
The Quebec government is promising to help businesses affected by tariffs. Can it afford to?
Social Sharing
The Quebec government has posted a historic budget deficit, is currently trying to scale back spending and is facing the threat of U.S. President Donald Trump imposing tariffs that would decimate the province's economy.
If the tariffs come, Premier François Legault has signalled that the province would step in with short-term loans to mitigate the impact of layoffs.
But economists and experts say Quebec is in an unfavourable financial position at an inopportune moment. As the province weighs potentially costly measures to counteract tariff impacts, they warn that any relief measures would have to be extremely targeted or they would risk putting the province's books into an even more dire state.
Preetika Joshi, an assistant professor of accounting at McGill University's Desautels Faculty of Management, said in an interview that the Quebec government has funds set aside for emergencies — exactly like the kind posed by Trump's tariffs. But she said the province's deficit spending might mean the government needs to be more surgical with its response.
"Just because they're running a deficit doesn't mean they don't have the physical capacity or ability to help companies. It's a little bit constrained," she said. "What it means is that whatever funds they have, they're going to have to deploy them in a more efficient manner."
Joshi said the government may have to take on more debt to respond to tariffs. That may seem like a distasteful prospect — Quebec's debt burden stands at roughly 38 per cent of its GDP — but she said that amount is in line with most other provinces and OECD countries.
Economists say the tariffs would likely plunge the Canadian economy into a recession. When the economy is in recession, government incomes drop. Combined with the cost of whatever tariff relief measures Quebec would implement, that poses a unique fiscal challenge.
WATCH | Quebec's aluminum industry at risk:
How tariffs on Quebec's massive aluminum exports could have ripple effects across the economy
26 days ago
Duration 2:57
Moshe Lander, an economics professor at Concordia University, said the Quebec government has been mismanaging its finances — spending too much, running deficits — when the economy was doing well.
"What are they going to do when the economy starts shrinking? They're going to have to run an even bigger deficit," he said. "But the problem is that the accumulated deficits over time add up to larger and larger debts, and those debts have to be financed."
In March of last year, Quebec Finance Minister Eric Girard announced that the province was projecting a deficit of $11 billion. However, in November, Girard said the economy was doing a bit better than expected. He announced more than $2 billion in new spending, despite the historic deficit projected.
Unemployment rate could rise, report says
A recent Desjardins Group report titled "Tariff Turmoil Foreshadows an Eventful Budget Season," projected that Canada's provinces collectively have up to $100 billion to provide relief to industries and individuals affected by tariffs.
However, the report noted Quebec's position was more vulnerable to tariffs than other provinces, in part because nearly eight per cent of the province's output is directly linked to U.S. exports. It said a blanket 25 per cent tariff on Canadian exports could see Quebec's unemployment rate rise — both through direct and indirect job losses — to 7.5 per cent.
Jimmy Jean, the chief economist at Desjardins Group, said provincial governments like Quebec have some "automated stabilizers" in place to soften the blow of job losses, which include employment insurance.
Quebec also has the ability to invest in "reskilling" workers — teaching them new professions and transitioning them to sectors less intertwined with the U.S. economy, Jean said. Legault has suggested workers could be retrained to work on hydroelectric projects. Jean said it's not clear how feasible that is, but it is an example of a way the provincial government could counter tariffs.
But those programs would be expensive and government revenue loss from a tariff-induced recession would also likely be substantial, he said, leading to more government debt. Jean said that's not necessarily a bad thing, as long as it leads to more economic growth in the future.
"The question is more 'what kind of measures do you roll out in order to boost productivity and economic growth over the long term?'" he said. "That's where decision making will be very important. It's certainly not the same kind of environment that we have during the pandemic, especially when you look at interest rates being much higher now."
Joshi and Lander, the accounting professor and the economist, both noted how burdensome it is for companies to do business in Quebec and how reducing that burden could be one way the government responds to tariffs.
Corporate tax rates are high in the province and things like language laws add barriers and costs.
"This government has created some of the most extreme interprovincial barriers," Lander said.
"Would they be willing to sacrifice some of those right now, relax some of those rules right now to try and give flexibility to the economy, to try and give Quebec export markets within Canada that otherwise wouldn't exist? I don't know that they're willing to do that. So they very much are part of this problem."
In a post on X Wednesday afternoon following more tariff talk at the White House, Legault said the province is ready to "speed things up" regarding interprovincial trade.
"Faced with a market of 340 million people about to impose tariffs on us, it makes perfect sense to increase our trade with the 32 million Canadians outside Quebec," he wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Wall Street drifts lower as Boeing sags and Oracle rallies
NEW YORK — U.S. stocks are drifting lower on Thursday as momentum wanes from their big rally that had brought them to the brink of their record. The S&P 500 was 0.3% lower in early trading. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 246 points, or 0.6%, as of 9:35 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.3% lower. Boeing was one of the main reasons for the Dow's struggles. It lost 5.5% after Air India said a London-bound flight crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport Thursday with 242 passengers and crew onboard. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a residential area near the airport five minutes after taking off. The cause of the crash wasn't immediately known. In the bond market, Treasury yields eased following another encouraging update on inflation. Thursday's said inflation at the wholesale level wasn't as bad last month as economists expected, and it followed a report on Wednesday saying something similar about the inflation that U.S. consumers are feeling. Wall Street took it as a signal that the Federal Reserve will have more leeway to cut interest rates later this year in order to give the economy a boost. The Federal Reserve has been hesitant to lower interest rates, and it's been on hold so far this year after cutting at the end of last year, because it's been waiting to see how much President Donald Trump's tariffs will hurt the economy and raise inflation. While lower rates can goose the economy by encouraging businesses and households to borrow, they can also accelerate inflation. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.36% from 4.41% late Wednesday and from roughly 4.80% early this year. Besides the inflation data, a separate report on jobless claims also helped to weigh on Treasury yields. It said slightly more U.S. workers applied for unemployment benefits last week than economists expected, and the total number remained at the highest level in eight months. On Wall Street, Oracle jumped 9.6% after the tech giant reported stronger profit and revenue for the latest quarter than analysts expected. In stock markets abroad, indexes were mixed across Europe and Asia amid mostly modest movements. Hong Kong's Hang Seng was an outlier, and it tumbled 1.4% to give back some of its strong recent gains. It's still up nearly 20% for the year so far. ___ AP business writers Matt Ott and Elaine Kurtenbach contributed. By Stan Choe


Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
Wildfires Pull Climate Onto the Agenda as G7 Leaders Meet in Alberta
With the G7 leaders' summit due to descend on Kananaskis, Alberta June 15-17, questions are swirling about what Canada can accomplish with this year's G7 presidency and how agreement is possible with Donald Trump in the room-while swirling smoke from a devastating Prairie wildfire season helps bring climate change back onto the leaders' agenda. Now in its 50th year, the G7 brings together the leaders of seven of the world's biggest economies plus the European Union in what is described as a "forum for co-operation, stability, and shared prosperity." The leaders' summit each year is meant to end with a consensus statement of all the countries. But community voices on everything from climate change to international finance and justice have rarely been satisfied with the outcome. Much of the news analysis leading up to this year's event has cast the G7 as a diminished institution, reduced to handshakes, photo ops, and carefully-worded generalities that are the most the countries can agree to. Coming into this year's summit, the G7's "legitimacy is hanging by a thread. Its promises have fallen flat, its unity is strained, and its moral voice is fading fast," retired civil servant Bhagwant Sandhu writes for The Hill Times. "Originally conceived as a multilateral pact among Western democracies to steward global economic control, the G7 was never intended to serve the desires of its most powerful-and now unpredictable and illiberal-member: the United States," he adds. "The group's initial goals have been obscured by authoritarianism, unilateral action, and creeping militarization." That leaves Prime Minister Mark Carney with a choice, Sandhu says. "Canada can, of course, preside over the usual choreography of communiques and handshakes-or try something more ambitious: restore the G7 to its founding mission." Carney's office kicked off that discussion June 7 with a list of the three "core missions" the PM will pursue in his role as G7 president, all "anchored in building stronger economies"-the same priority, CBC points out, that he has brought to the domestic scene in Canada. The list includes: "Protecting our communities and the world" by "strengthening peace and security, countering foreign interference and transnational crime, and improving joint responses to wildfires"; Building energy security and speeding up the "digital transition" by fortifying critical mineral supply chains and using technologies like artificial intelligence to spur economic growth; Investing in stronger infrastructure, creating higher-paying jobs, and fostering "dynamic", competitive markets for business. But much of the attention so far has been on the chaos Trump will bring to the table, just as he did in 2018 when Canada last hosted the G7 in Charlevoix, Quebec. Then, as now, U.S. tariffs were at the centre of the discussion, and Trump issued two angry tweets pulling the U.S. out of the leaders' final communique, just hours after countries had signed off on the text. "A show of unity on big geopolitical problems that holds longer than a few hours after President Donald Trump's participation will be seen as success after the American president in 2018 blew up a fragile consensus even before he left the last Canada-hosted G7 in Charlevoix, Que., later angrily insulting then-prime minister and G7 host Justin Trudeau," writes Toronto Star Ottawa bureau chief Tonda McCharles. This time around, "a key performance indicator for the summit will [be] getting something down that all leaders can agree upon that will also include the U.S.-and that will be a challenge," Deanna Horton, a diplomat who served twice in the Canadian embassy in Washington, told The Hill Times. On June 11, McCharles reported that organizers of this year's summit are not looking for a final communique that represents a consensus of all G7 members. "Instead, G7 host Carney is expected to issue a G7 chair's statement and the closed-door high-stakes sessions that could nevertheless produce some heated discussions will be summarized in documents likely to be so whitewashed of the juicy bits, that they could almost be written in advance." The Star has details on how the Summit agenda is likely to play out. Carney has also stirred controversy with the list of "middle power" countries he's invited to the summit. In addition to the leaders of Ukraine, Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, Australia, and South Korea, the list includes Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose government has been linked to acts of murder and extortion on Canadian soil, and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has been connected to human rights crackdowns, mistreatment of migrants, and the 2018 murder and dismemberment of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Meanwhile, Carney's plan for the summit makes scant direct reference to past G7 commitments in areas like power sector decarbonization, methane controls, forest and land degradation, and elimination of fossil fuel subsidies-a promise the countries made in 2016 and were supposed to deliver on by this year. "Its climate commitments remain stalled, and the vaunted $600-billion infrastructure pledge to the Global South-first announced in 2021 as the 'Build Back Better World' initiative-has been more frequently rebranded and re-announced than realized," Sandhu writes for The Hill Times. Moreover, "the G7 has yet to fulfill its decades-old promise to allocate 0.7% of each member's gross national income to humanitarian aid. At the start of the 2023 Hiroshima summit, it was still short by a staggering US$4.49-trillion. More troubling still, members like the United Kingdom have diverted aid funds from humanitarian crises to finance NATO expansions, raising serious questions about the group's priorities." In a release this week, Oxfam warned the G7 is in the midst of its biggest-ever foreign aid cut. The member countries, which account for three-quarters of the world's official development assistance, are on track to cut their aid budgets 28% in 2026 compared to 2024 levels, the organization said. "Rather than breaking from the Trump administration's cruel dismantling of USAID and other U.S. foreign assistance, G7 countries like the UK, Germany, and France are instead following the same path, slashing aid with brutal measures that will cost millions of lives," said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar. "The G7's retreat from the world is unprecedented and couldn't come at a worse time, with hunger, poverty, and climate harm intensifying. The G7 cannot claim to build bridges on one hand while tearing them down with the other." Meanwhile, in a G7 agenda stripped bare of any language that could rile up a volatile U.S. president, author Arno Kopecky says the massive wildfires covering swaths of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia are playing into Canadian officials' plan for keeping climate change in the conversation. When officials first began planning the meeting last year, "Canada's Liberal government wanted the G7 to discuss climate change (the host nation sets the summit agenda), but what if Donald Trump was there as President?" Kopecky writes for the Globe and Mail. "This was no abstract worry either: the day before Jasper caught fire, Joe Biden had dropped out of the presidential race, and the Democrats' prospects looked dismal." Officials "knew that if they start with the standard stuff on climate change, Donald Trump and his people would get out their red pens and just say 'no way,'" John Kirton, founding director of the G7 Research Group, told Kopecky. "So then, what is your strategy? And wildfires was the answer." The difference, Kopecky writes, is that while Trump refuses to listen to climate science, he's seen a rash of wildfires since he returned to the White House in January, and his country is now receiving smoke from the blazes in Canada. "So Donald Trump's got a reason to be seen to be doing something about it," Kirton said. It also "speaks volumes" that the energy security section of the G7 agenda talks about artificial intelligence, but makes no reference to oil and gas, Kopecky writes. Source: The Energy Mix


Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
G7 Summit marks turning point in India-Canada relations, says former minister Ujjal Dosanjh
Vancouver [Canada], June 12 (ANI): As India cements its place as the world's fourth-largest economy, the global balance of power is shifting -- and Canada must take note, says Ujjal Dosanjh, former Canadian Minister of Health, senior lawyer, and vocal advocate against extremism. Speaking in the wake of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's participation in the G7 summit, Dosanjh says this moment offers a much-needed opportunity to reset strained India-Canada relations, particularly due to long-standing tensions over Khalistan-linked extremism. 'India, even before it became the fourth-largest economy, was being recognised by leaders like Carney as indispensable on the global stage,' Dosanjh remarked, referring to Prime Minister Mark Carney, who assumed office earlier this year. 'Now that India has moved up in global rankings, it only strengthens the case for deeper cooperation.' Dosanjh pointed out that G7 leaders are well aware of India's growing influence and are likely advising Canada not to let political disagreements override strategic and economic interests. 'Leaders know that even when they have issues with a country, they can't ignore its importance. They find ways to engage constructively -- and that's the approach Carney seems to be taking,' he said. Prime Minister Carney's invitation to Prime Minister Modi drew protests from several Sikh separatist groups in Canada. But Dosanjh, a long-time critic of extremism, questioned the seriousness with which these groups should be taken, especially given their historical role in damaging Canada's global reputation. 'These elements did massive damage to Canada's image when they bombed Air India Flight 182 in 1985,' Dosanjh said, referencing the worst act of aviation terror before 9/11. 'That wasn't India's wound -- it was Canada's wound. Those were Canadian citizens who died.' He also recalled the role of Khalistani militant Talwinder Singh Parmar, believed to be the mastermind of the Air India bombing. 'Parmar had earlier killed police officers in India and fled here. Indira Gandhi sought his extradition, but Canada didn't act, partly because there was no extradition treaty at the time. That failure had grave consequences.' Dosanjh emphasised that Canada has allowed such extremist elements to penetrate mainstream politics. 'Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper rightly said we shouldn't tolerate separatists in our political parties -- especially those seeking to break up allied democracies. I've always believed that, and I suspect Carney privately does too,' he added. India has sought the extradition of 26 fugitives, including several Khalistani extremists. On this issue, Dosanjh confirmed that there are signs of cooperation, although progress remains slow. 'I spoke with Mr. Verma, India's former High Commissioner to Canada, and he said publicly -- and to me privately -- that Canada has started moving on some of those cases,' he revealed. 'There is an extradition treaty in place. It now depends on the quality of the evidence provided, and on Canada's willingness to act on it.' With both countries being democracies and promoting strategic autonomy in foreign policy, Dosanjh sees a natural alignment between India and Canada, especially on trade and global issues. 'Canada exports a lot of lentils and grains to India. I know someone personally in that business who's been suffering because of the diplomatic chill -- no trains are moving from his location,' he said. 'It's critical for both countries to stabilise relations not just for trade, but also to collaborate on global challenges as democratic allies.' Dosanjh believes PM Modi's visit to the G7, hosted by Canada this year, is a promising step toward restoring ties. 'Mr. Carney signalled his intent to reset the relationship during his campaign. Inviting Modi to the G7 is the first concrete step in that direction,' he said. While tensions remain, especially around the killing of separatist figure Hardeep Singh Nijjar, Dosanjh believes these should not prevent broader cooperation. 'Countries always have disputes. But responsible governments work on multiple tracks: you can address law enforcement matters on one track and continue dialogue on trade, people-to-people ties, and international cooperation on other tracks.' On the recent attack on journalist Mocha Bezirgan in Vancouver -- where Khalistani supporters allegedly surrounded, threatened, and snatched his phone -- Dosanjh didn't mince words. 'Khalistanis have never shied away from violence. Air India was just the most dramatic example,' he said. 'Unless there are serious prosecutions, these incidents will continue. Canada has been slow to prosecute Khalistani violence, and that delay is hurting our society.' He stressed that the problem is not just about India's security. 'It's in Canada's own interest to control this menace, for the peace and safety of Canadians. We must protect journalists, uphold free speech, and prosecute threats without fear or political calculations.' The extradition of Pakistani national Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, accused of plotting an ISIS-inspired attack in New York, has raised further concerns about radicalisation in Canada. Dosanjh believes these fears are well-founded. 'Nearly 100 Canadians went to fight alongside ISIS. Some returned and were prosecuted, some are in jail. Canada is aware of the threat, but our responses are often too slow and reactive,' he said. 'The same lethargy we showed after Air India shouldn't be repeated with new threats whether from Islamist extremists or Khalistani groups.' Dosanjh also pointed to Pakistan's long-standing role in fuelling the Khalistan movement -- a connection made more visible during recent protests in Vancouver where Pakistani flags were seen alongside Khalistani banners. 'This isn't new. In the 1970s, Jagjit Singh Chohan declared Khalistan in a U.S. newspaper after returning from Pakistan. That declaration was funded by Pakistani money, funnelled in part by the CIA. I met Chohan in Canada back then,' he recalled. He warned that the ISI's hand remains visible today. 'Figures like Pannun are believed to be working with Pakistani handlers in the U.S. Indian officials know this. Many Canadian politicians, either gullible or ignorant, still look the other way. But now, with the Pakistani flag appearing openly in these rallies, the truth is harder to deny.' Despite all the tensions and painful history, Dosanjh remains hopeful. 'This G7 summit, hosted by Canada, is a turning point. Prime Minister Carney has taken the first step by inviting Modi. Now it's time for sustained engagement, honest dialogue, and zero tolerance for those who threaten democracy in any form.' He concludes with a clear message: 'Canada and India are both democracies. They may have their differences, but the shared values and the global stakes are too high to let those differences define the relationship.' (ANI)