North Wales councils urged to install more 20mph speed cameras
The panel were given a presentation on road policing by Supt Simon Barrasford in which members were briefed on speeding figures since the 20mph default speed limit was introduced in Wales.
The panel were told the police face challenges enforcing the limit due to many drivers and holidaymakers crossing the border from England where the default 30mph speed limit still applies.
But when it was revealed that all the 'top five fixed camera locations' were all in Flintshire, Supt Barrasford told the panel that councillors could request more in their area, which could be funded by Welsh Government.
Panel's chairwoman Patricia Astbury said: 'In Flintshire, you've got a series of fixed cameras. Is that a local authority request? Is it historical? Has it come from Flintshire? Does that still apply? Can you still have these requests for fixed cameras?'
Supt Barrasford replied: 'Absolutely. Any local authority can liaise with Welsh Government for funding and put static cameras in. We've seen them on the strategic road network with great effect on Rhuallt Hill, for example.
'So that is another example. It can be done at any time. Flintshire, to be fair, are progressing potentially a similar scheme on one of the coast roads. So any local authority can progress that.'
20mph sign (Image: Newsquest) Ms Astbury said: 'It is interesting then that just Flintshire have, and others haven't.' Supt Barrasford nodded.
Mrs Astbury added: 'Which is why, Chris (Cllr Bithell), you made a comment the other day about more prosecutions (in Flintshire than other North Wales counties). It is because of that presumably. I thought it might have been because of being on the border with England, but looking at it, no, it is probably because of that (the fixed cameras), isn't it?
'So maybe some of the elected members need to go away and think about having some fixed cameras… I'm certainly going to ask elected members for one on my road.'
Cllr Chris Bithell then said some of the Flintshire cameras had been put in some years ago, including the one at Pontybodkin, 'which catches everybody'.
The top five fixed camera locations in North Wales, all in Flintshire, were revealed to be at the A5104, Pontybodkin; the A548, Oakenholt; the B5129, Pentre; the A5119, Northop Road, Sychdyn; and the A550 on Gladstone Way.
During the meeting, Supt Barrasford briefed the panel on the Welsh Government-funded 'Operation Ugain', a campaign to offer drivers exceeding the 20mph speed limit safety advice rather than penalty points.
Speed Camera (Image: BrianAJackson/Getty Images) The police revealed that 126,640 vehicles had passed a Ugain team. 2,840 of those vehicles were stopped due to exceeding the 20mph speed limit, with 2,826 engaging with the advice. 14 drivers were given a traffic offence report or a court summons.
Supt Barrasford said the highest speed at a fixed static camera site was 83mph at Mynydd Isa. The driver got a six-month disqualification and substantial fines and costs.
The superintendent said the highest recorded speed within a 20mph zone recorded by a staffed speed camera van was on Russell Road, Rhyl.
The vehicle was travelling 51mph 'at 11am in the morning on a very busy road', but the case is still going through the judicial process.
Another community speed watch camera also caught a driver going 61mph in a 20mph zone.
Supt Barrasford also revealed the top five non-fixed speed camera locations were Glan y Mor Road to Marine Drive in Penrhyn Bay in Conwy; the 5A525 Trefnant in Denbighshire; the A548 Russell Road, Rhyl, Denbighshire; the A494 Bala, Gwynedd; and the A5025 Amlwch Road/Bangor Road, Benllech, Anglesey.
North Wales Police hailed the success of the 20mph speed limit, insisting it had resulted in a notable downward trend of accidents.
Supt Barrasford said both minor and serious injuries had reduced in both 20mph and 30mph areas since the implementation.
He added a 12-month comparison between before and after the legislation change saw serious injuries down by 19.4% and slight injuries down by 43.9%.
Whilst fatalities had increased on these roads by 200% (from two to six, one being a double motorcycle fatality), the police said speed couldn't be attributed to have played a part at the time of the briefing, as investigations were ongoing.
Chief Constable Amanda Blakeman concluded: 'Collisions happen for all sorts of reasons, as we know. It is not just about speed on the road, is it?
'Sometimes it's young drivers, sometimes age-related, sometimes mechanical defects, and that's why it is being so difficult to be able to (explain) when you've asked me when I've been here previously (to explain) what difference is it making. There are so many factors that we really have to work our way through.
'Reporting in the (news)paper is sometimes very hit and miss. Some things get picked up. Some things don't. It is really difficult to be able to put that tangible response in relation to it.'
The chief constable went on to say the force had done a huge amount of work through schools, educating around 2,000 children.
This work centred around 'Olivia's Story' and schoolgirl Olivia Alkir, who was tragically killed on the B5105 in Ruthin in June 2019, after a serious collision while out on a road trip with friends.
The chief constable also said the force had done a lot of work around motorcycle fatalities in the Eryri National Park, but police were unable to talk about in detail due to ongoing investigations and coronial processes.
She added police had to collate and examine the facts so enforcement action could be taken but also warned tourists and visitors from England not adhering to the speed limit.
She said: 'I know we have visitors, but the roads are signposted really clearly, and it is an individual responsibility of anyone that gets behind the wheel of their car to have a look at what the road signage says.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Why SNP cannot allow these three fundamental pillars of Scotland to keep crumbling
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... For any country to prosper, it needs to have a strong economy. In order to have a strong economy, it should be obvious that it needs a well-educated and highly skilled workforce. However, as we report today, in what is just the latest of an alarming number of worrying signs about the state of Scotland's schools, one-in-seven secondaries are being asked to teach more pupils than they were designed to accommodate. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is also important that the adult population is kept 'working fit'. According to the last census, 24 per cent of Scots have some form of disability or long-term health problem that limits their ability to do ordinary tasks. And the number of adults claiming disability benefits is set to rise from 379,000 to more than 700,000 by 2030-31. If waiting lists for many forms of NHS treatment were not so unacceptably long, those numbers would almost certainly be lower. Police Scotland needs to have enough officers to do the job the public requires (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images 'Policing deserts' Furthermore, it should go without saying that law and order is crucial to the smooth functioning of society. Yet Police Scotland has stopped investigating some 'minor' crimes, and earlier this year, David Threadgold, chair of the Scottish Police Federation, warned that 'policing deserts' were appearing in parts of Scotland due to chronic under-investment in the force. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In Scotland, these three fundamental pillars of a strong economy and a flourishing society – education, the health service and the police – are all struggling to cope with the demands that are being placed upon them. What's worse, problems for one of these pillars can have knock-on effects for the others. For example, one of the police's biggest complaints is they are increasingly being forced to deal with people who are mentally ill because the NHS and social services are unable to provide the necessary care. Demoralised staff voting with their feet The rising tide of violence in Scotland's schools is also storing up trouble for the future when violent children with a contempt for rules and authority grow up into angry and poorly educated adults with few prospects. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Demoralised staff are, depressingly but understandably, voting with their feet, with four out of ten doctors either applying to work overseas or thinking about doing so, and some teachers are making the same choice.
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Nicola Sturgeon says Alex Salmond could have leaked probe against him and addresses conspiracy claim
Nicola Sturgeon has revealed what she 'found hardest to come to terms with' as Alex Salmond was accused of sexual harassment by several women. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Nicola Sturgeon has suggested Alex Salmond could have leaked a sexual misconduct investigation against him as she hit out at the "truly disgraceful' attempt of her predecessor to 'distort and weaponise' his alleged victims' trauma. In an excerpt of her new memoir, Frankly, published in the Sunday Times, Ms Sturgeon insists that a conspiracy against Mr Salmond, which he and his allies have claimed without proof had taken place, was 'a fabrication'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Mr Salmond was cleared of any criminality at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020 and died last year. In her book, Ms Sturgeon acknowledged Mr Salmond was 'acquitted of criminal behaviour', but stressed that during the trial, 'a picture emerged of behaviour towards women that, on occasion, had been inappropriate'. She added: 'He seemed content during his trial to concede this, to persuade a jury that while he could have been a 'better man', he wasn't guilty of actual offences. What he never did was show any contrition.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Referring to a conspiracy, which Mr Salmond and his allies were adamant had occurred against him, Ms Sturgeon stressed it 'would have needed a number of women deciding to concoct false allegations, without any obvious motive for doing so'. She added: 'It would then have required criminal collusion between them, senior ministers and civil servants, the police and the Crown. That is what he was alleging. 'The 'conspiracy' was a fabrication, the invention of a man who wasn't prepared to reflect honestly on his own conduct. This is what I found hardest to come to terms with.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Details of a Scottish Government investigation into Mr Salmond were leaked to the Daily Record newspaper. Last year, Police Scotland confirmed no action would be taken about the leak. But Ms Sturgeon has suggested the leak could have come from Mr Salmond himself, stressing the action could have been 'classic Alex'. "By his unacceptable behaviour he has condemned Turnberry, one of the outstanding golf courses on the planet, to Open Championship oblivion. There is no way the R&A will go near the Ayrshire course while Trump is in charge. As a result Scotland stands to lose the £100m economic return from a Turnberry Open." | Getty Images She said: 'It crossed my mind many times that it might have been Alex himself or someone acting on his behalf. 'To those with no experience of the dark arts of media manipulation, I know this will sound preposterous. However, in many ways it would have been classic Alex. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I had known him to make these kinds of calculations in the past. If there is damaging information certain to emerge about you and there is nothing you can do to stop it, get it out in a way that gives you the best chance of controlling the narrative.' Ms Sturgeon has also claimed that Mr Salmond asking her to intervene in the investigations into her predecessor signalled the breakdown of the duo's relationship. Referring to an exchange in her house when she was first made aware of the claims against him, Ms Sturgeon said that 'after appearing to be upset and mortified by the allegations, Alex became cold'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nicola Sturgeon | PA She added: 'He effectively admitted the substance of one of the complaints, but claimed that it had been a 'misunderstanding', for which he had apologised at the time. 'He made it obvious that he considered the whole process to be illegitimate. He would later claim differently, of course, but it was evident that he wanted me to intervene and to stop the investigation in its tracks or divert it into some kind of siding.
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Suzanne's law: Murderers who refuse to reveal location of victim's body should not be freed
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Few things in life could be so traumatic as losing a loved one at the hands of a murderer. Made worse if perpetrated by a partner or someone they trusted. The unimaginable pain felt by grieving loved ones never leaves. Burying your loved one is part of the grieving process, a small solace of closure to those bereaved family members. It is something we should all be entitled to do. Sadly that is not always the case. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When the individual who so cruelly took a loved one away compounds the grief by refusing to reveal the location of their victim's remains, we enter into a morally reprehensible scenario, one which I want to address. Currently the law dictates that someone who has completed the minimum part of a sentence for murder is eligible for release through parole. Murder victim Arlene Fraser's mother Isabelle Thompson, her sister Carol Gillies, murder victim Suzanne Pilley's sister Gail Fairgrieve and her mother Sylvia Pilley speak at an event about convicted murderers who refuse to disclose the location of their victim's remains (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Justice system must be fair In these circumstances, where a perpetrator chooses not to disclose the location of their victim's remains, this throws into serious doubt whether or not they should be released from prison. Why should they get to enjoy freedom when those grieving families have to endure ongoing pain and distress? This is about fairness, at the end of the day. The justice system itself should be about fairness. In my view, our justice system has for too long failed to deliver for victims of crime and their families. For too long the balance of the scales of justice have been weighted on the wrong side. With numerous measures over the years to reduce sentences and keep offenders out of prisons, victims, their families, and the organisations that support them have come to believe that the justice system must now be reformed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I believe that too and, back in 2022, I consulted on a Member's Bill which proposed sweeping reforms to improve the rights of victims and give them a greater voice in the criminal justice system, particularly through the parole process. Part of my Bill included the introduction of what is commonly known as 'Suzanne's Law'. Named after Suzanne Pilley, who was killed in 2010 and whose killer has never disclosed the location of her body, Suzanne's law would require the parole board, when deciding whether to release a prisoner, to consider if the killer has not disclosed the location of their victim's body. Suzanne's family have campaigned for these changes for many years, and it is to their credit that we are where we are today. It is also worth noting that Suzanne and her family are not the only victims of this crime, with high-profile Scottish cases like Margaret Fleming and Arlene Fraser also presenting justification for these proposals. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Replicating 'Helen's Law' After years of careful negotiation with the Scottish Government, ministers conceded this argument and accepted an amendment I proposed to insert a form of Suzanne's law into their own Victim's Bill in March of this year. My proposal alters the law in a meaningful way by dictating that the parole board must take the fact that a murderer has failed to reveal the location of their victim's remains into consideration before deciding to release – something which may currently happen but is not a primary consideration. That has to change. This replicates the essence of 'Helen's Law', so named after a similar case, in English law which Westminster agreed to. There are those who believe that my proposals don't go far enough, and that there should be an automatic 'no body, no parole' rule. I am entirely sympathetic with their argument and I consulted on this very issue. The concern with that blanket approach was that it could, as some believe, conflict with existing human rights legislation and result in legal challenges. The last thing I want to do is drag grieving families through the courts further. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Difficult to justify release There are some who argue that my proposals go too far, motivated by concerns around miscarriages of justice. I respectfully disagree with their assessment. Perpetrators have been convicted by a court of law and it is not the role of the parole board, nor politicians, to look beyond that conviction. There are others who claim that my proposals won't make a difference to current practice. I wholeheartedly reject this argument. If the SNP government fulfils its promise to deliver Suzanne's Law at stage three of the Bill, then because the parole board must take a failure to disclose the location of a victim's remains into account, this will arguably make it difficult to justify the release of an individual in such cases. Whilst I welcome criticism and robust debate about these issues, this is no time for political point-scoring. We are talking about real people and real victims who are suffering unimaginable trauma. Using words like 'betrayal' only serves to cause more upset to those very people we are doing this for. I am indebted to Victim Support Scotland and both the families of Suzanne Pilley and Arlene Fraser for their patience and their incredible campaigning efforts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I will also bring forward a wider package of measures that seek to improve our justice system, including giving victims the right to make impact statements to courts in all solemn cases, and establishing a Victims' Charter to make clear the rights of victims throughout the criminal justice system. I want to end on the words from Kate Wallace, the chief executive of Victim Support Scotland: 'It is a simple change of one word, but the impact on the families who have lost a loved one in this way will be enormous." I am privileged to change the law in this way, and I call on all politicians to help me achieve this.
