logo
Nordic nations revert to World War II strategies to prepare for World War III with these tactics

Nordic nations revert to World War II strategies to prepare for World War III with these tactics

Time of India29-05-2025
In 1944, during World War II, people in Kongsberg who were fighting against the Nazis used bombs to destroy a factory that was making cannons for Germany. Now, over 80 years later, Kongsberg is preparing again in case of war or sabotage, as per reports.
The local government reopened old bomb shelters, installed a satellite communication system, and is working with the military for war preparation. Odd John Resser, Kongsberg's emergency planning officer, said they learned from Ukraine that everyone needs to help, just like breweries in Ukraine made Molotov cocktails and schools were moved into shelters, according to the report by AP.
Nordic countries are increasing defense budgets and using a strategy called "total defense" where the entire society gets involved to prepare for both military and non-military threats. Russia has been blamed by Western officials for sabotage, arson, and cyberattacks across Europe since it invaded Ukraine, as per reports.
According to the report by AP, many of these incidents and made a map showing the ones clearly linked to Russia, pro-Russian groups, or Belarus. The Kremlin denies it was involved. Norway and some other Nordic countries now tell citizens to store food and water for at least 7 days. The Norwegian handbook asks people to think, What if electricity or water stops for a long time?
This company makes advanced weapons, including missiles used in Ukraine, and opened a new factory in 2024. The town might also host Western troops if there's a conflict. In May, local officials met with the military to plan logistics, health care, and more. Resser said if troops come to Norway to train or fight, the whole community would need to help.
Preparing for war also helps them prepare for other crises like pandemics, bad weather, or power cuts, like the one that hit Spain and Portugal in April. Kongsberg wasn't always this prepared, a 2007 flood and a 2016 drill with 4 days of no power made them realize they needed to act.
They did a legal risk assessment and found 30+ weak points, then spent money to fix them. They bought backup generators for town hall, hospitals, and elderly homes, and set up a satellite link to ask for help if needed. Because of cyberattack risks, local health authorities now print and save key patient data weekly.
Norway's defense minister, Tore O. Sandvik said Russia might try to sabotage energy grids, internet cables, and water supplies. Kongsberg Group's security chief, Even Tvedt, said sabotage is a real risk, someone tried to destroy fighter jet engines in 2024, drones flew where they weren't allowed, and there were attempts to breach the factory.
Tvedt said they can't always tell if these incidents are connected or just accidents, but the number of events shows sabotage is a serious concern. Redhead said Russia is now acting at a 'pre-war' level in Europe, but many people are still not mentally or physically ready for a real crisis. He said it might be necessary to start 'freaking people out' a little, so they take the threats seriously, as mentioned in the report by AP.
FAQs
Q1. What is total defense in Nordic countries?
It means the whole society, people, businesses, and local governments, helps prepare for war or other big threats.
Q2. Why is Kongsberg important if war breaks out?
It makes advanced weapons and could support Western troops in a conflict.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?
What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?

Aug 12 - U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold? European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump on Wednesday amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. WHAT KIND OF DEAL COULD EMERGE FROM SUMMIT? Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Putin. WHAT IF UKRAINE OBJECTS TO ANY TRUMP-PUTIN DEAL? Trump would face strong resistance from Zelenskiy and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Zelenskiy says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy U.S. weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of U.S. intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. HOW MIGHT A DEAL AFFECT TRUMP'S SUPPORT AT HOME? There would be big political risks in the U.S. for Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice in Putin's rape of Ukraine ... I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure", he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. HOW MIGHT UKRAINE'S EUROPEAN ALLIES RESPOND? EU member states said on Tuesday that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Foreign ministers of 25 countries urge Israel to let aid into Gaza as humanitarian crisis deepens
Foreign ministers of 25 countries urge Israel to let aid into Gaza as humanitarian crisis deepens

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Foreign ministers of 25 countries urge Israel to let aid into Gaza as humanitarian crisis deepens

'The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised,' the foreign ministers said in a joint statement Palestinians collect humanitarian aid packages from the United Arab Emirates after they were airdropped into Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza Strip, on Saturday. AP File The foreign ministers of 25 countries, including the UK, France, Australia, Spain, Japan, and several European Union representatives, have warned that humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached 'unimaginable levels,' and called on the Israeli government to allow essential humanitarian actors to operate in Gaza. 'The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised,' The Guardian quoted the foreign ministers as saying in a joint statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'However, due to restrictive new registration requirements, essential international NGOs may be forced to leave the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs) imminently which would worsen the humanitarian situation still further,' the statement added. The group of countries urged Israel to authorise international NGO aid shipments, unblock humanitarian actors, and allow full access to the region for the UN and other partners. 'We call on the government of Israel to provide authorisation for all international NGO aid shipments and to unblock essential humanitarian actors from operating. Immediate, permanent and concrete steps must be taken to facilitate safe, large-scale access for the UN, international NGOs and humanitarian partners. All crossings and routes must be used to allow a flood of aid into Gaza, including food, nutrition supplies, shelter, fuel, clean water, medicine and medical equipment,' the statement further said. The joint statement also condemned the use of lethal force at aid distribution sites and demanded protection for civilians, aid workers, and medical staff. The ministers expressed support for diplomatic efforts by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt to broker a ceasefire. 'We are grateful to the US, Qatar and Egypt for their efforts in pushing for a ceasefire and pursuing peace. We need a ceasefire that can end the war, for hostages to be released and aid to enter Gaza by land unhindered,' the statement added. Signatories include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and senior representatives from the European Union. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD More than 60,000 people have been killed in the Gaza war so far, according to Palestinian authorities, with a significant number of the victims reported to be women and children. Gaza's Health Ministry said at least 217 people — including 100 children — have died from starvation amid severe shortages of food and humanitarian aid. While Israel disputes these figures, it has not released alternative data. The United Nations has said the reported toll is largely credible and may even understate the true scale of the devastation. The war was triggered by a Hamas-led cross-border assault on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, in which militants killed around 1,200 people and abducted more than 250 others, according to Israeli officials. With inputs from agencies

For his China love, is Trump eyeing state control of the economy? Hint in push against Intel, Apple & Nvidia
For his China love, is Trump eyeing state control of the economy? Hint in push against Intel, Apple & Nvidia

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

For his China love, is Trump eyeing state control of the economy? Hint in push against Intel, Apple & Nvidia

From pressuring tech giants to securing strategic stakes, Trump's bold moves reveal a growing trend of government influence over private industry — blurring the lines between free-market capitalism and state control, according to report In a striking reversal of old assumptions, it's no longer China's economy that's mimicking America's — it's America's that's beginning to resemble China's. According to a Wall Street Journal report, from pressuring Intel's CEO to resign, to intervening in chip sales by Nvidia and AMD, and securing a 'golden share' in US Steel, President Trump's recent moves suggest a growing appetite for state-directed control of key industries. Trump's push to personally direct $1.5 trillion in investment from trading partners further underscores a shift toward state capitalism — not full-blown socialism, but a system where the government heavily influences corporate decisions, added the report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As the US government increasingly steers private enterprise under Trump's leadership, critics are asking: Is his admiration for China's economic model shaping America's own? According to the report, China brands its model as 'socialism with Chinese characteristics.' The US hasn't gone nearly as far — not as far as China, nor as far as more moderate versions of state capitalism seen in countries like Russia, Brazil, or even France. But what's emerging now might best be described as 'state capitalism with American characteristics.' And while it's not a full departure from capitalism, it marks a sharp shift from the free-market orthodoxy that once defined the US economy, added the report. This shift wouldn't be happening without a broad, bipartisan loss of faith in traditional free-market capitalism. That system incentivised CEOs to chase profits overseas, hollowing out American manufacturing, creating dangerous reliance on China for critical materials, and neglecting long-term investments in strategic sectors like clean energy and advanced semiconductors. The federal government has long intervened in the corporate sector — taking control of production during World War II and using the Defense Production Act in emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic. It also stepped in to bail out banks and automakers during the 2007-09 financial crisis. But these were largely temporary measures. Former President Joe Biden pushed further, aiming to reshape entire industries. His Inflation Reduction Act authorised $400 billion in clean-energy loans, while the Chips and Science Act allocated $39 billion in subsidies to boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing. Of that, $8.5 billion went to Intel — giving Trump leverage to demand the removal of its CEO over previous China ties, a demand Intel has resisted. Biden also blocked Nippon Steel's takeover of US Steel by overriding management and shareholders, despite his staff seeing no clear national security risk. Trump later reversed the veto but secured a 'golden share' in US Steel, allowing government influence over company decisions — mirroring the golden shares Chinese firms issue to the Communist Party, reported WSJ. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Biden officials considered creating a sovereign-wealth fund to finance high-risk, strategic projects like critical minerals — an area dominated by China. Last month, Trump's Department of Defense took a 15% stake in MP Materials, a key critical minerals miner. While China accelerates growth through massive infrastructure, scientific progress, and industry support, US efforts often stall amid democratic checks and balances. 'China is an engineering state, building big at breakneck speed, unlike the US, a lawyerly society blocking everything, good and bad,' WSJ quoted Author Dan Wang as saying in his upcoming book 'Breakneck: China's Quest to Engineer the Future'. Trump's appeal lies in his readiness to bulldoze legal and democratic hurdles. He's imposed tariffs unilaterally, claiming powers meant for Congress, and secured $1.5 trillion in investment pledges from Japan, the EU, and South Korea, pledges he says he will personally control, despite no clear legal basis and disputes over their validity. State capitalism has long struggled because governments typically allocate capital less efficiently than markets, leading to waste, distortion, and cronyism. Countries like Russia, Brazil, and France have lagged behind the US in growth. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China's rapid growth since 1979 largely came from market reforms, not state control. As Xi Jinping tightened state grip, growth slowed, with wasted savings and excess capacity pushing prices and profits down. The US hasn't done better. National security-driven interventions often result in failures like Foxconn's Wisconsin plant or Tesla's Buffalo solar factory. Unlike China's state capitalism — an all-encompassing system run by millions of cadres — the US approach is mostly symbolic Oval Office declarations without real policy or institutional support. 'The core characteristic of China's state capitalism is discipline, and Trump is the complete opposite of that,' WSJ quoted Wang as saying in an interview. State capitalism is about political control as much as economics. Xi uses economic power to enforce party dominance — when Alibaba's Jack Ma criticised regulators in 2020, China swiftly canceled Ant Group's IPO, fined it $2.8 billion, and Ma vanished from public view. Similarly, Trump has used executive orders and regulatory power against perceived opponents while rewarding loyal executives. CEOs who once criticised him now mostly stay silent or praise him. Trump is also pushing for political control over independent agencies like the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Federal Reserve, echoing China's fully party-controlled bureaucracy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump admires Xi's control, American democracy — with its judiciary, free speech, due process, and power separation — sets limits. The future of US state capitalism depends on how well these checks and balances endure. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store