Hartford profit surges as insurance demand, investment income climb
Despite reduced discretionary spending due to geopolitical and economic uncertainties, individuals and businesses continued prioritizing insurance investments to safeguard against risks.
This trend benefited multi-line insurers such as Hartford, which reported that property and casualty (P&C) written premiums rose by 8% in the second quarter.
Hartford's net investment income, before taxes, reached $664 million, jumping $62 million from the year-ago period, helped by the company's reinvestment at higher interest rates.
The company reported net income available to common stockholders of $990 million, or $3.44 per share, for the three months ended June 30, compared with $733 million, or $2.44 per share, in the year-earlier period.
Shares of the company, which have gained nearly 11% this year, rose 1% in after-hours trading.
Earlier this year, Hartford refreshed its brand and shortened its name from The Hartford Financial Services Group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aviva took six months to transfer my pension - and it cost me £7,000: SALLY SORTS IT
I had three pensions with Aviva worth £140,607 that I wanted to transfer to investment firm Vanguard. I made the request on November 27 last year, as I wanted the money in my Vanguard account in good time by April 5, 2025, so I could have some income from it in that tax year. However, this was not possible because Aviva delayed transferring them. Please can you help? G.W., Maidstone, Kent. Sally Hamilton replies: When you asked to transfer your pensions from Aviva, Vanguard suggested it would take around four to eight weeks. This gave you plenty of breathing space – or so you thought – to get the transaction done, so you could take an income from the transferred pot before the tax year ended. But it wasn't until April 2 – with just three days left of the last tax year – that Aviva finally told you by letter that the payment had been issued, including £2,638 in late interest. You checked your Aviva account online and found it was indeed closed, with no funds remaining. But to your frustration it had not reached Vanguard. The delays continued. Two weeks (and nine chasing phone calls to Aviva customer service) later, Aviva revealed that the payment couldn't be made as the bank had not authorised it. It gave no explanation but told you not to worry as it would go through in a couple of days. It didn't. Your blood pressure climbed when staff said it would take four weeks to investigate your complaint. After four weeks your frustration was off the charts, when they told you they were still looking into it and asked you to allow them another four weeks. All this time you had neither access to your pension – and nor was it invested. Every time you tried to speak to someone with authority, you ended going round in circles, with calls either not returned – or missed – and when you called back, the manager who had left you a message wasn't known to the call handler. It was time for me to give Aviva a serious prod. Within a few days Aviva finally got a grip on your case and your money landed with Vanguard a few days later. Details were not given of what exactly went wrong except the company admitted a blunder. A spokesman says: 'We are extremely sorry for the delay in transferring Mr W's pensions, and the distress this has caused him. 'This was due to an error on our part. I can confirm that the full payment has now been transferred and received by Vanguard.' Last week, Aviva finally completed a loss assessment after liaising with Vanguard. This took several weeks of to-ing and fro-ing between it and Vanguard. In the end, taking into account late and lost interest, plus potential tax liability faced by you for taking the money in the current tax year rather than last year as planned, plus £750 as an apology, you have received total recompense of £8,096. Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 9 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@ — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chiefs donate to Missouri Republicans after $1.5b stadium proposal as Kansas pushes NFL team to flee state
Don't count out the Show Me State just yet. With Kansas eagerly trying to lure the NFL's Chiefs and MLB's Royals across state lines, the reigning AFC champions have made $25,000 in donations to republican candidates for the Missouri House amid the team's ongoing efforts to secure renovation funding for Arrowhead Stadium. The donation, first reported by the Missouri Independent, comes shortly after a $1.5 billion stadium funding plan was approved by the state legislature in hopes of convincing the Chiefs and MLB's Royals to remain in Missouri. The Missouri Independent reports the Chiefs spent more than $3 million and the Royals added another $2.5 million last year to support a ballot measure extending sales taxes to fund renovations at Arrowhead Stadium as well as a new ballpark in downtown Kansas City. The donations come at a convenient time for team officials and representatives hoping to avoid the negative publicity that typically comes with publicly funded stadium constructions and renovations. Not only are the Chiefs gearing up for another Super Bowl run - potentially the final chance for 35-year-old Travis Kelce - but the tight end also welcomed girlfriend and Donald Trump nemesis Taylor Swift onto his popular podcast this week, thereby drawing the spotlight away from Arrowhead Stadium's future. Meanwhile, with fans focused on the Chiefs' immediate future, team officials have pressed ahead with varying options for a future home. After decades of playing alongside each other at the Truman Sports Complex, the Chiefs and Royals will each see their respective leases expire in January of 2031. While the Chiefs have supported republican candidates in this effort, the Missouri Independent reports that two GOP state legislators filed lawsuits in July to defeat the measure, which they called 'unconstitutional' because it also addressed matters unrelated to stadiums. Despite Missouri's efforts, neighboring Kansas remains a potential destination for both the Chiefs and Royals. Last month, a committee in the Kansas legislature extended a deadline for both teams to accept state financing for new stadiums. And the teams are hearing competitive offers from both Kansas and Missouri. Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe initially approved legislation to authorize bonds to pay for up to 50 percent of the cost of stadium construction (Royals) and renovation (Chiefs). Kansas responded by offering bonds that could cover 70 percent of those costs should either team choose to switch states, but Missouri has since followed with an additional funding package. 'We've had more meetings, more discussions,' Chiefs president Mark Donovan said in July. 'At this point it's literally - you're taking an agreement this long and whittling it down to this paragraph and this line, and we need an agreement on this, and we're doing this on both sides. You're in that process where you're not sure which way it will go.' Previously, in April of 2024, Jackson County rejected a sales tax proposal that would have helped to renovate Arrowhead Stadium while providing the Royals with a ballpark in downtown Kansas City, Missouri.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
MIAX-parent Miami International set for NYSE debut after $345 million IPO
Aug 14 (Reuters) - Miami International Holdings (MIAX.N), opens new tab, the parent of exchange operator MIAX, will begin trading on the NYSE later on Thursday, ending a 15-year drought in flotations by U.S. financial exchanges. The Princeton, New Jersey-based company sold 15 million shares above the marketed range of $19 to $21 apiece to raise $345 million on Wednesday, one of the biggest listings of a U.S. bourse operator. Only a handful of U.S. exchange operators have gone public since the 2000s and Miami International's listing had been a long time coming as the company confidentially filed for an IPO in 2022. CME Group (CME.O), opens new tab was the first U.S. exchange to go public in 2002, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE.Z), opens new tab listed in 2010. Exchanges have also thrived this year as heightened market volatility fueled record trading volumes and boosted profits. MIAX entered the fray in 2007 after a wave of consolidation amongst equity and options exchanges. It is led by Thomas Gallagher, one of its principal founders. "I'm not worried about fragmentation. I'm not worried about the aspects of having a very diverse set of exchanges," Gallagher told Reuters in an interview. "I just think it's a matter of those that have the right technology, those that have the right infrastructure, the right relationships with their market participants." While MIAX operates nine exchanges across asset classes such as equities and futures, the majority of its revenue comes from options trading. The company launched its first options exchange in 2012 and has gained market share from rivals over the past decade. In the first half of 2025, it had a 16% market share in the U.S. options industry, behind only the NYSE, Nasdaq, and Cboe, according to the Options Clearing Corporation. MIAX launched its fourth U.S. equity options exchange last year. While it currently does not have any products involving crypto futures, the company is open to expanding its offerings if the opportunity comes. "If a crypto partner comes to me and says, we'd like to do a joint venture to bring a crypto offering, either to your futures exchange or some type of an option on some crypto index, we're open for business," Gallagher said. Besides buyout firm Warburg Pincus, Miami International is backed by trading firms Susquehanna and Wolverine.
