Romualdez: Impeachment court's move to return raps to House 'deeply concerning'
'Deeply concerning.'
That's how House Speaker Martin Romualdez described the Senate impeachment court's move to return the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte to the House.
"I rise, not in defiance, but with resolve, guided by duty, grounded in principle. The decision of the Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, to return the articles of impeachment is deeply concerning,' Romualdez said in his speech Wednesday night.
Romualdez, however, said that they "will comply with the requirements of the impeachment court" to ensure that the process continues.
"In matters of truth and accountability, the House does not back down,' said Romualdez.
The House of Representatives, meanwhile, has certified that the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte complied with the 1987 Constitution.
On a motion by Isabela Rep. Inno Dy, the House plenary deferred acceptance of the articles of impeachment until the Senate Impeachment Court has responded to the queries sought by the House prosecution panel regarding the remanding of the articles of impeachment.
With no objections, the motion was carried.
In a voice vote, the House plenary adopted House Resolution No. 2346, which certified that the impeachment initiated on February 5, 2025, against Sara Duterte fully complied with the constitution, including the circumstances on the filing of the first three impeachment complaints.
The Senate sitting as an impeachment court on Tuesday voted for the articles of impeachment to be returned to the House of Representatives without dismissing or terminating the case until such time that:
The House of Representatives certified to the non-violation of Article XI, Section 3, paragraph 5 of the Constitution, which provides that 'No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within one year; include the circumstances on the filing of the first three impeachment complaints"; and
The House of Representatives of the 20th Congress communicated to the Senate that it was willing and ready to pursue the impeachment complaint against the Vice President.
Those who voted yes include Senate President Chiz Escudero and Senators Ronald 'Bato' Dela Rosa, Robin Padilla, Christopher Lawrence "Bong" Go, Francis Tolentino, Imee Marcos, Cynthia Villar, Mark Villar, Jinggoy Estrada, JV Ejercito, Ramon Revilla Jr., Joel Villanueva, Lito Lapid, Alan Peter Cayetano, Pia Cayetano, Loren Legarda, Raffy Tulfo, and Juan Miguel Zubiri.
The negative votes came from Minority Leader Aquilino "Koko" Pimentel III, Deputy Minority Leader Risa Hontiveros, and Senators Grace Poe, Sherwin Gatchalian, and Nancy Binay. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Chua calls for neutrality after some senator-judges join Sara in Malaysia
House prosecution member Manila Representative Joel Chua on Friday called on senator-judges to observe neutrality in the impeachment of Sara Duterte after some of them joined the Vice President in a trip to Malaysia. This comes after Senator-judges Robin Padilla and Imee Marcos joined Duterte in Malaysia to commemorate Independence Day on Thursday. 'Ang nakalagay kasi sa rules of impeachment na ginawa po ng Senado dapat ay mag-exercise sila ng neutrality,' Chua told GMA Integrated News' Unang Balita in an interview. (What is stated in the rules of impeachment made by the Senate is that they should exercise neutrality.) 'Nakakalungkot nga dahil ilang senator-judges na nagpaliwanag, nagpahayag na talagang kahit anong mangyari ay nandoon sila sa panig ng kabila,' he added. (It is sad because several senator-judges already explained and stated that no matter what happens, they will side with the other camp.) Chua said the House prosecution team will discuss possible steps to address the issue. Aside from Chua, one of the authors of the 1987 Constitution, Christian Monsod, earlier said that Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa and Francis Tolentino should inhibit themselves from sitting as senator-judges after they sought to dismiss the impeachment case against Duterte. Motion for clarification Meanwhile, Chua said the House prosecution team is planning to file a motion for clarification on the order of the Senate or the impeachment court to remand the complaint back to the lower chamber. 'Kaya nga po kami ay magsusumite ng clarificatory para at least malinawan po kami sa kanilang aksyon,' Chua said. (That's why we will submit a clarificatory so that at least we can be clear about their actions.) 'Sa totoo lang dapat noong June 2 pa pinatawag na kami ng Senado. Dapat nandodoon na kami. Tapos ito ay na-move ng June 11. So, anong magiging epekto itong mga ginagawa po Senado para malaman din po namin kung saan po talaga pauusad itong mga pangyayari,' he added. (Actually, the Senate should have summoned us on June 2. We should have been there. Then it was moved to June 11. So what will be the impact of the Senate's actions so that we can also know where these events are really going.) On Tuesday, Senator-judge Alan Peter Cayetano moved to amend Senator Dela Rosa's motion to dismiss the case and instead made the motion that the articles of impeachment be returned to the House until such time that: The House of Representatives certify to the non violation of Article XI, Section 3, paragraph 5 of the Constitution, which provides that 'No impeachment proceedings shall be initiated against the same official more than once within one year; include the circumstances on the filing of the first three impeachment complaints"; and The House of Representatives of the 20th Congress communicates to the Senate that it is willing and ready to pursue the impeachment complaint against the Vice President. PhilConsa Philippine Constitution Association (PhilConsa) governor Dindo Garciano, however, pointed out that the motion for clarification will imply that the House has agreed that the Senate's order is correct. For Garciano, the House prosecutors should challenge the Senate's order by filing a motion for reconsideration instead. 'Ang sinasabi nga natin, unconstitutional at null and void ang order na yun. So mag-file ka ng motion for reconsideration. Atakehin mo yung order. Sabihin mo that your order, with all due respect your honors, is null and void, its void ab initio, from the very beginning,' Garciano said in a separate interview on Unang Balita. (What we are saying is that order is unconstitutional, null, and void. So file a motion for reconsideration. Attack the order. Say that your order, with all due respect your honors, is null and void, its void ab initio, from the very beginning.) 'You have no business to tell us to prove that our Articles of Impeachment or complaint is unconstitutional or not. It is not for us, the burden of proof is not on us to prove the constitutionality. It is for the defender to prove that our Articles of Impeachment is unconstitutional,' he added. (You have no business to tell us to prove that our Articles of Impeachment or complaint is unconstitutional or not. It is not for us, the burden of proof is not on us to prove the constitutionality. It is for the defender to prove that our Articles of Impeachment is unconstitutional.) Garciano also pointed out that Duterte's defense team should be the one raising such a concern and not the Senate who is sitting as an impeachment court. Duterte was impeached by the House on February 5 with more than 200 congressmen endorsing the verified complaint against her. The vice president was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte has denied the allegations. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
14 hours ago
- GMA Network
Dela Rosa, Tolentino must inhibit as senator-judges in VP Sara impeachment trial —Monsod
One of the authors of the 1987 Constitution believes Senators Ronald 'Bato' dela Rosa and Francis Tolentino should inhibit themselves from sitting as senator-judges after they sought to dismiss the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. According to Ian Cruz's report in '24 Oras' on Thursday, lawyer Christian Monsod said the two senators must recuse themselves from the impeachment trial following statements both have made. 'I think they should, Senator Bato and Senator Tolentino, they should think about recusing themselves…The source of legitimacy is independence. If they're incapable of independent thinking, I think they should withdraw and say, you know, we're not participating,' he said. Dela Rosa earlier called for the dismissal of the impeachment complaint even without undergoing trial. 'I respectfully move that in view of constitutional infirmities and questions on the jurisdiction and authority of the 20th Congress, the verified impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte be dismissed,' he said. Meanwhile, Tolentino said the trial is considered 'functionally dismissed' if it extends beyond June 30. 'If we cannot conclude the trial before June 30, 2025, we must recognize this impeachment case as functionally dismissed by constitutional operation,' he said. GMA Integrated News reached out to Tolentino for comment. Dela Rosa, on the other hand, said he will not inhibit from participating in the impeachment trial as he does not see anything wrong with their call for its dismissal. For his part, former Integrated Bar of the Philippines national president Domingo Cayosa said the impeachment court is different from the regular courts. 'Dito ho kasi sa Senate impeachment court is a class by itself. They have their own rules,' he said. Cayosa added that inhibiting someone from acting as senator-judge in the trial won't be easy. 'Maaari pero pagbobotohan nila 'yan ulit and it will be very contentious. Wala kasing specific provision doon, unlike the rules of court and many other rules of administrative bodies,' he said. (They can vote on that and it will be very contentious. Because there's no specific provision on that unlike the rules of court and many other rules of administrative bodies.) But Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said that they cannot stop anyone if he decides to inhibit from the impeachment trial. 'Desisyon nila kung magi-inhibit o magre-recuse sila. Hindi 'yan subject matter of vote…Walang ganoong klaseng procedure o proseso sa impeachment court man o sa regular court,' he said. (That's their decision if they will inhibit or recuse. That's should not be a subject matter of vote…There's no such procedure whether in the impeachment court or in the regular court.) In the event a senator allied with Duterte inhibits from the trial, Paulo Tamase of the University of the Philippines College of Law said, 'Ang requirement sa Saligang Batas is two-thirds of all of the members of the Senate. Majority is based on who votes, that is a rule that applies to the courts. Halimbawa, may mag-recuse na isa, 22 na lang ba bibilangin natin o out of 24. Hindi 'yan klaro sa Saligang Batas. Possible naman na may mag-recuse talaga.' (The requirement under the Constitution is there should be two-thirds of the members of the Senate. So the majority is based on who votes and that applies to the courts. For example, someone recused, so does it mean we only have 22 out of 24. That was not clear in the Constitution. But it's really possible that someone would recuse.) —Vince Angelo Ferreras/RF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
17 hours ago
- GMA Network
Senate OKs priority bills before adjourning sine die
Several legislative priorities of the Marcos administration were ratified by the Senate before the 19th Congress adjourned sine die on Wednesday night. These included the bicameral conference committee reports on the Enhanced Fiscal Regime for Large-Scale Metallic Mining Act and the Accelerated and Reformed Right-of-Way (ARROW) Act, which were both listed as 'top priority' measures of the Legislative-Executive Development Council (LEDAC). The ratified bicam report on the Enhanced Fiscal Regime for Large-Scale Metallic Mining Act came from Senate Bill No. 2826 and House Bill No. 8937. According to Senator JV Ejercito, the reconciled version allows a five percent royalty based on gross output on mines operating within mineral reservation and a 5-tier royalty rate ranging from one percent to five percent based on margin from metallic mining operations for those outside mineral reservations. With the reforms in large-scale mining, the senator believes the government would benefit from an additional P6 billion worth of revenues. Senator Risa Hontiveros, however, opposed the measure, saying that it rejected amendments on increasing royalties for indigenous communities affected by mining, and imposing an export tax to fund the National Industrialization Program. Meanwhile, the ARROW Act was ratified by the upper chamber through the bicam report on the disagreeing provisions of Senate Bill No. 2821 and House Bill No. 6571. Senator Mark Villar, sponsor of the bill in the Senate, said that the measure is important in addressing the right-of-way issues that delay government infrastructure projects. 'Many projects have failed to meet their target completion dates due to unresolved right-of-way delays. Given these challenges, we welcome the amendment of the existing right-of-way law. The ARROW Act introduces key reforms to make the law more responsive to the evolving infrastructure landscape,' Villar said. The Senate also ratified the bicam report seeking to extend the term of barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials to four years. The report also postpones the 2025 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections from December 2025 to the first Monday of November 2026 Also ratified by the Senate on Wednesday night were bicam reports on the following: Judiciary Fiscal Autonomy Act (Senate Bill No. 2982 and House Bill No. 11358); An Act amending Sections 134 and 168 of Republic Act No. 8424, otherwise known as the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended (Senate Committee Report No. 581 and House Bill No. 10535); Philippine Nuclear Energy Safety Act (Senate Bill No. 2899 and House Bill No. 9293); and Career Progression System for Public School Teachers and School Leaders Act (Senate Bill No. 3000 and House Bill No. 10270) — BM, GMA Integrated News
