley/White House / SWNS Musk knocked Trump during a multi-day X tirade over the debt increases contained in the 'big beautiful bill' earlier this week and said without his hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions, the president would never have been re-elected in 2024. Here is the latest on Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud He also claimed credit for delivering the GOP a 53-47 majority in the Senate — and holding onto its majority in the House. Advertisement 3 Trump has hit back at Musk's comments in the ongoing feud. The Tesla and SpaceX billionaire contributed more than a quarter of a billion dollars to Republican candidates in the 2024 cycle, federal campaign filings show.


Gizmodo
35 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Musk Deletes His ‘Really Big Bomb' Claiming Trump Appears in Epstein Files
In the middle of their very public breakup, a scorned Elon Musk decided to drop a 'really big bomb' on Donald Trump, accusing the president of appearing in the Epstein files. Sometime Saturday, it seems the billionaire decided he wanted to try to disarm that bomb, as he deleted his posts claiming that Trump has links to the famous child sex trafficker. Musk and Trump had been acting catty for a couple of days by the time Musk went nuclear, going back and forth over Musk's opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'—a proposal that includes the largest cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs in history. Musk objected to the bill, but not because it would be devastating to low- and middle-income households, but seemingly rather because it was going to hurt his own bottom line by ending electric vehicle tax credits that Tesla benefits from. Musk tried to kill the bill by posting incessantly about it, creating a rift among Republicans who will essentially need everyone in the party to be on board in order to get the thing passed. Trump, annoyed, took some shots at Musk for his dissent, which led to Musk just blowing the whole thing up. He said Trump appeared in the Epstein files and 'That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Funnily, he also doubled down by saying, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Those posts are now deleted—though have, of course, been archived, screenshotted, and quoted many times over. So, too, has a post in which Musk supported the idea that Trump should be impeached. He hasn't gotten around to taking down his post claiming that Trump's tariffs will cause a recession, so, it's clear the two aren't fully ready to make up, even if there is a de-escalation. We're also starting to get more of a picture of what has been happening behind the scenes while these two air out each other in public. A report published Saturday by the Washington Post claims that Trump was 'dejected' during Musk's crash out, and tried to rationalize Musk's behavior by calling him 'a big-time drug addict.' Musk had apparently been acting erratically for quite some time (not exactly a shock if you've scrolled through his posts on Twitter for like, 30 seconds), and a reported physical conflict with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that saw Musk supposedly throw his shoulder into Bessent was the breaking point where the billionaire started to get pushed out, per the Post. Trump opted not to pour gasoline on the situation—a shocking decision from a guy not exactly known for his restraint—but also is apparently not interested in reconciling with Musk. An official within the administration told the Post that even if they do make up, 'It'll never be the same.'