Storks migrate back to conservation project at Knepp estate
Storks born in England have successfully returned home after migrating to Morocco.The White Stork Project, launched in 2016, releases young storks at the Knepp estate in West Sussex and Wadhurst Park in East Sussex to encourage the birds to later return there to nest.At least six birds born at Knepp in 2024 returned to nest in the colony, including one who has set up home in the same tree as her parents, according to project officer Laura Vaughan-Hirsch.Knepp estate owner Isabella Tree said the estate's storks were "interacting with wild birds and bringing wild birds back with them as pairs".
Storks stopped breeding in Britain centuries ago due to hunting and habitat loss.Birds now living at Knepp had given birth to more than a dozen fledglings by May and about 40 more were expected in 2025.
The project began reintroducing storks to southern England in 2016 by taking on rescued, non-flying birds from Warsaw Zoo, in Poland, breeding them at Cotswold Wildlife Park, then releasing their young in Sussex.Other Polish storks, some of which have injuries that mean they can fly short distances but not migrate, live in or around a fox-proof enclosure at Knepp, breeding and establishing the founding colonies that will attract other storks.Baby ground-nesting storks are hand-fed pieces of fish to supplement food their parents can source in the pen.The storks' success at Knepp showed that "sort the habitat out, the soils, insects, healthy water systems, and then your storks will come eventually," Ms Vaughan-Hirsch said."We all see the white stork as a big charismatic species but what it really is, is an emblem for nature recovery."The landscape at Knepp has undergone rewilding since 2000, converting agricultural land into scrub, disturbed ground and grassland.There are also areas of woodland, the nearby river has been restored to a more natural state, and reintroduced beavers in an enclosure have turned a small stream into insect-filled wetlands.Ms Tree added: "What are we are seeing is that even species that don't have a reputation as being keystone species have an effect on ecosystems."They are doing extraordinary things that we had never really known about."
Additional reporting by PA Media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Bournemouth late night fire near bars and clubs extinguished
Fire crews have extinguished a large late night blaze in a commercial property on a busy road near bars and and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service (DWFRS) said it was called to the fire on Old Christchurch Road, in Bournemouth, at about 00:50 BST on said 10 crews from across the county, alongside the aerial platform unit and a Hampshire-based crew, responded to the fire in a ground-floor Police said its officers also attended the incident to assist with road closures and evacuating the property involved and neighbouring properties. Fire crews from Springbourne, Redhill Park, Westbourne, Christchurch, Poole, Hamworthy, Wimborne, Blandford, Verwood and Ringwood responded to the said that on arrival, residents from the neighbouring flats had already fire was "quickly" brought under control, with eight breathing apparatus wearers using one main line and two hose reel jets to extinguish the stop came in at 02:31, with no casualties reported, DWFRS added. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Conservationists call for Lake District to lose Unesco world heritage status
Conservationists have launched a campaign to revoke the Lake District's Unesco world heritage status, arguing that it promotes unsustainable sheep farming at the expense of nature recovery and local communities. In a letter to Unesco, the ecologist Lee Schofield argues that the designation 'promotes a false perception of farming, is not economically sustainable, is working against crucial efforts to restore the natural environment and mitigate the impacts of climate change, does not help sustain farming livelihoods, is not wanted by local people and is contributing to damaging overtourism.' The campaign is backed by a report published by World Heritage Watch, co-authored by Schofield, Dr Karen Lloyd of Lancaster University and the University of Cumbria's Prof Ian Convery. They argue that the inscription elevates sheep farming over equally traditional mixed farming that includes cattle, pigs, horses and poultry. The Unesco designation celebrates the Lake District as a 'cultural landscape' shaped by traditional agro-pastoral farming, with sheep farming a central part of its identity. Schofield notes that the word 'sheep' appears 357 times in the Lake District's 716-page nomination document, far exceeding mentions of other traditional livestock. The authors calculate that the Lake District's 673,000 sheep comprise 90% of medium-sized mammal biomass, with wild mammals representing 3%. Schofield calls sheep farming 'both ecologically catastrophic and economically precarious', linking it to the fact that only 20.7% of the Lake District's sites of special scientific interest are in a favourable condition. Intensive sheep grazing can prevent tree regeneration, reduce biodiversity and cause erosion and compaction of soils. 'We're in a biodiversity and a climate crisis. But as important as cultural heritage might be, we're not in a cultural heritage crisis,' Schofield says. The Unesco designation provides no financial support for the farming practices it celebrates, while, according to critics, hindering the transition to climate- and nature-positive farming that is the main focus of post-Brexit farming funds. David Morris, of the bird and wildlife conservation charity RSPB, endorsed the report's claims. He said the designation 'has been misused to protect probably some of the most ecologically damaging and economically loss-making agriculture practices in the English uplands'. Morris argued that the inscription enabled 'nimbyism' against conservation efforts. When the RSPB replaced sheep with cattle and ponies on its Haweswater site, locals cited world heritage status in opposition. 'People are able to use the world heritage thing to lobby against progressive change for nature recovery,' he said. The RSPB and other environmental NGOs are considering raising concerns directly with Unesco. The concerns echo warnings from the Guardian columnist George Monbiot in 2017 that world heritage status would 'lock the Lake District into its current, shocking state, ensuring that recovery becomes almost impossible' while boosting tourism unsustainably. Visitor numbers have risen from 16.4 million in 2015 to more than 18 million a year, with 22 million projected by 2040. Lloyd says intense tourism is driving house prices beyond local families' reach and overwhelming infrastructure. 'The Lake District world heritage inscription is presiding over the death of the landscape and its communities – both wild and human.' However, the view that world heritage status is hindering progressive farming is contested. Jane Barker, a farmer and former deputy chair of the Lake District National Park Authority, said the designation 'hasn't really made a difference' to her farm business. 'I don't recognise what [Schofield] has said in terms of [world heritage] putting a brake on things,' she said. Farming within the designation could be 'perfectly compatible with net zero, climate change, biodiversity, water quality', she said, adding: 'There is an appetite amongst the older and the younger generations [of farmers] to embrace that change.' Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Julia Aglionby, a professor of practice at the University of Cumbria and executive director of the Foundation for Common Land, argues that world heritage protection of traditional practices was necessary. 'In parts of the Lake District, some people would like to take all the sheep off. I personally think that's an erosion of cultural heritage,' she said. Aglionby disputed that revoking world heritage status was the answer. She said: 'The main issue is that we haven't had an effective public money for public goods policy.' Rather than world heritage blocking environmental schemes, Aglionby said, 'most farmers I know are really keen to get into schemes. Their concern is that there aren't schemes available.' If successful, the campaign would mark the second loss of UK world heritage status, after Liverpool's waterfront was stripped of its designation in 2021. Steve Ratcliffe, the director of sustainable development for the Lake District National Park Authority, said: 'We recognise the urgent challenges facing biodiversity, climate and farming. Whilst changes in land management are necessary to support nature recovery and climate resilience, this should take place with consideration to the area's cultural heritage.' Unesco did not respond to a request to comment.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Dear Richard Madeley: ‘My housemate and I kissed and now she's avoiding me'
Dear Richard, I'm living in a shared house with one man and two women, one of whom is an old friend from university. We are all in our early 30s. We get on pretty well but tend to socialise with our own groups of friends outside the house – we don't do big Sunday lunches together or anything like that. A couple of weeks ago, one of the women – the one I don't know well – asked me if I wanted to go out to the pub. We went for a few drinks, and then we kissed on the way back to the house. Nothing has been said since, and I get the feeling she's avoiding me. I don't want her to feel uncomfortable about what happened, but I worry that if I try to clear the air I'll just make things worse. It's fine if she thinks it was a mistake – while I don't exactly hate the idea of our revisiting some sort of romantic situation, I haven't fallen head-over-heels in love or anything, plus I don't want to upset the 'chemistry' of the house. It's just that it now feels really awkward. Should I try to talk to her? –Ben, via email Dear Ben Hmm. I've always been cautious about initiating 'clear the air' conversations. In my experience, they can have the opposite effect, leaving the atmosphere clouded by confusion, embarrassment – and even antagonism. Often the wiser course is simply to let things lie and resolve themselves with the passage of time. If this woman is avoiding you, it's precisely because she doesn't want an air-clearing exchange with you. Maybe she's simply embarrassed about your brief clinch on the way home, or she feels guilty about it for some reason, or she just plain regrets it. Whatever the reason, she obviously doesn't want to talk about it. You should be sensitive to that. And in any case, it's hardly a big deal, is it? It was only a kiss or two (or maybe three?). These things happen. And if she wants to pretend that it didn't, I'd go along with it if I were you. Least said, soonest mended.
