Reform Scotland changes name to avoid Nigel Farage connection
A political think tank has 'regretfully' been forced to rebrand after being repeatedly confused with Nigel Farage's Reform UK party.
Reform Scotland was founded in 2008 but the growing success of Farage's right-wing party throughout the UK has prompted a name-change to Enlighten.
Chris Deerin, the former journalist who heads the think tank, said organisations contacted by Reform Scotland were increasingly mixing up the two.
'Reform UK had a very good general election, ended up with five MPs, and, as we know from the polls, they are going to do quite well next year at the Holyrood election,' Deerin said.
'And we started to find there was confusion arising when we were speaking to people and introducing ourselves.
'As we became aware that their prospects
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
MoD plots £1.5bn radar upgrade as wind farms threaten to conceal attacks
Military chiefs are planning a £1.5bn upgrade of Britain's radar defences amid fears that the growing number of wind farms risks leaving the country blind to attacks. Under the Ministry of Defence's 'Njord' programme, named after the Norse god of sea and wind, seven air defence radar stations around the country will be replaced or improved to ensure they are not confused by interference from turbines. There are already 3,352 operational or under-construction wind turbines in UK waters, according to the Crown Estate, with another 1,000 at least set to be deployed by 2030 to meet the Government's net zero targets. Without measures to tackle the problem, military chiefs fear the interference will impede the ability of the Royal Air Force to detect enemy missiles and aircraft. Each radar station upgrade will be worth up to £210m and the Ministry of Defence opened the bidding process earlier this year, with several unnamed defence companies in the running. An industry source said: 'They are concerned that, without mitigation, you are going to see a deterioration of radar coverage if you build all the wind farms envisaged under the 2030 targets. 'That would potentially reduce the time you have to respond to threats, as well as the probability of detecting them, and so would leave the country more vulnerable to attacks.' 'A unique and detrimental impact' The interference problem occurs when turbine blades reflect the electromagnetic pulses pinged out by radar stations, generating unhelpful background noise for the system operators. Each blade on a turbine can generate a false return, creating the potential for massive disruption from some sites.
STV News
17 minutes ago
- STV News
Achieving child poverty target could cost £920m a year in benefits, report warns
Scotland could meet its 2030 child poverty target—but a report has warned that this could cost £920m a year in benefits, with 'significant additional' spending also required to increase the number of parents in work. Chris Birt, associate director at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) in Scotland, said its research shows: 'Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them.' PA Media The Joseph Rowntree Foundation examined the costs and impacts of different measures that could be introduced to tackle child poverty (Jane Barlow/PA). The think tank said there would be financial benefits from getting more parents into employment, and from helping those with jobs to work more hours. Doing this could increase tax revenues to the Scottish Government by £410m, it said, while cutting spending on universal credit by around £500 million a year. With 240,000 children living in poverty in Scotland, the JRF produced what it described as a 'toolkit' for parties running in the 2026 Holyrood election, setting out the impact different policies could have towards meeting the target of having less than 10% of youngsters in relative poverty by 2030–31. The think tank said it had 'deliberately not prescribed an exact course of action' but had instead 'shown the required scale of action needed'. To meet the target, the report said the next Parliament would need to 'lift around 100,000 children out of poverty' – adding this would 'require a laser-focused prioritisation'. The Meeting the Moment paper stresses that none of the measures it considered would achieve the target on their own. 'Even a near quadrupling of the SCP (Scottish child payment) to £100 a week per child at an annual cost of £1.14 billion would see a child poverty rate three percentage points above the targets,' it said. However it found increasing the SCP – which is given to low-income families for every child they have under the age of 16 – to £40 a week would have 'the best poverty reduction impact per pound'. This would cost an extra £190m a year – but on its own would only bring the child poverty rate down to 18%. However the research found that by supplementing the benefit for families with babies and for single parents, and by boosting take-up to 100% of those eligible, when combined with other measures – such as boosting employment among parents in poverty – 90,000 youngsters could be lifted out of poverty, meeting the 10% target. The report said: 'This would cost an additional £920m in targeted child benefits in Scotland (as well as other costs associated with increasing employment). 'It would also increase tax revenues by £410m because of increased parental employment. 'Universal credit expenditure could also fall by £500m as demand for it falls due to higher incomes through work.' Mr Birt said: 'Whoever forms the next Scottish Government has the chance to change what it means to grow up in Scotland. 'To do so, they must meet the Parliament's child poverty targets. Not only for Scotland's children and their futures, but to show those who often feel overlooked and ignored by politics that trust can be rebuilt through actions. 'This analysis gives each political party a detailed map to help them reach a Scotland free from child poverty. They may choose to take different routes to get there. But whichever route they take will require every ounce of determination and demand action at scale. 'The actions of Westminster governments may help, or hinder, but Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'I welcome this report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 'We are absolutely committed to meeting the 2030 child poverty targets and thanks to the actions we are already taking, families in the poorest 10% of households are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-26 and this value is projected to grow to an average of £3,700 a year by 2029-30. 'However our policies are having to work harder in the current economic context and as a result of decisions taken by the UK Government, such as keeping the two-child limit on Universal Credit which are holding back Scotland's progress. 'While the Joseph Rowntree Foundation predict child poverty will rise in other parts of the UK by 2029, they highlight that policies such as our Scottish Child Payment, and our commitment to mitigate the two-child limit, are behind Scotland 'bucking the trend'. 'We will publish our third child poverty delivery plan by the end of March 2026, setting out the actions to be taken between 2026-2031 to meet the 2030 targets. We will continue working closely with stakeholders, including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, to shape that plan.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer faces demands for cast-iron vow to spend 3% of GDP on defence as he unveils plan to make Britain 'war-ready'
Keir Starmer is facing demands for a cast-iron commitment to spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence today as he unveils a push to get Britain 'war-ready'. The PM is heralding a strategic review of the UK's military, promising investment in new submarines, munitions and personnel. He has warned that the mounting threat from Russia and allies such as Iran and North Korea means the country must ramp up preparations. Sir Keir argued this morning that being poised for conflict is the best way of avoiding it. But the blueprint is predicated on spending reaching 3 per cent in the next decade - with ministers sowing confusion over whether that will definitely happen. Yesterday Defence Secretary John Healey rowed back on a statement that the increase 'will' happen, stressing that it is an 'ambition'. The Treasury appears to be panicking over how to balance the books as the economy stalls. External authors of the report - expected to be accepted in full by Sir Keir - have suggested that reaching 3 per cent is 'vital' to its success. Key elements of the proposals include: Up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines will be built; A £1.5billion push to set up at least six munitions factories, supporting the procurement of up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons British fighter jets could soon carry nuclear weapons for the first time; Increasing the number of people in the armed forces, but not until the next Parliament; More than £1.5billion in extra funding will go to military homes in response to the review. Writing in The Telegraph, Labour former minister Lord Robertson, Russian expert Fiona Hill and General Sir Richard Barrons said the 'Government's important decision to raise Defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027-28 and, vitally, to 3 per cent in the next Parliament made an enormous difference'. They added: 'The decision established the affordability of our recommendations across a 10-year programme.' Sir Keir will launch the Government's Strategic Defence Review in Scotland, following many months of work and lobbying by military chiefs. But a Nato summit later this month is expected to push for members to hit 3.5 per cent by 2032, while US President Donald Trump has already called for a jump to 5 per cent within the alliance. Mr Healey told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg show: 'We have a historic commitment to increasing defence spending to 2.5 per cent in two years' time. We haven't hit that level since Labour was last in power in 2010. And an ambition to meet 3 per cent in the next Parliament.' Challenged that it was an 'just an ambition' rather than a 'guarantee', Mr Healey talked about being able to 'deliver the vision' of today's review. Defence minister Luke Pollard again refused to confirm the commitment this morning, telling Times Radio: 'Well, we've set out that we are spending 2.5 per cent by April 2027, with the ambition to spend 3 per cent in the next parliament, when economic conditions allow.' He added: 'Well I've got no doubt that we will get to 3 per cent in the next parliament, as I've said a number of times.' Mr Pollard said the strategic defence review was the 'biggest transformation of our armed forces in 100 years'. He said: 'It seeks to learn the lessons from the war in Ukraine, refresh our capabilities, invest in our people, and underscore that increased defence spending up to 2.5 per cent of our GDP by April 2027 is an engine for growth.' The Ministry of Defence has already announced plans to build up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines to boost the Royal Navy's commitment to the Aukus Pacific defence partnership with Australia and the United States, while investing £15billion in warheads. But the first of these UK-built submarines is not expected to enter service before the late 2030s. It will also be for future Parliaments to honour the spending commitment. The Conservatives have seized on on Labour's muddle on defence, accusing Mr Healey of weakening UK security. Tory defence spokesman James Cartlidge told the Mail: 'These promises on submarines are a fantasy fleet without real money to back them up. 'The fact is, John Healey has been forced into a humiliating climb down by the Treasury after confirming, as recently as Thursday, that defence spending would definitely rise to 3 per cent. 'But by Sunday he was backtracking completely. John Healey has been badly let down by the Chancellor – so now he knows how the rest of us feel.'
