Similipal declared as National Park
Similipal will be the second National Park in Odisha after Bhitarkanika National Park which is spread over 145 sq km in Kendrapara district. Similipal getting National Park status is a big step for conservation in Odisha, said PCCF (Wildlife) and Chief Wildlife Warden P K Jha. The State government declared Similipal as a National Park after it fulfilled all formalities, an official said.
Initially proposed as a National Park in 1980, Similipal could not get the status due to several factors, including human habitation in the core area. 'This long-awaited recognition brings national attention to Similipal's unparalleled biodiversity, rich tribal legacy and ecological value, making it a proud symbol of Odisha's green soul,' an official statement said.
The final notification acknowledges Similipal's multi-layered significance — as a Wildlife Sanctuary, Project Tiger, UNESCO Biosphere Reserve and Elephant Reserve — now united under the highest national ecological recognition, it said.
Stating that Similipal is one of India's most unique ecological landscapes, a senior Forest department official said it is home to 40 wild tigers, including the world's only home to wild melanistic tigers, shelter to 25 per cent of Odisha's elephant population, host to 104 orchid species and many endemic to the region.
Similipal is also a haven for over 360 species of birds, and diverse mammals like leopards, sambar and mugger crocodiles and others apart from being a lifeline forming key river catchments in northern Odisha, he said. The official said to secure the newly designated National Park and its surrounding ecological corridors, the Forest department is implementing the Greater Similipal Landscape Programme, which includes AI-powered camera towers and trail guard camera systems, V-SAT communication networks for surveillance in remote zones and a dedicated security force including one company of trained police personnel and ex-servicemen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
T.N. to set up second Marine Elite Force in Chennai to protect Olive Ridley turtles
The Tamil Nadu Forest Department has issued orders to set up a Marine Elite Force under the Chennai Wildlife Division with a budget allocation of ₹96 lakh for the year 2025–2026. In a Government Order (G.O.) issued by Supriya Sahu, Additional Chief Secretary, Departments of Environment, Climate Change and Forests, said that the focus of the Marine Elite Force will be on safeguarding endangered marine species, especially Olive Ridley turtles, and reducing threats in the region between Neelankarai and Marina, a key nesting site. This will be the second Marine Elite Force unit to be established in Tamil Nadu. The first unit was set up in May 2024 in Ramanathapuram to protect the marine ecosystems of the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay. In January and February 2025, the Chennai coast recorded a rise in Olive Ridley turtle deaths, with hundreds of carcasses found washed ashore. These incidents were linked to bycatch in mechanised fishing nets, marine debris, plastic ingestion, and unregulated coastal development. The Marine Elite Force will be deployed to address these threats through patrolling, enforcement, and coordination with relevant departments, the G.O. said. The force will carry out enforcement against illegal fishing and wildlife crimes within five nautical miles of the coast, respond to stranded or injured marine animals, and conduct regular patrolling during the nesting and hatching season from November to April. It will also support enforcement of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, and coordinate with the Tamil Nadu Coastal Security Group, Indian Coast Guard, fisheries department, NGOs, and fishermen's associations. The expected results include a reduction in turtle deaths, increased enforcement against illegal trawling and poaching, quicker response to marine strandings, improved data for research, and better coordination among departments and local communities.
Indian Express
8 hours ago
- Indian Express
How Haryana's new ‘dictionary meaning of forest' will affect the Aravallis
The Haryana government on Monday (August 18) officially defined the 'dictionary meaning of forest'. Officials say that the state's definition of a forest 'references precedents from Supreme Court rulings' and is aligned with 'judicial expectations'. Environmentalists, however, say that it is a narrow definition which will exclude the ecologically sensitive Aravalli ridge from protection, and make it vulnerable to unchecked development, illegal mining and real estate encroachment. In its notification dated August 18, Haryana's Environment, Forest and Wildlife department stated: 'A patch of land shall be deemed to be 'forest as per dictionary meaning' if it fulfils following conditions: * It has a minimum area of five hectares, if it is in isolation, and a minimum area of two hectares, if it is in contiguity with the government notified forests; and * It has a canopy density of 0.4 (40%) or more'. The notification further specifies that 'all linear/compact/agro-forestry plantations and orchards situated outside the government notified forests shall not be treated as forests under the above definition'. Such linear plantations are frequently found along roads, canals and railway tracks, where they can serve multiple purposes. SC's directives in March The Haryana government's notification came after the Supreme Court on March 4 directed all States and Union Territories to define what constitutes a 'forest' and commence surveys to identify forest areas in their respective jurisdictions. The court said that States and UTs must constitute expert committees within one month to identify 'forest-like areas', 'unclassified forest lands', and 'community forest lands', and that these committees must complete their mapping of forest lands and submit a report to the Centre within six months. The court further said that 'the process must strictly follow the 2011 Lafarge Umiam Mining guidelines, mandating a GIS-based decision-support database that includes — district-wise plots that may qualify as 'forest' under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA); Core, buffer, and eco-sensitive zones of protected areas; important wildlife migratory corridors; lands diverted from forest use in the past; and supporting maps like TOPO-sheets and Forest Survey of India maps'. Chief Secretaries of States and Administrators of UTs who fail to comply will be held 'personally accountable for any non-compliance [with the court's directives],' the court said. These directives were made in the challenge to the 2023 amendment to the FCA (Ashok Kumar Sharma, IFS (Retd) & Ors. vs. Union of India) that the apex court is currently hearing. At the heart of both the amendment and the challenge to it is the question: 'what constitutes a forest?' The FCA of 1980 restricted 'the dereservation of forests or use of forest land for non-forest purpose'. The Act barred the diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes without the prior approval of the Centre. In 1996, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices J S Verma and Justice B N Kirpal in T N Godavarman Thirumulpad v Union of India ruled that the word 'forest', for the purposes of the FCA, 'must be understood according to its dictionary meaning' which 'covers all statutorily recognised forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise'. This was a landmark order: effectively, any parcel of forested land, regardless of size, official status or ownership, could be deemed a forest. This widening of the applicability of the FCA, according to the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the 2023 amendment, was 'restraining the authorities from undertaking any change in the land use and allowing any development or utility related work'. 'Today, this (the FCA) comes in the way of building even toilets in schools for tribal girls,' Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav had said in Parliament while introducing the amendment. To resolve this issue, the amendment made the FCA applicable only to notified forests and lands that were identified as 'forest' in government records. This amendment was challenged by a group of retired Indian Forest Service officers and NGOs such as Vanashakti and Goa Foundation who said that it 'substantially diluted' the FCA. In February 2024, the apex court directed all UTs and State governments to follow Godavarman's definition of 'forest' while it was hearing Ashok Kumar Sharma. In March, the court issued the aforementioned directives, and asked the Centre to compile and consolidate reports submitted by all States and UTs. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for September 9. Reactions to Haryana's definition Although Haryana constituted state- and district-level committees in April, surveys were stalled until a formal definition of 'forest' was finalised. Officials say that 'with the official notification… these committees can finally proceed clearing the path for surveys that determine which areas qualify as forests, a critical step in ensuring they gain protection under the FCA'. But environmentalists have been critical of Haryana's definition which, they say, creates 'a very high threshold' for a land to be classified as forest. 'It is a pity that Haryana has blindly followed the lead of states like Goa in choosing a minimum threshold of 40% forest canopy cover to identify an area as a deemed forest,' environmentalist Chetan Agarwal told The Indian Express. 'The Aravallis in the south and west (of Haryana) get only 300 to 600 mm rainfall annually. This low rainfall and the rocky terrain creates tough conditions for growth of forests in the Aravalli. Vegetation here has adapted over millions of years into a stunted growth of thorny and dry deciduous species and scrub forest conditions,' he said, adding that 'the decision to keep such a high threshold of forest cover will exclude much the Aravallis from the protective embrace of the FCA' and that this definition was prima facie violative of the 1996 Godavarman judgement. 'The minimum area threshold of 2 and 5 hectares is also unreasonably high for such a dry state and should have been kept at 1 and 2 hectares, respectively', Agarwal added.
Indian Express
20 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bijwasan Railway Project awaits forest dept clearance: Construction activity on deemed forest land has damaged 91 trees, NGT told
Clearing of land coupled with construction activity on deemed forest land at Dwarka's Bijwasan Railway Project site, without prior approval, has damaged 91 trees, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) has informed the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Wednesday. The project, which includes expansion of a Northern Railway coaching and freight terminal, has been pending forest clearance from the Centre. In the submission filed in a plea moved by Dwarka resident Naveen Solanki against the Rail Land Development Authority, the MoEFCC said the Delhi government had submitted a proposal to divert 6.202 hectares of deemed forest land for the project through the Parivesh online portal. However, the Regional Empowered Committee (REC), flagging multiple deficiencies, including the lack of a certified area calculation and geo-referenced maps, had recommended a consolidated compensatory afforestation plan in February. 'Satellite imagery suggested that construction had already begun on the site,' the affidavit noted. A site inspection by the Deputy Chief Conservator of Forests (West) on April 1 has confirmed that 1.69 hectares (4.2 acres) of land had been broken up and 91 trees — including Safeda, Shisham, Neem, Bakain, Pilkhan, and Subabul — had been damaged without clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act,1980. The Ministry also underlined that while the Delhi government's proposal is still under review, any non-forest activity on forest land requires prior approval from the Centre under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act. It stressed that a 2020 MoEFCC clarification exempting commercial railway projects from environmental clearance under the EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) Notification, 2006, does not override the requirement for forest clearance if the land is classified as forest. The REC had earlier directed the Divisional Forest Officer to conduct a fresh site inspection and submit a report as it said that any violation would invoke action under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the Forest (Conservation) Act,1980. The Ministry noted that its queries regarding the proposal, including unclear cadastral maps and an incomplete muck disposal plan, were still pending with the Delhi government, due to which the final approval has been delayed.
