logo
The Americanisation of our diets is destroying our health – and it's not just about size

The Americanisation of our diets is destroying our health – and it's not just about size

Telegraph01-03-2025

Nothing is better evidence of America's devotion to junk food than Donald Trump's go-to lunch order. According to insiders he regularly eats a Big Mac, Filet-o-Fish, french fries and a vanilla milkshake in one sitting, a meal that comes in at well over 2000 calories.
Junk food is part of America's DNA. The first American fast food joint opened in 1921 in the mid western state of Kansas, as the US experienced the post-WW1 boom that shaped it into the nation we know now. These days burger giant McDonald's – surely the country's most famous export – contributes as much to America's GDP as the entire state of Rhode Island. The chain is ubiquitous from coast to coast: it's not Texas or Florida but the supposedly clean-eating state of California that's home to the most McDonald's restaurants.
Enormous stacks of pancakes heaped with bacon and maple syrup, burger buns stuffed with eight cheese-wrapped patties, pizzas the width of a doorframe – all reflect the 'general American affinity for the idea that bigger is always better,' says Dr Will Bulsiewicz, US medical director for the nutrition company Zoe.
Meanwhile the rest of the world has adopted America's love of fast food, and nutritionists in Britain are now blaming the Americanisation of our diets for rising rates of obesity, bowel cancer and type 2 diabetes. But are people in the States really eating in a way that's uniquely unhealthy? We asked the experts.
Portion size
'It's absolutely true that portion sizes tend to be larger in America,' says Prof Rebecca Earle, a food historian at the University of Warwick. Earle was born in America, and when she first moved to the UK in the 1980s, she was 'astonished that the yogurts I'd buy from British supermarkets came in such tiny pots, because individual servings at home were pretty much double the size'.
The differences are most stark at fast food restaurants. McDonald's chicken nuggets are offered in 40-nugget boxes in the United States, while in Britain, it's only possible to buy a serving of 20 in one box – a large serving of fries, meanwhile, is around 30 per cent bigger in America than it is in the UK.
More than just upping the number of calories we might eat in one sitting, 'regularly being served such large amounts of food makes people numb to smaller portions,' says nutritionist Jenna Hope. 'When we're given big portions, we overeat by default and lose the chance to be satisfied with a smaller amount of calories. In the case of American fast food, this also means that people are consuming more saturated fat, sugar and salt.' The consequences are obvious: weight gain, higher risk of diabetes and raised cholesterol.
Contrary to popular belief, a Big Mac in America is about the same size as one you'd find here in Britain – both weigh around 200g, and measure about 10cm across. Burger trends across both countries, however, tell the real story about how Americans eat.
Here in Britain, we like thick beef burgers served with cheddar cheese, chunky chips and lots of veg, as evidenced by the proliferation of gourmet burger joints in recent years. In America, meanwhile, burgers have trended larger and crazier. Just take Wendy's, which doesn't have restaurants in Britain: their Dave's Triple Burger comes with three beef patties and three slices of cheese, and it isn't even the most calorific option on the menu.
Some of the contrast here might be put down to American competitive spirit, says Dr Bulciewicz. 'Americans eat out a lot, so there's competition to provide value for money as part of that experience,' he explains.
Hope, meanwhile, thinks that America's large portions have more to do with social media trends, which encourage people to eat in ways that are increasingly over-the-top and calorific, and the size of American supermarkets, which contain millions of products. 'I still remember going into a supermarket in America years ago and finding hot dogs wrapped in blueberry pancakes,' she recalls. 'It takes a truly enormous supermarket to be able to stock items as niche and outlandish as this.'
Add to this the problems with processed meat in America – for example, many manufacturers still add harmful trans fats to patties, a practice that has been reduced through market incentives in Britain – and US portion sizes become a health nightmare.
Wendy's Dave's Triple Burger vs GBK The Classic, single
Additives
Even a Greek-style yogurt sold in an American supermarket may not be made equal to a British offering. Aside from being larger, a pot of yogurt might also contain carrageenan, a food thickener that's also used to make toothpaste, air freshener and makeup.
'In the US, food companies don't always need to seek approval before they start putting different additives into our foods [if the additives are considered safe],' says Dr Bulsiewicz. 'We know that some of the additives in our food are causing health issues, but once they're in our food supply, it's really difficult to isolate them and show which ones are causing the problem.'
For American health experts, the issue of additives in food demands attention on one product in particular: bread. Soft, white slices of Wonder Bread, America's most-bought loaf, contains over 30 different ingredients, most of which are chemicals that would never be found in our kitchen cupboards next to flour and yeast. Some other kinds of bread sold in America even contain potassium bromate, an ingredient illegal in Britain and the EU as it is a proven carcinogen.
Why is bread in America so excessively tampered with? People in this country 'have always been concerned about what's in their loaves,' says Prof Earle. The first British laws against the adulteration of bread were introduced 800 years ago, in 1202. The same legal history is not present in America, says Dr Bulciewicz. 'The USDA [United States Department of Agriculture] was only created after the Second World War to govern our food supply, and to this day the regulations are more relaxed than they are in Europe,' he explains.
Dietitians in modern Britain still rail against the health risks of shop-bought white bread. Our most-loved loaf is Warburtons Toastie White, which itself has over 10 ingredients, and the ultra-processing of bread to make it stay fresh and mould-free for longer 'strips it of most of its fibre,' says Stephenson.
'Not only are you getting rid of many of the beneficial compounds in the grain, you're removing the element that makes people feel full. You can sit and eat white bread all day, but a good-quality brown sourdough will have you feeling full after one good, thick, slice,' says Stephenson. In the US, that additive-free wholemeal sourdough can come in at $6.50 (over £5) per supermarket loaf, if it can be found – 23.5 million Americans live in food deserts, defined as areas with no fresh food available within a mile in urban areas, or 20 miles in rural ones.
By now we are used to hearing about the deleterious effects of additives, but as a reminder, 'you're asking your body to break down chemicals that it never evolved to encounter whenever you're eating them,' says Hope. 'This disrupts your gut microbiome, which has massive knock-on effects on your overall health, and causes inflammation. While additives are included at safe levels in individual foods, that doesn't account for the amount we're consuming in our daily diets.'
Wonder Bread vs Warburtons medium white sliced loaf
Sugar
American foods are known for being sugary to the point of sickly-sweetness – and 'generally Americans tend to have a taste for sweeter foods,' says Prof Earle. Both American and British intakes are far too high at around 80-100g of sugar consumed per person per day, but sugar seems to be wreaking havoc in America especially, where 49 per cent of the country is either prediabetic or diabetic.
American breakfasts have a characteristic sweetness. While this is far from what our bodies naturally crave – 'we need protein in the mornings, but we're conditioned to want sugar instead,' says Stephenson – sugar does give us a boost of energy in the mornings, and can tempt us out of bed at even our groggiest. Add to that the fact that corn is so abundant in America, and can be easily turned into corn syrup, it's easy to see why Americans are known for eating Poptarts, pancakes and cereals that resemble cookies and 'candies' first thing in the morning.
American cereals such as Lucky Charms, Froot Loops and Cinnamon Toast Crunch are packed with high fructose corn syrup, 'which is actually sweeter than sugar, and is terrible for your body because it's more likely to be stored as fat and cause health issues like insulin resistance,' says Hope. Though fructose is also present in fruit, fruit also contains fibre and glucose which make fruit healthy, she points out. Over time 'even cereals that are good for you have had more and more sugar added to them, which makes it normal to sit down and eat something that's basically cookies with milk'.
By contrast, the most-bought breakfast cereal in Britain is Weetabix (though we eat our fair share of over-sweetened cereals here too). Although Weetabix does contain ingredients that nutritionists like Hope describe as ultra-processed, the cereal 'has more fibre and protein as well as added vitamins,' making it much safer to eat on a regular basis.
Lucky Charms (36g) vs Weetabix (2 biscuits)
Salt
Visitors to America often remark on the saltiness of the foods that they find there. 'In America, 60 percent of the calories we eat every day come from ultra-processed food, and ultra-processing essentially involves combining salt, fat and sugar to make food taste food,' says Dr Bulsiewicz. 'We're hardwired to pursue salt – it's part of our biology,' he adds. 'Most Americans who cook with salt have no problem with seasoning their food healthily, but manufacturers add salt to their products to keep people buying and eating them.'
Some salt is essential to our health, 'but too much can negatively affect the gut microbiome, as well as kidney and immune system function, and may contribute to the risk of autoimmune disease, ' Dr Bulsiewicz says. Salt is also a preservative, making it essential in a country 'where so many people drive long distances and on the road, there's limited options for what to eat outside of ultra-processed food,' Hope adds.
We can see this most plainly when we contrast the classic neon-orange American sliced cheese with old-fashioned British cheddar (or Wensleydale, stilton or red Leicester, or any other British-origin cheese). Kraft Singles, a popular brand of American cheese, actually contain less than 51 per cent 'cheddar cheese', meaning that the product can't be legally marketed as a kind of cheese. The rest of each slice is made up of milk, whey, preservatives and emulsifiers, and comes in at 230mg of sodium per slice.
Cathedral City mature cheddar meanwhile contains less sodium gram-for-gram, and its only listed ingredient is cheddar. While most cheeses are considered high in saturated fat, 'cheddar contains calcium and protein, making it relatively nutritious,' Hope says. No wonder we call it 'plastic cheese' in this country by contrast.
Calories
All of this means that the same foods are simply more calorific in America. Hidden calories account for a large part of the fact that the average American eats over 3,500 calories every day, more than the average for any other country in the world – and more what we eat in the UK, with the average man getting through 3,000 calories per day and women 2,500.
Competition between fast food companies has led to hidden fat, salt and sugar in all sorts of foods, which come in far larger serving sizes. Even the gherkins found in an American burger can come with added corn syrup. 'It's much harder for Americans to keep track of what they're eating,' Hope explains. This is a fact that Dr Bulsiewicz says makes him 'really quite angry,' given the costs of fresh produce in many parts of the United States.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Covid vaccination protects against severe kidney damage, study suggests
Covid vaccination protects against severe kidney damage, study suggests

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Covid vaccination protects against severe kidney damage, study suggests

Complications from a Covid infection can harm the heart, brain, lungs and kidneys. A new study finds that patients hospitalized for Covid were less likely to suffer severe kidney damage if they were vaccinated. Researchers at UCLA Health analyzed electronic medical records at a large academic hospital between March 1, 2020, and March 30, 2022, of approximately 3,500 hospitalized patients, ages 18 and older, and compared hospitalized patients who got at least two primary doses of the Moderna or Pfizer mRNA vaccine or one dose of Johnson & Johnson Janssen vaccine for Covid with hospitalized patients who had not been vaccinated. The researchers examined which participants developed kidney disease severe enough to require a type of dialysis known as CRRT, or continuous renal replacement therapy. The nonstop dialysis therapy does the work of the kidneys by filtering and removing waste from the blood. It's typically used when a patient is in intensive care, said lead author Dr. Niloofar Nobakht, health sciences clinical associate professor of medicine in nephrology at UCLA Health. The study found that 16% of unvaccinated patients with Covid were more likely to need CRRT, compared with 11% of vaccinated patients during their hospital admission. Unvaccinated patients were more than two-and-a-half times as likely to need CRRT after leaving the hospital — and also had a much higher risk of dying after being discharged, compared with vaccinated patients. In a 2021 study, researchers at Yale University School of Medicine found that among hospitalized patients with Covid, approximately 30% develop acute kidney injury — an abrupt, usually reversible form of kidney dysfunction. Patients hospitalized with Covid were twice as likely to need dialysis than patients hospitalized for other reasons. There is a major limitation in the new study. The researchers did not have the full data on baseline kidney status for the patients —meaning, it's not known how well their kidneys were functioning before the infection — so the benefits of the vaccine may be overestimated or underestimated, said Dr. Scott Roberts, associate medical director of infection prevention at Yale School of Medicine, who was not part of the new study. How Covid can damage the kidneys Covid can injure the kidneys either directly or by damaging other organs such as the heart and lungs, Roberts said. The more severe the symptoms, the greater the risk. 'Conversely, mild or asymptomatic infections rarely cause significant kidney harm,' said Yong Chen, a professor of biostatistics and director of the Center for Health AI and Synthesis of Evidence at the University of Pennsylvania, who was not associated with the new study. Chen researches Covid complications, including kidney problems, in children and adolescents. The risk of post-Covid kidney complications is especially high in older people or the immunocompromised, but it's likely connected to the severity of the initial infection, rather than the virus itself, experts say. 'Comparing Covid to people hospitalized with flu, for example, shows that both have an elevated risk of kidney injury, and it seems to track with how sick they were during their hospitalization,' said Dr. F. Perry Wilson, associate professor of medicine and public health at Yale University School of Medicine who has studied kidney injury in Covid patients. 'Among people with Covid, I would expect that, all else being equal, the vaccinated group just has less severe disease and thus less kidney trouble.' Why vaccination may protect the kidneys 'Vaccination protects kidneys mainly by preventing the severe forms of Covid that cause kidney injury,' Chen said. 'While vaccines don't directly shield kidney cells, they blunt the systemic illness that otherwise leads to multi-organ failure.' However, both Covid infection and the vaccines may be risky for people with glomerulonephritis, a type of kidney disease where the filtering units known as glomeruli get damaged Dr. Jeffrey S. Berns, clinical nephrologist and professor of medicine and pediatrics at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, said there are reports of adults and children with glomerulonephritis having a relapse of the condition or developing the condition for the first time following Covid infection and also vaccination. Berns was not part of the study. Risks for children The study only applied to people 18 and older, but experts say children with Covid can get acute kidney injury and some of them may have permanent kidney damage. 'In a study led by our team, the results also showed that children with prior Covid had a 35% higher risk of new-onset chronic kidney disease over six months,' Chen said. In late May, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will no longer recommend routine Covid shots for healthy children and pregnant women. Doctors say it's too soon to know whether the revised guidelines would contribute to unvaccinated children's increased risk of kidney injury. Even as a new variant of the Covid virus is gaining momentum in the United States, there are fewer cases of acute kidney injury associated with the illness than in the early years of the pandemic. 'As more and more people got vaccinated and or had some degree of immunity from prior infection, disease severity was not as bad and AKI became much less common,' Berns said.

Goal to end AIDS by 2030 'more off-track' after Trump cuts, UNAIDS head says
Goal to end AIDS by 2030 'more off-track' after Trump cuts, UNAIDS head says

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Goal to end AIDS by 2030 'more off-track' after Trump cuts, UNAIDS head says

JOHANNESBURG, June 13 (Reuters) - Donald Trump's cuts to HIV/AIDS programmes will further derail an already faltering plan to end the disease as a public health threat by 2030, UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima said on Friday. With 1.3 million new infections in 2023, according to the latest data, the world was already "off track," Byanyima told journalists in South Africa, a country with the world's largest number of people living with HIV, at 8 million. "Less funding means we will get more and more off-track," she said in the main city of Johannesburg, after meeting President Cyril Ramaphosa to discuss Africa's HIV/AIDS strategy in light of the U.S. president slashing billions of dollars in foreign aid in February. "We don't know yet what that impact will be, but impact there will be: ... already you see in several countries a drop in the number of people going to clinics," Byanyima said. Before the cuts, prevention programmes had brought down new infections, she said, but they were "not coming down fast enough to reach our target of 2023." Now, with the shuttering of community prevention clinics across Africa, infections would surely rise, though it wasn't clear yet by how much, she said. The administration's decision to axe swaths of U.S. foreign aid has disrupted the supply of life-saving HIV treatments, with some countries facing potentially running out. In South Africa, about a fifth of whose HIV budget was U.S.-funded, testing and monitoring of HIV patients is already falling. Byanyima said even poor, indebted countries were managing to plug funding gaps, but called on other rich nations to step in. "We're saying to the donors: this is one of the diseases ... without a cure, without a vaccine, yet we're seeing progress," she said. "If you've got a good success story, why drop it ... before you end it?"

Lidl urgently recalls breakfast staple over concerns it contains pieces of metal
Lidl urgently recalls breakfast staple over concerns it contains pieces of metal

Daily Record

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Lidl urgently recalls breakfast staple over concerns it contains pieces of metal

Shoppers have since been urged not to consume the product. Lidl shoppers have been warned not to eat a batch of hash browns. There are fears that the breakfast favourite may contain foreign bodies, making them "unsafe to eat." The German supermarket giant has issued a recall for its popular Harvest Basket Hash Browns after it was discovered that they "may contain pieces of metal." ‌ A food alert posted to the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has advised customers that the recall affects a 750g pack size, with the batch code 5144L and the best before date of May 24, 2027. ‌ The full risk statement posted to the FSA read: "This product may contain metal pieces which presents a choking hazard and makes it unsafe to eat." Due to the potential health risk, the supermarket has since advised customers who have bought the affected hash browns not to eat them but to return them to store where a full refund will be provided. For further information, shoppers are also being advised to contact the customer care line on or 0203 966 5566. Lidl said in its recall notice: "We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your cooperation." What is a food alert? Food alerts are issued by the FSA when there is a problem with a food product that means it should not be sold, leading to it either being 'withdrawn' or 'recalled' from store shelves. ‌ In response, the food watchdog issues alerts to let consumers and local authorities know the problems associated with the affected product. There are also 'allergy' alerts when a food is found to contain missing or incorrect allergy labelling, meaning that they could pose a potential health risk to certain customers. We recently reported that Iceland had recalled its popular 4 Sub Rolls because they contained undeclared barley (gluten), with the best before date June 2, 2025 affected. ‌ Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. On a more serious note, we also shared with customers that Brits had been urged to "dispose of" a popular brand of American sweets after they contained ingredients that were " compliant with UK laws". The FSA issued an urgent 'Food Alert For Action' that urged UK retailers to stop selling four types of Jolly Rancher confectionary products as they contained two mineral oils, with one being linked to an increase in cancer. ‌ All batch codes and dates of each bag of sweets were affected as they include Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons, (MOAH), and Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons, (MOSH), both which are not allowed in the UK. The Hershey Company, owner of Jolly Rancher, is said to have be working closely with the food watchdog to remove non-compliant and unsafe products from the UK market since 2024. While the company made the decision not to supply the UK market going forward, its products are still imported to the country, which is why the FSA has urged enforcing authorities to take action.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store