Colorado rally attack suspect charged with federal hate crime in US
A Colorado man has been charged with a federal hate crime for his alleged role in a bomb attack on a pro-Israeli rally in Boulder that injured eight people, according to an affidavit issued by the US Department of Justice.
Mohamed Sabry Soliman was already facing an array of state charges, including attempted murder, after the attack on Sunday in the city of Boulder on a group seeking to draw attention to hostages seized in Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel.
US Attorney General Pam Bondi said the suspect would be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law for what was described as an 'antisemitic terror attack'.
The affidavit said Soliman, 45, had planned the attack for more than a year. Investigators found 14 Molotov cocktails filled with petrol or gasoline near where the suspect was detained.
The police also found a petrol canister in his car parked nearby and a weed sprayer filled with petrol at the scene. Soliman told investigators that he had learned how to make the firebombs from YouTube.
The affidavit references a video posted on social media during the attack showing Soliman 'shirtless, pacing back and forth while holding what appear to be Molotov cocktails'.
The suspect, who was being detained in lieu of $10m bail, according to official records, told police he 'wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead', the affidavit said.
The burst of violence at the popular Pearl Street pedestrian mall, a four-block area in downtown Boulder, unfolded against the backdrop of Israel's war on Gaza that continues to inflame global tensions and has contributed to a spike in anti-Semitic violence in the United States.
The attack happened at the beginning of the Jewish holiday of Shavuot, which is marked with the reading of the Torah and barely a week after a man who also yelled 'Free Palestine' was charged with fatally shooting two Israeli embassy staffers outside a Jewish museum in Washington.
According to the complaint, Soliman lived with his wife and five children in Colorado Springs, a city about 161km (100 miles) south of Boulder. The affidavit says that he waited until after his daughter's graduation to conduct the attack.
Few other details were available about him.
Todd Lyons, acting director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said Soliman had overstayed a tourist visa and had an expired work permit.
Federal documents make no reference to his nationality, but the New York Times said he was Egyptian, citing the Department of Homeland Security.
The Departments of Homeland Security and Justice did not respond to requests for comment. The Denver office of the FBI, which is handling the case, did not immediately respond to emails or phone calls seeking details in the case.
Officials from the Boulder County Jail, Boulder Police and Boulder County Sheriff's Office did not immediately respond to inquiries.
'There are millions of individuals like this that we are attempting to locate from the past administration that weren't properly screened that were allowed in,' Lyons said during a press conference in Boston. 'I will tell you that's a huge effort for ICE right now.'
Under former US President Joe Biden, ICE prioritised arrests of serious criminals and called for officers to consider humanitarian factors when making arrests.
Lyons declined to provide more information, but a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson previously said Soliman had entered the country in August 2022 and filed for asylum the following month. 'The suspect, Mohamed Soliman, is illegally in our country,' the spokesperson said.
President Donald Trump criticised Biden over the incident.
'Yesterday's horrific attack in Boulder, Colorado, WILL NOT BE TOLERATED in the United States of America,' Trump said on his Truth Social network, describing it as a 'terrible tragedy'.
He blamed 'Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy' for allowing Soliman into the country.
'This is yet another example of why we must keep our Borders SECURE, and deport Illegal, Anti-American Radicals from our Homeland,' he wrote.
Four women and four men between 52 and 88 years of age were transported to hospitals after the attack, Boulder police said.
The attack took place on the Pearl Street Mall, a popular pedestrian shopping district near the University of Colorado, during an event organised by Run for Their Lives, a group devoted to drawing attention to the hostages seized in the aftermath of Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel.
Rabbi Yisroel Wilhelm, the Chabad director at the University of Colorado, Boulder, told CBS Colorado that the 88-year-old victim was a Holocaust refugee who fled Europe.
Sunday's attack was not the first high-profile incident of mass violence in Boulder, a university town that attracts many young professionals and outdoor enthusiasts. In 2021, a gunman fatally shot 10 people, including an off-duty police officer, in a local supermarket.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Disgusting abomination': Why is Elon Musk slamming Trump's budget bill?
Billionaire Elon Musk has lashed out at United States President Donald Trump's budget bill, describing it as a 'disgusting abomination', less than a week after he left the administration and at a time when the legislation is expected to come up for voting before the Senate. The so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' passed in the House of Representatives in late May has come under increasing scrutiny not just from opposition Democrats but from sections of conservatives, including a handful of Republican senators, and Musk. Musk, who headed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), set up by Trump to cut waste in public spending, left the administration on May 29. He had criticised the bill a day before his stint in government ended, but in much more muted language than the words he used on Tuesday. But why is Musk so opposed to the bill, why is the legislation so important to Trump, and how does it square with the president's other stated fiscal priorities? 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'In another post, Musk wrote, 'Mammoth spending bills are bankrupting America! ENOUGH.' The world's richest man continued his tirade against the bill on Wednesday. 'This immense level of overspending will drive America into debt slavery!' he wrote on X. Musk claimed the bill would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion'. The US government's budget deficit has been rising. It stood at $1.83 trillion in the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. This is not the first time that Musk has criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', even mocking its name in a television interview in late May. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it can be both. My personal opinion,' Musk told CBS journalist David Pogue on May 27. He added that he was 'disappointed to see the massive spending bill'. At DOGE, Musk was tasked with slashing US government infrastructure – a mandate that saw his team push through a significant culling of the federal workforce, with thousands laid off. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the government's foreign aid diplomacy arm, was also gutted, leaving critical public health initiatives, among others, struggling for survival in several emerging economies. In the interview with Pogue, Musk suggested that profligate government spending through the bill would undercut the gains made by DOGE in saving tax dollars. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is the centrepiece of Trump's legislative agenda and aims to deliver on a series of his campaign promises. It extends the tax cuts Trump introduced during his first term in office in 2017. At the same time, however, it earmarks funding for other priorities of the current administration. It sets aside, for instance, $46.5bn to continue work on constructing barriers along the US-Mexico border to stop migrants and refugees from entering the country. On social media, Trump has described the bill – characteristically, in all caps – as a 'WINNER' and as a 'BIG GROWTH BILL'. The bill carries financial – and many believe political – costs. To finance Trump's priorities, the bill in its current form would dramatically cut social security programmes that millions of Americans depend on. Funding for Medicaid subsidies will drop by $698bn, according to estimates by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). More than 71 million Americans were enrolled under Medicaid as of January 2025, according to government data. The programme offers health insurance to low-income Americans. The bill will also snip $267bn in funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known as food stamps, according to the CBO. An estimated 41 million Americans used food stamps in 2024. Many critics of the bill have said these cuts leave the most vulnerable Americans even more exposed to healthcare crises and food shortages. But others, especially at the conservative end of the political spectrum, have pointed to how the bill will further bloat the country's debt. The current US federal debt limit stands at $36.1 trillion, set on January 2, 2025. But that gives the government no leeway to borrow any more, since the federal government is currently $36.2 trillion in debt. The new bill proposes raising the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. That has angered some Republicans. Rand Paul, a Republican senator from Kentucky, on Tuesday backed Musk's criticism of the bill. 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending,' Paul wrote on X. 'We can and must do better.' Paul has said he will try to block the bill in its current form in the Senate, where Republicans have a razor-thin majority. In the House, the bill passed with 215 votes in favour, and 214 against: all Democrats voted against it, joined by two Republicans, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio. Yes, in many ways, the bill's proposal to raise the debt ceiling contradicts another Trump campaign promise – to cut debt. DOGE was set up with that in mind, and the Trump administration has justified slashing foreign aid by arguing that it would curb US debt. Trump has also argued that the tariffs he has imposed – and wants to impose – on a range of countries and goods will help the US trim its debt, though many economists have challenged the logic behind that claim.
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
In Gaza, even humanitarian aid 'has been politicised'
Colin Clarke, the research director at The Soufan Group, discusses the chaotic US-backed aid distribution drive in Gaza and explains why trained professionals must lead the effort.
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump's 50% steel and aluminium tariffs take effect
In a move that has reignited trade tensions with key allies, United States President Donald Trump has doubled tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. The new rates, which came into effect early on Wednesday, raise duties from 25 percent to 50 percent. Trump says the measure is designed to bolster the struggling US metals sector. 'We started at 25 and then, after studying the data more, realised that it was a big help, but more help is needed. And so that is why the 50 [percent tariff] is starting tomorrow,' said White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett during a steel industry event in Washington on Tuesday. The executive order applies to all trading partners except the United Kingdom, which has reached a provisional trade deal with Washington during a 90-day pause on broader tariffs. British exports will continue to face a 25 percent rate until at least July 9. The hike is expected to weigh heavily on Canada and Mexico, two of the US's closest economic allies and among the largest suppliers of steel. Census Bureau data shows Canada alone exports more aluminium to the US than the rest of the top 10 countries combined. Almost half of the US aluminium consumption is imported. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney's office confirmed that 'intensive and live negotiations' were ongoing to remove the tariffs. Mexico's Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard slammed the decision as irrational, noting the imbalance in steel trade between the two nations. 'It makes no sense for the United States to levy a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,' he said, adding that Mexico would seek an exemption. The European Union criticised the decision, saying it 'strongly regrets' the move and warned it could take retaliatory action, accusing Washington of undermining attempts at a negotiated settlement. OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira told the AFP news agency that the tariffs have already dampened global trade, investment and consumption, and that the US will bear the brunt of the fallout. While several of Trump's tariff measures face legal scrutiny, they remain in force during the appeals process.
