Jersey States panel backs cannabis farm noise and smell complaint
A States' panel has upheld a complaint over the way the government handled residents' concerns about noise and smells from a cannabis farm in Jersey.The complaints panel said the Infrastructure and Environment Department had prioritised the interests of the Northern Leaf farm in St Lawrence to the detriment of people living nearby last August.The panel said the government had taken too long to deal with residents' complaints, criticising its use of an unjust "sniff test" to decide whether cannabis odours from the farm were a problem.Andy Scate, Chief Officer of Infrastructure and Environment, said the department acknowledged the report but did not accept the findings.
The panel said the government officers had "misinterpreted" the law that covered how nuisances should be dealt with.It added that delays in bringing forward an abatement notice for noise and any action in relation to the odours had been unreasonable and that there was enough evidence to have acted to quicker in respect to "odours emanating from the site".Head of the panel Geoffrey Crill said: "The fact that no precedents existed should not have prevented action from being taken by the department. "The board considers it unacceptable that the department simply extended the monitoring of odours in order to meet a threshold that had already been acknowledged as unworkable."
The government rejected the panel's decision, saying there were "many inaccuracies" in its findings.Mr Scate said: "Our responsibility is to uphold Jersey's regulatory framework fairly and impartially - that means acting in the interests of all parties, residents, businesses and the wider community."In the case of Northern Leaf, the department has issued a number of enforcement and noise asbatement notices and we have taken clear regulatory action in response to concerns raised. "We stand by our actions taken, ensuring that our interventions lead to meaningful and lasting improvements for those affected."
'Panel oversteps boundaries'
Mr Scate said there had been a "substantial investment of resources" into the case, including more than 10 officers over a four-year period and "over 1,000 hours of focused effort".He said: "We do not accept the view that more could or should have been done - our team has acted at all times with diligence, professionalism and within the scope of legislation."Mr Scate added that the department was "not afforded the opportunity to participate fully in the panel's hearing process". He said: "The absence of a right to reply or to clarify key information before conclusions were drawn is disappointing and does not reflect principles of procedural fairness."We believe the panel continues to overstep the boundaries of its remit, particularly in matters relating to professional judgment and legal process."The department said it would report to the States within the next three months with a full response to the decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
7 hours ago
- Time Out
Thailand kills the high on recreational weed
Those jasmine scented cannabis cafes, street cool parlours and puff bar sanctuaries that bloomed post 2022 just received their death warrant overnight. On 25 June 2025, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's cabinet delivered the final blow when Minister Somsak Thepsutin's signature hit the Royal Gazette, officially ending the 2022 liberalisation that had pulled cannabis from narcotics lists. Now the billion-dollar lifeline that once throbbed through Bangkok's backstreets and neon arteries bleeds slow and tourism now bleeds out under the weight of this regulation amounts to aesthetic assassination. Cannabis flowers now carry the 'controlled herb' label. That means if you want to research, grow, trade or export, there's a licensing tango to navigate under the Traditional Medicine Wisdom Act – source tracking, timestamps, quantities and monthly data drop offs. Public sales can be said to be extinct. No vending machine shelves, no online herb dispensaries, no ads allowed, everything's off limits. Though Bangkok's dispensaries are finding loopholes in white coats, they might soon be playing the game with pharmacists on the payroll. Now only licensed medical doctors, Thai traditional healers and Chinese medicine practitioners can prescribe it and only in measurable doses for up to 30 days at a time. Soon scoring a joint in Thailand will mean navigating the same bureaucratic maze as getting antibiotics. The hope is to shift cannabis from a vacation thrill to clinical calm, from party accessory to medical necessity. The activists called it: this industry has always been hostage to backdoor deals not supply and demand. Their push for cannabis freedom normalised teen access and rising addiction rates became the very ammunition used against the decision. While regulators sterilise the vibe in the name of protecting minors and cutting smuggling routes, it does affect Thailand's most intoxicating export. The internet's loudest question right now: will Thailand's cannabis renaissance revive itself, or is this the moment the high finally crashes flat, silent, done?
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Chief Pleas to buy Sark Electricity under compulsory purchase
Sark Electricity Ltd (SEL) is set to be bought by Chief Pleas under a compulsory purchase government supported the purchase in a vote which saw majority of 10 to three. It was also agreed that the money would come in the form of a loan from the States of compulsory purchase will halt a previously planned sale of SEL by its managing director, Alan Witney-Price, to Island Power for more than £2m. Mr Witney-Price said he had already begun legal proceedings against Chief Pleas. The decision to move forward with the compulsory purchase of SEL, to ensure the company's survival, is a big win for Chief Pleas. Conseiller John Guille, chair of Policy & Finance, said "It's a relief. We are all very happy, it's an absolutely crucial milestone."We're progressing through compulsory purchase where we didn't want to end up."The next step will be to work with Mr Witney-Price to try and jointly appoint a Mike Locke, chair of Future Energy Committee, said: "I am very pleased not only with the decision but the margin... It's brilliant."We do understand conseillers and islanders do have concerns and what to make sure things are absolutely right, we share those Chief Pleas Now has 30 days to jointly agree a valuer to progress to the next stages of the compulsory purchase. Ahead of the meeting, Alan Witney-Price said he was still open to negotiating with Chief Pleas. He said it had no right to be getting in the way of the sale to Island Power, which was set to be complete on 3 said "I've written to Chief Pleas six, seven, eight, nine times in the last 10 days."Every piece of that correspondence says: 'We're here, reach out, come and have a conversation.' "I even offered Chief Pleas a partial purchase, as they can't afford the full value of the company."They're not interested. They just want to buy it at a discounted value. There have been mixed opinions for people living in SarkAndy Cook said he was worried about the legal action from told BBC News: "My main concern is that the whole issue will end up in a massive court battle with undetermined costs and we won't be quite sure how that's going to pan out.""One islander who wished to be anonymous said: "If the power cuts out, I have nothing"My water is linked to the bore hole, so that will be out; no heating, lights and I won't be able to charge my bike."I would be stranded. I just want a reliable said: "We can't be held to ransom".Business on Sark rely on the electricity grid to keep doors open. Bernadette Southern, who works at the Fleur De Jardin, said she was tired with the entire said: "It's just gone on and on and on. It really has its affecting people."I don't think it really matters who owns it. I think the island needs a good service and the electric needs to be at a good price."
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Jersey States panel backs cannabis farm noise and smell complaint
A States' panel has upheld a complaint over the way the government handled residents' concerns about noise and smells from a cannabis farm in complaints panel said the Infrastructure and Environment Department had prioritised the interests of the Northern Leaf farm in St Lawrence to the detriment of people living nearby last panel said the government had taken too long to deal with residents' complaints, criticising its use of an unjust "sniff test" to decide whether cannabis odours from the farm were a Scate, Chief Officer of Infrastructure and Environment, said the department acknowledged the report but did not accept the findings. The panel said the government officers had "misinterpreted" the law that covered how nuisances should be dealt added that delays in bringing forward an abatement notice for noise and any action in relation to the odours had been unreasonable and that there was enough evidence to have acted to quicker in respect to "odours emanating from the site".Head of the panel Geoffrey Crill said: "The fact that no precedents existed should not have prevented action from being taken by the department. "The board considers it unacceptable that the department simply extended the monitoring of odours in order to meet a threshold that had already been acknowledged as unworkable." The government rejected the panel's decision, saying there were "many inaccuracies" in its Scate said: "Our responsibility is to uphold Jersey's regulatory framework fairly and impartially - that means acting in the interests of all parties, residents, businesses and the wider community."In the case of Northern Leaf, the department has issued a number of enforcement and noise asbatement notices and we have taken clear regulatory action in response to concerns raised. "We stand by our actions taken, ensuring that our interventions lead to meaningful and lasting improvements for those affected." 'Panel oversteps boundaries' Mr Scate said there had been a "substantial investment of resources" into the case, including more than 10 officers over a four-year period and "over 1,000 hours of focused effort".He said: "We do not accept the view that more could or should have been done - our team has acted at all times with diligence, professionalism and within the scope of legislation."Mr Scate added that the department was "not afforded the opportunity to participate fully in the panel's hearing process". He said: "The absence of a right to reply or to clarify key information before conclusions were drawn is disappointing and does not reflect principles of procedural fairness."We believe the panel continues to overstep the boundaries of its remit, particularly in matters relating to professional judgment and legal process."The department said it would report to the States within the next three months with a full response to the decision.
